ALL LINKS IN THIS SECTION SHOULD BE VIEWED AS SCAM SITES - A WARNING

[ruthbabe]

I think that any website promising unrealistic % is potentially a Scam.

Even realistic offers are also scams. The number one rule  in "ALL" of any investment sites  is do not and never invest because think that when the investments go bigger, they won't be able to support the payout anymore in the long run so they collapse eventually in the end.

Don't know if OP is updated as I don't see any SCAM ICO project that was posted there. ICO projects could be considered if not, as one of the biggest investment sites... they're raising millions of dollars during crowdsale.

Example of SCAM ICO...

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=2046788.0 >  [ICO FINISHED]🔥Crystal - Revolutionary project for everyone🔥
https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=2861323.0 > CRYSTAL CLEAR SCAM ME. ALEX VEA is big fat liar !

[marlboroza]

Don't know if OP is updated as I don't see any SCAM ICO project that was posted there.

Last update was 2 years ago.

I don't see any SCAM ICO project that was posted there. ICO projects could be considered if not, as one of the biggest investment sites... they're raising millions of dollars during crowdsale.

It is easier to identify regular ponzi schemes(unrealistic gains) than ICO scams, in most cases you can't know that ico is scam until they scam someone.

I wonder are there any statistics on failed ICO's from 2017.

[bias]

Don't know if OP is updated as I don't see any SCAM ICO project that was posted there.

Last update was 2 years ago.

I don't see any SCAM ICO project that was posted there. ICO projects could be considered if not, as one of the biggest investment sites... they're raising millions of dollars during crowdsale.

It is easier to identify regular ponzi schemes(unrealistic gains) than ICO scams, in most cases you can't know that ico is scam until they scam someone.

I wonder are there any statistics on failed ICO's from 2017.

It would be more than good to have something like this.
We can take very good results and see through their flaws and scams some pattern of their way...

[V-D-S]

This thread is ancient, if anybody is still around can you redirect me to an update?

[KingDome]

This thread is ancient, if anybody is still around can you redirect me to an update?

It seems like there is no update incoming from the creators of the thread and its gone because the lacks of the activity in the thread.

[davis196]

The scam list in this thread is kinda like all over the place.It would be great if the creator of the list/thread breaks the list into categories like online casinos,probably fair games,HYIP scams,cloud mining scams,ICO scams,etc.

[theskillzdatklls]

Have any of the HYIPs or other in this section in all of time ever been remotely honest? I mean so in a way where obviously some lose but some win and the overall experience is transparent/fair etc.

[condoras]

Have any of the HYIPs or other in this section in all of time ever been remotely honest?

Firstly ask yourself this question: How something based to scam with false and misleading info, can be honest?

I mean so in a way where obviously some lose but some win and the overall experience is transparent/fair etc.

There isn't "in a way" some loses, there is certain and garranty loses. Any "win" is for specific purpose (eg. promoting the scheme).
How is it possible to say that the overall experience is transparent and fair?! For who exactly?

[theskillzdatklls]

Have any of the HYIPs or other in this section in all of time ever been remotely honest?

Firstly ask yourself this question: How something based to scam with false and misleading info, can be honest?

I mean so in a way where obviously some lose but some win and the overall experience is transparent/fair etc.

There isn't "in a way" some loses, there is certain and garranty loses. Any "win" is for specific purpose (eg. promoting the scheme).
How is it possible to say that the overall experience is transparent and fair?! For who exactly?

I have an idea that I'm working on personally but it is going to take me a while to develop (6-12 months). Sounds like you don't exactly agree which is a perfectly valid opinion, its a ridiculously seedy industry.

When you are saying transparent/fair and for who exactly, I can loop this back to my personal forte which is poker (I played professionally for over 5 years). There are long term winners and long term losers in the game. The house takes a cut. But at the end of the day, as long as everyone is getting a fair slice of the deck and is playing on their own accord, that's what I would call transparent/fair.

Even though there are many losers in the game.

Make sense?

[V-D-S]

This thread is ancient, if anybody is still around can you redirect me to an update?

It seems like there is no update incoming from the creators of the thread and its gone because the lacks of the activity in the thread.

Thanks for the reply. At any rate, looks like we rebooted it. I think I will DM the original content creator.

[condoras]

Have any of the HYIPs or other in this section in all of time ever been remotely honest?

Firstly ask yourself this question: How something based to scam with false and misleading info, can be honest?

I mean so in a way where obviously some lose but some win and the overall experience is transparent/fair etc.

There isn't "in a way" some loses, there is certain and garranty loses. Any "win" is for specific purpose (eg. promoting the scheme).
How is it possible to say that the overall experience is transparent and fair?! For who exactly?

I have an idea that I'm working on personally but it is going to take me a while to develop (6-12 months). Sounds like you don't exactly agree which is a perfectly valid opinion, its a ridiculously seedy industry.

When you are saying transparent/fair and for who exactly, I can loop this back to my personal forte which is poker (I played professionally for over 5 years). There are long term winners and long term losers in the game. The house takes a cut. But at the end of the day, as long as everyone is getting a fair slice of the deck and is playing on their own accord, that's what I would call transparent/fair.

Even though there are many losers in the game.

Make sense?

Seems that you don't understand or misundertood the basic difference.
HYIP, Ponzi, doubler, tripler, mabler-jambler schemes are by definition scam.

This isn't gambling, no matter how much others trying (very hard and unsuccesfuly) to present it like it is.
If you believe otherwise, we don't have much more to say. Especialy at this thread which is for proven scam sites.

[theskillzdatklls]

Yeah, maybe there is a misunderstanding of sorts. I guess I don't have much more to say either. I'm continuing work on it and if you're still lurking around later when its ready I'd really value your thoughts on it then.

[condoras]

Yeah, maybe there is a misunderstanding of sorts. I guess I don't have much more to say either. I'm continuing work on it and if you're still lurking around later when its ready I'd really value your thoughts on it then.

Well if you make a thread about it and be spesific on what you will do and how you will do it, i have no problem to comment/share my thoughts.
This thread isn't the proper place, that's all.

[nangthothan]

I do not think should participate. too many risks for newbies

[condoras]

I do not think should participate. too many risks for newbies

The "risk" is for all, despite ranks. Of course, elder ones isn't so prone since they have experienced such scam projects over the years.
And to be clear, there is no risk involvement here. There is only sure loss.