Bitcoin Forum
January 04, 2026, 08:06:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more asktom.cf users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the asktom.cf administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 [630] 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 ... 2136 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com  (Read 3050099 times)
ASIC-K
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


Hell?


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:28:23 PM
 #12581

I've said this phrase too often, but "Excuse my ignorance", shouldn't CGMiner display the actual mining rate without having to do calculations?
When I look at my erupters mining, it is displaying 333MHash/s each, plain as day. Why not here?
That's because the implementation of the hashrate meter is driver dependent, and in this case, we didn't write the driver. When we do write the driver, the hashrate displayed is the effective valid hashrate only (i.e. not hardware errors).

ahh, and you are planning to do it? will you receive some KNC miner for testing and driver development?
Earlier on knc said they'd engage us early on in the development process... but then didn't, and wrote their own driver for cgminer. I can't predict what they'll do now and how that will impact on whether code will be merged or maintained in cgminer, but I will be asking for them to provide their driver code publicly.

doesnt really matter though right? once you get your hands on one, you can make your own awesome driver anyway....
Yes I'll support any device I have myself.

But I don't see confirmation that we'll be given hardware, and I'm not buying one.

what if i loan you my mercury?
vesperwillow
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:29:31 PM
 #12582

I've said this phrase too often, but "Excuse my ignorance", shouldn't CGMiner display the actual mining rate without having to do calculations?
When I look at my erupters mining, it is displaying 333MHash/s each, plain as day. Why not here?
That's because the implementation of the hashrate meter is driver dependent, and in this case, we didn't write the driver. When we do write the driver, the hashrate displayed is the effective valid hashrate only (i.e. not hardware errors).

ahh, and you are planning to do it? will you receive some KNC miner for testing and driver development?
Earlier on knc said they'd engage us early on in the development process... but then didn't, and wrote their own driver for cgminer. I can't predict what they'll do now and how that will impact on whether code will be merged or maintained in cgminer, but I will be asking for them to provide their driver code publicly.
Sigh.
It really wouldn't be that hard for them y'know...

What if 469GH/s is with 1% of chip working? Are we getting 46,9TH/s devices?!
You would probably need a building to power that. or 2

It was likely to fast-track the development/delivery. They were on a razor-thin line to make deadlines and literally cut it by seconds. Delays, even on the software side, would've thrown everything awry. I doubt they didn't want to work with the cgminer team at all, merely they sidestepped the plan at the time. Considering the team will get equipment at some point somehow, it wasn't likely to try and avoid them. Merely, deadlines mattered more.

In some work I've done in the past when it came to deadlines, it was simply easier for me to take something into my own hands and make sure it was checked-off, rather than hand it off to the person it was designated to in the first place. Revisit it in the future, without a doubt.

Has anyone seen the latest statistics from the Jupiter they have mining? It was fluctuating up to 800Ghz AND IS STABLE AT 650!

http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/17Czc8RVL3FU5T2MLx2zLbRnpfBNgH9vFo

That could be more than one machine...maybe Jupiter + Mercury? I wouldn't give too much weight to those numbers unless we know that they're only running 1 Jupiter on those workers.

One clue we were given is they were making, on average, 1.4W/gh. It doesn't mean they were limited solely to 500gh or 600gh either. I'd imagine, especially since the chips have built-in failover, you could get much more provided you worked around providing it more power. The machines are using 860w PSU's. Just like with a AM Blade, more power, up the clock = more cycling.

RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1007


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:30:44 PM
 #12583

Can anyone estimate how many chips per wafer can KnC make?

flowdab
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 215
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:37:14 PM
 #12584

I've said this phrase too often, but "Excuse my ignorance", shouldn't CGMiner display the actual mining rate without having to do calculations?
When I look at my erupters mining, it is displaying 333MHash/s each, plain as day. Why not here?
That's because the implementation of the hashrate meter is driver dependent, and in this case, we didn't write the driver. When we do write the driver, the hashrate displayed is the effective valid hashrate only (i.e. not hardware errors).

ahh, and you are planning to do it? will you receive some KNC miner for testing and driver development?
Earlier on knc said they'd engage us early on in the development process... but then didn't, and wrote their own driver for cgminer. I can't predict what they'll do now and how that will impact on whether code will be merged or maintained in cgminer, but I will be asking for them to provide their driver code publicly.
Sigh.
It really wouldn't be that hard for them y'know...

What if 469GH/s is with 1% of chip working? Are we getting 46,9TH/s devices?!
You would probably need a building to power that. or 2

It was likely to fast-track the development/delivery. They were on a razor-thin line to make deadlines and literally cut it by seconds. Delays, even on the software side, would've thrown everything awry. I doubt they didn't want to work with the cgminer team at all, merely they sidestepped the plan at the time. Considering the team will get equipment at some point somehow, it wasn't likely to try and avoid them. Merely, deadlines mattered more.

In some work I've done in the past when it came to deadlines, it was simply easier for me to take something into my own hands and make sure it was checked-off, rather than hand it off to the person it was designated to in the first place. Revisit it in the future, without a doubt.

Has anyone seen the latest statistics from the Jupiter they have mining? It was fluctuating up to 800Ghz AND IS STABLE AT 650!

http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/17Czc8RVL3FU5T2MLx2zLbRnpfBNgH9vFo

That could be more than one machine...maybe Jupiter + Mercury? I wouldn't give too much weight to those numbers unless we know that they're only running 1 Jupiter on those workers.

One clue we were given is they were making, on average, 1.4W/gh. It doesn't mean they were limited solely to 500gh or 600gh either. I'd imagine, especially since the chips have built-in failover, you could get much more provided you worked around providing it more power. The machines are using 860w PSU's. Just like with a AM Blade, more power, up the clock = more cycling.

So you're saying I should have ordered a 1200W power supply instead of the 850 I'm having delivered tomorrow?
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4788
Merit: 1910


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:37:26 PM
 #12585

...
Earlier on knc said they'd engage us early on in the development process... but then didn't, and wrote their own driver for cgminer. I can't predict what they'll do now and how that will impact on whether code will be merged or maintained in cgminer, but I will be asking for them to provide their driver code publicly.

doesnt really matter though right? once you get your hands on one, you can make your own awesome driver anyway....
There'd be no point buying one now - it won't get back it's BTC cost - since difficulty will sky rocket in the next month or so - and they don't want us involved so I can't see one appearing on the doorstep.

(a 200% jump would mean that after that 200% jump, 469GH/s would make 22BTC in 100 days if after that jump it rose 30% each 11 days ... then subtract 850W for 100 days ...)

So ... yeah, except that they are required to provide the source code to anyone with one, that asks for the code, I can't see much else happening.

As a developer I certainly have no interest in giving someone $1000's of dollars to update their driver ... and never get that $1000's back.
That's paying someone when you do work for them - yeah not gonna happen.
I prefer to simply not lose the BTC.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1244


Gerald Davis


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:37:49 PM
 #12586

Can anyone estimate how many chips per wafer can KnC make?

KNC has never reported the die size.  If someone wants to destroy their new miner and break open the package we could find out real quick.
ASIC-K
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


Hell?


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:40:30 PM
 #12587

...
Earlier on knc said they'd engage us early on in the development process... but then didn't, and wrote their own driver for cgminer. I can't predict what they'll do now and how that will impact on whether code will be merged or maintained in cgminer, but I will be asking for them to provide their driver code publicly.

doesnt really matter though right? once you get your hands on one, you can make your own awesome driver anyway....
There'd be no point buying one now - it won't get back it's BTC cost - since difficulty will sky rocket in the next month or so - and they don't want us involved so I can't see one appearing on the doorstep.

(a 200% jump would mean that after that 200% jump, 469GH/s would make 22BTC in 100 days if after that jump it rose 30% each 11 days ... then subtract 850W for 100 days ...)

So ... yeah, except that they are required to provide the source code to anyone with one, that asks for the code, I can't see much else happening.

As a developer I certainly have no interest in giving someone $1000's of dollars to update their driver ... and never get that $1000's back.
That's paying someone when you do work for them - yeah not gonna happen.
I prefer to simply not lose the BTC.

I offered ckolivas my mercury for a couple days to make a better driver if it would help the community.
600watt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106



View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:46:18 PM
 #12588

when knc is over with this hash attack the business model of maybe more than one competitor is history. hashfast, cointerra and all the others, that have no product to ship currently ----  you are screwed, aren´t you ?  Kiss
optimator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 351
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
October 01, 2013, 02:50:15 PM
 #12589

Earlier on knc said they'd engage us early on in the development process... but then didn't, and wrote their own driver for cgminer. I can't predict what they'll do now and how that will impact on whether code will be merged or maintained in cgminer, but I will be asking for them to provide their driver code publicly.

I hope the API on the KNC machines is the same as on cgminer.  Smiley

Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:50:55 PM
 #12590

when knc is over with this hash attack the business model of maybe more than one competitor is history. hashfast, cointerra and all the others, that have no product to ship currently ----  you are screwed, aren´t you ?  Kiss

Not at all. First of all those companies all sold enough preorders that they have nothing to worry about no matter what happens.

Secondly, as difficulty shoots up, power consumption will become key again. Not exactly KnC's strong suit. If anything, a few months from here its KnC that will have put themselves out of business while the others, assuming they can deliver on their performance/w promises, will still have products that can be sold, even though obviously the margins wont be anywhere near where they are today.
ImI
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019



View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:51:04 PM
 #12591

Does anybody know what size and weight the shipment of one Jupiter is???
mruiter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 281
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:53:21 PM
 #12592

Anybody received a UPS tracking number yet ?

❘|❘ ICONOMI  Fund Management Platform
  LINK TO ICO | LINK TO DISCUSSION
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1244


Gerald Davis


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:53:54 PM
 #12593

when knc is over with this hash attack the business model of maybe more than one competitor is history. hashfast, cointerra and all the others, that have no product to ship currently ----  you are screwed, aren´t you ?  Kiss

It likely will dry up future sales until they start shipping but both of the companies you listed have enough funds (preorders) to make it to delivery.  However if anyone pulls a BFL and falls on their face there is no ability to bring in more funding by extended preorders and upgrades.  My guess is both HF and Cointerra deliver.   I don't think every ASIC company today will still be here in 2015.   It is relatively easy to make a fortune when difficulty is low, demand is high and margins are 99.9% or higher.  As the difficulty skyrockets, demand falls and margins collapse not every company will make it.
600watt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106



View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:56:12 PM
 #12594

Does anybody know what size and weight the shipment of one Jupiter is???


Physical characteristics
Mean radius   69,911 ± 6 km[6]
Equatorial radius   
71,492 ± 4 km[6]
11.209 Earths
Polar radius   
66,854 ± 10 km[6]
10.517 Earths
Flattening   0.06487 ± 0.00015
Surface area   
6.1419×1010 km2[7]
121.9 Earths
Volume   
1.4313×1015 km3[3]
1321.3 Earths
Mass   
1.8986×1027 kg[3]
317.8 Earths
1/1047 Sun[8]

Rampion
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:56:16 PM
 #12595

Anybody received a UPS tracking number yet ?

Overdelivering now, no need for trackings.

Xialla
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1001


/dev/null


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:57:13 PM
 #12596

Anybody received a UPS tracking number yet ?

Overdelivering now, no need for trackings.

lol.))
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1007


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 02:58:58 PM
 #12597

Does anybody know what size and weight the shipment of one Jupiter is???

It's on their website:

Size:500 x 400 x 200
Weight:4 kg.

600watt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106



View Profile
October 01, 2013, 03:01:08 PM
 #12598

when knc is over with this hash attack the business model of maybe more than one competitor is history. hashfast, cointerra and all the others, that have no product to ship currently ----  you are screwed, aren´t you ?  Kiss

It likely will dry up future sales until they start shipping but both of the companies you listed have enough funds (preorders) to make it to delivery.  However if anyone pulls a BFL and falls on their face there is no ability to bring in more funding by extended preorders and upgrades.  My guess is both HF and Cointerra deliver.   I don't think every ASIC company today will still be here in 2015.   It is relatively easy to make a fortune when difficulty is low, demand is high and margins are 99.9% or higher.  As the difficulty skyrockets, demand falls and margins collapse not every company will make it.

competiton is good. and i don´t want anything bad to happen to anymore customers nor genuine companies.

it´s just... after 600 pages of hate and evil ... i couldn´t resist ...

(a lot of knc customers will spit back on other threads now i guess... RECONQUISTA  Grin
DPoS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 01, 2013, 03:01:22 PM
 #12599

when knc is over with this hash attack the business model of maybe more than one competitor is history. hashfast, cointerra and all the others, that have no product to ship currently ----  you are screwed, aren´t you ?  Kiss

It likely will dry up future sales until they start shipping but both of the companies you listed have enough funds (preorders) to make it to delivery.  However if anyone pulls a BFL and falls on their face there is no ability to bring in more funding by extended preorders and upgrades.  My guess is both HF and Cointerra deliver.   I don't think every ASIC company today will still be here in 2015.   It is relatively easy to make a fortune when difficulty is low, demand is high and margins are 99.9% or higher.  As the difficulty skyrockets, demand falls and margins collapse not every company will make it.

Cointerra reeks of a future avalanche of excuses

but sure, I hope all my miner competition waste their money on them instead of getting real hashing miners.


~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~Play Boardgames for Bitcoins!!~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~ Something I say help? Donate BTC! 1KN1K1xStzsgfYxdArSX4PEjFfcLEuYhid
CYPER
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 502



View Profile
October 01, 2013, 03:04:07 PM
 #12600

Does anybody know what size and weight the shipment of one Jupiter is???

50x40x20cm and a bit over 7kg - that's just the miner, without the shipping box.
Confirmed over the phone a few days ago.
Pages: « 1 ... 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 [630] 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 ... 2136 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!