|
greaterninja
|
 |
September 23, 2013, 10:52:54 PM
Last edit: September 23, 2013, 11:36:53 PM by greaterninja |
|
Kit #1 (3 H boards):
I need help or suggestions for tuning it correctly. I put resistors at 1170ohm to 1250ohm as soom boards did not like it when I lowered the resistance on the resistor. It looks like I got some bad chips. What do you guys suggest?
Here is my log for kit#1:
1 AIfDSo 55 2.362 2.452 165 7 0 0 232 [0:0] 63 11 11 11 10 10 10 10 9 11 1$
2 AIfDSo 55 2.391 2.283 167 6 0 0 216 [0:1] 77 10 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 $
3 AIfDSo 55 2.004 2.241 140 8 1 0 212 [0:2] 88 9 9 8 8 7 9 10 10 10 9 9 9 $
4 AIfDSo 55 2.205 2.251 154 4 0 0 213 [0:3] 77 10 10 9 9 10 10 10 8 9 10 1$
5 AIfDSo 55 2.248 2.304 157 11 0 0 218 [0:4] 75 10 10 10 8 9 10 10 10 10 10$
6 AIfDSo 55 2.462 2.251 172 4 0 0 213 [0:5] 100 11 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 $
7 AIfDSo 55 2.047 2.209 143 8 0 0 209 [0:6] 96 9 9 7 8 8 8 9 10 10 10 9 10$
8 AIfDSo 55 2.419 2.315 169 2 0 0 219 [0:7] 63 10 11 11 10 10 11 11 11 11 $
9 AIfDSo 55 2.319 2.452 162 14 0 0 232 [0:8] 107 9 11 11 9 11 11 11 10 10 11$
10 AIfDSo 55 1.646 1.966 115 4 0 0 186 [0:9] 131 8 7 6 7 7 6 7 7 7 6 8 8 8 7$
11 AIfDSo 55 2.176 2.389 152 10 0 0 226 [0:A] 107 10 8 10 9 10 10 10 10 10 10$
12 AIfDSo 55 2.162 2.283 151 9 0 0 216 [0:B] 101 10 9 7 9 10 10 10 9 10 10 1$
13 AIfDSo 55 2.105 2.230 147 4 0 0 211 [0:C] 93 10 10 10 9 9 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 $
14 AIfDSo 55 2.176 2.336 152 6 0 0 221 [0:D] 68 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 9 10 9 9 $
15 AIfDSo 55 2.276 2.272 159 2 0 0 215 [0:E] 84 10 10 10 9 10 10 10 10 10 1$
16 AIfDSo 55 2.477 2.410 173 6 0 0 228 [0:F] 78 10 11 11 11 11 10 11 11 11 $
17 AIfDSo 55 1.890 2.082 132 1 0 0 197 [8:0] 111 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 8 9 9 9 8 8$
18 AIfDSo 55 0.959 1.955 67 30 0 0 185 [8:1] 387 3 5 5 5 6 3 4 4 3 4 3 6 6 3$
19 AIfDSo 55 1.847 1.987 129 2 0 0 188 [8:2] 115 8 8 8 8 8 7 9 9 9 8 8 7 8 8$
20 AIfDSo 55 1.775 2.072 124 4 0 0 196 [8:3] 112 8 8 7 7 7 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8$
21 AIfDSo 55 2.004 1.945 140 3 0 0 184 [8:4] 124 9 9 8 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8$
22 AIfDSo 55 2.062 1.998 144 5 0 0 189 [8:5] 123 10 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 9 10$
23 AIfDSo 55 2.119 2.051 148 1 0 4 194 [8:6] 154 9 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10$
24 AIfDSo 55 1.990 2.040 139 4 0 2 193 [8:7] 170 9 9 9 9 9 10 9 9 8 8 9 8 8 $
25 AIfDSo 55 1.875 2.029 131 6 0 0 192 [8:8] 238 8 9 9 9 9 8 8 7 7 9 8 8 8 8$
26 AIfDSo 55 1.890 2.040 132 9 0 0 193 [8:9] 192 9 9 9 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 9$
27 AIfDSo 55 2.105 2.082 147 3 0 0 197 [8:A] 180 8 9 9 8 8 9 10 9 10 9 10 10$
28 AIfDSo 55 1.890 2.019 132 7 0 0 191 [8:B] 145 9 9 9 9 8 8 8 7 9 9 9 8 6 7$
29 AIfDSo 55 1.732 2.082 121 2 1 0 197 [8:C] 127 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 8 7$
30 AIfDSo 55 2.133 2.103 149 2 0 0 199 [8:D] 126 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9$
31 AIfDSo 55 1.618 1.998 113 3 0 0 189 [8:E] 173 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 6 7 7 7 7 7$
32 AIfDSo 55 2.205 2.103 154 6 0 0 199 [8:F] 112 11 11 9 9 9 9 8 9 8 9 10 10$
33 AIfDSo 55 1.833 2.251 128 5 0 0 213 [C:0] 116 9 8 8 8 7 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 9 8$
34 AIfDSo 55 2.362 2.283 165 2 0 0 216 [C:1] 75 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 10 10 $
35 AIfDSo 55 2.534 2.315 177 3 0 0 219 [C:2] 107 11 11 11 10 11 12 12 12 11 $
36 AIfDSo 55 1.918 2.177 134 5 1 0 206 [C:3] 102 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 8 8$
37 Aifdso 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [C:4] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0$
38 AIfDSo 55 1.847 2.177 129 2 0 0 206 [C:5] 97 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8$
39 AIfDSo 55 2.105 2.283 147 7 0 0 216 [C:6] 95 8 7 10 9 10 9 10 10 10 9 9 $
40 AIfDSo 55 0.730 1.448 51 52 0 0 137 [C:7] 505 2 5 4 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 2 3 3$
41 AIfDSo 55 2.448 2.272 171 3 0 0 215 [C:8] 94 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 $
42 AIfDSo 55 2.047 2.156 143 4 0 0 204 [C:9] 87 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 10 9 $
43 AIfDSo 55 2.291 2.283 160 3 0 0 216 [C:A] 59 11 10 10 10 10 9 9 10 9 10 $
44 AiFDso 55 0.100 0.602 7 30 0 0 57 [C:B] 680 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0$
45 AIfDSo 55 2.219 2.220 155 5 0 0 210 [C:C] 81 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 10 10$
46 AIfDSo 55 2.305 2.209 161 3 0 0 209 [C:D] 130 9 10 10 11 11 11 11 10 10 1$
47 AIfDSo 55 2.319 2.336 162 3 0 0 221 [C:E] 86 10 9 10 10 10 11 10 11 11 1$
48 AIfDSo 55 2.119 2.220 148 1 0 0 210 [C:F] 87 9 9 9 10 10 10 9 10 9 9 9 9$
speed:2530 noncerate[GH/s]:94.747 (1.974/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:100.464 good:6618 errors:321 spi-err:3 miso-err:6 jobs:324 co$
0: 880 35.476 36.645 2478 105 1 0 16 0 0 (2.217/chip) 88%
8: 880 30.093 32.586 2102 88 1 6 16 0 0 (1.881/chip) 79%
C: 770 29.177 31.233 2038 128 1 0 14 1 1 (1.824/chip) 74%
My Kit#2: Hashing well at ~69.12GH/s noncerate (2 H cards)
1 AIfDSo 55 2.090 2.294 146 12 0 0 217 [0:0] 36 9 10 9 10 8 9 9 10 9 9 8 9 $
2 AIfDSo 55 2.076 2.251 145 19 0 0 213 [0:1] 20 9 8 7 9 9 10 10 11 10 9 8 8$
3 AIfDSo 55 1.961 2.315 137 6 0 0 219 [0:2] 25 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 7 9 7 8 9 9 9$
4 AIfDSo 55 2.162 2.188 151 3 0 0 207 [0:3] 15 9 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 9 10 10 1$
5 AIfDSo 55 2.119 2.230 148 4 0 0 211 [0:4] 19 9 8 9 9 9 10 9 9 10 10 10 1$
6 AIfDSo 55 2.491 2.336 174 3 0 0 221 [0:5] 14 10 11 11 11 11 11 12 10 11 $
7 AIfDSo 55 2.147 2.198 150 3 0 0 208 [0:6] 14 10 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 10$
8 AIfDSo 55 2.692 2.399 188 7 0 0 227 [0:7] 13 13 11 11 12 12 12 11 12 12 $
9 AIfDSo 55 2.419 2.378 169 1 0 0 225 [0:8] 10 11 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 $
10 AIfDSo 55 1.918 2.135 134 7 0 0 202 [0:9] 28 9 9 8 9 8 7 8 7 8 9 9 9 9 9$
11 AIfDSo 55 2.348 2.220 164 10 0 0 210 [0:A] 21 10 9 10 11 10 11 10 11 11 1$
12 AIfDSo 55 2.147 2.220 150 2 0 0 210 [0:B] 15 9 9 8 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10$
13 AIfDSo 55 1.918 2.061 134 8 0 0 195 [0:C] 22 8 8 7 8 8 9 9 9 7 9 9 9 9 7$
14 AIfDSo 55 2.591 2.241 181 8 0 0 212 [0:D] 9 12 12 12 10 9 10 12 12 8 12$
15 AIfDSo 55 2.176 2.272 152 9 0 0 215 [0:E] 32 10 10 10 10 7 9 10 9 10 10 $
16 AIfDSo 55 1.976 2.262 138 15 0 0 214 [0:F] 21 8 10 8 9 8 8 8 9 7 9 8 8 10$
17 AIfDSo 55 2.419 2.442 169 8 0 0 231 [C:0] 31 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 9 11 1$
18 AIfDSo 55 2.262 2.357 158 3 0 0 223 [C:1] 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 $
19 AIfDSo 55 2.090 2.410 146 9 0 0 228 [C:2] 39 9 9 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 10 10$
20 AIfDSo 55 2.348 2.346 164 13 0 0 222 [C:3] 34 11 10 10 10 8 10 10 11 11 1$
21 AIfDSo 55 2.477 2.325 173 6 0 0 220 [C:4] 13 9 11 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 1$
22 AIfDSo 55 2.205 2.357 154 2 0 0 223 [C:5] 19 10 10 10 9 10 10 10 10 9 9 $
23 AIfDSo 55 1.518 1.871 106 4 0 0 177 [C:6] 106 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 6 5 6 7 6 7$
24 AIfDSo 55 2.377 2.399 166 5 0 0 227 [C:7] 20 10 9 10 10 10 11 11 10 9 10$
25 AIfDSo 55 1.661 2.283 116 5 0 0 216 [C:8] 86 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 7 7 7 8 8 8$
26 AIfDSo 55 1.918 2.368 134 31 0 0 224 [C:9] 39 8 9 9 9 8 7 9 9 7 7 6 8 9 1$
27 AIfDSo 55 2.033 2.378 142 13 0 0 225 [C:A] 13 8 10 9 10 7 8 10 9 9 8 9 9 $
28 AIfDSo 55 2.219 2.357 155 9 0 0 223 [C:B] 68 10 9 10 9 10 9 10 11 9 10 1$
29 AIfDSo 55 1.890 2.230 132 13 0 0 211 [C:C] 28 6 9 6 8 9 8 9 8 8 9 9 7 9 8$
30 AIfDSo 55 2.219 2.357 155 13 0 0 223 [C:D] 31 9 10 9 10 10 8 9 9 10 9 10 $
31 AIfDSo 55 1.875 2.304 131 6 0 0 218 [C:E] 23 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 8 9 9 8$
32 AIfDSo 55 2.377 2.431 166 11 0 0 230 [C:F] 35 10 11 10 10 11 11 10 10 9 1$
speed:1760 noncerate[GH/s]:69.120 (2.160/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:73.216 good:4828 errors:268 spi-err:0 miso-err:0 jobs:327 cor$
0: 880 35.233 36.000 2461 117 0 0 16 0 0 (2.202/chip) 97%
C: 880 33.887 37.216 2367 151 0 0 16 0 0 (2.118/chip) 95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
greaterninja
|
|
September 24, 2013, 08:00:11 AM |
|
I've setup 3 kits now: Originally I had 5. I only have walmart fans blowing on them. A/C set at 76F. Resistors at 1.18 K ohm to 1.31 k ohm.
Kit #1; 2 cards; Noncerate: 72.227GH/s
Kit #2; 2 cards; Noncerate: 69.521GH/s
Kit #3; 1 card; Noncerate: 26.038GH/s
Kit #1 is stock but gives miso errors. I'm guess this is because chip #2 is screwed up right?? What do i do from here? Manually clock the bad tooth down?
1 AIfDSo 55 1.700 1.850 95 8 0 1 140 [0:0] 666 5 7 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 5 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
2 AIfDSo 55 0.841 1.744 47 31 0 0 132 [0:1] 711 2 2 4 3 2 3 1 4 3 3 4 4 2 4 3 3 2 3 1 2 3 2 4 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 2 1
3 AIfDSo 55 1.593 1.770 89 8 0 0 134 [0:2] 670 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 5 6 3 6 6 7 6 6 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1
4 AIfDSo 55 1.342 1.850 75 11 0 0 140 [0:3] 685 5 5 5 6 4 5 3 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 0 0 1 0 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
5 AIfDSo 55 1.915 1.731 107 7 0 0 131 [0:4] 657 6 7 7 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 7 6 7 7 7 6 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
6 AIfDSo 55 1.342 1.784 75 5 0 0 135 [0:5] 684 5 4 3 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 AIfDSo 55 1.933 1.863 108 8 0 0 141 [0:6] 659 7 7 7 6 6 7 7 8 6 7 8 7 7 7 6 5 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2
8 AIfDSo 55 1.646 1.876 92 4 0 0 142 [0:7] 668 6 6 5 5 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
9 AIfDSo 55 1.450 1.863 81 15 0 0 141 [0:8] 681 6 6 6 5 5 4 3 6 6 5 6 6 4 3 4 6 0 0 0 1 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 2 0
10 AIfDSo 55 1.700 1.863 95 3 0 0 141 [0:9] 667 5 7 7 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
11 AIfDSo 55 1.467 1.916 82 12 0 0 145 [0:A] 681 5 5 4 6 5 5 6 6 5 5 3 6 4 5 6 6 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 3 0 2 1 0 0
12 AIfDSo 55 1.861 1.836 104 3 0 0 139 [0:B] 661 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 6 5 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
13 AIfDSo 55 1.754 1.889 98 8 0 0 143 [0:C] 665 6 5 5 6 4 5 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 6 7 7 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0
14 AIfDSo 55 1.754 1.916 98 10 0 0 145 [0:D] 663 6 6 5 6 4 6 7 7 7 7 7 5 6 6 6 7 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0
15 AIfDSo 55 1.378 1.850 77 1 0 0 140 [0:E] 683 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 AIfDSo 55 1.557 1.929 87 8 0 0 146 [0:F] 674 6 5 6 5 6 6 6 5 5 6 6 5 6 4 4 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 0
speed:880 noncerate[GH/s]:25.233 (1.577/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:29.529 good:1410 errors:142 spi-err:0 miso-err:1 jobs:300 cores:11% good:16 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:0.000) Tue Sep 24 07:57:48 2013
0: 880 25.233 29.529 1410 142 0 1 16 0 0 (1.577/chip) 11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
juhakall
|
|
September 24, 2013, 12:48:29 PM |
|
Try the newest version of chainminer, IIRC it could help with miso-errors. Just run git pull && make clean && make in the chainminer directory. Obviously after making a backup  |
|
|
|
|
|
joris
|
|
September 24, 2013, 01:33:07 PM
Last edit: September 25, 2013, 09:30:35 AM by joris |
|
Try the newest version of chainminer, IIRC it could help with miso-errors. Just run git pull && make clean && make in the chainminer directory. Obviously after making a backup Abracadabra. Would love to end my MISO-error party, but can you please get one level lower on the raspi skill ladder. So the software 'knows' where to get the git? And we only run the command "git pull && make clean && make"in the folder /opt/bitfury/chainminer/ . Do we need root access to do this, or is user "pi" good enough for this task? I'd love to just try and break something to learn afterwards how to repair and prevent it, but in this case, I'm going to arrange the backup first. EDIT: Tnx for indexing puffmais. In fact, it is the second post ;-) EDIT2: Improvement of about 20 GH to 50 GH on 2-board Starter Kit ~ 1 board pencil modded, which already threw out a lot of MISO-errors, which automagically disapperead after updating the chainminer. |
;-)
|
|
|
|
puffmais
|
|
September 24, 2013, 01:38:00 PM |
|
You can read in the first post what is to do to update the miner  I had over 120 miso errors and dont know why. changing the slots didnt help. after updating the software i have zero errors and around 10gh/s more |
|
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
|
September 24, 2013, 02:34:06 PM |
|
I've setup 3 kits now: Originally I had 5. I only have walmart fans blowing on them. A/C set at 76F. Resistors at 1.18 K ohm to 1.31 k ohm.
Kit #1; 2 cards; Noncerate: 72.227GH/s
Kit #2; 2 cards; Noncerate: 69.521GH/s
Kit #3; 1 card; Noncerate: 26.038GH/s
Kit #1 is stock but gives miso errors. I'm guess this is because chip #2 is screwed up right?? What do i do from here? Manually clock the bad tooth down?
1 AIfDSo 55 1.700 1.850 95 8 0 1 140 [0:0] 666 5 7 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 5 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
2 AIfDSo 55 0.841 1.744 47 31 0 0 132 [0:1] 711 2 2 4 3 2 3 1 4 3 3 4 4 2 4 3 3 2 3 1 2 3 2 4 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 2 1
3 AIfDSo 55 1.593 1.770 89 8 0 0 134 [0:2] 670 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 5 6 3 6 6 7 6 6 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1
4 AIfDSo 55 1.342 1.850 75 11 0 0 140 [0:3] 685 5 5 5 6 4 5 3 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 0 0 1 0 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
5 AIfDSo 55 1.915 1.731 107 7 0 0 131 [0:4] 657 6 7 7 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 7 6 7 7 7 6 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
6 AIfDSo 55 1.342 1.784 75 5 0 0 135 [0:5] 684 5 4 3 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 AIfDSo 55 1.933 1.863 108 8 0 0 141 [0:6] 659 7 7 7 6 6 7 7 8 6 7 8 7 7 7 6 5 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2
8 AIfDSo 55 1.646 1.876 92 4 0 0 142 [0:7] 668 6 6 5 5 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
9 AIfDSo 55 1.450 1.863 81 15 0 0 141 [0:8] 681 6 6 6 5 5 4 3 6 6 5 6 6 4 3 4 6 0 0 0 1 1 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 2 0
10 AIfDSo 55 1.700 1.863 95 3 0 0 141 [0:9] 667 5 7 7 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
11 AIfDSo 55 1.467 1.916 82 12 0 0 145 [0:A] 681 5 5 4 6 5 5 6 6 5 5 3 6 4 5 6 6 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 3 0 2 1 0 0
12 AIfDSo 55 1.861 1.836 104 3 0 0 139 [0:B] 661 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 6 5 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
13 AIfDSo 55 1.754 1.889 98 8 0 0 143 [0:C] 665 6 5 5 6 4 5 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 6 7 7 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0
14 AIfDSo 55 1.754 1.916 98 10 0 0 145 [0:D] 663 6 6 5 6 4 6 7 7 7 7 7 5 6 6 6 7 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0
15 AIfDSo 55 1.378 1.850 77 1 0 0 140 [0:E] 683 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 AIfDSo 55 1.557 1.929 87 8 0 0 146 [0:F] 674 6 5 6 5 6 6 6 5 5 6 6 5 6 4 4 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 0
speed:880 noncerate[GH/s]:25.233 (1.577/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:29.529 good:1410 errors:142 spi-err:0 miso-err:1 jobs:300 cores:11% good:16 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:0.000) Tue Sep 24 07:57:48 2013
0: 880 25.233 29.529 1410 142 0 1 16 0 0 (1.577/chip) 11%
I normally get the same miso error you show here on the 1st chip when I just fire up the BF. A little later it disappears and all is good. I am thinking it would be more of a problem if the number was higher then 1 it would start showing miso errors on the rest of the chips on that card. I am thinking you're ok. |
|
|
|
|
|
americandesi
|
|
September 24, 2013, 06:19:10 PM |
|
You can read in the first post what is to do to update the miner I had over 120 miso errors and dont know why. changing the slots didnt help. after updating the software i have zero errors and around 10gh/s more Which M board do you have.? Did you buy from EU or US.? Also can anyone confirm that it reduces miso errors on v 2.3 M-Board from US sales.? |
|
|
|
AMD FTW
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 317
Merit: 250
GET IN - Smart Ticket Protocol - Live in market!
|
|
September 24, 2013, 06:37:45 PM
Last edit: September 24, 2013, 07:20:23 PM by AMD FTW |
|
I'm going to be hardware modifying my boards when I get them. If you're doing the pencil mod using a graphite pencil you'd modify resistor R02F to get a lower ohms reading between 1.1k-1.2k ohms. From my reading it appears this increases the voltage. Now if I'm actually going to be desoldering and from reading c-scapes post it seems to be better to desolder R01F resistor and increase the resistance to 1.5k ohms which bumps the voltage from .65v to .70v. Is there a reason why one should hardware mod R01F resistor over hardware modding the R02F resistor. To me it appears both mods accomplish doing the same thing, that is bumping up voltage which increases clock speed. R01F resistor I'm looking at getting. Which of these 3 would you recommend. I know the thin film resistors are typically more precise at .5%, or should I go with the thick film 1% tolerance that can handle more wattage. I wasn't sure of the minimum resistor wattage recommended. Thin Film low watts 62.5 mW http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Susumu/RR0816P-152-D/?qs=%2fha2pyFadujrU2xFewWLBjwEx2mjC6RiRlpijhODKY4%3dThick film high watts 250 mW http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Vishay-Dale/CRCW06031K50FKEAHP/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMu61qfTUdNhG9YJum83zc0DZxAhkoNdosw%3dThick film 100 mW http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Vishay-Dale/CRCW06031K50FKEA/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMu61qfTUdNhG7Gzy2l2IcrzI0BRrlOBedI%3dAlso I believe their is an error here. In the picture below it says R02F resistor is 10k ohms but right below that it says for the pencil mod to verify it is 1.3k ohms. I bolded the words in orange so others can verify this
 Note: if you accidentally mess up the capacitor next to the resistor (C10F), and you wish to replace it, use 1nF, 50V, X7R type. Similarly, resistor R02F is 10k, 1%.
[/quote] a) Get an Ohmmeter or DMM b) Get an HB or softer Pencil c) Locate R02F resistor. Donot mod R01F. d) Make sure R02F measures 1.3KOhm
e) Rub pencil on the surface of R02F 3 - 4 times f) Measure resistance, if it's 1.2K plug the board in g) Measure output voltage, and repeat steps e,f if necessary for fine-tuning h) Hash like a boss i got those pictures sent from a user ... to guide through the process of the pencil mod .... ***be aware that you loose warranty of the h-board in doing this ... and you can brick your board!!!***details:- temp +10-15° - 1.6 times higher electricity needed - up to 50% increased hashrate Step 1: unplug your h-board ... and locate the R02F Resistor  Step 2: use ur multimeter on the resistor and verify that it shows 1.3k Ohm  Step 3: use a HB (medium grade) pencil ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pencil) and rub 2-3 times  Step 4: use ur multimeter on the resistor and check how much it was lowered in resistance ...as long as your higher then 1.2k restart step 3 & step 4 ... if it is under 1.2k just swip a little with your finger ... |
|
|
|
|
cscape
|
|
September 24, 2013, 07:20:08 PM |
|
Wattage isn't important, but you should pick a resistor with low temperature coefficient, to reduce the effects of a warming board causing the voltage to drift up.
Also, as well as 1.5k you should get 2.2k and maybe 2.7k.
|
Happy with your c-scape product ? Consider a tip: 16X2FWVRz6UzPWsu4WjKBMJatR7UvyKzcy
|
|
|
AMD FTW
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 317
Merit: 250
GET IN - Smart Ticket Protocol - Live in market!
|
|
September 24, 2013, 07:34:56 PM |
|
Wattage isn't important, but you should pick a resistor with low temperature coefficient, to reduce the effects of a warming board causing the voltage to drift up.
Also, as well as 1.5k you should get 2.2k and maybe 2.7k.
Thanks cscape for the information. I'll be modding probably at least 150 of these boards between my setup and friends being I have a nice soldering station and hot air station so I'll try a variety of these resitance values. Do you have an idea of what 2.2k ohms and 2.7k ohms equates to approximate voltage values. It will be interesting to see how these boards perform oh yeah did you see my question in the above post about the potential error I highlighted in orange about the R02F resistance values. |
|
|
|
|
cscape
|
|
September 24, 2013, 07:59:57 PM |
|
Thanks cscape for the information. I'll be modding probably at least 150 of these boards between my setup and friends being I have a nice soldering station and hot air station so I'll try a variety of these resitance values. Do you have an idea of what 2.2k ohms and 2.7k ohms equates to approximate voltage values. It will be interesting to see how these boards perform. 2.2k results in about 0.75V. I haven't tried 2.7k yet, but I did try 3.3k, and that was too much. oh yeah did you see my question in the above post about the potential error I highlighted in orange about the R02F resistance values.
Yes, the resistor is 10k, but people are measuring it in-circuit and getting distorted values. |
Happy with your c-scape product ? Consider a tip: 16X2FWVRz6UzPWsu4WjKBMJatR7UvyKzcy
|
|
|
AMD FTW
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 317
Merit: 250
GET IN - Smart Ticket Protocol - Live in market!
|
|
September 24, 2013, 11:31:41 PM |
|
Yes, the resistor is 10k, but people are measuring it in-circuit and getting distorted values.
Oh ok, that makes sense now. So another question for you. Do you happen to know what the masterboard rated safe wattage is. From what I've seen a full loaded bitfury setup takes around 400 watts. Being that there are 2 6 pin pci express connectors which are normally rated for 75 watts and an 8 pin is rated for 150 watts. Both the 6 pin and 8 pin have 3 hot wires while the 8 pin has 2 more grounds. With an overclocked complete bitfury 400 ghash units possibly overclocked to 500 ghash or more, do you think the master board is capable of handling 500-600 watts through just 2 6 pin pci express connectors. I know most quality psu's use 18 ga wire which can handle 10 amps each (not that I'd want to run that much current through 18ga), would mean the wire is good for 600 watts, but is the masterboard capable of this? Otheriwse it may be better to only run 12 overclocked boards in each master and just run additional masterboards and raspberry pi's to not over draw to much current |
|
|
|
Cablez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...
|
|
September 25, 2013, 12:37:11 AM |
|
With an overclocked complete bitfury 400 ghash units possibly overclocked to 500 ghash or more, do you think the master board is capable of handling 500-600 watts through just 2 6 pin pci express connectors. I know most quality psu's use 18 ga wire which can handle 10 amps each (not that I'd want to run that much current through 18ga), would mean the wire is good for 600 watts, but is the masterboard capable of this?
Short answer, yes. The six 12v lines coming from the PSU are good to at least 9A each so more than enough margin. The board appears to be able to handle the increased wattage so far. |
Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup??? Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right! No job too hard so PM me for a quote
Check my products or ask a question here: https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
|
|
|
greaterninja
|
|
September 25, 2013, 12:41:00 AM |
|
Yes, the resistor is 10k, but people are measuring it in-circuit and getting distorted values.
Oh ok, that makes sense now. So another question for you. Do you happen to know what the masterboard rated safe wattage is. From what I've seen a full loaded bitfury setup takes around 400 watts. Being that there are 2 6 pin pci express connectors which are normally rated for 75 watts and an 8 pin is rated for 150 watts. Both the 6 pin and 8 pin have 3 hot wires while the 8 pin has 2 more grounds. With an overclocked complete bitfury 400 ghash units possibly overclocked to 500 ghash or more, do you think the master board is capable of handling 500-600 watts through just 2 6 pin pci express connectors. I know most quality psu's use 18 ga wire which can handle 10 amps each (not that I'd want to run that much current through 18ga), would mean the wire is good for 600 watts, but is the masterboard capable of this? Otheriwse it may be better to only run 12 overclocked boards in each master and just run additional masterboards and raspberry pi's to not over draw to much current This is a major concern of mine as well. I think some power supplies will get melted if OC and max capacity (all 16 slots) take place. |
|
|
|
|
|
greaterninja
|
|
September 25, 2013, 03:08:39 AM
Last edit: September 25, 2013, 04:27:42 AM by greaterninja |
|
Before Upgrading my ChainMiner on my bitfury rig with lots of Nonce errors *****NOTE THIS IS A V2 BOARD***** DO NOT GET THE SAME CHAINMINER AS ME AS I HAVE V2!!!!*******
1 AIfDSo 55 2.276 2.378 159 6 0 0 225 $
2 AIfDSo 55 2.062 2.262 144 17 0 0 214 $
3 AIfDSo 55 2.019 2.272 141 17 0 0 215 $
4 AIfDSo 55 1.861 2.368 130 30 0 0 224 $
5 AIfDSo 55 1.861 2.209 130 13 0 2 209 $
6 AIfDSo 55 1.875 2.262 131 19 0 2 214 $
7 AIfDSo 55 1.990 2.325 139 26 0 4 220 $
8 AIfDSo 55 2.248 2.251 157 15 0 10 213 $
9 AIfDSo 55 1.589 2.146 111 29 0 12 203 $
10 AiFDso 55 0.429 0.613 30 12 0 0 58 $
11 AIfDSo 55 1.503 2.188 105 15 0 2 207 $
12 AIfDSo 55 0.358 0.571 25 7 0 4 54 $
13 AIfDSo 55 1.689 2.124 118 25 0 2 201 $
14 AIfDSo 55 0.401 0.634 28 1 0 0 60 $
15 AIfDSo 55 1.704 2.061 119 13 0 0 195 $
16 AIfDSo 55 1.732 2.114 121 33 0 0 200 $
speed:825 noncerate[GH/s]:25.598 (1.600/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:30.779 good:1788 e$
0: 825 25.598 30.779 1788 278 0 38 15 1 $
After Upgrading ChainMiner
1 AIfDSo 54 2.448 2.220 171 0 0 0 210 $
2 AIfDSo 54 2.047 2.093 143 2 0 0 198 $
3 AIfDSo 0 0.000 1.057 0 84 0 0 100 $
4 AIfDSo 55 2.491 2.188 174 0 0 0 207 $
5 AIfDSo 55 2.004 2.061 140 0 0 0 195 $
6 AIfDSo 54 2.090 2.103 146 0 0 0 199 $
7 AIfDSo 54 2.162 2.188 151 0 0 0 207 $
8 AIfDSo 55 2.591 2.220 181 0 0 0 210 $
9 AIfDSo 54 2.362 2.220 165 2 0 0 210 $
10 AIfDSo 54 1.890 2.220 132 0 0 0 210 $
11 AIfDSo 54 2.076 2.209 145 1 0 0 209 $
12 AIfDSo 56 2.162 2.167 151 1 0 0 205 $
13 AIfDSo 56 2.448 2.220 171 2 0 0 210 $
14 AIfDSo 54 2.391 2.241 167 0 0 0 212 $
15 AIfDSo 54 2.434 2.188 170 0 0 0 207 $
16 AIfDSo 53 2.434 2.283 170 7 0 0 216 $
speed:816 noncerate[GH/s]:34.030 (2.127/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:33.876 good:2377 e$
0: 816 34.030 33.876 2377 99 0 0
|
|
|
|
|
skrazy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
September 25, 2013, 03:41:00 AM |
|
Nice bump in gh greaterninja. Glad to see the improvement I saw is not a one off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
greaterninja
|
|
September 25, 2013, 04:30:13 AM |
|
My board is a Version 2.3. If you have a version 1 M board DO NOT GET THE SAME CHAINMINER BUILD AS ME.
oh and as far as my results I left the resistor the same. the new chain miner build definately improved results.
What I also noticed is there is a even newer upload on buzzdave's links. Is it a newer build or older build??
|
|
|
|
|
mr_rulezzz
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
September 25, 2013, 05:06:40 AM |
|
plz make "how to" step4step frob back up to chainminer upgrade manual for noobs like me)
|
|
|
|
|
|
puffmais
|
|
September 25, 2013, 05:18:31 AM |
|
I didnt get bitminter pool working with my bitfury, can someone help me??
what url must i insert in the web interface? "stratum+tcp://mint.bitminter.com" or "stratum.mint.bitminter.com" or something else?? the miner not start with these?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
gmannn
|
|
September 25, 2013, 07:20:03 AM |
|
My board is a Version 2.3. If you have a version 1 M board DO NOT GET THE SAME CHAINMINER BUILD AS ME.
oh and as far as my results I left the resistor the same. the new chain miner build definately improved results.
What I also noticed is there is a even newer upload on buzzdave's links. Is it a newer build or older build??
I have the same board version, could you post how you updated chainminer? git pull and git clone both didn't work for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
