Are bounty managers to be blamed?

[starblocks]

Bounty campaign managers aren't to blame if a project fails to raise enough funding in its crowdsale or if the project turns out to be a scam but it helps if they do due diligence and also if the funds for the campaign are escrowed in advance

The rest is up to the bounty hunters to ensure they're working with a reputable campaign manager and have researched the project themselves

[otong]

not entirely the fault of the manager but a manager should also be responsible that what he has promoted is not a fraudulent project or the project is unclear. besides that we also have to be observant in finding a bounty campaign

[doroshok]

That's a pretty interesting question. On the one hand, the Manager must carefully check the company, and on the other hand, we check the company ourselves. And there's no point in blaming him, since he didn't know about the fraud either.

[nurbay]

The mistake of someone who has committed fraud against many people does make many people feel annoyed.
Maybe my advice is in the midst of the conditions of any ICO who are doing a scam, so we must be careful before joining the ICO because at this time following the ICO is quite risky because now many are doing scams and many ICO that do not meet the soft cap.
Make this incident a valuable event to avoid scam ICO.

[5stringer]

I don't figure the abundance supervisor should fault, abundance chief toward the start of a don't have the foggiest idea about the ICO is extortion, and now the market isn't great, there are various ventures have not achieved their caps, so ICO is considered by an abundance seeker is a trick.

[FO4R]

we shouldnt blame these bounty managers because they are only in charge on the flow and the partcipants in rach ICO.Failing of ICO doesnt reflect the bounty managers but the failed of each participants to meet the requirements for each ICO should also considered.At the end of the day,bounty participants are the one who makes every ICO successful.

[ayu07]

They don't deserve the blame. If a bounty manager is doing his job with responsibility like keep updating bounty thread/tg group with latest news concerning bounty,calculate stakes accurately and most importantly take note of complaints and answer them politely then it's not always their fault if ICO turned out to be a scam.

[koshkatrol]

They should be blamed only if they fail to fulfill their obligations and do not do their job.

[Ortintin1]

Of course bounty managers should be held responsible. Afterall they are the one managing the campaign

[Stimah23]

There's scam ICOs everywhere, I don't think all blame are for the bounty manager alone because the managers are only giving the bounty project as work to do, and if the team decided any stopped to the project it's will surely affects the bounty campaign.
But bounties manager should be conscious of bounty campaign they offered to them so as to protect there reputation.

[marcus_v]

The bounty manager only publishes and manages the bounty. It is not responsible for project development and fund management. It can be said that he is only an intermediary between the project party and the bounty hunter and cannot be responsible for the authenticity of the project.

[Troysen]

Although I think we shouldn't blame them so quickly, I also think that bounty managers have a bit of blame, many people participate on bounties that have responsible managers, because they feel confident with them, what happens is that it is very complicated to know that an ICO is a scam if done very well, you can find out if it's a scam if you look at the obvious things like the whitepaper, the roadmap or the team, but when all goes well and the project looks successful and the development team decides to run away with the money, how can you predict that? hard stuff

[coffee_man]

There are different situations when new projects are closed and lost at the ICO stage.
And in many new projects there is no official representative of the company, often hired bounty managers simply do not know what is happening in the project and are also deceived.

[Set02222]

Well even they are reputable bounty managers it is hard to predict the ICO projects are scam. We cannot blame them and accept that we are in the industry wherein there is no assurance of the projects. That is why we do bounty campaigns at our own risk and  move on to the next project.

[Hazaki]

Bounty managers are not to be blamed only if they do contribute in the scam that is taking place and those ones are usually members of the team that launched the ICO at first place.
Even if you are not that implicated in the scam or you really didn't verify whether the ICO is a credible one by reading it's whitepaper , seeing whether they have an opportunity of making money and so on ..
I remember that lately a very known and trusted campaign manager have received numerous negative feed backs only because he knew that the campaign he is managing is a fraud , so the managers aren't really those to blame ..
Experienced enough bounty hunters can make the difference between a scam and the real deal and should alert people whenever they smell something fishy (which is already happening with a lot of ICOs ..) .

[StevenCS]

not all failed bounties have to blame the bounty managers because maybe the bounty manager has also been deceived, and a bounty manager is also a human, of course he has done wrong, but of course there is a bounty manager who does the work only for scam bounties, so stay away a bounty manager who has a negative reputation for trust

[strawberrypills]

There are a lot of scam ICOs these days so it's up to the bounty managers to up their game as well. They need to be critical in choosing an ICO project otherwise people would start to lose their fate in them just like with this other bounty manager I know. But I don't think we should blame shift the blame on the manager only. Us hunters should also be able to detect things like that.

[DiamondsAndCoins]

I think a score should be kept on how many bad bounties a manager does.  This way we all know what we are dealing with.  Some ICO's will fail however we may see a pattern with some of these guys have more failures than others and we can avoid. 

[GulpoRu]

Abundance directors are human as well. They can commit errors. They can't flawlessly distinguish which are tricks and which are most certainly not. Be that as it may, that is no reason for taking trick extends constantly. They ought to build up their own particular strategies to know or if nothing else measure whether the venture passed his or her standard. There ought to be checks made. It is best to do overseeing full time to give full core interest.

[OculusMan]

Managers bounty campaigns, the same staff as we do and we should not blame the team for them for what they have not produced payments on time or not paid at all. The Manager's bounty is probably as affected as we are.