[TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits

[JayJuanGee]

How many times do i have to ask you to f*** off  

You take matters very personally, mikeywith, and that does not seem to be a good thing.  

Animal Farm happened to be a classic amongst books.  Very short and easy to read, too.  

The horse therein, Boxer, continuously blamed himself for nearly everything on the farm that went badly, and Boxer would also carry the weight of the work of the farm in several ways that were tangibly noticeable.  

Any lack of progress issues, and Boxer would say to himself, "I will work harder," and the solution for Boxer was always, "I will work harder," but in the end, inspite of hard work and contribution, Boxer got screwed and instead of living his final days in green pastures, he was sent to a glue house for processing.

Anyhow, I was attempting to make a point, and such point was not just about you.  Go figure.      

[Veleor]

I can't find myself in the OP, can it really be right? I'm not completely sure so figured I should at least ask first.

Following from the BPIP, you have received 813 merit and sent 496 merit: https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Hhampuz

OP includes members to the list according to the "Generosity" parameter which is calculated by formula:

Code:

GENEROSITY = SENT_MERITS - ceil(RECEIVED_MERITS / 2)

Therefore, your "Generosity" = 496 - ceil(813/2) = 496 - 407 = 89, which is not enough to get into the list.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Merit abuse, anyone? 125 Merit to 3 people in 3 transactions?

[LoyceV]

Merit abuse, anyone? 125 Merit to 3 people in 3 transactions?

Probably:

Merit sent by notthematrix from January 24, 2018 until April 05, 2019 (source)


Thu Mar 28 01:10:27 2019: 50 to julerz12 (history) for [BOUNTY] CODEX CRYPTOCURRENCY EXCHANGE ________________________________________
Thu Mar 28 01:08:16 2019: 50 to Aerys2 (history) for [BOUNTY][ICO] Next.exchange Community Trading| 3% NEXT REWARDS
Thu Mar 28 01:07:52 2019: 25 to goldkingcoiner (history) for 🔳[BOUNTY][ICO]🔳 ERECOIN ~ 3D-PRINTING GOES BLOCKCHAIN 3,750,000 ERE(~2%)

But it's not against the rules, and there's this:

If you have 150 source merit and you only see 3 merit-worthy posts in a month, then I'd rather you over-give each of them 50 merit than let the merit expire. That way there are more people capable of sending merit, and the "merit economy" is less top-down.

[Veleor]

Merit abuse, anyone? 125 Merit to 3 people in 3 transactions?

One of the receivers has created a topic in Meta a week ago: 50 Merits for bounty threads.

[Coin-1]

This is a monthly statictics for April 2019 below.

The most generous users giving merits (April 2019)

	User name	Sent merits	Received merits	Generosity
1)	chimk	1036 (in 299 txns to 122 users)	62 (in 49 txns from 32 users)	1005 (max 1005)
2)	suchmoon	1020 (in 108 txns to 82 users)	196 (in 123 txns from 60 users)	922 (max 923)
3)	dbshck	846 (in 205 txns to 87 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	845 (max 845)
4)	Foxpup	783 (in 278 txns to 95 users)	30 (in 12 txns from 9 users)	768 (max 768)
5)	Flying Hellfish	561 (in 70 txns to 46 users)	48 (in 20 txns from 15 users)	537 (max 537)
6)	bones261	495 (in 242 txns to 106 users)	62 (in 26 txns from 22 users)	464 (max 464)
7)	frodocooper	332 (in 168 txns to 58 users)	17 (in 6 txns from 6 users)	323 (max 323)
8)	LoyceV	452 (in 285 txns to 162 users)	259 (in 98 txns from 59 users)	322 (max 323)
9)	TMAN	303 (in 58 txns to 46 users)	10 (in 10 txns from 7 users)	298 (max 298)
10)	Welsh	298 (in 49 txns to 38 users)	17 (in 9 txns from 7 users)	289 (max 290)
11)	DarkStar_	309 (in 66 txns to 47 users)	73 (in 43 txns from 29 users)	272 (max 272)
12)	Halab	276 (in 135 txns to 65 users)	88 (in 19 txns from 12 users)	232 (max 232)
13)	OgNasty	229 (in 212 txns to 155 users)	19 (in 18 txns from 14 users)	219 (max 219)
14)	qwk	246 (in 155 txns to 57 users)	62 (in 44 txns from 19 users)	215 (max 216)
15)	JayJuanGee	231 (in 231 txns to 107 users)	54 (in 48 txns from 31 users)	204 (max 205)
16)	Vod	223 (in 68 txns to 59 users)	37 (in 24 txns from 12 users)	204 (max 205)
17)	ETFbitcoin	220 (in 165 txns to 94 users)	41 (in 25 txns from 18 users)	199 (max 202)
18)	vapourminer	203 (in 199 txns to 124 users)	21 (in 17 txns from 12 users)	192 (max 192)
19)	malevolent	194 (in 83 txns to 51 users)	5 (in 5 txns from 5 users)	191 (max 191)
20)	StarenseN	173 (in 9 txns to 8 users)	24 (in 12 txns from 7 users)	161 (max 168)
21)	Bitdonator	141 (in 14 txns to 13 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	140 (max 141)
22)	DdmrDdmr	174 (in 153 txns to 87 users)	100 (in 62 txns from 34 users)	124 (max 124)
23)	Jet Cash	131 (in 52 txns to 40 users)	16 (in 13 txns from 9 users)	123 (max 123)
24)	LFC_Bitcoin	134 (in 124 txns to 71 users)	68 (in 57 txns from 33 users)	100 (max 100)
25)	xandry	91 (in 47 txns to 41 users)	12 (in 6 txns from 5 users)	85 (max 87)
26)	BobLawblaw	100 (in 89 txns to 48 users)	31 (in 28 txns from 18 users)	84 (max 84)
27)	tyz	90 (in 65 txns to 50 users)	14 (in 12 txns from 9 users)	83 (max 84)
28)	joniboini	109 (in 47 txns to 27 users)	60 (in 42 txns from 23 users)	79 (max 82)
29)	krogothmanhattan	138 (in 108 txns to 44 users)	126 (in 53 txns from 36 users)	75 (max 75)
30)	mindrust	90 (in 57 txns to 45 users)	33 (in 31 txns from 21 users)	73 (max 73)
31)	theymos	215 (in 19 txns to 15 users)	288 (in 128 txns from 77 users)	71 (max 83)
32)	paxmao	71 (in 41 txns to 16 users)	3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	69 (max 70)
33)	DoublerHunter	64 (in 15 txns to 15 users)	5 (in 4 txns from 2 users)	61 (max 63)
34)	Mr. Big	60 (in 14 txns to 11 users)	0	60 (max 60)
35)	layer1gfx	60 (in 11 txns to 9 users)	3 (in 3 txns from 2 users)	58 (max 58)
36)	EFS	59 (in 16 txns to 14 users)	2 (in 1 txn)	58 (max 58)
37)	BitMaxz	63 (in 42 txns to 34 users)	14 (in 10 txns from 8 users)	56 (max 56)
38)	crazyearner	55 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	55 (max 55)
39)	Micio	70 (in 20 txns to 9 users)	29 (in 11 txns from 1 user)	55 (max 55)
40)	infofront	70 (in 70 txns to 40 users)	31 (in 27 txns from 18 users)	54 (max 54)
41)	vizique	73 (in 14 txns to 10 users)	41 (in 16 txns from 8 users)	52 (max 54)
42)	elokk	50 (in 1 txn)	0	50 (max 50)
43)	AngusCanine	50 (in 1 txn)	0	50 (max 50)
44)	Vlad2Vlad	50 (in 9 txns to 7 users)	2 (in 1 txn)	49 (max 49)
45)	marcus_of_augustus	50 (in 1 txn)	1	49 (max 49)
46)	theymos_away	48 (in 10 txns to 10 users)	0	48 (max 48)
47)	klarki	57 (in 52 txns to 40 users)	18 (in 6 txns from 3 users)	48 (max 50)
48)	Buchi-88	49 (in 42 txns to 31 users)	4 (in 4 txns from 4 users)	47 (max 47)
49)	hilariousandco	58 (in 22 txns to 16 users)	21 (in 16 txns from 13 users)	47 (max 47)
50)	hugeblack	58 (in 57 txns to 27 users)	28 (in 27 txns from 17 users)	44 (max 44)
51)	Husna QA	104 (in 92 txns to 33 users)	122 (in 60 txns from 24 users)	43 (max 43)
52)	redsn0w	43 (in 10 txns to 8 users)	0	43 (max 43)
53)	600watt	53 (in 53 txns to 38 users)	24 (in 24 txns from 18 users)	41 (max 42)
54)	philipma1957	57 (in 26 txns to 20 users)	33 (in 21 txns from 12 users)	40 (max 46)
55)	lucolo	37 (in 18 txns to 7 users)	0	37 (max 37)
56)	seleme	36 (in 8 txns to 6 users)	0	36 (max 36)
57)	Globb0	47 (in 19 txns to 13 users)	21 (in 21 txns from 16 users)	36 (max 40)
58)	Mitchell	36 (in 9 txns to 8 users)	3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	34 (max 34)
59)	criptix	35 (in 5 txns to 3 users)	1	34 (max 34)
60)	rednoW	33 (in 5 txns to 5 users)	0	33 (max 33)
61)	andulolika	33 (in 26 txns to 26 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	32 (max 32)
62)	Xprim777	32 (in 4 txns to 4 users)	0	32 (max 32)
63)	d5000	47 (in 47 txns to 31 users)	31 (in 25 txns from 10 users)	31 (max 33)
64)	rockmoney	35 (in 8 txns to 4 users)	9 (in 3 txns from 1 user)	30 (max 30)
65)	HairyMaclairy	51 (in 38 txns to 26 users)	41 (in 37 txns from 20 users)	30 (max 31)
66)	Carlton Banks	56 (in 18 txns to 13 users)	54 (in 25 txns from 15 users)	29 (max 31)
67)	yahoo62278	39 (in 16 txns to 11 users)	19 (in 8 txns from 7 users)	29 (max 29)
68)	o_e_l_e_o	114 (in 96 txns to 77 users)	176 (in 89 txns from 48 users)	26 (max 29)
69)	kingcolex	44 (in 19 txns to 15 users)	36 (in 32 txns from 22 users)	26 (max 27)
70)	Your Point Is Invalid	25 (in 6 txns to 6 users)	0	25 (max 25)
71)	jpcfan	25 (in 1 txn)	0	25 (max 25)
72)	newguy05	25 (in 2 txns to 1 user)	2 (in 1 txn)	24 (max 25)
73)	fronti	42 (in 33 txns to 21 users)	36 (in 30 txns from 16 users)	24 (max 24)
74)	gmaxwell	60 (in 6 txns to 5 users)	71 (in 24 txns from 12 users)	24 (max 50)
75)	audiotopix	24 (in 11 txns to 8 users)	1	23 (max 24)
76)	BitcSeo	23 (in 8 txns to 8 users)	0	23 (max 23)
77)	rarkenin	22 (in 11 txns to 8 users)	0	22 (max 22)
78)	kenanzz	22 (in 1 txn)	0	22 (max 22)
79)	Paashaas	47 (in 45 txns to 25 users)	50 (in 32 txns from 17 users)	22 (max 22)
80)	Dabs	24 (in 11 txns to 10 users)	4 (in 4 txns from 4 users)	22 (max 22)
81)	OneNattyLitecoin	21 (in 1 txn)	0	21 (max 21)
82)	franckuestein	22 (in 20 txns to 17 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	21 (max 21)
83)	nutildah	59 (in 54 txns to 43 users)	75 (in 41 txns from 26 users)	21 (max 25)
84)	mole0815	27 (in 27 txns to 17 users)	12 (in 12 txns from 8 users)	21 (max 21)
85)	greenplastic	21 (in 19 txns to 15 users)	1	20 (max 20)
86)	IconFirm	20 (in 10 txns to 10 users)	0	20 (max 20)
87)	fragout	20 (in 1 txn)	0	20 (max 20)
88)	SyGambler	25 (in 23 txns to 11 users)	10 (in 10 txns from 6 users)	20 (max 20)
89)	NotFuzzyWarm	24 (in 12 txns to 4 users)	7 (in 7 txns from 4 users)	20 (max 20)
90)	julerz12	23 (in 10 txns to 9 users)	5 (in 4 txns from 4 users)	20 (max 23)
91)	cryptoman77777	20 (in 1 txn)	2 (in 1 txn)	19 (max 20)
92)	CjMapope	21 (in 20 txns to 17 users)	3 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	19 (max 19)
93)	Bojcha	18 (in 1 txn)	0	18 (max 18)
94)	tim-bc	20 (in 1 txn)	4 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	18 (max 19)
95)	HagssFIN	24 (in 17 txns to 10 users)	11 (in 7 txns from 5 users)	18 (max 18)
96)	TECSHARE	37 (in 16 txns to 14 users)	37 (in 23 txns from 20 users)	18 (max 26)
97)	Coiner.de	18 (in 14 txns to 12 users)	0	18 (max 18)
98)	marlboroza	40 (in 26 txns to 20 users)	43 (in 18 txns from 13 users)	18 (max 23)
99)	Pamoldar	32 (in 17 txns to 12 users)	30 (in 19 txns from 14 users)	17 (max 22)
100)	mu_enrico	64 (in 55 txns to 20 users)	94 (in 52 txns from 21 users)	17 (max 17)
101)	Claymore	20 (in 1 txn)	5 (in 1 txn)	17 (max 20)
102)	babo	19 (in 19 txns to 11 users)	3 (in 3 txns from 2 users)	17 (max 17)
103)	sabotag3x	19 (in 18 txns to 14 users)	4 (in 3 txns from 2 users)	17 (max 17)
104)	Mr.Ease	16 (in 15 txns to 14 users)	0	16 (max 16)
105)	adamvp	24 (in 23 txns to 7 users)	16 (in 16 txns from 6 users)	16 (max 16)
106)	pandukelana2712	56 (in 50 txns to 27 users)	80 (in 45 txns from 23 users)	16 (max 16)
107)	jbreher	31 (in 27 txns to 20 users)	29 (in 24 txns from 16 users)	16 (max 18)
108)	P_Shep	17 (in 7 txns to 7 users)	3 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	15 (max 15)
109)	coin-investor	16 (in 11 txns to 11 users)	1	15 (max 15)
110)	buzzkillb	16 (in 3 txns to 2 users)	1	15 (max 16)
111)	cAPSLOCK	19 (in 7 txns to 7 users)	7 (in 7 txns from 6 users)	15 (max 15)
112)	Hhampuz	68 (in 61 txns to 42 users)	106 (in 59 txns from 42 users)	15 (max 17)
113)	anonymousminer	30 (in 23 txns to 16 users)	32 (in 14 txns from 13 users)	14 (max 14)
114)	F2b	17 (in 17 txns to 14 users)	6 (in 4 txns from 3 users)	14 (max 14)
115)	Heisenberg_Hunter	23 (in 19 txns to 16 users)	17 (in 12 txns from 11 users)	14 (max 14)
116)	Taki	14 (in 5 txns to 5 users)	0	14 (max 14)
117)	Abdussamad	18 (in 9 txns to 6 users)	8 (in 6 txns from 4 users)	14 (max 15)
118)	ErisDiscordia	16 (in 10 txns to 9 users)	3 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	14 (max 14)
119)	Hueristic	19 (in 19 txns to 18 users)	10 (in 10 txns from 10 users)	14 (max 14)
120)	ryzaadit	45 (in 36 txns to 18 users)	64 (in 35 txns from 14 users)	13 (max 13)
121)	TheFuzzStone	40 (in 25 txns to 22 users)	54 (in 33 txns from 21 users)	13 (max 14)
122)	tvplus006	46 (in 46 txns to 20 users)	66 (in 38 txns from 19 users)	13 (max 15)
123)	Daniel91	22 (in 22 txns to 12 users)	17 (in 8 txns from 8 users)	13 (max 13)
124)	crairezx20	15 (in 11 txns to 10 users)	4 (in 4 txns from 4 users)	13 (max 14)
125)	akamit	18 (in 17 txns to 15 users)	9 (in 8 txns from 7 users)	13 (max 14)
126)	enhu	13 (in 1 txn)	1	12 (max 13)
127)	tm2013	12 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	12 (max 12)
128)	shahim	12 (in 5 txns to 4 users)	0	12 (max 12)
129)	mkmdoc	12 (in 1 txn)	0	12 (max 12)
130)	Zadicar	17 (in 14 txns to 14 users)	9 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	12 (max 13)
131)	phoinex	24 (in 20 txns to 12 users)	23 (in 18 txns from 11 users)	12 (max 16)
132)	afbitcoins	12 (in 3 txns to 3 users)	0	12 (max 12)
133)	thandie	16 (in 6 txns to 5 users)	7 (in 6 txns from 4 users)	12 (max 14)
134)	pera	12 (in 6 txns to 5 users)	0	12 (max 12)
135)	TimeTeller	12 (in 12 txns to 12 users)	0	12 (max 12)
136)	Nerd-Labs	11 (in 1 txn)	0	11 (max 11)
137)	kawetsriyanto	49 (in 36 txns to 12 users)	76 (in 50 txns from 14 users)	11 (max 14)
138)	Farul	26 (in 21 txns to 16 users)	30 (in 19 txns from 10 users)	11 (max 12)
139)	DireWolfM14	64 (in 54 txns to 39 users)	105 (in 43 txns from 31 users)	11 (max 19)
140)	Zeta0S	11 (in 1 txn)	0	11 (max 11)
141)	Vtools	11 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	11 (max 11)
142)	daarul50	14 (in 6 txns to 6 users)	5 (in 4 txns from 3 users)	11 (max 11)
143)	ivan1975	12 (in 10 txns to 9 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	11 (max 11)
144)	avikz	13 (in 8 txns to 8 users)	4 (in 4 txns from 3 users)	11 (max 11)
145)	magneto	13 (in 7 txns to 7 users)	3 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	11 (max 11)
146)	ManagerVirta	11 (in 5 txns to 5 users)	0	11 (max 11)
147)	Cyrus	14 (in 5 txns to 4 users)	6 (in 6 txns from 6 users)	11 (max 14)
148)	bhokor	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
149)	shiunsai	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
150)	madmartyk	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
151)	faetos	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
152)	Matt9301	10 (in 8 txns to 5 users)	0	10 (max 10)
153)	UdjinM6	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
154)	Jannn	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
155)	pallas	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
156)	amishmanish	19 (in 8 txns to 8 users)	17 (in 8 txns from 7 users)	10 (max 16)
157)	shorena	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
158)	Lesbian Cow	26 (in 14 txns to 12 users)	32 (in 13 txns from 11 users)	10 (max 10)
159)	AlexGR	10 (in 1 txn)	0	10 (max 10)
160)	plast555	9 (in 8 txns to 6 users)	0	9 (max 9)
161)	hahahafr	9 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	0	9 (max 9)
162)	Youghoor	9 (in 4 txns to 4 users)	0	9 (max 9)
163)	coinscrow	10 (in 1 txn)	2 (in 1 txn)	9 (max 10)
164)	rizaldi	10 (in 6 txns to 5 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	9 (max 9)
165)	theyoungmillionaire	39 (in 24 txns to 16 users)	60 (in 19 txns from 14 users)	9 (max 9)
166)	panjay	43 (in 33 txns to 13 users)	68 (in 28 txns from 9 users)	9 (max 9)
167)	pushups44	11 (in 7 txns to 7 users)	3 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	9 (max 9)
168)	J_ROC	9 (in 1 txn)	0	9 (max 9)
169)	ZipReg	11 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	3 (in 3 txns from 3 users)	9 (max 11)
170)	gentlemand	28 (in 20 txns to 20 users)	37 (in 29 txns from 21 users)	9 (max 9)
171)	DrBeer	10 (in 2 txns to 2 users)	1	9 (max 10)
172)	VoskCoin	13 (in 9 txns to 9 users)	8 (in 4 txns from 4 users)	9 (max 11)
173)	bL4nkcode	17 (in 16 txns to 15 users)	16 (in 14 txns from 12 users)	9 (max 10)
174)	The Pharmacist	89 (in 46 txns to 42 users)	159 (in 75 txns from 44 users)	9 (max 11)
175)	AhmadM	10 (in 9 txns to 6 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	9 (max 9)
176)	Anonylz	9 (in 5 txns to 5 users)	1	8 (max 8)
177)	Blowon	8 (in 8 txns to 8 users)	0	8 (max 8)
178)	galaxiekyl	9 (in 9 txns to 7 users)	1	8 (max 8)
179)	cryptovigi	27 (in 24 txns to 10 users)	37 (in 36 txns from 11 users)	8 (max 11)
180)	Yamifoud	10 (in 8 txns to 7 users)	3 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	8 (max 9)
181)	vectisitch	8 (in 4 txns to 3 users)	0	8 (max 8)
182)	guoyu78	8 (in 4 txns to 4 users)	0	8 (max 8)
183)	KingCaper	8 (in 5 txns to 5 users)	0	8 (max 8)
184)	MirkoIta	8 (in 4 txns to 4 users)	0	8 (max 8)
185)	DaveF	21 (in 8 txns to 6 users)	26 (in 15 txns from 7 users)	8 (max 10)
186)	Dobrii	8 (in 4 txns to 4 users)	0	8 (max 8)
187)	Vladdirescu87	8 (in 8 txns to 7 users)	0	8 (max 8)
188)	Nerobasta	8 (in 1 txn)	0	8 (max 8)
189)	squatz1	26 (in 7 txns to 6 users)	36 (in 13 txns from 12 users)	8 (max 8)
190)	sirazimuth	8 (in 3 txns to 2 users)	0	8 (max 8)
191)	eternalgloom	11 (in 8 txns to 7 users)	5 (in 4 txns from 4 users)	8 (max 8)
192)	LeGaulois	31 (in 30 txns to 29 users)	45 (in 29 txns from 21 users)	8 (max 8)
193)	ndnh	7 (in 1 txn)	0	7 (max 7)
194)	mirakal	8 (in 8 txns to 7 users)	2 (in 2 txns from 2 users)	7 (max 7)
195)	anu1908	14 (in 3 txns to 3 users)	14 (in 13 txns from 10 users)	7 (max 8)
196)	Agrawas	28 (in 17 txns to 14 users)	42 (in 9 txns from 5 users)	7 (max 10)
197)	Dakustaking76	10 (in 1 txn)	5 (in 3 txns from 2 users)	7 (max 9)
198)	Sharon121212	27 (in 22 txns to 19 users)	39 (in 28 txns from 20 users)	7 (max 8)
199)	xwebnetwork	7 (in 1 txn)	0	7 (max 7)
200)	witcher_sense	36 (in 30 txns to 13 users)	58 (in 36 txns from 19 users)	7 (max 10)

In April 2019 total sent 20698 merits (in 11314 txns to 2115 users):

• 4% to Newbies: 764 merits (to 439 users)
• 5% to Jr. Members: 1064 merits (to 339 users)
• 11% to Members: 2239 merits (to 357 users)
• 13% to Full Members: 2766 merits (to 258 users)
• 15% to Sr. Members: 3120 merits (to 246 users)
• 20% to Hero Members: 4048 merits (to 252 users)
• 32% to Legendaries: 6697 merits (to 401 users)

Total user count on May 1, 2019:

• 2744 Legendaries (1253 of them sent merits)
• 3789 Hero Members (1363 of them sent merits)
• 9092 Sr. Members (2658 of them sent merits)
• 18409 Full Members (5171 of them sent merits)
• 29996 Members (7816 of them sent merits)
• 12976 Jr. Members (1852 of them sent merits)
• about two millions newbies

[Coin-1]

The tables and chart on the first page have been updated.

I also published monthly statistics for April 2019. Interestingly, the merit source chimk is the leader of this TOP-200 in the previous month. Good work!

By the way, d5000 confirmed to be a merit source in a public post. Thanks to qwk for the info.

~

I will add them to the full list of merit sources if the analysis detects them calculating their indicator "Generosity".

The analysis has detected d5000 as a merit source, so I added this user to the list of known merit sources.

I can't find myself in the OP, can it really be right? I'm not completely sure so figured I should at least ask first.

Following from the BPIP, you have received 813 merit and sent 496 merit: https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Hhampuz

OP includes members to the list according to the "Generosity" parameter which is calculated by formula:

Code:

GENEROSITY = SENT_MERITS - ceil(RECEIVED_MERITS / 2)

Therefore, your "Generosity" = 496 - ceil(813/2) = 496 - 407 = 89, which is not enough to get into the list.

Veleor has explained this question very well.

is my userID invisible in whatever data you use to conduct these results ? , i read the op trying to find any special criteria which i don't fit into,i couldn't find any reason why am i not being listed in the most generous merit senders despite the fact that I sent hundreds of them so far  

You are in the same situation. No new criteria is used.

[Coin-1]

I haven't updated my posts on the front page this week.

I just want to say that the detection algorithm has spotted the following members as new merit sources:
1) Quickseller
2) cabalism13
3) CryptopreneurBrainboss
4) micgoossens

I will update all tables and chart later.

[Lauda]

I just want to say that the detection algorithm has spotted the following members as new merit sources:
1) Quickseller

How do I down merit this cancerous move?

[cabalism13]

I just want to say that the detection algorithm has spotted the following members as new merit sources:
1) Quickseller

How do I down merit this cancerous move?

Algorithms are sometimes wrong Maybe there is a some mistake on Coin-1's detection, just like Coolcryptovator he is one of the Sources now as he said it himself but the algo hasn't detected his presence.
Is there anything I can do to deny the claim

[DdmrDdmr]

<…>

I’ve just checked it on the Merit Dashboard and @Quickseller (as of last Friday) had earned 552 non-airdropped Merits, while having sent 488 sMerits. The 552 earned merits would account for 276 sent sMerits out of the 488 sent sMerits. The remaining 212 sent sMerits could be part of the initial sMerit airdrop (or not):
 
Since Legendries could have received up to 400 sMerits depending on their activity (see re:Initial sMerit for every rank?), those 212 sent sMerits may have come from the initial sMerit airdrop, from being a Merit Source, or a combination of both. Just by looking at the numbers I don’t think we can determine that he is a Merit Source yet.

You can assert that someone is a Merit Source of the total amount or sent sMerits > (Received floor(sMerits/2) + Max potential airdropped sMerit for the rank), but just before this value there is a grey area due to not knowing the exact amount of airdropped sMerits.


Many appointed Merit Sources tend to have small allowances to start-off with. They also are often people that earn merits (thus generating sMerits), so during the first months, the awarded sMerits from the Merit Source allocation may not exceed the generated/unspent sMerits, and thus remain undetected (as is the case of @Coolcryptovator I presume).

Edit: @JayJuanGee, apparently the max is 400 for Legendries:

While specific formula is not given, theymos wrote that the initial sMerit is not solely determined by rank, but determined by rank and activity points obtained in the last year.

The exact formula was:

Code:

yearActivity = activity in the last ~year, max 378
freeMerit = the merit (not sMerit) you started with
modifier =
  0.1 if member
  0.2 if full member
  0.25 if sr member
  0.35 if hero
  0.4 if legendary

return (yearActivity/378) * modifier * freeMerit

So the most you could get is if you were a Legendary who maxed out your activity points in the last year, in which case you would get 1 * 0.4 * 1000 = 400 sMerit.

Edit 2:
Then again:

I got 200 sMerit airdropped, even though it should have been 400 based on theymos' formula.

Yep, 200 was the max for legendaries. AFAICT the formula is lacking a division by 2 since values for the other ranks are double of the actual amounts as well.

That would mean that the 212 before referenced sMerits > 200 sMerits, placing @Quickseller as a Merit Source.

[JayJuanGee]

<…>

I’ve just checked it on the Merit Dashboard and @Quickseller (as of last Friday) had earned 552 non-airdropped Merits, while having sent 488 sMerits. The 552 earned merits would account for 276 sent sMerits out of the 488 sent sMerits. The remaining 212 sent sMerits could be part of the initial sMerit airdrop (or not):
 
Since Legendries could have received up to 400 sMerits depending on their activity (see re:Initial sMerit for every rank?), those 212 sent sMerits may have come from the initial sMerit airdrop, from being a Merit Source, or a combination of both. Just by looking at the numbers I don’t think we can determine that he is a Merit Source yet.

You can assert that someone is a Merit Source of the total amount or sent sMerits > (Received floor(sMerits/2) + Max potential airdropped sMerit for the rank), but just before this value there is a grey area due to not knowing the exact amount of airdropped sMerits.


Many appointed Merit Sources tend to have small allowances to start-off with. They also are often people that earn merits (thus generating sMerits), so during the first months, the awarded sMerits from the Merit Source allocation may not exceed the generated/unspent sMerits, and thus remain undetected (as is the case of @Coolcryptovator I presume).

I believe that the maximum that any Legendaries could have received on the initial airdrop would have been 200, so Quickseller has spent an excess of 12 merits which would explain why he has been detected as a merit source.

By the way, it does appear that as of last week, theymos added an additional 7 merit sources (raising the total merit sources from 123 to 130)

Edit:   I take back everything that I said above, and I suppose that my memory is going bad because it seems that I had erroneously recalled that my initial airdrop of smerits was 200.

[Quickseller]

<…>

I’ve just checked it on the Merit Dashboard and @Quickseller (as of last Friday) had earned 552 non-airdropped Merits, while having sent 488 sMerits. The 552 earned merits would account for 276 sent sMerits out of the 488 sent sMerits. The remaining 212 sent sMerits could be part of the initial sMerit airdrop (or not):
 
Since Legendries could have received up to 400 sMerits depending on their activity (see re:Initial sMerit for every rank?), those 212 sent sMerits may have come from the initial sMerit airdrop, from being a Merit Source, or a combination of both. Just by looking at the numbers I don’t think we can determine that he is a Merit Source yet.

You can assert that someone is a Merit Source of the total amount or sent sMerits > (Received floor(sMerits/2) + Max potential airdropped sMerit for the rank), but just before this value there is a grey area due to not knowing the exact amount of airdropped sMerits.


Many appointed Merit Sources tend to have small allowances to start-off with. They also are often people that earn merits (thus generating sMerits), so during the first months, the awarded sMerits from the Merit Source allocation may not exceed the generated/unspent sMerits, and thus remain undetected (as is the case of @Coolcryptovator I presume).

I believe that the maximum that any Legendaries could have received on the initial airdrop would have been 200, so Quickseller has spent an excess of 12 merits which would explain why he has been detected as a merit source.

By the way, it does appear that as of last week, theymos added an additional 7 merit sources (raising the total merit sources from 123 to 130)

I believe he actually added 8 new merit sources because one was removed.

[LoyceV]

I take back everything that I said above, and I suppose that my memory is going bad because it seems that I had erroneously recalled that my initial airdrop of smerits was 200.

I got 200 sMerit airdropped, even though it should have been 400 based on theymos' formula.

From what I've read, QuickSeller had exhausted his sMerit supply, and has been sharing more sMerit than he earned since theymos added 8 Merit sources. So I believe he's a Merit source now.

[suchmoon]

I got 200 sMerit airdropped, even though it should have been 400 based on theymos' formula.

Yep, 200 was the max for legendaries. AFAICT the formula is lacking a division by 2 since values for the other ranks are double of the actual amounts as well.

[bones261]

I take back everything that I said above, and I suppose that my memory is going bad because it seems that I had erroneously recalled that my initial airdrop of smerits was 200.

I got 200 sMerit airdropped, even though it should have been 400 based on theymos' formula.

From what I've read, QuickSeller had exhausted his sMerit supply, and has been sharing more sMerit than he earned since theymos added 8 Merit sources. So I believe he's a Merit source now.

     Oh boy, if this is true, this is going to cause a good deal of controversy. I guess theymos wants the dark side to have a hand in who gets merit as well.  We will see how this goes over. Making sure to put popcorn on my grocery list.

[Quickseller]

I take back everything that I said above, and I suppose that my memory is going bad because it seems that I had erroneously recalled that my initial airdrop of smerits was 200.

I got 200 sMerit airdropped, even though it should have been 400 based on theymos' formula.

From what I've read, QuickSeller had exhausted his sMerit supply, and has been sharing more sMerit than he earned since theymos added 8 Merit sources. So I believe he's a Merit source now.

You are mistaken my friend. Merit spent when you have available source merit comes from your source merit balance, not your sMerit balance. As such, I have some available sMerit that remains unspent.

I am not sure if most merit sources spend more than their source merit each month, but if not, I would imagine many merit sources have considerable sMerit if they earn a decent amount of merit. The way things are looking, I will run out of both source merit and sMerit before the end of the month, but I plan on addressing this by earning more merit.

[LoyceV]

You are mistaken my friend.

Unlikely, let's call it "misunderstood"

Merit spent when you have available source merit comes from your source merit balance, not your sMerit balance.

I meant you were out of sMerit before you were a source, then you started sharing more, which much mean you're a source now.

I am not sure if most merit sources spend more than their source merit each month

The total amount of sMerit transfered is very close to the total amount that sources have to spend. So not all sources empty theirs.

[coinlocket$]

The total amount of sMerit transfered is very close to the total amount that sources have to spend. So not all sources empty theirs.

Yes, also the amount of merit available for sources are different.

Some source can have 200+ merits to send others can have 15+, it's easier to spend 15 merits than 200+.

[JayJuanGee]

The total amount of sMerit transfered is very close to the total amount that sources have to spend. So not all sources empty theirs.

Yes, also the amount of merit available for sources are different.

Some source can have 200+ merits to send others can have 15+, it's easier to spend 15 merits than 200+.

I do understand that from time to time, theymos might change the monthly quantity of smerits that any source receives, but I did not imagine that such monthly allotment would have gone as low as 15 smerits per month. 

Of course, I understand that theymos can do whatever he wants in terms of quantity of source smerits, and I doubt the algorithm would require him to have any number higher than 1 source smerits per month, if he were to so chose, and perhaps some low number merit sources, like 15 source smerits per month, would be either a way of trying someone out or an attempt to get smerits distributed more widely.  I would have imagined that in real practice the real lowest of any source is in the 50 source smerits per month territory... but i don't know any specific examples that are lower than 50 (it is hard to prove a negative), so if anyone knows of any actual examples of a source (without necessarily naming names) who has lower than 50 source smerits per month, then, to me, that would be an interesting revelation of an actual case.   

By the way, the monthly quantity of any smerit source would be difficult to determine, by inference on the lower end, because the source might not be spending all of the source smerit allotment, yet on the upper end, it would be a bit more easily determined, especially if the smerit source is spending a high quantity of smerits that go beyond his/her initial allotments and what s/he is gaining through regular received merits from other members.