SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[nutildah]

51 deleted posts in total this time around. Here's one of my favorites:

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

https://sv.coin.dance/blocks

It’s no secret, BSV is winning the blocksize race.

Funny how you have to invent competitions in order to have one where you are actually winning.

BTC can build a layer that ignores the miners, if BTC ever reaches 20k again it will cost 50$ just to fund a lightning node with an on chain transaction.

This statement highlights the cognitive dissonance of BSVers. How can transaction fees be so high if BTC is ignoring miners? Either transaction fees are high, or miners are being ignored. Both items cannot be present at the same time.

At this rate BSV miners will claim a higher reward from transaction fees over block rewards, this is how bitcoin was meant to be.

Average BSV block reward per day minus fees: $148,950
Average BSV transaction fees per day: $125  

The only way this could possibly happen (before the next halving) is if transaction fees increase by a factor of 1191 while the price remains the same. This will never happen.

Let's compare the same stats for BTC:

Average BTC block reward per day minus fees: $14,400,000
Average BTC transaction fees per day: $136,444

The ratio between block reward and fees for BTC is only 105.5, whereas it is 1191 for BSV! Your entire existence has just been rendered absurd. 

Additionally your last stress test could only produce a block that was 8 MB. Why not just use Bcash? What's the difference? At least the Bcash cult leader doesn't think he's Satoshi.

What a joke.

[JayJuanGee]

51 deleted posts in total this time around. Here's one of my favorites:

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

https://sv.coin.dance/blocks

It’s no secret, BSV is winning the blocksize race.

Funny how you have to invent competitions in order to have one where you are actually winning.

BTC can build a layer that ignores the miners, if BTC ever reaches 20k again it will cost 50$ just to fund a lightning node with an on chain transaction.

This statement highlights the cognitive dissonance of BSVers. How can transaction fees be so high if BTC is ignoring miners? Either transaction fees are high, or miners are being ignored. Both items cannot be present at the same time.

At this rate BSV miners will claim a higher reward from transaction fees over block rewards, this is how bitcoin was meant to be.

Average BSV block reward per day minus fees: $148,950
Average BSV transaction fees per day: $125  

The only way this could possibly happen (before the next halving) is if transaction fees increase by a factor of 1191 while the price remains the same. This will never happen.

Let's compare the same stats for BTC:

Average BTC block reward per day minus fees: $14,400,000
Average BTC transaction fees per day: $136,444

The ratio between block reward and fees for BTC is only 105.5, whereas it is 1191 for BSV! Your entire existence has just been rendered absurd. 

Additionally your last stress test could only produce a block that was 8 MB. Why not just use Bcash? What's the difference? At least the Bcash cult leader doesn't think he's Satoshi.

What a joke.

You had tended to make a lot of decent points arguing with those dweebs in that self-moderated thread, but all of these deleted posts seems to support that a lot of that wonderful posting ends up being a BIG ass waste of time - we are just kind of getting the deleted posts out of context when we see them here.. even though sometime the context might be understood, even if posted here quite later (your sample post is 2.5 months later... so I guess that it stayed posted for 2.5 months before it was deleted.. so maybe there is some value in that?  perhaps?).

[bitserve]

Unlike mine (I am not really complaining) nutildah post seems to be a perfectly ontopic and constructive one. Maybe someone didn't like to face the truth and that was the reason for deletion. Go figure.

[JayJuanGee]

Unlike mine (I am not really complaining) nutildah post seems to be a perfectly ontopic and constructive one. Maybe someone didn't like to face the truth and that was the reason for deletion. Go figure.

Of course, the SV propaganda diptwat is making that thread self-moderated so that he can totally spin bullshit and perhaps mislead innocent people into believing that there is some merit in the snake oil salesman claims  while making it appear as if the thread is a kind of open discussion of the merits of the coin, yet surely not all members are going to realize that there is a difference between a self-moderated thread and an open thread, and they might not realize the whole damned self-moderated thread is a deceptive propaganda piece.  It is too bad, but the forum does seem to allow those kinds of threads that are likely going to facilitate the hurting of some truly innocent people.

By the way, I do believe that it can serve some purposes to make fun of the SV diptwats in various kinds of ways, so even if nutildah might have some abilities to really hone in on their bullshit, sometimes even the more superficial criticisms can have purpose and resonate with people too, in terms of raising red flags about the phony baloney nonsense that gets posted in that thread.

[nutildah]

EXTRA BREAKING NEWS

(its actually 2 days old)

Craig claims he was hacked by Blockstream... before Blockstream was founded; is demanding all communications with Ira Kleiman from them.

https://beincrypto.com/craig-wright-says-blockstream-hacked-him-to-forge-documents

The ongoing case between Craig Wright and the estate of his late business partner Dave Kleiman has taken yet another interesting turn. The controversial figure now claims that Bitcoin developers at Blockstream hacked electronic devices to backdate documents and undermine his case.

The information comes from a Joint Discovery Memorandum filed yesterday. In the document, the defendant’s legal counsel requests access to communications between various groups and individuals connected with Bitcoin’s early history and Kleiman’s brother, Ira. These include Greg Maxwell, the Twitter user with the handle “Contrarian,” Blockstream, Bitcoin Core, and mining pools mining BTC.

The defense alleges that those mentioned may have hacked Craig Wright’s electronic devices and created the backdated documents being used as evidence in the case.

https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1207327447672401920

@Blocksteam hacking Craig, Ramona Watts wants to be paid to be involved in her husband's lawsuit, Tulip Trust...

https://twitter.com/Excellion/status/1207463576060907520


Of course, Faketoshi has provided zero evidence that he was actually hacked.

You can read the referenced court document for yourself here.

There is a 70-page transcript of the latest court hearing here, at the bottom of the page, but it requires a PACER account for purchase...

[bitserve]

^ LOL at... everything.

Wright's wife demanding around $100K to testify is probably the single most funny thing in all that shit.

Everything is so ridiculous that one could argue the guy is really a genius and has a master plan we can't even fathom. or he is the most retarded and reckless person in the world (most probable).

When all this ends, I hope someone make a movie out of it. Jim Carrey would be perfect for the role. He would need to put up some weight though. For the screenplay I think the ones behind "Pain & Gain" would also make a perfect job for this story. The title is easy: "I am Satoshi".

[Cryptotourist]

^ LOL at... everything.
~
Jim Carrey would be perfect for the role.

I went down my - BSV official - deleted posts memory lane, and found this gem:

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

I recommend to the person concerned

1. Don't put all your eggs in one basket" to keep in mind that there is no 100% safe investment and that it is important to diversify!

2. Make and organize your savings before your expenses, so you put your savings aside before you even plan your expenses. This makes it possible to hold his savings project, it's as simple as that!

3. Precisely, when talking about expenses, the successful investor mentions "that purchases of things you don't need will result in sales of things you need".

For those who do not know without going into details I suggest unilateral advice:

Invest in Yourself - Get Confidence - Surround Yourself with the Best - Don't Keep Cash in the Long Term - Observe Stock Market Indices - Understand the Company, Consumer Demand and Product Quality - Diversification - Never Pay Too Much for Shares - Know What to Invest in - Put Money in Long Term - When making a medium or even long term investment, you must be aware of the time it takes to act to achieve an interesting level of profitability - Be Patient - The best investments are the easiest - Do not try to anticipate the market - Continue to learn.

Remember that risk exists when you don't know what you're doing. For my part nChain and their BSV to my blessing.

your advice is wise i thank you for sharing it here

[Iamtutut]

Forgetoshi caught in another forgery: https://twitter.com/gardling/status/1208054855589355522

[TheNewAnon135246]

I am Satoshi, fools

No, you are publically defending one of the biggest frauds in crypto history. BSV will be whiped out in the coming months. Wait and see what happens when you're lying and trying to deceive U.S. courts .

[Iamtutut]

Here's what the faketoshi's lover deleted today on the Bitcoin Shit Version aka BSV thread:

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.

- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs

...

Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.

"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537

 

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin

- https://youtu.be/NSD11dnphg0

Do BTC supporters understand that they are communists yet?

In a sense that the rather love their own power rules, than Satoshi's rules.
Than tell ppl they did Bitcoin, not Satoshi
Cause of ... (brain wash + need sales colors to promote things that do not need promoting)


Plain Hard Facts:
BSV is more BitCoin than any other implementation
CSW is more likely ...

LMAO.

0 conf shitcoin is anything but Bitcoin.
Closed source dev is anything but Bitcoin.
The face of the project calling for the possibility to "reverse or undo" Tx is anything but Bitcoin.

.. the only closed thing here seems to be ur own washed mind

BSV is fully about opencompetition - if you cannot read / understand simple Bitcoin code - u cannot compete.

try harder
 

Read the WP again.
Read Satoshi posts another time.

Some stuff about avoiding double spending.

Then try to troll again.

[Iamtutut]

Guys, let the fun coming:

https://twitter.com/roryhighside/status/1208434774437556224

[Iamtutut]

Total annihilation of faketoshi by Arthur Van Pelt
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1209858790113337344

Best resume of Craig Wright frauds to pose as Satoshi.

Spoiler: there are a lot of them.

Enjoy your reading.

[Iamtutut]

Calvin Ayre was banned in British Columbia Canada:

    20-year trading ban

    20-year director/officer ban (with conditions)

    20-year investor relations ban

Violation:

    Unregistered distribution

    Failure to file insider reports

    Misrepresentations

    Insider trading

    Failure to comply with a Summons

https://www.bcsc.bc.ca/Enforcement/Disciplined_Persons_List/Ayre,_Calvin_Edward/

Thx to https://twitter.com/pmullr/status/1209575377837801472

[TheNewAnon135246]

Total annihilation of faketoshi by Arthur Van Pelt
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1209858790113337344

Best resume of Craig Wright frauds to pose as Satoshi.

Spoiler: there are a lot of them.

Enjoy your reading.

Excellent thread by Arthur. I'd love to see a BSVtard debunk his points.

[Iamtutut]

They block.

As I keep saying, BSV shilling leads to serious brain damage.

[Hueristic]

Total annihilation of faketoshi by Arthur Van Pelt
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1209858790113337344

Best resume of Craig Wright frauds to pose as Satoshi.

Spoiler: there are a lot of them.

Enjoy your reading.

This was a great read, it sidetracked me here which was another good read. I didn't know craig was stalking kleiman.

https://gizmodo.com/the-strange-life-and-death-of-dave-kleiman-a-computer-1747092460

[Iamtutut]

Indeed, interesting article.

[nutildah]

Here's a shocker: now Craig is saying he may never be delivered the private keys to the million BTC.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-27/bitcoin-alleged-creator-says-his-fortune-may-remain-locked

https://markets.businessinsider.com/currencies/news/claimed-bitcoin-creator-says-his-cryptocurrency-riches-could-be-locked-2019-12-1028786649

Wright added that he never said the "private keys" to the other half of the bitcoin fortune would be available or used in January.

"I do not intend to dump my family's BTC as some people suspect or want, as this would hurt many people in the industry," Wright said in the statement to Bloomberg.

But he also said this to his Slack channel, which of course didn't happen either:



And just for fun, here's Craig being booted from a 2018 Bitcoin conference in China:

https://youtu.be/2Rzcgpdj7SA

[Iamtutut]

He's being called out by Satoshilite.

BTW, my posts recently deletedin the BSV thread:

Now fraudtoshi aka Craig Wright writes shit about Hal Finney

https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1173953365342117893 (thanks again to Arthur Van Pelt)


Finney was arguably the major contributor to PGP, so his coding skills were top notch.

See what he wrote about Bitcoin, and we KNOW he mined Bitcoin very early.



What did Satoshi think about Finney ?


Two humble ultra skilled coders with mountains of respect for each other. Just the opposite of the fraud wannabe Satoshi.

Imagine if one day all PoW operating resources will go to BSV. Did you know that you can already store several Terabytes in a micro-SD in 2019.

It's more likely to go on a weekend trip on the moons of Jupiter than having all of POW (I hope you mean SHA256 ASICs, otherwise it's worse than I think) dedicated to BSV.

Undo twitter, learn about twetch

https://youtu.be/I_n1aNbyk2w

Yeah, ask Kevin Pham 

Pedo sv, remember ?

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47130268

"Child abuse images hidden in crypto-currency blockchain

Images of child sexual abuse have been found embedded in the system powering a high-profile crypto-currency.

Somebody added the illegal images to the core ledger of Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) by using a payment processor."

It is just a matter of time until all of BTC is uploaded to the BitCoin blockchain
Scaling, who can and who cant, without it, bye bye

Tell me when BSV moves 1 billion dollars in a single block.

"peer to peer electronic cash system".

Nobody is forcing you to use Segwit by the way

Suuuurrrre.

People changed the bitcoin protocol.... other people didn't adopt those protocol alterations (segwit and opdsv).   It's quite simple.

Nobody is forcing you to use a Bech32 adress, you can use a Legacy adress.

https://medium.com/@buddhasource/bitcoin-legacy-vs-segwit-wallet-address-what-is-the-difference-cb2e71ab8381

Nobody is forcing u to use a coin that runs on up to 3 different histories, has nothing to do with BitCOin any more - but has ticker BTC

Use something much more transparent and scalable

Closed source development is not transparent.     

hv_ is a dumb BSV shill and liar:

https://www.reddit.com/r/bsv/comments/edr0av/massive_replay_theft_coming_to_a_scamchain_near/
Step 1. Find all transactions on Bitcoin which pay to P2SH outputs with known redeem scripts and who's inputs haven't been spent on BSV.

Step 2. After the hardfork, replay all those transactions on BSV. This is permitted because "After the Genesis activation, the original signature hashing algorithm, which is still in use on the BTC blockchain, is valid for outputs created before the Genesis activation."

Step 3. Immediately after (or even in the same block), collect all those newly created P2SH outputs. Because they were created by the replays post rule change they can now be taken without access to their private keys. This is possible because of the first paragraph I quoted and the last one.

So yes according to the 'spec' P2SH is still enforced for old coins but after the hardfork replay protection is not enforced. So replay can be used to make a boatload of new P2SH outputs which can then be taken. Replay protection post-fork point would even prevent anything except the first move of these coins from being replayed-- you couldn't replay their whole history up to current or at least the point of invalidation due to coinbase mixing. The rules look like they were specifically designed to have this effect, otherwise they're really weird.

After all, if the goal were "original behaviour" why would replay protection be selectively defeated only before the fork point instead of just applying the original algorithm going forward?

Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.

- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs

...

Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.

"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537

 

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin

- https://youtu.be/NSD11dnphg0

Do BTC supporters understand that they are communists yet?

In a sense that the rather love their own power rules, than Satoshi's rules.
Than tell ppl they did Bitcoin, not Satoshi
Cause of ... (brain wash + need sales colors to promote things that do not need promoting)


Plain Hard Facts:
BSV is more BitCoin than any other implementation
CSW is more likely ...

LMAO.

0 conf shitcoin is anything but Bitcoin.
Closed source dev is anything but Bitcoin.
The face of the project calling for the possibility to "reverse or undo" Tx is anything but Bitcoin.

.. the only closed thing here seems to be ur own washed mind

BSV is fully about opencompetition - if you cannot read / understand simple Bitcoin code - u cannot compete.

try harder
 

Read the WP again.
Read Satoshi posts another time.

Some stuff about avoiding double spending.

Then try to troll again.

That's all folks.

[TheNewAnon135246]

I love how Craig/Coingeek already started damage control.

As I’ve explained in court proceedings, I believe I will receive information in January 2020 that will enable us to identify coins I mined into my companies in 2009 and 2010, but cannot be certain that all of that information will in fact arrive. I have not said the private keys to those coins would become available, or if so, actually used, in January 2020. In the next few weeks, we will be holding trust meetings and working out the next steps going forward in 2020.

Anyone who believes Craig has room temperature IQ.