iv4n: Looking for feedback - should the negative tag remain?

[UmerIdrees]

I will let you do the math, check my profile and how old I am, then check history and you will see was I affected by these personally and directly, and try to imagine in how many ways indirectly!

The history does not count as only a one incident is enough in the court of Law, but having a good history does make your case strong.

So you think I should accept my new title as a dishonest person who cries for money around because life is not fair, because you spoke your mind honestly, and your reaction to it is none of your concern?!

If you admit that you had some intentions of getting the money when you wrote the review, you will be remembered as a honest person.

Now here is what you can do.

If I get the coins I will play and I will be able to say something more about 1xbit casino! Cheers!

You had got the coins but you still did not play. Go play with those coins and share your honest review again.

In the end, I didn't even know I was paid for that... I just checked that address, $30 bucks still sit there!

Lets resolve this by peace.  

[iv4n]

I will let you do the math, check my profile and how old I am, then check history and you will see was I affected by these personally and directly, and try to imagine in how many ways indirectly!

The history does not count as only a one incident is enough in the court of Law, but having a good history does make your case strong.

So you think I should accept my new title as a dishonest person who cries for money around because life is not fair, because you spoke your mind honestly, and your reaction to it is none of your concern?!

If you admit that you had some intentions of getting the money when you wrote the review, you will be remembered as a honest person.

Now here is what you can do.

If I get the coins I will play and I will be able to say something more about 1xbit casino! Cheers!

You had got the coins but you still did not play. Go play with those coins and share your honest review again.

In the end, I didn't even know I was paid for that... I just checked that address, $30 bucks still sit there!

Lets resolve this by peace.  

I wanted to resolve this peacefully days ago...

I can admit that I had intentions to get those $30 and to spend them like I always do with the "free money"! But to admit that I was desperate and that I am someone who begs for money is something I can't accept! After all, that money still sits there, that shows something, right?

I don't know why Jolly doesn't admit that he overreacted here, without knowing all the facts... numerous people wrote their opinions, and I think there's nobody here who totally agrees with him about this!

[nutildah]

I agree that the negative is too harsh and think it should be changed to a neutral. From a trade risk perspective, the review he left poses minimal damage, seeing as how there's already a bunch of warnings about 1xbit in that specific thread (and elsewhere).

He also writes posts that some people seem to enjoy and is known in the Gambling section.

Should DT be tagging members for leaving anything other than negatively-worded reviews for what are in all likelihood scam services?

Sometimes yes if the scam element is obvious, however, it someone realizes what they did wasn't worth it and is unlikely to do it again, I think the negs should be removed or at least downgraded to neutrals.

One question I have for @iv4n is: would you do it all over again if given the chance?

Bear in mind I have no moral judgment about you either way, that's not what this should be about anyway.

[iv4n]

I agree that the negative is too harsh and think it should be changed to a neutral. From a trade risk perspective, the review he left poses minimal damage, seeing as how there's already a bunch of warnings about 1xbit in that specific thread (and elsewhere).

He also writes posts that some people seem to enjoy and is known in the Gambling section.

Should DT be tagging members for leaving anything other than negatively-worded reviews for what are in all likelihood scam services?

Sometimes yes if the scam element is obvious, however, it someone realizes what they did wasn't worth it and is unlikely to do it again, I think the negs should be removed or at least downgraded to neutrals.

One question I have for @iv4n is: would you do it all over again if given the chance?

Bear in mind I have no moral judgment about you either way, that's not what this should be about anyway.

I write from my mind, and I wrote this specific post from my mind, like all others! I still don't understand how can someone see this post as "shilling for 1xbit and chasing for money"!? That was an honest post and I wrote what I felt at that moment, yes for some possible reward that will be spent on fun and trying the site that many people marked as a scam, what I wrote at the beginning of that post! At that time they got a new manager on the forum, they wrote they will pay more attention to accusations and solving them, so I decided to open the site for the first time and check it...

I have no problems with my post but looks like I should be a lot more aware of scam accusations around (and there are plenty of them for almost all services) and act accordingly! So before writing my own opinion and about my own experience, I should mention all scam accusations around and possible risks when dealing with a specific service!

I have been accused of something I am not guilty of! Even you wrote "the review he left poses minimal damage", is it minimal or no damage at all! How this one post can be "Writing highly dubious and selective reviews for getting paid by scammers"? Why it's dubious and selective... anyone can open 1xbit and will see they accept many coins and they really have an incredible choice of games... as a crypto gambler, I am attracted by that!

[dkbit98]

Jolly I think you should really stop this drama and change his negative feedback to neutral, that was also suggested by majority of DT members here in this topic including me.

We can all agree that his post for 1xbit has zero value, but I think that he learned his lesson and he will think twice before writing something similar in future.

[JollyGood]

Should DT be tagging members for leaving anything other than negatively-worded reviews for what are in all likelihood scam services?

Sometimes yes if the scam element is obvious, however, it someone realizes what they did wasn't worth it and is unlikely to do it again, I think the negs should be removed or at least downgraded to neutrals.

He has mentioned he sees nothing wrong with his post but also says that he should have been aware of scam accusations so that is a much better position he is in now than before therefore the feedback will be changed to neutral.

I have no problems with my post but looks like I should be a lot more aware of scam accusations around (and there are plenty of them for almost all services) and act accordingly! So before writing my own opinion and about my own experience, I should mention all scam accusations around and possible risks when dealing with a specific service!

It is nice to know you reflected on this and are aware that your posts can have an impact. Thank you iv4n, the feedback will be changed to neutral.

Jolly I think you should really stop this drama and change his negative feedback to neutral, that was also suggested by majority of DT members here in this topic including me.

We can all agree that his post for 1xbit has zero value, but I think that he learned his lesson and he will think twice before writing something similar in future.

I hope he has learned from this experience, it certainly seems he has from what he wrote.

Thank you to all who commented in this thread, I appreciate any input regardless of where you stood on the issue. The feedback will be changed to neutral therefore it is time to lock this thread.