⭕ BitList.co - Mixers ' Exchanges ' Services ' Casinos

[NotATether]

It's not going to be a big problem if you are buying bitcoin like this once or twice, but bank can always mark this transactions as suspicious and ask you to provide more information what you are purchasing exactly.
It would be interesting to see what this payments are registered like in bank statements.

There should not be a problem when  P2P trading though, especially when the buyer is sending your cash from inside he same country and it's a small amount - no more than a few hundred dollars, because such transactions are pretty normal from the bank's point of view.

What you don't want to do is make so many trades with the same bank that it starts to get suspicious with all these wires coming all of a sudden. I like to use an interval of at least once a month because that aligns with people's paydays.

[dkbit98]

I have used SolCard to pay for a Hulu subscription and some other things and haven’t had any issues. They are partnered with Alchemy Pay so if you’ve used cards from another Alchemy Pay partner, like Bit.Store, you will notice they work similarly.

I used Bit.store cards before and they worked (mostly) fine but I had some issues with them and I lost some money because they canceled one of my cards and I was not able to receive refund for my purchase.
They also changed a lot of thing recently and they added more restrictions for some websites.
Do you know what is the difference between SolCard and Bit.Store, if there is any?  

There should not be a problem when  P2P trading though, especially when the buyer is sending your cash from inside he same country and it's a small amount - no more than a few hundred dollars, because such transactions are pretty normal from the bank's point of view.

Like I said, it should not a problem if this doesn't happen often, but they can always find some connection with Bitcoin and flag your bank account.

[NotATether]

@icopress Your images for freebitcoin and roobet are broken.

[dansus021]

@icopress I am just curious how to add more website on your site and what is the requirement

I been using services like Vultr VPS and Surfhsark VPN and I usually pay it using crypto as far as I know they didn't require KYC so are two of them eligible to get on your list

[serversguru]

Hello,

Just stumble upon your website today. Thank you for listing us!
I wanted to correct that we (servers.guru) do have a tor onion link which is : srvguru7bjzzjba7xy2hnx2ju4k77qy4eum2h3tgudwc3j2zof4aggyd.onion

Would be great if it could be corrected!

Thank you.

[The Change Ltd]

  Good afternoon, we would like to see ourselves in this list, we are working for the second month without any complaints and have not a small deposit, as well as the administration of the project is not anonymous (we plan to do an official registration)!

[paid2]

Bump!

[examplens]

@icopress, A suggestion for you. You should implement some social media add-ons on this platform. I tried to share the website link on FB and X (formerly Twitter) and the post only contained the link, without any tags or description.
For example Twitter https://developer.x.com/en/docs/x-for-websites/cards/overview/abouts-cards
Or Fb https://developers.facebook.com/docs/sharing/webmasters/images/

[NotATether]

@icopress, A suggestion for you. You should implement some social media add-ons on this platform. I tried to share the website link on FB and X (formerly Twitter) and the post only contained the link, without any tags or description.
For example Twitter https://developer.x.com/en/docs/x-for-websites/cards/overview/abouts-cards
Or Fb https://developers.facebook.com/docs/sharing/webmasters/images/

Does anybody even use Facebook anymore? (At least among the crypto population)

[dkbit98]

Does anybody even use Facebook anymore? (At least among the crypto population)

examplens is obviously using it
I think that Instagram has the same owners as facebook, and they are known for privacy violations.
Most crypto oriented people this days are probably hanging on twitter and nostr this days.

[examplens]

Does anybody even use Facebook anymore? (At least among the crypto population)

examplens is obviously using it
I think that Instagram has the same owners as facebook, and they are known for privacy violations.
Most crypto oriented people this days are probably hanging on twitter and nostr this days.

Some time ago, a project I was involved in required knowledge of FB ads, so I was forced to familiarize myself with it.
Seen from the point of view of promotion, I often got better results from FB posts compared to Twitter, at least when it comes to ordinary users, not influencers or big accounts. I am referring to crypto things.
I would not ignore the potential of promotion on social networks, regardless of whether we think that no one uses it.

[bitmover]

Does anybody even use Facebook anymore? (At least among the crypto population)

examplens is obviously using it
I think that Instagram has the same owners as facebook, and they are known for privacy violations.
Most crypto oriented people this days are probably hanging on twitter and nostr this days.

Some time ago, a project I was involved in required knowledge of FB ads, so I was forced to familiarize myself with it.
Seen from the point of view of promotion, I often got better results from FB posts compared to Twitter, at least when it comes to ordinary users, not influencers or big accounts. I am referring to crypto things.
I would not ignore the potential of promotion on social networks, regardless of whether we think that no one uses it.

I think promoting a mixer-related website on Facebook is a bit contradictory. No one seeking privacy would ever search on Facebook...

I agree that adding the tags/meta description/etc to easily share with images and title is important, because it is also useful in different platforms.

[examplens]

I think promoting a mixer-related website on Facebook is a bit contradictory. No one seeking privacy would ever search on Facebook...

Now you are putting me in a situation where I have to defend FB. 
Above I gave only an example of what it looks like if someone were to share a bitlist.co link on that network. I wouldn't go into the usefulness of that here, although I often got better results from there than from "crypto-friendly" Twitter. I'm talking from the aspect of push site traffic.
Is it logical that someone wants privacy on FB, probably not, but I would not ignore the millions of users of that network.

Finally, in addition to the collection of mixers, Bitlist.co has listed casinos, debit cards, exchanges and other services. It is not exclusively focused on mixers.

[dkbit98]

I would not ignore the potential of promotion on social networks, regardless of whether we think that no one uses it.

I am not ignoring them, that is why I said that twitter is currently better for purpose of advertising Bitlist.co

I think promoting a mixer-related website on Facebook is a bit contradictory. No one seeking privacy would ever search on Facebook...

Probably, but there are exceptions for every rule.
Some people are using facebook only for their marketplace, others for contact with friends and family, but Zuckerberg is using all of them

Another suggestion I have for icopress is to suggest listing of BitList.co to Kycnot.me website:
https://kycnot.me/request/service

[icopress]

Another suggestion I have for icopress is to suggest listing of BitList.co to Kycnot.me website:
https://kycnot.me/request/service

Thanks for the suggestion! It's on my to-do list (I've even spoken to kycnotme's CEO)

[Kruw]

Thanks for the suggestion! It's on my to-do list (I've even spoken to kycnotme's CEO)

A month ago, I sent you an urgent message about 4 coinjoin phishing sites you have listed. They are still there. Explain.

[examplens]

I think now is the time to remove services that have been offline for several months. It's obvious, it's not a temporary break and it won't come back. If, for any reason, there is a need for such services to continue to be listed, there should probably be a special category for such services, graveyard or similar.

[examplens]

In the meantime, there was a small upgrade, so let's mention it here. Each category on the site has its own unique link, simplified navigation and sharing

Clicking each tab will now go to its respective URL, just like visiting the URL will go to its respective tab.

Example:
https://bitlist.co/services
https://bitlist.co/debit-cards

[paid2]

I think now is the time to remove services that have been offline for several months. It's obvious, it's not a temporary break and it won't come back. If, for any reason, there is a need for such services to continue to be listed, there should probably be a special category for such services, graveyard or similar.

Yes for the idea of a graveyard, even if "offline" status is already enough IMO (talking about special category).
But in the meantime I think it would be a mistake to completely remove links from offline services, as this lets users know that a service is not accessible and can avoid them falling into the trap of phishing copies.

[examplens]

I am currently looking at the PGP signed letter verification tool https://bitlist.co/pgp it seems that this type of verification is mainly used by mixers. The only exceptions from non-mixers are eXch and Gingerwallet.
Why do other exchangers avoid PGP fingerprint verification?