🌐 Bridgoro.com - Instant Crypto Exchange | #kycfree ✅

[Bridgoro]

No-KYC means you also won't get my IP-address, so I'm not going to stop using Tor.

We don't collect any user data other than email addresses, which are used only for account registration and login purposes.
But as we always say, it's up to you what browser to use. You may face problems with logging in to our exchange, as you are having problems with just visiting Google page using the TOR browser (because of CAPTCHA).
For additional privacy, we strongly recommend creating a dedicated email address for Bridgoro on privacy-oriented services such as Tutanota, StartMail, or ProtonMail.

An Onion version of the platform (without CAPTCHA) will be released once the main exchange version is complete.

Maybe you can expedite this as a privacy feature

The success of our P2P exchange depends on building an active user base, which requires attracting more participants.
As you know, only a small percentage of internet users are familiar with the Onion network (darknet).
That said, an Onion mirror of the exchange is already planned and will begin development after the successful launch of the current version.

TOR browser doesn't work well with captcha, so there are difficulties in passing it.

Maybe a different captcha can work, Protonmail has a much easier one (for humans).

At the moment, our main focus is on bug tracking and carefully listening to our testers to improve the overall UX.
Once the current bugs are resolved, we will experiment with alternative CAPTCHA systems and let users choose the one they prefer.

I don't like installing unknown software, and I don't want them on my system without VM. But as I never use those coins, I'll just skip them.

Of course, whether to install additional wallets is completely up to you, so we don’t force it.
To clarify: if you already use Monero GUI and Electrum, then installing officially verified browser extensions such as MetaMask (ETH), SolFlare (SOL), or TronLink (TRX) shouldn't be an issue.
But again, the choice is yours.

This is a BIG problem! You're basically asking users to trust you (to be semi-decentralized). Now it looks like a regular website, but with the additional risk of losing coins because of a bad smart contract.
All I see is an address. I can't see when it was created, and even if it was just fresly created, it could come from a regular wallet.
This is one of the reasons I've never used "decentralized" exchanges: when it comes to the details, I can't verify but have to trust. I'm not in crypto to trust people, and I've seen enough reasons not to trust anyone.

We fully understand your concern. Many people will initially think that any new crypto platform might be a scam.
That's a normal reaction.
To address this directly, at the start, our exchange will have maximum amount restrictions.
This is both for user protection and to limit unnecessary risks on our side. Initially, the maximum one-time exchange amount will be $5k in USD equivalent (for high-level accounts).
In the unlikely event of an issue, we, as guarantors, will restore the lost funds to one or both parties. While the chances are extremely small, we've prepared a plan to cover this scenario.
Keep in mind that development has already cost us over 7 months of R&D.
The value of that effort is far greater than any possible short-term scam (10x more than the maximum one-time transaction limit).
It simply wouldn't make sense to spend so much time and resources to risk everything for $5k.

Finally, once the bugs are fixed and we reach the final launch stage, we will conduct a full audit of the code and system.
This won't only increase trust but also serve as strong proof of reliability and great publicity for the platform.

I'm starting to think you're mixing up testnet3 and testnet4: your Beta guide linked to several testnet4 faucets, which made me think that's what you're using, but other parts of the guide make it look like you're using the old testnet. You should probably use the most recent version, which is much easier to get.

We are using BTC Testnet v3. If you need test BTC (tBTC), here are some working faucets we recently tested:
https://cryptopump.info/
https://testnet.help/en/btcfaucet/testnet
Alternatively, just send us your tBTC address and we will be happy to send you some directly.

I took one of those offers, and made another deposit on the latest testnet chain. Let's see.... Update: "DEPOSIT TIMEOUT" again

Could you please send us the TX Hash of your BTC transaction (for the BTC -> XMR offer), so that we can check it on our side?

My post was kinda "work in progress", hence the "messy notes ahead". I'll just quote myself there.

Please feel free to send us your notes anytime and we will do our best to provide clear and precise answers to all your questions.


Can we use some of your questions for our upcoming FAQ section?

[btcnbegun]

Who’s going to fund the exchange wallet since this website is created in Mar 2025?

Good question!
At the moment project is funded directly by our team. There are two devs behind the Bridgoro exchange, and we are covering this from our own funds to ensure everything runs smoothly during the Beta Test phase and beyond.
We completely understand that, being a new project means trust is essential. Every established project was once new, and we believe that shouldn't stop new ideas from being built and shared. Our goal is to prove reliability step by step and show through our work that the project deserves the community's trust.
And another reason for the current Beta Test show users how the exchange works on testnet networks, so users during tests won't risk their funds.

Are you asking to put our funds for the subscription?

[Bridgoro]

Are you asking to put our funds for the subscription?

We don't ask for any funds, and there isn't even a subscription option on our platform.
Right now, we are in the Beta Test phase, where only Bitcointalk members are invited to participate.
All testing is done on testnet networks with testnet tokens, which have no real-world value so there are no risks involved.
Testnet tokens can be obtained via free faucets. How to get testnet tokens can be found on our GitBook page.

On top of that, we've allocated a $1.3k reward pool from our own funds for the TOP 10 active users.
It's not a huge pool, but it's a start and we want to give back to the community that helps us shape the project.

You can find more details about Beta Test participation on this thread.

[LoyceV]

No-KYC means you also won't get my IP-address, so I'm not going to stop using Tor.

We don't collect any user data other than email addresses, which are used only for account registration and login purposes.

I read that, but I have no reason to believe it. Don't take it personally, this isn't just for your site, I have no reason to believe any site that makes the same claim. Better safe than sorry!

As you know, only a small percentage of internet users are familiar with the Onion network

For a non-KYC service, I'd expect a much larger share of privacy oriented users than the average internet user.

To clarify: if you already use Monero GUI and Electrum, then installing officially verified browser extensions such as MetaMask (ETH), SolFlare (SOL), or TronLink (TRX) shouldn't be an issue.

I never install browser extensions either

But again, the choice is yours.

I always choose for privacy

We fully understand your concern. Many people will initially think that any new crypto platform might be a scam.
That's a normal reaction.
To address this directly, at the start, our exchange will have maximum amount restrictions.
This is both for user protection and to limit unnecessary risks on our side. Initially, the maximum one-time exchange amount will be $5k in USD equivalent (for high-level accounts).
In the unlikely event of an issue, we, as guarantors, will restore the lost funds to one or both parties. While the chances are extremely small, we've prepared a plan to cover this scenario.
Keep in mind that development has already cost us over 7 months of R&D.
The value of that effort is far greater than any possible short-term scam (10x more than the maximum one-time transaction limit).
It simply wouldn't make sense to spend so much time and resources to risk everything for $5k.

I've been around long enough to recognize a promising project over just another copy/paste scam site. I count yours in the first category. But I've also been around long enough to see promising sites disappear without a trace, even without a clear reason. This one for example. I get your argument that $5k won't be worth an exit scam after so much work, but again, I've been around long enough to know the possibility of a long con. I'm not saying that's what's going to happen, but it would be really nice if you can prove it's impossible in your semi-decentralized system.

We are using BTC Testnet v3.

In that case, you should really remove the links to v4-faucets.

Alternatively, just send us your tBTC address and we will be happy to send you some directly.

Please do: I got 0.0001 to tb1qck9tluyepn87txve4pwdnwejlfwnygp895upj8 (v3) from a faucet, but it's only enough for one transaction. I regret not keeping some. Faucets are sad nowadays (I've seen days where real Bitcoin faucets paid more than current testnet faucets).
Let's try this again: now it notices my deposit

I took one of those offers, and made another deposit on the latest testnet chain. Let's see.... Update: "DEPOSIT TIMEOUT" again

Could you please send us the TX Hash of your BTC transaction (for the BTC -> XMR offer), so that we can check it on our side?

9d97e02ca3abe43fd1a513a689f599e8d263eab1d76b0d6b7bddb49f5e7cb0f9
But this was on v4.

Can we use some of your questions for our upcoming FAQ section?

Sure!

[Bridgoro]

I read that, but I have no reason to believe it. Don't take it personally, this isn't just for your site, I have no reason to believe any site that makes the same claim. Better safe than sorry!

No problem and we completely understand.

For a non-KYC service, I'd expect a much larger share of privacy oriented users than the average internet user.

We will work on it.

I never install browser extensions either

Noted.

I always choose for privacy

That's a good point.

I've been around long enough to recognize a promising project over just another copy/paste scam site. I count yours in the first category. But I've also been around long enough to see promising sites disappear without a trace, even without a clear reason. This one for example. I get your argument that $5k won't be worth an exit scam after so much work, but again, I've been around long enough to know the possibility of a long con. I'm not saying that's what's going to happen, but it would be really nice if you can prove it's impossible in your semi-decentralized system.

We prefer not to make empty promises, but to show our intentions through actions.
Long live privacy.

In that case, you should really remove the links to v4-faucets.

Updated the links to working tBTC faucets.

Please do: I got 0.0001 to tb1qck9tluyepn87txve4pwdnwejlfwnygp895upj8 (v3) from a faucet, but it's only enough for one transaction. I regret not keeping some. Faucets are sad nowadays (I've seen days where real Bitcoin faucets paid more than current testnet faucets).
Let's try this again: now it notices my deposit

Sent you 0.0012345 tBTC.

9d97e02ca3abe43fd1a513a689f599e8d263eab1d76b0d6b7bddb49f5e7cb0f9

Unfortunately, we couldn't find your transaction on the Testnet BlockExplorer.
Please try again using Testnet v3.

Sure!

Thank you!

[LoyceV]

Sent you 0.0012345 tBTC.

Thanks!
Question: what does "Release ready, waiting for confirmation" mean? My deposit has 300+ confirmations, my withdrawal isn't showing yet.

[Bridgoro]

Thanks!

You are welcome!

Question: what does "Release ready, waiting for confirmation" mean? My deposit has 300+ confirmations, my withdrawal isn't showing yet.

What trading pair? Is it your created offer or you accepted someone's offer?

[LoyceV]

What trading pair? Is it your created offer or you accepted someone's offer?

I accepted a BTC > XMR offer.

[Bridgoro]

I accepted a BTC > XMR offer.

Release Ready, Waiting for Confirmation means that the XMR is currently locked and waiting to be unlocked before it can be sent.
On the Monero blockchain, this usually takes up to 20 minutes. This delay is related to the Monero protocol itself, not our platform.

Please let us know once your deal is marked as Completed.
If it remains stuck in Release Ready status for more than 20 minutes, just write here and we will investigate it for you.

[LoyceV]

If it remains stuck in Release Ready status for more than 20 minutes, just write here and we will investigate it for you.

It's been much more than 20 minutes:

Code:

Created on 8/20/2025, 2:34:48 PM

Deposit TX:

Code:

f0c2a706bb17ae8bac54f292a74ac5ca1ef28f85a67430501f07de6625a9843d

[Bridgoro]

If it remains stuck in Release Ready status for more than 20 minutes, just write here and we will investigate it for you.

It's been much more than 20 minutes:

Code:

Created on 8/20/2025, 2:34:48 PM

Deposit TX:

Code:

f0c2a706bb17ae8bac54f292a74ac5ca1ef28f85a67430501f07de6625a9843d

I've found the stuck offer.
We'll investigate it and share the details here once the review is complete.
Status: [Added to Backlog]

UPDATE: Can you send a screenshot of this deal's popup screen with amount and other details, please? I would like to check the data to see if this is the right deal.

[LoyceV]

Can you send a screenshot of this deal's popup screen with amount and other details, please? I would like to check the data to see if this is the right deal.

[Bridgoro]

Much appreciated!
We will take a closer look at this and aim to provide you with a report by tomorrow. At the moment, we still have quite a lot on our plate to fix, but we will make sure to get back to you as soon as possible.

[dkbit98]

Since you've already identified a bug, we kindly ask you to report it in our [BOUNTY] Bridgoro Beta Test thread, including a brief note on which browser you used and how the issue can be reproduced.
As the first to submit a valid bug report, you currently have a strong chance of securing 1st place with a $350 reward. Once submitted, your report will be logged into our Beta Test bug list to help us improve the system.

Sure, I will try to write my report and explain it best I can.
Now I tried to reproduce the same bug again, but I run into another bug that is not allowing me to login to my account, and showing some error User not assigned.
I will check everything tomorrow once again and see if this issue are related with my browser or something else.

[Hamza2424]

I just read the basic core system of the site, it is very clever and creative idea of using buffer wallet because this increases the security but for this purpose burner wallet addresses couldn't be used? Can you tell more about the collector module that can ustuck the transaction, how you made this or acquired it from third party although the basic core system is not very complex but very effiecient.

The minimum amount is fixed at $30 I guess in beta stage the amount is not fixed but when the mainnet will be released the minimum amount will be fixed at $30 why is that? If you have already an answer posted to this question you can just give me the post link. I did not get much idea about the gamified system to earn BRGX, I think they are still under development right?

[Faisal2202]

I just read the basic core system of the site, it is very clever and creative idea of using buffer wallet because this increases the security but for this purpose burner wallet addresses couldn't be used? Can you tell more about the collector module that can ustuck the transaction, how you made this or acquired it from third party although the basic core system is not very complex but very effiecient.

The minimum amount is fixed at $30 I guess in beta stage the amount is not fixed but when the mainnet will be released the minimum amount will be fixed at $30 why is that? If you have already an answer posted to this question you can just give me the post link. I did not get much idea about the gamified system to earn BRGX, I think they are still under development right?

Your question is valid one, I think buffer wallets are best because the management of books is easier with buffer wallets then burner wallets, It act as a single middlemen, while there willl be numerous burner wallets and keeping the track of the funds is very hard. Collector module looks like a smart contract operational module and I don't think they have to get it from someone else they must have made it by themselves.

I also had the same question about $30 fixed amount, but I think someone has already asked this question but I guess not here in this ANN, well let's hear more from the team on this.

[Bridgoro]

Sure, I will try to write my report and explain it best I can.
Now I tried to reproduce the same bug again, but I run into another bug that is not allowing me to login to my account, and showing some error User not assigned.
I will check everything tomorrow once again and see if this issue are related with my browser or something else.

Thank you for being part of our Beta Testers community!
All of your participations have helped us uncover a number of unexpected bugs, many of which will be fixed very soon.

By the way, I saw your report on the [BOUNTY] Beta thread, and it's already been added to our backlog for further investigation and fixing.

I just read the basic core system of the site, it is very clever and creative idea of using buffer wallet because this increases the security but for this purpose burner wallet addresses couldn't be used?
Can you tell more about the collector module that can unstuck the transaction, how you made this or acquired it from third party although the basic core system is not very complex but very efficient.

Thank you for the thoughtful questions and for taking the time to dive into the core system!

Regarding Burner Wallet Addresses:
We intentionally chose to use escrow Buffer Wallets instead. Burner wallets could technically be applied, but they don't provide the same level of traceability and control the system needs for automated rollbacks and dispute prevention. With buffer wallets, each deal creates a unique wallet address that allows the system to securely lock funds until both parties confirm their part of the transaction. This gives us more transparency and reduces risks compared to simple burner addresses.
In addition, if funds become stuck in a Buffer Wallet, the Collector Module is able to retrieve them, since it is the only component with access to Buffer Wallets.

As for the Collector Module:
This is our own implementation, not something we acquired from a third party. Its role is to automatically monitor deals and step in whenever a transaction gets “stuck” (for example, if one side has deposited but the status doesn’t update properly). The module is designed to detect such edge cases and trigger a rollback or finalize the release, depending on the blockchain confirmations.
More about how Buffer Wallets work and the Collector Module can be found on our GitBook page.

You are right,  the core idea is not overly complex, but that's intentional. Our goal was to keep it efficient and transparent for users, while still making sure that users don't lose funds because of technical issues or unexpected delays.

The minimum amount is fixed at $30 I guess in beta stage the amount is not fixed but when the mainnet will be released the minimum amount will be fixed at $30 why is that? If you have already an answer posted to this question you can just give me the post link. I did not get much idea about the gamified system to earn BRGX, I think they are still under development right?

During the Beta Test phase, we initially set the minimum exchange amount to $10 (USD equivalent), but today we raised it to $12 (USD equivalent).
This adjustment was necessary because free faucets provide only small amounts of test tokens.

On mainnet, however, the minimum amount will be higher: most likely a bit above $30 (USD equivalent). This is due to the issues of Dead Wallet Amounts and Dust Transactions. We would gladly lower the minimum if it were possible, but unfortunately, blockchain limitations force us to raise it instead to avoid stuck transactions.

Once we've double-checked the Dead Wallet and Dust Transaction handling, we will inform the community of the final minimum exchange amount for mainnet.

[Bridgoro]

If it remains stuck in Release Ready status for more than 20 minutes, just write here and we will investigate it for you.

It's been much more than 20 minutes:

Code:

Created on 8/20/2025, 2:34:48 PM

Deposit TX:

Code:

f0c2a706bb17ae8bac54f292a74ac5ca1ef28f85a67430501f07de6625a9843d

Hi LoyceV,
We've identified the cause of the stuck Release Ready transaction. It was due to a Dust Transaction issue.
Even though there will be no Service Fee on mainnet for the first 6 months, during the Beta Test, we added a Service Fee % to each transaction (applied only to testnet tokens) for testing purposes.
In this case, because the exchange amount was very small, the Service Fee amount ended up being too tiny to be processed on the Bitcoin network. As a result, the transaction got stuck.

As mentioned in the [BOUNTY] Beta thread, we are already working on fixing the Dead Wallet Amount and Dust Transaction issues, so this problem will be resolved in upcoming updates.
Status: [Added to backlog]

[btcnbegun]

Are you asking to put our funds for the subscription?

We don't ask for any funds, and there isn't even a subscription option on our platform.
Right now, we are in the Beta Test phase, where only Bitcointalk members are invited to participate.
All testing is done on testnet networks with testnet tokens, which have no real-world value so there are no risks involved.
Testnet tokens can be obtained via free faucets. How to get testnet tokens can be found on our GitBook page.

On top of that, we've allocated a $1.3k reward pool from our own funds for the TOP 10 active users.
It's not a huge pool, but it's a start and we want to give back to the community that helps us shape the project.

You can find more details about Beta Test participation on this thread.

Are you asking members to get rewards till Q2 '26 to find bugs using testnet tokens?

[Bridgoro]

Are you asking members to get rewards till Q2 '26 to find bugs using testnet tokens?

I understand why Bitcointalk members are often suspicious of newcomers.
Before asking further questions, please take a moment to read our [ANN] and [BOUNTY] posts: all the key information is clearly written there.

To clarify once again:
We don't ask anything from forum members.
As a new project, we've launched the Beta Test phase, where we invite interested users to participate by testing the platform and reporting bugs.
As a token of our gratitude, the TOP 10 most active testers will receive financial rewards.

The Beta phase runs until August 31, 2025, and rewards will be distributed within 1-2 days after we finish counting and reviewing all bug reports from each user.