Charlie Kirk shot dead

[Solodoski]

Politics is a career like every other profession. Politics has to do with views and ideas, so I don't understand why someone will kill another person because they don't share the same idea or view with them.
I really condem the killing of Charlie Kirk, because I think he has right to his opinion and it's for the people to either agree or disagree with his idea,  but resulting to shooting him is very wrong and I don't think any right thinking person will support such act. Politics should not be violence,  but rather it should should be platform for us to share ideas and agree or disagree. My condolences to his family.

[Johnlomape]

I don't know whether he is the culprit or not, but what is circulating this photo in our discussion environment.

The picture is not clear so one can't really tell if it was a gun he was holding like that or not but the police can use some technology to make it more clear or dictate if that was a gun he was holding, if they do that and find out it was a gun he was holding then he should be arrested, and interrogated to find out if he was really the one that shot at Charlie Kirk because it may be a gun his holding but it could be for self defense as long as he is license to hold that gun when going out then one can't accuse him for the murder of Charlie Kirk.
The crime should be investigated very well so as to fine out who really killed Charlie Kirk, I believe there should be CCTV cameras in that place he was shot and people in that place may know where the gun shot came from, I believe if the police and FBI dig into that matter they will find the curprit.

This is not about being a gun because the culprit has already been arrested and will be charged to court very soon.
The police has been able to identify the culprit which was a 22 years collect student.
 He has no social identity and I believed this must have been masterminded by politician that is against free speech.

[franky1]

I don't know whether he is the culprit or not, but what is circulating this photo in our discussion environment.

The picture is not clear so one can't really tell if it was a gun he was holding like that or not but the police can use some technology to make it more clear or dictate if that was a gun he was holding, if they do that and find out it was a gun he was holding then he should be arrested, and interrogated to find out if he was really the one that shot at Charlie Kirk because it may be a gun his holding but it could be for self defense as long as he is license to hold that gun when going out then one can't accuse him for the murder of Charlie Kirk.
The crime should be investigated very well so as to fine out who really killed Charlie Kirk, I believe there should be CCTV cameras in that place he was shot and people in that place may know where the gun shot came from, I believe if the police and FBI dig into that matter they will find the curprit.

This is not about being a gun because the culprit has already been arrested and will be charged to court very soon.
The police has been able to identify the culprit which was a 22 years collect student.
 He has no social identity and I believed this must have been masterminded by politician that is against free speech.

but to answer the question about the guy in blue
he was not some random student, faculty, visitor watching the debate. you can clearly see he is on the inside of the area, thus part of the entourage so would have been vetted and checked by security

[AmaGold70]

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/live-blog/live-updates-shooting-charlie-kirk-event-utah-rcna230437

I don't really have much to do with politics as I am not really a voter. Never voted once, but I do pay attention and this guy is 1 of the people who's views I have been watching on reels the last few months. Some stuff I agree with and some I don't, but the question is why do people who disagree think the answer is to kill someone? Many people in politics over the years have been murdered, not only in the USA but all over the world.

Just doesn't make sense how this stuff still happens. Why are politics so full of anger? Why is it shoot 1st ask questions later? People should be able to disagree and go on about life.

Politics has turned into a dark game that no one is able to disagree with the next politician and get away with it, it could be that Charlie Kirk disagree with the opinion of other politicians and paid with his life. Everyone should have the freedom of speech and different opinions without fear, I may not be a politician but I like politics and I support wholeheartedly but right now I'm having a second thought because politics has become a dirty and deadly game and the weakest or the vulnerable gets eaten, Charlie Kirk didn't deserve to die like this because he was saying his own opinion and it is only normal to disagree with him without spilling blood, I saw in the news that his killer is a 22yrs old student and I'm yet to understand how a 22yrs old was able to pull that assassination off like a professional killer.

[Johnlomape]

I don't know whether he is the culprit or not, but what is circulating this photo in our discussion environment.

The picture is not clear so one can't really tell if it was a gun he was holding like that or not but the police can use some technology to make it more clear or dictate if that was a gun he was holding, if they do that and find out it was a gun he was holding then he should be arrested, and interrogated to find out if he was really the one that shot at Charlie Kirk because it may be a gun his holding but it could be for self defense as long as he is license to hold that gun when going out then one can't accuse him for the murder of Charlie Kirk.
The crime should be investigated very well so as to fine out who really killed Charlie Kirk, I believe there should be CCTV cameras in that place he was shot and people in that place may know where the gun shot came from, I believe if the police and FBI dig into that matter they will find the curprit.

This is not about being a gun because the culprit has already been arrested and will be charged to court very soon.
The police has been able to identify the culprit which was a 22 years collect student.
 He has no social identity and I believed this must have been masterminded by politician that is against free speech.

but to answer the question about the guy in blue
he was not some random student, faculty, visitor watching the debate. you can clearly see he is on the inside of the area, thus part of the entourage so would have been vetted and checked by security

He can only be suspected as a result of the scene around the Utah University.
I don't see him as a potential suspect even if others do since he's top was not similar to that of the suspect.
This is a political assassination as described by the governor of Utah and they might have brainwashed the 22 years old  boy in carrying out this attack on Charlie Kirk our amaible activist. I felt so disturbed watching the scene video of how he was shoot at the presence of his family.

[franky1]

I don't know whether he is the culprit or not, but what is circulating this photo in our discussion environment.

but to answer the question about the guy in blue
he was not some random student, faculty, visitor watching the debate. you can clearly see he is on the inside of the area, thus part of the entourage so would have been vetted and checked by security

He can only be suspected as a result of the scene around the Utah University.
I don't see him as a potential suspect even if others do since he's top was not similar to that of the suspect.

before anyone knew the killers name or description(before details of suspects clothes were released). some spotted this guy in blue shirt and noticed something in his hand and just alleged he might be a suitable suspect/man of interest. and even now people still are wondering about this guy and what was in his hand

i simply expelled some notions by just bringing attention to the fact of which side of the barrier he was on, to say he is not part of the random crowd. he seems to be one of the vetted/checked entourage allowed to be on the inside of the barrier. so im sure he was exonerated as not a suspect
obviously video footage would also show the direction and type of killshot was not of one from a close proximity of a small weapon

[Free Market Capitalist]

For sure, but that makes me think you haven't you heard what he has said before this. So where are you getting your information from him from?

I am subscribed to his channel, where the videos are considerably longer than 10 seconds taken out of context.

Are you basing a lot of your views on how they sound?

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/A54Hkn0vcBY

What I don't base them on is a 10-second clip taken out of context.

[montaga]

From law point all humans are equal.
There are 128 gun relating deaths a day in US, somehow one fake event is making world news.
No blood on tent
No exit wound from 140 yards with a .30-06
Audio of gun not matching sound, its like a .223
Ring on finger changed finger it is on
How did the guy get on the roof, did he bring his ladder?
Taken away in black SUV instead of Ambulance
Hunter the last guy interviewing, cant stop giggling
Book released on Amazon a day before the shooting, of him being shot   Edit; https://youtu.be/vBgwZjsCBaE
People like Steve Crowder (changed name of show the very next day) faking sadness and outrage
Epstein files just varnished
Logo on shirt, hair ... https://youtu.be/_Y-2INjx2YE
Villain smile on first time in public after husband is supposed to be dead

Squib Blood pack just like Trump used when loosing part of his ear
Trump first to anouce charlie is shot, first ot anouce the shooter found
Charlie's rise to power is artificial

[hilariousandco]

Squib Blood pack just like Trump used when loosing part of his ear
Trump first to anouce charlie is shot, first ot anouce the shooter found
Charlie's rise to power is artificial

Good lord. Are you for real? A squib planted on his back can blow out a hole in his jugular spewing out super realistic fake blood? This is some Hollywood level special effects.

[NotATether]

I saw in the news that his killer is a 22yrs old student and I'm yet to understand how a 22yrs old was able to pull that assassination off like a professional killer.

Reddit, my friend.

That is where all the crazies meet up and likely where this guy got radicalized too. As Bluesky did not exist back then.

[yahoo62278]

**WARNING** **NSFW**

https://youtube.com/shorts/7HqspxT9eXY?si=oYQ5IoY4UsR3lf0K

If this video is not allowed for some reason I'll remove it or the mods can remove it. I seen a reply by hilariousandco and him quoting montaga about a squib and the shooting being faked basically. Watch the video and tell me how that was fake. Video is very graphic and you have to click the warning to view that is on the video.

The shooter was also turned in by his father FYI.

[Hispo]

It catches my attention how the killing of this man was allowed to be uploaded and keep on the internet on social media like youtube, instagram and others webpages though.
I would have expected the videos of this killing to be taken down from all places of the internet because of the terms of services of those social media on gore and disturbing content, it is kind of weird if you think about it, in those communities you are not allowed so use some words, but at the same time you are allowed to upload and watch a political assassination with no filters or censorship, it sound like a contradiction.

I am not complaining though, I am glad for once, one can use social media too inform oneself with the raw reality of the facts

[silpersurfer]

Ironically, he was ultimately killed with the same weapon he used to fight for his freedom. This was clearly a premeditated assassination. Previously, Donald Trump was nearly killed in an assassination attempt by a child while Trump was campaigning, but fortunately the shot missed and only injured Trump's ear. However, what happened to his beloved son, Charlie Kirk, was truly beyond help even though he was rushed to the hospital because the bullet directly hit a vital part. So, it is clear that the shooter was no amateur. However, to prevent a similar incident from happening again, the United States government must issue a strict policy regarding the prohibition of firearms for its citizens, even though I do not know whether the shooter was part of the community or was indeed a soldier or a trained veteran.

[Juse14]

I personally dislike, and you could even say I hate, Charlie Kirk, especially because of his harsh and often hurtful statements, especially regarding the Palestinian issue. He clearly sided with the oppression of the Palestinian people by the Israeli Zionists, and that's what angered many people. But no matter how strong my hatred is, I still don't think he deserved to die by being shot in public, especially since the recording was widely circulated on social media. Ultimately, he was simply speaking his own views, albeit sharp and provocative. The way to silence such opinions should be through argument, discussion, or resistance through sound opinion, not with bullets. Because the muzzle of a gun can never be spoken to; it only breeds more hatred and revenge.
So, I offer my condolences on Charlie Kirk's death.

[franky1]

Ironically, he was ultimately killed with the same weapon he used to fight for his freedom. This was clearly a premeditated assassination. Previously, Donald Trump was nearly killed in an assassination attempt by a child while Trump was campaigning, but fortunately the shot missed and only injured Trump's ear. However, what happened to his beloved son, Charlie Kirk, was truly beyond help even though he was rushed to the hospital because the bullet directly hit a vital part. So, it is clear that the shooter was no amateur. However, to prevent a similar incident from happening again, the United States government must issue a strict policy regarding the prohibition of firearms for its citizens, even though I do not know whether the shooter was part of the community or was indeed a soldier or a trained veteran.

a 200metre shot is not like the 1.5mile sniper record of the military.. an average rifle is easily accurate at 600metre so a 200metre shot is not as difficult as people think. and may only require someone with deer hunting experience or just backyard practice to achieve. infact some states wont even give someone a gun permit unless they can be certified to have hit a target at a certain distance, whereby they have to show they can effectively humanely hit a deer before being allowed to go deer hunting. so just general training to get a gun would end up being used as the experience to then harm someone

also when it comes to gun control. people are already talking about stricter rules. but you then have to ask how did the guy get a rifle into a uni campus. commonsense guessing would be disguise it in a guitar box or a sports bag(hockey) or something similar which are normal to see being carried around a campus. so how would things like that get policed..
.. would it be more pre permit education..
.. would it be turning universities into a search and seize security zone..
.. would it be [insert your idea]

[BADecker]

There are so many politicians out there, that it is difficult to check them all out. I had barely heard of Charlie Kirk before his assassination. But now his name can be found many places, especially in alternative news.

Apparently Charlie Kirk was more well known in America than I was aware of.


WTH??? Office Depot Supervisor and Manager REFUSE To Print Posters For Charlie Kirk Vigil—Tell 3 Teenagers Who PAID in Advance: “We don’t print propaganda here!” [VIDEO]


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09/wth-office-depot-supervisor-manager-refuse-print-posters/
The Gateway Pundit spoke exclusively with one of the parties involved in helping to promote a Charlie Kirk Prayer Vigil in Portage, Michigan, tonight, about a shocking incident that involved  3 teenagers being refused service at a local Office Depot by a supervisor and manager because the project was considered "political propaganda," by them.

A stunning video was sent to me by Kelly Sackett, the woman working with 3 teenage boys who were organizing a vigil for Charlie Kirk. The teenage boys paid in advance to have posters made for their vigil in Portage, MI. When they got to Office Depot to pick up their posters, two of the employees informed them that their posters weren't printed and that they were not going to be printed by them. When the teenage boys asked, "Why?" one of the employees told them, "We don't print propaganda!"

"So, we came in for an order earlier— for—to print a poster for a vigil tonight, for somebody that passed," one of the boys can be heard saying, "Yeah, so we don't print propaganda," the female/male? supervisor tells him. "It's not—" the teenager tried to explain, but the manager interrupts him, saying, "It's propaganda! I'm sorry. We don't print that here!"  The teenage boy asks the two adult Office Depot employees, "What's your name?" to which the male employee responds, "I'm (unintelligible), I'm the print supervisor." The female/male? Office Depot employee replies, "I'm one of the managers. So, unfortunately, we do not print—"

Here is a copy of the receipt for the Charlie Kirk prayer vigil posters that were paid for in advance:

"Okay, so you say you don't print propaganda, but this is for somebody who passed away a couple of years [days] ago," the teenager explains. "That's political propaganda, unfortunately." The teenager desperately tries to explain that the posters are for a vigil tonight.

"What makes it political propaganda? one of the teenagers can be heard asking. "Because it's political propaganda, and we don't have to—" the female/male? manager explains. The print supervisor interrupts to tell the teenagers who are helping to host a prayer vigil tonight that they can always come back on Monday and talk to their general manager, telling them, "You're welcome to return."
...

[montaga]

There are so many politicians out there, that it is difficult to check them all out. I had barely heard of Charlie Kirk before his assassination. But now his name can be found many places, especially in alternative news.
................

Lots of alternative news channels are worse than main stream media this days, will do anything to get views/money. Very few stood the test of time.
Charlie Kirk was a character created for this event, like many others
 https://youtu.be/JtrgIj7dqsQ

Anyone who cant see the 3 in the logo, go and visit a eye doctor

[tvbcof]

Looks like the sponsors (and almost certainly the perps in the 'murder') are running a trial-balloon on having Ben Shapiro 'pick up Charlie's bloody microphone' and lead the mission.

I, for one, am totally in favor of this for a variety of reasons.  Hopefully others who feel likewise do what they can in the initial phases to make the sponsors feel like they have enough of a chance to push the thing.  That will produce the opportunity for the fun part to kick in.

We need Ben!  Goooo Ben!

[Iranus]

It catches my attention how the killing of this man was allowed to be uploaded and keep on the internet on social media like youtube, instagram and others webpages though.
I would have expected the videos of this killing to be taken down from all places of the internet because of the terms of services of those social media on gore and disturbing content, it is kind of weird if you think about it, in those communities you are not allowed so use some words, but at the same time you are allowed to upload and watch a political assassination with no filters or censorship, it sound like a contradiction.

I am not complaining though, I am glad for once, one can use social media too inform oneself with the raw reality of the facts

No matter how perfect a system is, there will always be loopholes and someone will find a way to exploit them. I was unaware that the Charlie Kirk assassination video was posted on the popular social media networks you mentioned. But there have been times in the past when I have even come across porn, sex videos on Facebook or YouTube. But they only exist for a short time, they will be deleted and that account will also be banned shortly after. So I think it was just an accident, there was no political interference there.

Also, it's not too hard to find that clip on X or Reddit.

[LTU_btc]

It catches my attention how the killing of this man was allowed to be uploaded and keep on the internet on social media like youtube, instagram and others webpages though.
I would have expected the videos of this killing to be taken down from all places of the internet because of the terms of services of those social media on gore and disturbing content, it is kind of weird if you think about it, in those communities you are not allowed so use some words, but at the same time you are allowed to upload and watch a political assassination with no filters or censorship, it sound like a contradiction.

I am not complaining though, I am glad for once, one can use social media too inform oneself with the raw reality of the facts

That's good question. Usually NSFW content like video where someone get killed is quickly removed from social media. But sometimes it's not. In most cases that's videos that caused big resonance like famous politician or celebrity getting killed. Starting from JFK, then Japanese PM Shinzo Abe and now Charlie Kirk. Videos of these assasinations is all over the internet.
Also, probably everyone already video saw Ukrainian girl killed in metro by some mad dude.
It's a bit strange that such videos is allowed while you can get banned just for using bad words.