🥃 WHISKYWIN.COM | $25k VIP 🍾 | 💰 75% Cashback 💰 >>> 777% Welcome 🔥 🔥 🔥

[Haunebu]

The connection to Chilistakes coupled with the 10 grand requirement for VIP transfers on launch pretty much state that your site is shady as hell op and only naive gamblers would invest big amounts here currently.

It doesn't really help that the site is centered around alcohol which is one of the easiest ways to bleed gamblers dry. All the best trying to improve the reputation of this site now.

[gunhell16]

We can provide no deposit/no bonus bottle of whisky for you, but where, as we DO NOT REQUIRE KYC for Crypto people?

Where should we ship it? Let's play a game?

Honestly, this is something that gamblers here in this forum will like when they read your post because most of the players here dislike KYC. Though some don't mind submitting
KYC as long as the casino is regulated.

This initiative that you've started is great, and that's why it's always fun to have drinks while gambling for others, it brings a unique kind of joy and feeling as gamblers
in a casino while drinking whisky as we play surely we WIN. Welcome to the forum, by the way!

[SquirrelJulietGarden]

Honestly, this is something that gamblers here in this forum will like when they read your post because most of the players here dislike KYC. Though some don't mind submitting
KYC as long as the casino is regulated.

This initiative that you've started is great, and that's why it's always fun to have drinks while gambling for others, it brings a unique kind of joy and feeling as gamblers
in a casino while drinking whisky as we play surely we WIN. Welcome to the forum, by the way!

It's what they said and we don't know what they will do with users and their deposits in the future. In the meantime, there is another big question and possible issue, with the Whiskywin connection to Chillistake as you see here.

The connection to Chilistakes coupled with the 10 grand requirement for VIP transfers on launch pretty much state that your site is shady as hell

With discovery by the forum community, the Whiskywin and their father company must resolve the fraud case of Chillistakes if they want to gain success and reputation with Whiskywin. Otherwise, with evidence on connection of the father company, Chillistakes and Whiskywin and unresolved fraudulent, it's hard to convince forum members to join their casino with money.

[bettercrypto]

The connection to Chilistakes coupled with the 10 grand requirement for VIP transfers on launch pretty much state that your site is shady as hell

With discovery by the forum community, the Whiskywin and their father company must resolve the fraud case of Chillistakes if they want to gain success and reputation with Whiskywin. Otherwise, with evidence on connection of the father company, Chillistakes and Whiskywin and unresolved fraudulent, it's hard to convince forum members to join their casino with money.

That's just the thing, though. It's being said that even if you change the business brand, if it's still related to unresolved fraud issues from before, then no matter what, you won't really achieve success in a business like this.

So Chillistakes should really address the fraud issue first, because no matter how good Whiskywins tries to be, it will still be haunted by the bad image created by Chillistakes.
But if they resolve the fraud issue, Whiskywins can definitely move forward properly."

[noormcs5]

That's just the thing, though. It's being said that even if you change the business brand, if it's still related to unresolved fraud issues from before, then no matter what, you won't really achieve success in a business like this.

So Chillistakes should really address the fraud issue first, because no matter how good Whiskywins tries to be, it will still be haunted by the bad image created by Chillistakes.
But if they resolve the fraud issue, Whiskywins can definitely move forward properly."

That's true as even if the brand name changes (and even with new owners), its hard to change the trust rating from bad to good. Anyone buying the old business must ensure that it has good name before otherwise they will find it hard time building the trust and changing the perception of the people.

In this case, Whiskywins has a tough job on hand. They need to clear the cases and those aren't the fault by Whiskywins. That would be really hard for them, let us see how they come out of this difficult situation. Even though they claim that they aren't linked with Chillistakes 

[yahoo62278]

I've opened a discussion about this casino and their connection to Chilistakes if anyone cares to read. Something doesn't feel right, but if I am wrong I have no issue apologizing.

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=5564806.0

[dimonstration]

👉 VIP TRANSFER is now LIVE for BTT Godfathers – claim it here: https://forms.gle/rMAYUnrM4sXjGNV66

By this VIP transfer do you mean that if I have VIP status in another casino, I can transfer that to your platform? Lets say its a yes, do I have to prove my VIP status and by what means can I do that to be able to enjoy all the VIP benefits your platform offers? I have not really seen this type implemented in some of the casinos I have used in the past and it is really cool to see it because it will attract a lot of gamblers to your platform depending on how well other policies sit with them.

You need to submit a screenshot of your VIP progress to other casino. The wager volume is the one that will be transferred while this casino VIP level based on your wager will be assigned to your account.

But you should be cautious since there’s a 10K$ deposit that needs to fulfill before you can avail this VIP transfer in addition to the reputation thread raised by @yahoo.

[khaled0111]

Welcome to bitcointalk,  Whiskywin!
I can see on your announcement thread and also on your website that therevis a 777%  welcome bonus, but why does it say every time I visit your website that I still have 20 seconds to sign up before this promo expires! This doesn’t seem to be right. It seems like you are trying to lure visitors into signing up on your website with fake promotions.
I hope I am wrong... please prove me wrong!

[mitchr4]

Welcome to bitcointalk,  Whiskywin!
I can see on your announcement thread and also on your website that therevis a 777%  welcome bonus, but why does it say every time I visit your website that I still have 20 seconds to sign up before this promo expires! This doesn’t seem to be right. It seems like you are trying to lure visitors into signing up on your website with fake promotions.
I hope I am wrong... please prove me wrong!

The 777% welcome bonus is actually real, but it's divided into seven separate bonuses as part of their welcome pack. Here's the breakdown:
1st deposit – 125% bonus
2nd deposit – 50% bonus
3rd deposit – 115% bonus
4th deposit – 60% bonus
5th deposit – 150% bonus
6th deposit – 100% bonus
7th deposit – 177% bonus
More details on his Promotions page!

I'm not sure why they put "you are only 20 seconds away" on the homepage, which makes it look like the promo is about to expire. But after creating an account, that message no longer appears on the homepage. It seems like just a marketing trick to make people feel like they need to hurry and sign up to claim the bonus.

[God Of Thunder]

Welcome to the forum.

It seems everything happened too fast—three negative feedback on your profile within the first few days. I don't understand why you didn't mention that the same company owns both Chillistakes and Whiskywin. Now, I am curious if the same team operates both platforms. You should clarify this matter honestly. You are just going to ruin your reputation because of what you did by Chillistakes here.

If one casino is scamming, others under the same brand will likely scam as well. This is how the community will judge you here. So, you have no chance to grow here. I expect you guys to share your relationship with chillistakes in more detail.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

Well, on the one hand, I see a nice and funny presentation, and on the other, I see the controversy it has generated and the three red tags. If there is a parent company that owns both casinos, the casino teams may be different, as God Of Thunder mentioned, and this one may have nothing to do with the other casino that has scammed people. However, given the variety of trusted casinos on the forum and the awareness many people have of potential scams, I doubt that even if it could be proven in some way that the teams are different, whiskywin's reputation could be restored. To be linked by the parent company raises enough red flags.

[gunhell16]

Honestly, this is something that gamblers here in this forum will like when they read your post because most of the players here dislike KYC. Though some don't mind submitting
KYC as long as the casino is regulated.

This initiative that you've started is great, and that's why it's always fun to have drinks while gambling for others, it brings a unique kind of joy and feeling as gamblers
in a casino while drinking whisky as we play surely we WIN. Welcome to the forum, by the way!

It's what they said and we don't know what they will do with users and their deposits in the future. In the meantime, there is another big question and possible issue, with the Whiskywin connection to Chillistake as you see here.

I apologize, dude because only after posting it did I realize there's actually an existing issue with Chilistakes related to Whiskywin. As others here have pointed out, this issue really needs
to be resolved first. While it’s possible Chilistakes and Whiskywin share the same owner, my question is: are their management teams also one and the same?

Additionally, I’ve read comments here claiming Whiskywin has denied any connection to Chilistakes. I’m not entirely sure if their claims are true, but if this issue is genuine,
it would be best to resolve it properly to avoid further problems.

[God Of Thunder]

However, given the variety of trusted casinos on the forum and the awareness many people have of potential scams, I doubt that even if it could be proven in some way that the teams are different, whiskywin's reputation could be restored. To be linked by the parent company raises enough red flags.

Yes, people are unlikely to change their feedback even if Whiskywin provide some evidence that they have a different operations team. Since it has already been proven that the same parent company owns both companies, people will consider this and judge them accordingly. However, I would like to share here what I posted in another thread.

I have worked with only a few brands so far, and they also have sister sites. I have worked with Spinly, which has another casino named Bspin; both sites are owned and operated by the same company and persons. I mentioned Owned and Operated, because the operation team could be different. We all knew Sportsbet, Bitcasino, and livecasino were owned by Yologroup, but the operational teams were different (if I am not wrong). I am currently working with two more casinos, which also have sister sites. When I reached out to my contact to see if they would bring their sister site here as well, they responded that the operation team is different.

Therefore, there is always a possibility that the owner remains the same, but the operational team is different. I believe that the operational team makes the majority of decisions. The owners are barely aware of these situations. Let's say the operational team is different here, and one team is being penalised because of another operational team within their company. It is happening because the same company owns them.

I am not telling you what is right or wrong, but it's just my personal opinion. You should get to know them before passing judgment.

[The Cryptovator]

It seems you have some serious issues that you need to clear with our community. Once I saw your post and became curious about your negative feedback, though I wondered why a new gambling platform should be tagged for a new announcement. Then I discover the story from your feedback, and unfortunately you haven't even tried to defend yourself. So the community has the right to ask for the full story behind your negative feedback. Because your negative feedback would disappoint real gamblers from the forum.

We can see a lot of allegations in the scam accusation board, and some of them are also solved, or the casino representatives explain the situation. I am pretty sure you have been running two platforms; one of them already has a serious allegation. Since both platforms are under the same company and licence, it means you can't ignore the situation. We expect a clear explanation from your end.

[rohang]

Even if their operating teams are different, the scammed money from other site is funneling into the owners pockets after all
So Either,
Owner is not aware of the scams, which is very hard to believe
Owner is the one directing these practices

Either way only a very naive person would ever deposit any meaningful sum on either of the sites

[Bitinity]

Surprisingly the OP seems to be gone from this forum since the issue about their relation with chilistakes arised. Unlike on the first few days, OP answered most questions/feedback confidently, but he is offline for 5 days now instead of trying to answer/clarify more about their connection to chilistake. For me, it proves that they are absolutely managed by the same owner but the forum member catched it so early fortunately . Hope none get scammed by this new sister site of the older scam site.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Surprisingly the OP seems to be gone from this forum since the issue about their relation with chilistakes arised. Unlike on the first few days, OP answered most questions/feedback confidently, but he is offline for 5 days now instead of trying to answer/clarify more about their connection to chilistake. For me, it proves that they are absolutely managed by the same owner but the forum member catched it so early fortunately . Hope none get scammed by this new sister site of the older scam site.

That's the most likely explanation, although it could also be that when they saw several red tags, they thought it would be difficult to get them removed no matter how much explanation they gave, and decided to go elsewhere. Although I lean towards the first option.

Anyway, it's a shame about the humorous touch they gave to this. I hope that in the future we'll have a legitimate casino with a humorous touch like this one. I've never seen one like it before.

[Haunebu]

Surprisingly the OP seems to be gone from this forum since the issue about their relation with chilistakes arised. Unlike on the first few days, OP answered most questions/feedback confidently, but he is offline for 5 days now instead of trying to answer/clarify more about their connection to chilistake.

Nothing surprising at all. Dude was flabbergasted after seeing one forum member make the connection so quickly and gave some nonsensical explanations which literally no one bought due to which he bolted like a coward.

Anyway, it's a shame about the humorous touch they gave to this. I hope that in the future we'll have a legitimate casino with a humorous touch like this one. I've never seen one like it before.

Linking alcohol to gambling is never humorous which is why casinos usually refrain from such stuff smartly. Gamblers on the Vegas strip can attest to this.

[gunhell16]

Surprisingly the OP seems to be gone from this forum since the issue about their relation with chilistakes arised. Unlike on the first few days, OP answered most questions/feedback confidently, but he is offline for 5 days now instead of trying to answer/clarify more about their connection to chilistake. For me, it proves that they are absolutely managed by the same owner but the forum member catched it so early fortunately . Hope none get scammed by this new sister site of the older scam site.

It seems like Whiskywin is indeed connected to Chilistake. Because someone exposed the relationship between Chilistake and Whiskywin, I think the person responsible has lost the nerve to provide an explanation. This is likely because they saw that the people leaving comments are long-time members of this forum, and they were probably advised to just keep quiet.

And I think none of our fellow members here have been victimized by these kinds of tactics. I almost believed it myself and signed up, but thankfully, I read one of our member's posts regarding the issue. The long-time members of this community also deserve a good job for their vigilance.

[stompix]

The 777% welcome bonus is actually real, but it's divided into seven separate bonuses as part of their welcome pack. Here's the breakdown:
1st deposit – 125% bonus
2nd deposit – 50% bonus
3rd deposit – 115% bonus
4th deposit – 60% bonus
5th deposit – 150% bonus
6th deposit – 100% bonus
7th deposit – 177% bonus

That's not 777%, that's lying.
777% deposit is when you deposit $100 and you get $777 bonus, with that scheme if you would deposit $100 each step, you would get $777, so it's 111% nowhere near 777%. A casino could claim a 1 trillion percent bonus, all you would have to do is deposit 100 trillion times and you would get 1% each time!
Would that be legit?

Well, no wonder they also faked their promotions!