What Do you think about such users

[lovesmayfamilis]

Obim34 you are correct, signature and Avatar are publicly displayed on campaign thread and because of this it's impossible to stop people from using them however it will be nice if there's a rule that will stop people that are not accepted into a campaign to wear the signature and Avatar but when this rule is made it will stop freedom of support because some people do this because they want to push the company and it could be they are benefiting from the company in one way or the other so it'll be better no rule is given in that area.

If you are lending money to any member in this forum do well to check the spreadsheet of the campaign you can know if a person is in the campaign paying role or not for wearing there signature and Avatar in the forum. Don't Lend money to a member without checking spreadsheet.

How can you stop this? Everyone condemns trolling on the forum. Can it be stopped? Can someone stop them from writing nasty things? No. If someone is very sensitive to criticism, they're advised to ignore the rude people, but any user can wear an avatar and signature even without receiving money. There was a case a long time ago where a troll deliberately changed the signature of a company, at the time a very well-paid company, so that the signature accused the company of being a scam. And only then, if I'm not mistaken, was this user negatively tagged. But until something happens to the original signature, the response to someone using it should be based on their posting history and possible violations of the existing rules.

By the way, OP, you can also leave your own tags, rather than making waves and encouraging others to leave theirs.

[Hyphen(-)]

So I'm not specifically referring to a user rather I am talking about many users who practice this act and what could be done to reduce it.

Sometimes some users keep the signatures of their former campaign so that they can have chance to join another one on time because some of us think it can be an added advantage especially if the campaign ends and you are looking for another one to join.
Nevertheless, it is not proper to wear signature of a campaign you are not part of even if you like the campaign because people wearing it are getting paid for it and if anything happens it might stain your reputation especially if the casino or any platform you are advertising fall victim for any scam or fraudulent activities.

[igebotz]

Perhaps it's a way to associate Rainbet's campaign with spamming shitposters? Sounds like a conspiracy theory. Another scenario is that they might be doing it to go under the radar of AI posting; someone who's in a campaign is less likely to use AI to write posts than a new account.

To look relevant and to boast their chances of getting accepted when applying for signature campaigns- it gives the managers the thoughts of " oh he's already part of a big sig campaign, he must be a good poster" vibes and it works cause some managers don't do their jobs thoroughly.

This was exactly what I said on the reputation board the other day - not all alice and bob that wears stake signature and avatar are part of the campaign. Some spammers who were removed still wear it.

Internet trolls are mostly bullies, sadist, loners, psychopaths and kids brought up without love at home. I don't give them my time and love.

[GeorgeJohn]

Wearing a signature and avatar of same signature campaign without been hired for a campaign, it's not against the ethics of campaign management..dont you see some people wearing a signature without avatar or avatar without signature, it's their personal choice, so we dont need argue about...

Sometimes campaign managers may think that users wearing a signature and avatar of a campaign is in campaign they're a good posters depends on the campaign they wear the signature and avatar, and that will give them chances for manager to accept them, thinking they're in campaign already, maybe because of the payment they decides to join another campaign.

[KingsDen]

Personally I think it might be appropriate to atleast give a neutral tag to such users (the tags can be removed once the remove the signature and avatar) because such user is passing false information for others and managers to believe and so they are not to be trusted.

Because a forum user decided to wear a signature or an avatar of a particular project, it will ruin the reputation of the manager managing the campaign. I don't understand how you thought about this. There is alot of freedom in the forum. The projects make their campaign and avatar public, so anyone can decide to give them free promotion. Why talking about whose reputation is bad. How about if LoyceV decides to wear the signature of a particular project for free, will it raise as much uproar?

Signature space is personal and the owner decides what they advertise their in as much as it is a legal product or services. If neutral tag is given to such a person for wearing a random signature, and also be removed when they remove the signature, it means you are given someone a full time job to check these things and leave the tag.

[Alvin_talk]

Well, I really appreciate all your efforts and contributions in this thread, with your feedbacks I now understand better. I love trying in my little way to make suggestions I feel will be good for the community, this is just an opinion I came up with and nothing personal.

Thank you for your honest contributions.

So let me get this straight, you are salty that you are not enrolled with yet another account of yours in this campaign?   Based on where you post and how you post, it is clear that you are an account farmer.  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Common bro, I didn't really mean to offend, I only used the case for other users to understand me fully, really nothing personal. I really admire your level of knowledge on bitcoin but there's something I'll also like you to consider learning about, the theory of anti-essentialism, may be it will help change your perspective about people a little.

Do you know Nigeria is a country is a country with over 234 million people, with vast religions and culture? And all can't be corrupt the way you see it. In every nation and tribe there exist the good and the evil, therefore you shouldn't always jump into conclusion that way, even leaving me a negative tag, you should do better than this.

Charles-Tim, Igehbotz, CryptopreneurBrainboss, upgradoo, Mia Chloe, ambatman, Hatchy, Satoprincess, Smartgold, etc have all contributed positively to this community in their little way and guess what, they all come from this same region you are criticising me for. I am proudly Nigerian, great people, great culture.

Please lets spread love instead of violence in 2026, happy new year!

[Satofan44]

How can you stop this? Everyone condemns trolling on the forum. Can it be stopped? Can someone stop them from writing nasty things? No.

Trolling and rudeness are completely separate concepts. Trolling can include nasty things, but it does not have to. Venn diagrams help with understanding the differences between these concepts for those who may not fully get it.

Signature space is personal and the owner decides what they advertise their in as much as it is a legal product or services. If neutral tag is given to such a person for wearing a random signature, and also be removed when they remove the signature, it means you are given someone a full time job to check these things and leave the tag.

Ideas by those who would be unable to implement them are often useless and not effective. There is no good way to automate it, and manually doing it is just a waste of time. The pool of users who could be checking for these things is always going to be much smaller than the pool of users who could be doing these things. There is no balance, it is completely asymmetrical. Should scam busters start checking signature campaign participation instead of looking for account farms? I am sure that some users would love that for totally non-malicious reasons.  

Well, I really appreciate all your efforts and contributions in this thread, with your feedbacks I now understand better. I love trying in my little way to make suggestions I feel will be good for the community, this is just an opinion I came up with and nothing personal.

Thank you for your honest contributions.

So let me get this straight, you are salty that you are not enrolled with yet another account of yours in this campaign?   Based on where you post and how you post, it is clear that you are an account farmer.  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Common bro, I didn't really mean to offend, I only used the case for other users to understand me fully, really nothing personal. I really admire your level of knowledge on bitcoin but there's something I'll also like you to consider learning about, the theory of anti-essentialism, may be it will help change your perspective about people a little.

Do you know Nigeria is a country is a country with over 234 million people, with vast religions and culture? And all can't be corrupt the way you see it. In every nation and tribe there exist the good and the evil, therefore you shouldn't always jump into conclusion that way, even leaving me a negative tag, you should do better than this.

Charles-Tim, Igehbotz, CryptopreneurBrainboss, upgradoo, Mia Chloe, ambatman, Hatchy, Satoprincess, Smartgold, etc have all contributed positively to this community in their little way and guess what, they all come from this same region you are criticising me for. I am proudly Nigerian, great people, great culture.

Please lets spread love instead of violence in 2026, happy new year!

If you need merit, there is no need to open a thread here. Just post in your local board instead, they will boost you easily. You've bought up plenty of examples, any one of them can lovingly help you.  

[Alvin_talk]

If you need merit, there is no need to open a thread here. Just post in your local board instead, they will boost you easily. You've bought up plenty of examples, any one of them can lovingly help you.  

Anyways, welcome to my ignore list, your trust abuse is louder than your bitcoin knowledge.

[Alone055]

1. Forum's rules should be updated to capture the violation in wearing unauthorized campaign signature.

Forum believes in freedom when it comes to such restrictions, and besides, the forum doesn't even moderate scams, so I don't think such a thing will ever be implemented or added in the rules.

2. Anyone who is not in a campaign, but wants to wear its signature, must first seek the permission of the CM before wearing thei signature.

Permission is not important, people often wear the signatures even before getting accepted into the campaigns they have applied to. The best way is for the manager to leave a neutral tag for those who are not enrolled but still wearing the signature if they have a bad reputation and they believe this can be a threat to their reputation or the reputation of the brand they are working with.

3. The violators should either be red-tagged or banned after adequate warnings.

A neutral tag is enough.

Interrupting the original signature code of a campaign in your profile would obviously change the outlook of the signature design and I think when compared to other participants signatures in same campaign the difference could be easily spotted except for a newbie.

No, that's not how it works. Signatures contain links in the code which are the reason why signatures are clickable, anyone can change or replace the links and add any link they want, and the signature won't change at all, but only the link will be different. So, tampering with the links within a signature doesn't change how a signature looks on your profile.

[aioc]

Signature code and Avatar are publicly displayed on campaign threads, you can't stop users from wearing them unless the signature board creates new rules against wearing signatures without being accepted in the campaign by any manager.

The bad side is towards manipulating lenders to give them loan without collateral, using the signatures as a disguise to be qualified for the loan, in this case i expect them to receive tags for manipulation.

Another downside is that the code can be manipulated by changing the links and linking it to ransomware. The manipulator can buy a domain very similar to the casino's signature domain.
 
The campaign manager can stipulate that only participants can wear a signature, and those who do not follow it will get a tag from the manager or be banned from his campaigns.

But if the intention is good and he wears the signature because he is playing there and he is a good poster, then it will be fine to let him, provided that he asks for permission for his intention.

[lovesmayfamilis]

If you need merit, there is no need to open a thread here. Just post in your local board instead, they will boost you easily. You've bought up plenty of examples, any one of them can lovingly help you.  

Anyways, welcome to my ignore list, your trust abuse is louder than your bitcoin knowledge.

Really?