[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[Artoodeetoo]

Hey. bounty ?

I will give you hard link for this.
I got the link.

Once again.  Prove up!

Put bounty, then I will.

there is NO bounty for that test, stop going in circles

I am saying hard link. not test.
If I provide hard link, what is bounty ?

100 XC's

BTC...

LOL, stop acting like a child, sell on an xchange if you want BTC...

You are just looking silly now.

[sukottosan_d]

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

[atcsecure]

Lets see the proof/hard link he is talking about

[Artoodeetoo]

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

[PUMPBANDIT]

100XC What a cheap bastard!

[acseric]

Hey. bounty ?

I will give you hard link for this.
I got the link.

Once again.  Prove up!

Put bounty, then I will.

there is NO bounty for that test, stop going in circles

I am saying hard link. not test.
If I provide hard link, what is bounty ?

100 XC's

BTC...

LOL, stop acting like a child, sell on an xchange if you want BTC...

You are just looking silly now.

I would assume he thinks that XC will crash once he proves the anon function doesnt work, thus making the bounty next to worthless.

[chaeplin]

Hey. bounty ?

I will give you hard link for this.
I got the link.

Once again.  Prove up!

Put bounty, then I will.

there is NO bounty for that test, stop going in circles

I am saying hard link. not test.
If I provide hard link, what is bounty ?

100 XC's

It's design flaw. You have to fix it.

it doesn't impact REV2

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?


 

[acseric]

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Exactly.  All the rest of this back and forth is childish semantics

[atcsecure]

Hey. bounty ?

I will give you hard link for this.
I got the link.

Once again.  Prove up!

Put bounty, then I will.

there is NO bounty for that test, stop going in circles

I am saying hard link. not test.
If I provide hard link, what is bounty ?

100 XC's

It's design flaw. You have to fix it.

it doesn't impact REV2

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?


 

yes proof that there is connection from sender to receiver

[Artoodeetoo]

ATC, you will never please these jokers.. I would suggest if they don't want to now take part, we all just ignore them - including chaeplen or whatever he is called - you have made a reasonable offer and so far it has been just met with more FUD.. I think we can all see the hidden agenda here...

[greyskies]

So funny how many people are trying to FUD this topic.

Dev has given a challenge which can't be cheated:

bounty for what?

prove to me who sent the payment to

XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k

and you can get a bounty

Prove it or STFU

[sukottosan_d]

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

[atcsecure]

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

okay, show the link from SENDER to RECEIVER, and claim the bounty - this is an open challenge, who ever post the proof first gets the bounty

[Artoodeetoo]

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

Just very peculiar, looking at your posts, you spend most your time on the DRK thread then come over here demanding answers..... Im sure you are 100% legit...

[acseric]

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

okay, show the link from SENDER to RECEIVER, and claim the bounty - this is an open challenge, who ever post the proof first gets the bounty

And to be clear, the bounty is how much?

[chaeplin]

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?


 

yes

Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.

Problem is received coins are reused.

Proof :

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=631052.msg7254769#msg7254769

I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

Right ?
 

[atcsecure]

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

okay, show the link from SENDER to RECEIVER, and claim the bounty - this is an open challenge, who ever post the proof first gets the bounty

And to be clear, the bounty is how much?

100 XC's or the equivalent in BTC

[acseric]

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

Just very peculiar, looking at your posts, you spend most your time on the DRK thread then come over here demanding answers..... Im sure you are 100% legit...

Who cares if he is legit.  he is asking for something completely reasonable

[greyskies]

No-one proving any links.

All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today  

Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.

Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.

[atcsecure]

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?


 

yes

Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.

Problem is received coins are reused.

Proof :

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=631052.msg7254769#msg7254769

I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

Right ?
 

ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER