bgm
Member

Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 05:01:17 PM Last edit: January 04, 2018, 05:14:22 PM by bgm |
|
I've just deposited on YoBit without seeing that it is on Wallet Maintenance. Will those funds be credited once it's fixed? When will it be fixed?
Thanks.
Yes they should be credited. If Yobit updated the latest version! Thank you! Any estimated date on the update? Would you contact YoBit so they update? Magi will send another request! Hope they update, because Bittrex asks a lot of stuff to withdraw (and not willing to give my personal info tbh). Cheers There is an exchange that values privacy over anything. No registration needed you just swap your coins like it should be. The problem is they do not at this time accept magi, but I am sure we can persuade them to do so... https://flyp.meEDIT: I sent a request so we will see if a truly anonymous exchange will add this coin...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raist
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 05:11:18 PM |
|
We need to scale this pretty one into DASH price level.  7kk coins that is nothing. Lives from 2014 - also good. Dev is somehow working also good. So - 2018 $300 per coin not less!
|
|
|
|
|
steven_ik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 05:22:53 PM |
|
Don't know abt xpoolx, I run another pool. Other pools that I do know of are getting their blocks confirmed.
Can you please suggest me a pool, then I will move my workers there. the luckypool seems to be working again
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raist
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 05:41:55 PM |
|
Don't know abt xpoolx, I run another pool. Other pools that I do know of are getting their blocks confirmed.
Can you please suggest me a pool, then I will move my workers there. the luckypool seems to be working again Thanks but moved already to stratoserver.net. Shall see about the payment.
|
|
|
|
|
HeftyMagi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 05:44:03 PM |
|
Blocks will be orphaned anyway untill fork is complete.
Running pools will show with amount of miners and hashrate of the pool.
You're right sir, thats why I set miners off on all PCs  P.S. For some guy was asking earlier: Ryzen 1700X ~ 5820K (I have both), 120-140 khash/s with e=60...70 (allows CPU to do everything else you need except gaming or rendering while staying warm, not even hot) just out of interest have you tried overclocking and running it at 100% to see what the max hashrate is? well, i cant speak for him but i can give you numbers based on my results with a 1600 overclocked, assuming perfect scaling across cores. My 1600 at 3.9 and 3200 memory manages around 150-160 kh/s, or roughly 26.6 kh/s per core, or 13.3 per thread. Assuming good scaling, that puts a 1700 right around 210 kh/sec. I did a more in depth post waay earlier in the thread, if you want to see the whole post, I checked and its from August 1 2017. wow on 3.9 you menage to push 1600 to 160kh so intels are still worst than amds clock/core wise, i tested 8700k stock is 170kh and @5ghz 200kh and 7700k is 133kh @5ghz roughly 16.6kh per thread@5ghz. Intels need some minerd optimization.
|
|
|
|
|
steven_ik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 05:47:47 PM |
|
Don't know abt xpoolx, I run another pool. Other pools that I do know of are getting their blocks confirmed.
Can you please suggest me a pool, then I will move my workers there. the luckypool seems to be working again Thanks but moved already to stratoserver.net. Shall see about the payment. oke let us know if it any good ^^
|
|
|
|
|
maddmike
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 05:53:44 PM |
|
Does anyone know why the XMG pools seem to be shutting down? Supernova is gone. MaxMiners seems to be gone?
|
|
|
|
|
technocamel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 05:54:17 PM |
|
Don't know abt xpoolx, I run another pool. Other pools that I do know of are getting their blocks confirmed.
Can you please suggest me a pool, then I will move my workers there. the luckypool seems to be working again Thanks but moved already to stratoserver.net. Shall see about the payment. oke let us know if it any good ^^ When I was first starting, I was a part of several different pools. Debating who to stick with. What's everyone planning on starting back up with? Minerclaim? m-hash? luckypool? Some such as suprnova are gone. What others do you guys like?
|
|
|
|
|
Iame3
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 07:04:41 PM |
|
If anybody is interesting in - Orange Pi PC, allwinner H3 with wolf cpu miner is making ~4 kh/s. I guess PC2 with H5 64 bit would make ~12kh/s, ~20€ from aliexpress with shipping. Just my 2 cents  Actually those devices are good for watching HD movies, but then I'm turning off mining (using above mentioned PC H3). I've actually got an orange pi with the allwinner H3 on the way right now, can I ask if you're running a 64 bit OS on that? or if you know if it's possible? No way, it's 32 bit computer. You need H5 for 64 bit OS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ex33s
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 07:37:47 PM |
|
Blocks will be orphaned anyway untill fork is complete.
Running pools will show with amount of miners and hashrate of the pool.
You're right sir, thats why I set miners off on all PCs  P.S. For some guy was asking earlier: Ryzen 1700X ~ 5820K (I have both), 120-140 khash/s with e=60...70 (allows CPU to do everything else you need except gaming or rendering while staying warm, not even hot) just out of interest have you tried overclocking and running it at 100% to see what the max hashrate is? well, i cant speak for him but i can give you numbers based on my results with a 1600 overclocked, assuming perfect scaling across cores. My 1600 at 3.9 and 3200 memory manages around 150-160 kh/s, or roughly 26.6 kh/s per core, or 13.3 per thread. Assuming good scaling, that puts a 1700 right around 210 kh/sec. I did a more in depth post waay earlier in the thread, if you want to see the whole post, I checked and its from August 1 2017. wow on 3.9 you menage to push 1600 to 160kh so intels are still worst than amds clock/core wise, i tested 8700k stock is 170kh and @5ghz 200kh and 7700k is 133kh @5ghz roughly 16.6kh per thread@5ghz. Intels need some minerd optimization. I've manage to push my i7-8700k @ 5 Ghz to 213 kh/s https://i.imgur.com/EoNSEt3.png
|
|
|
|
Captmario
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 07:44:10 PM |
|
Is it more profitable to mine XMG over cryptonote coins? (using CPU)
Is there any calculator out there? just trying to figure how much i can mine with 2x Intel Xeons
|
|
|
|
|
RR3US
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 08:09:46 PM |
|
Is it more profitable to mine XMG over cryptonote coins? (using CPU)
Is there any calculator out there? just trying to figure how much i can mine with 2x Intel Xeons
before the chain went down I had 1 PC running with an Intel 6600k (gaming overclock to 4.2ghz) with a speed of ~120 MH/s steady. That brought me at that time with that diff 1 sometimes 2 coins a day.
|
|
|
|
|
HeftyMagi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 08:12:29 PM Last edit: January 05, 2018, 05:13:59 AM by HeftyMagi |
|
Blocks will be orphaned anyway untill fork is complete.
Running pools will show with amount of miners and hashrate of the pool.
You're right sir, thats why I set miners off on all PCs  P.S. For some guy was asking earlier: Ryzen 1700X ~ 5820K (I have both), 120-140 khash/s with e=60...70 (allows CPU to do everything else you need except gaming or rendering while staying warm, not even hot) just out of interest have you tried overclocking and running it at 100% to see what the max hashrate is? well, i cant speak for him but i can give you numbers based on my results with a 1600 overclocked, assuming perfect scaling across cores. My 1600 at 3.9 and 3200 memory manages around 150-160 kh/s, or roughly 26.6 kh/s per core, or 13.3 per thread. Assuming good scaling, that puts a 1700 right around 210 kh/sec. I did a more in depth post waay earlier in the thread, if you want to see the whole post, I checked and its from August 1 2017. wow on 3.9 you menage to push 1600 to 160kh so intels are still worst than amds clock/core wise, i tested 8700k stock is 170kh and @5ghz 200kh and 7700k is 133kh @5ghz roughly 16.6kh per thread@5ghz. Intels need some minerd optimization. I've manage to push my i7-8700k @ 5 Ghz to 213 kh/s https://i.imgur.com/EoNSEt3.pngdo you use avx or generic minerd, i oc it to 5.3 now 91C on hottest core others 77-83C with h110 not worth it though and why is load so small from minerd at 20% on 8700k, on older intels i have load 99-100% edit: low load - -buggy real temp app reading on newer intels
|
|
|
|
|
realbagdad
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 08:24:14 PM |
|
Why is it that the reward for Magi varies so wildly? Earlier, it was over 20 XMG per block, and now the last few blocks are less than 2 XMG, with the latest one being 0.98? I don't know if I understand magi enough to tell what's going on. Anyone have an answer?
|
|
|
|
|
ParaplegicRacehorse
Member

Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 36
HODL. Patience.
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 08:28:25 PM |
|
All this talk of hard-fork and mining is making me bonkers. It's all well and good for us (I am mining, total about 35kh/s on several wimpy workers, luckypool). BUT, the pre-hardfork mining hashrate is driving the block reward - for non-orphaned blocks - way down. Watching blockchain and rewards, I'm thinking more and more about buying and staking.
On that note, has anyone written a comprehensive staking guide? I tried searching through the forum and found some reference, but nothing hard except to fix settings in the conf file. I'm looking more for a complete reference to the cli daemon and scripting for auto-rotating coins to keep them fresh and staking, etc.
'magid --help' is _almost_, but not quite, actually useful here. I really don't want to scroll through the code to find the hooks I'll need to set this all up. Has anyone already done this?
|
|
|
|
|
ParaplegicRacehorse
Member

Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 36
HODL. Patience.
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 08:31:02 PM |
|
Why is it that the reward for Magi varies so wildly? Earlier, it was over 20 XMG per block, and now the last few blocks are less than 2 XMG, with the latest one being 0.98? I don't know if I understand magi enough to tell what's going on. Anyone have an answer?
Mining block rewards are inversely proportional to total network hashrate. As more miners come online to push us toward the hardfork block, the reward for non-orphaned blocks will continue to fall. And probably stay that way until people reduce their mining rate to a more normalized output. But, look at the block payout for PoS.  example - https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/block.dws?1605731.htm
|
|
|
|
|
realbagdad
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 08:32:36 PM |
|
Why is it that the reward for Magi varies so wildly? Earlier, it was over 20 XMG per block, and now the last few blocks are less than 2 XMG, with the latest one being 0.98? I don't know if I understand magi enough to tell what's going on. Anyone have an answer?
Mining block rewards are inversely proportional to total network hashrate. As more miners come online to push us toward the hardfork block, the reward for non-orphaned blocks will continue to fall. And probably stay that way until people reduce their mining rate to a more normalized output. But, look at the block payout for PoS.  I thought it was a result of more miners, but I am surprised at how bad it got so quickly. It's a shame I can't even transfer coins from cryptopia to myself to stake..as I barely have any in my personal wallet and I believe you need like 100+ to stake, right?
|
|
|
|
|
HeftyMagi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 08:39:51 PM |
|
staking is still not working for me not enough weight although i send my self few times 100 few times 500 and many times 5000 i also tried to send to another wallet same thing not enough weight :/
|
|
|
|
|
realbagdad
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 09:08:42 PM |
|
staking is still not working for me not enough weight although i send my self few times 100 few times 500 and many times 5000 i also tried to send to another wallet same thing not enough weight :/
would you like to send 5000 to me instead 
|
|
|
|
|
starmman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1029
|
 |
January 04, 2018, 09:18:49 PM |
|
staking is still not working for me not enough weight although i send my self few times 100 few times 500 and many times 5000 i also tried to send to another wallet same thing not enough weight :/
staking not fully working for me now either, but I do have the weight - I'm experimenting with changing the time on my wallet computer. is your block height the same as the block height in the explorer - and did you unlock your wallet for staking? here is a sample magi.conf file # You must set rpcuser and rpcpassword to secure the JSON-RPC api rpcuser=[put-a-username-of-your-choice-here] rpcpassword=[put-a-random-password-of-your-choice-here]
# Listen for RPC connections on this TCP port: rpcport=8232
# server=1 to accept JSON-RPC commands server=1
# listen=1 to accept connections from outside listen=1
# RPC connection from localhost allowed rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
# Add nodes to connect to specific peers addnode=104.128.225.215 addnode=45.35.251.73
# posii=1 to enable PoS staking; default = 0 posii=1
# Transaction under stake with a value greater than the threshold is being splitted stakesplitthreshold=500
# Transactions with values less than the threshold will combine into one stakecombinethreshold=500
|
|
|
|
|
|