CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[ioglnx]

Here it is:
- CPU AVX2 only
- GPU arch SM3.0 - 6.1 this time I have added the most supported CM/SM

https://mega.nz/#!4o43iKBA!5LCdYt1Zlxuf1KHrsPHmteNVVXhrb5_vDPXeT8xCJdA

@Port to VS2015 is now running stable so far. Still hassle the hoff with github :-D

[krnlx]

Here it is:
- CPU AVX2 only
- GPU arch SM3.0 - 6.1 this time I have added the most supported CM/SM

https://mega.nz/#!4o43iKBA!5LCdYt1Zlxuf1KHrsPHmteNVVXhrb5_vDPXeT8xCJdA

@Port to VS2015 is now running stable so far. Still hassle the hoff with github :-D

It works well only on SM5.0+ cards, because of use  shared atomics. For older cards, SAv4 is more fast

[TIKCrazy]

tried to make my "own" port with krlnx help

https://mega.nz/#!4csV3JjY!RcslqSzlofgFOnyanga2T9wsfc0LmA08Hz8i5TtBl-o

based on tpruvot release and krlnx changes

[ioglnx]

@krnlx
Okay good to know..well lets see what test of those users will show.
I noticed the change to use atmoics the Cuda Profile looks much better in usuage..during the rounds.
It also loweres the power consumption ..its good optimization

Btw you can add in param.h the optimization of extermal from yesterday..

[krnlx]

@krnlx

Btw you can add in param.h the optimization of extermal from yesterday..

They are already there

[ioglnx]

@krnlx

Btw you can add in param.h the optimization of extermal from yesterday..

They are already there

The last opt. are a bit different..diff your param.h against last of extermal..and wush..there are differences.

Hitting 456sol/s now :-D

[Amph]

Here it is:
- CPU AVX2 only
- GPU arch SM3.0 - 6.1 this time I have added the most supported CM/SM

https://mega.nz/#!4o43iKBA!5LCdYt1Zlxuf1KHrsPHmteNVVXhrb5_vDPXeT8xCJdA

@Port to VS2015 is now running stable so far. Still hassle the hoff with github :-D

something wrong, by controlling my machine via teamviewer, the miner start but hang there and no response, it seems that it's not working at all

ok fixed it was -cs and cv 0, what are those btw what they do?

[krnlx]

@krnlx

Btw you can add in param.h the optimization of extermal from yesterday..

They are already there

The last opt. are a bit different..diff your param.h against last of extermal..and wush..there are differences.

Hitting 456sol/s now :-D

I changed only

Code:

#define LDS_COLL_SIZE (NR_SLOTS * 20 * (64 / THREADS_PER_ROW))

because it is faster with this one(1070)

[_javi_]

Here it is:
- CPU AVX2 only
- GPU arch SM3.0 - 6.1 this time I have added the most supported CM/SM

https://mega.nz/#!4o43iKBA!5LCdYt1Zlxuf1KHrsPHmteNVVXhrb5_vDPXeT8xCJdA

@Port to VS2015 is now running stable so far. Still hassle the hoff with github :-D

something wrong, by controlling my machine via teamviewer, the miner start but hang there and no response, it seems that it's not working at all

ok fixed it was -cs and cv 0, what are those btw what they do?

it happened the same here... what are the right switches? -cs ? -cv ?

[Amph]

Here it is:
- CPU AVX2 only
- GPU arch SM3.0 - 6.1 this time I have added the most supported CM/SM

https://mega.nz/#!4o43iKBA!5LCdYt1Zlxuf1KHrsPHmteNVVXhrb5_vDPXeT8xCJdA

@Port to VS2015 is now running stable so far. Still hassle the hoff with github :-D

something wrong, by controlling my machine via teamviewer, the miner start but hang there and no response, it seems that it's not working at all

ok fixed it was -cs and cv 0, what are those btw what they do?

it happened the same here... what are the right switches? -cs ? -cv ?

i just removed them altogether

[_javi_]

360 sols for 4x1070 g1 with no OC ..

[Amph]

360 sols for 4x1070 g1 with no OC ..

i'm at 106 with 1070 g1 gaming, you should definitely get more try to play with msi afterburner

for the g1 gaming -502 mem 0 core and 55% tdp work great, low power while still a nice hashrate, good compromise for me

[ioglnx]

If you use nheqminer -h you will see the right switches.

I use always miner -cv 1 for SA Cuda impl.

[_javi_]

shouldnt we create another thread?? this is no Sp-mod related..

[sp_]

I am modding as well.

1070: 100sol/s (default clocks) With -500 on the memclock I get 110
1060 6gb 75sol/s(default clocks)
gtx 970 70sol/s(default clocks)

I use

#define THRD 128
#define BLK (NR_ROWS/THRD)

in param.h

[_javi_]

360 sols for 4x1070 g1 with no OC ..

i'm at 106 with 1070 g1 gaming, you should definitely get more try to play with msi afterburner

for the g1 gaming -502 mem 0 core and 55% tdp work great, low power while still a nice hashrate, good compromise for me

what´s wrong?? this is what i get...

sube

[krnlx]

I am modding as well.

1070: 100sol/s (default clocks) With -500 on the memclock I get 110
1060 6gb 75sol/s(default clocks)
gtx 970 70sol/s(default clocks)

I use

#define THRD 128
#define BLK (NR_ROWS/THRD)

in param.h

Did you check last changes? I updated last eXtremal's code

[Amph]

360 sols for 4x1070 g1 with no OC ..

i'm at 106 with 1070 g1 gaming, you should definitely get more try to play with msi afterburner

for the g1 gaming -502 mem 0 core and 55% tdp work great, low power while still a nice hashrate, good compromise for me

what´s wrong?? this is what i get...

sube

strange you should get 400+, what drivers? OS seems windows 7 i'm on win 10, it may be a factor

[_javi_]

amph:
win 7 64, 372.54 drivers

btw, i always wondered about those GPU usage and power oscillating patterns.. are those normal?

[Amph]

amph:
win 7 64, 372.54 drivers

btw, i always wondered about those GPU usage and power oscillating patterns.. are those normal?

372.90 here, i think yes, code is not optimized it may be also for pool side problem, mine do that as well

just checked again, and no, my gpu sit there at 98% no swings in usage, so it perhaps the problem is in your side only