[Project Development] cgEasy 1.0.0--Generate CGminer config for LTC Mining easy!

[meebs]

I'll post it later

For 550kh/s+ on my 7950 I use this config:

Code:

host ???
port ???
user xxx
pass xxx


protocol litecoin

worksize 256
vectors 1
aggression 20
threads_per_gpu 1
sharethreads 32
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 24576

This person managed 700kh/s on water: http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/2250/reaperg.jpg

edit: After playing with this for a while and plotting thread_concurries and kh/s quantities, I can say the following:
- For any given card there is a thread_concurrency value range which is optimum with lookup_gap == 2.  For the 7770, this span is 6080-11456.  Below this range the number of stales increases, with it becoming mostly stale in the 4000-ish range.  Above this range, the speed in kh/s drops dramatically.  Within this range, speed in kh/s seems to plateau and is nearly constant.
- Using the lowest thread_concurrency values seems to use the least power (I guess because less memory is being used).
- You can run 1550MHz+ RAM on these cards using MSI Afterburner with this file in the Afterburner folder and overlocking mode set to 2 in the Afterburner configuration.

DING we have a winner! 590 k/hash :-D

Now I'm going to try to get the 7870 up to par.

[tacotime]

DING we have a winner! 590 k/hash :-D

Now I'm going to try to get the 7870 up to par.

np.  good luck.

LhY6GBzeLCjhmNP4F9UWMNmWkyhGVrpQwv

[meebs]

DING we have a winner! 590 k/hash :-D

Now I'm going to try to get the 7870 up to par.

np.  good luck.

LhY6GBzeLCjhmNP4F9UWMNmWkyhGVrpQwv

Payment sent.

No luck yet for the 7870.. anything equivelent or close to what worked on the 7950 seems to fall on its face.

[tacotime]

DING we have a winner! 590 k/hash :-D

Now I'm going to try to get the 7870 up to par.

np.  good luck.

LhY6GBzeLCjhmNP4F9UWMNmWkyhGVrpQwv

Payment sent.

No luck yet for the 7870.. anything equivelent or close to what worked on the 7950 seems to fall on its face.

Thanks!
Try these thread concurrency values with the same settings otherwise as for the 7950, but with aggressions between 13 and 20
13568, 14336. 16000, 16384, 17408, 18432

The concurrencies are really strange, for instance I have no explanation of why 8000 is optimal for a 7770

[serraz]

Hey if you all use this but want a easier way of creating configs. I Have ported cgeasy to a site on my pool. Feel free to check it out at http://give-me-ltc.com/configs