OK, I wanted to look at the video and I stopped at the first proof.
"The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude ..."
WTF?!? Of course it is appears perfectly flat! Can you evan imagine the size of the Eart at all?
I can only assume what other "proofs" are ...
I would really like to hear a genuine scientist who believes in a flat earth not some charlatans who probably had difficulties with elementary school physics.
If the earth were really flat - no mountains or valleys, but
flat - and you stood on the earth and looked straight ahead, you would never see the horizon. Why not? Because you have to look down a little to see the horizon. The higher you go in altitude, the harder it is to see the horizon if you look straight ahead. The only reason you see it at all is because of peripheral vision.
On a earth with mountains and valleys, the difference is that you would need to go higher in altitude to realize this.
The point is that the whole concept of the horizon is treated incorrectly by both FE non-scientists, and GE non-scientists. There are not enough details given to handle it in a scientific manner. There are all kinds of things that we automatically consider without stating them, if we do things from a non-scientific point of view.
The horizon never rises to meet the eye that is looking straight ahead, level, parallel to the earth. If this eye is above the earth at all, it will never see the horizon on either a flat earth or a globe. The only part of the eye that will see the horizon, is the peripheral vision part. What this means is that the eye is looking down. The horizon is not rising to meet the eye.
