Flat Earth

[Astargath]

^^^ While primarily intended to highlight issues with JPEG compressed images, the ELA is still useful in highlighting issues in a .PNG format image hence the ability of the application to load that format.

...
In August 2007, Dr. Neal Krawetz gave a presentation at the Black Hat Briefings computer security conference. The presentation, titled "A Picture's Worth", covered a handful of novel photo analysis algorithms. (A video of the presentation is available from iTunes, search for "Krawetz". The associated white paper and slides are available online.) Using these algorithms, researchers can determine if a picture is real or computer graphics, if it was modified, and even how it was modified. Dr. Krawetz gave variations of this presentation at different conferences between 2007 and 2010.
...
Source: http://fotoforensics.com/faq.php

Here's the white paper: https://blackhat.com/presentations/bh-dc-08/Krawetz/Whitepaper/bh-dc-08-krawetz-WP.pdf | archive.org

Here's more from the tutorial:

...
Look around the picture and identify the different high-contrast edges, low-contrast edges, surfaces, and textures. Compare those areas with the ELA results. If there are significant differences, then it identifies suspicious areas that may have been digitally altered.
...

Source: http://fotoforensics.com/tutorial-ela.php

In this case the ELA highlights the inconstant background noise behind the stars and other issues.

While my use of the fotoforensics software and analysis of the NASA provided image thereof is far from conclusive, there's a preponderance of evidence of fraud with NASA and their claims. This being the case the chances that the provided image is authentic approaches zero.

What I mean by "fixed them" is they've anticipated my use of fotoforensics and modified the images accordingly so as not to highlight any inconsistencies. What they didn't anticipate is me pulling a frame from their little video.

So you are analyzing a 'photo' that is actually a frame from a video, LOL

[Filos]

Ofc NASA's images have digital processing.. :facepalm:

Do you people think that by proving that NASA's images are digitally processed you prove that the earth is flat? I mean wtf how much more idiotic can an argument get?  

You think they go to space and take images with an iphone or a simple camera? get real guys...

Anyone can check out raw images from NASA here for example: https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/raw-images/raw-image-viewer/?order=earth_date+desc&per_page=50&page=0

But that's not appealing to the average joe... so yeah

[Cryptotourist]

Has this been posted?



Batty?

[lightlord]

Has this been posted?



Batty?

All evidence of a 3D brain is manipulated by the government, MRI scanners pictures are altered by a secret software, And there is a flat brain inside our skulls with a dome around it.

[BADecker]

Has this been posted?



Batty?

All evidence of a 3D brain is manipulated by the government, MRI scanners pictures are altered by a secret software, And there is a flat brain inside our skulls with a dome around it.

But it's the Eskimos who have an ice-ring around the outer edges.

 

[Cryptotourist]

My favorite:

[Filos]

I would not suggest to any flattard to see the following video. They would not be able to understand it.

Anyhow pretty interesting. (another simple way to prove that the earth is not flat...) Add it to my list above.(prev page)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYZ-Ab9-WHI

[XCASH]

Do you people think that by proving that NASA's images are digitally processed you prove that the earth is flat? I mean wtf how much more idiotic can an argument get?  

You think they go to space and take images with an iphone or a simple camera? get real guys...

Notbatman thinks they have never been to space. He also posts in the fake moon landing thread.

[Filos]

There is a plethora of evidence that we have been to space. And not just NASA ofc.

Beyond the GPS that anyone can use with the right equipment, there are topographic satellites for example that are used to find mineral resources. Every flattard is using those in his everyday life.

But they are not smart enough to wonder how can someone find hydrocarbons in the middle of the frakin ocean. Ofc satellites are not the only equipment used. But they are pretty important as a guide.  

A great example is jason 3 that uses altimetric data to modelize ocean topography variations. The altitude of sea surface help us determine the density of underlying formations..  

Only a total retard would think we haven't been to space by now, two thousand frakin nineteen..

Notbatman thinks they have never been to space. He also posts in the fake moon landing thread.

Sooo yeah, ok. An argument can become much more idiotic than i thought..

[notbatman]

Why is it called a brain? It's because it is a membrane:


^{Source: https://www.chegg.com/ -- Textbook Solutions, Expert Q&A}

Remember, the airplane flies over the plain in Spain because the air above the plain in Spain is a plane.

[Cryptotourist]

Remember, the airplane flies over the plain in Spain because the air above the plain in Spain is a plane.

[TheBeardedBaby]

@notbatman, do you really believe that the Earth is flat or you are just trolling around??

[notbatman]

@notbatman, do you really believe that the Earth is flat or you are just trolling around??

Where does the rain fall? Can you understand that the Earth is measurably and observably flat for as far as the eye can see? Can you understand that a gyroscope proven to maintain its position in space with respect to 15°/h will not respond to the claim that the Earth moves?

You can't bullshit a gyroscope, it doesn't respond to lies.

[BADecker]

@notbatman, do you really believe that the Earth is flat or you are just trolling around??

https://i.imgur.com/PLeX4H5.jpg

Where does the rain fall? Can you understand that the Earth is measurably and observably flat for as far as the eye can see? Can you understand that a gyroscope proven to maintain its position in space with respect to 15°/h will not respond to the claim that the Earth moves?

You can't bullshit a gyroscope, it doesn't respond to lies.

https://i.imgur.com/FiKHAcO.jpg

And as the earth turns, the gyroscope attempts to maintain its true orientation to the universal center. Look at a child's toy gyroscope. It wobbles as it spins on its base. The best of our gyroscopes are too flimsy to measure universal center accurately. So, what does that have to do with FE?

When you look throughout the universe, there is nothing that is flat. Flat is a virtual concept developed by people who would rather live in a virtual world than in reality.

When you drive your car up a mountain, does it mean that the mountain flattens out in a different direction for you? Or does it mean that the earth is not flat?

[notbatman]

The Copernican revolution gave birth to the foul giant that is atheism and communism, we're gonna need a bigger helicopter.

[BADecker]

When you have the spinning globe, all you need is the 'copter blades.

[notbatman]

^{Image source: https://www.nrk.no/troms/ser-du-trollet_-1.11708745}


Mountain troll walked this Earth before he sat to rest his feet.

[BADecker]

https://i.imgur.com/qJhhjWF.jpg
^{Image source: https://www.nrk.no/troms/ser-du-trollet_-1.11708745}


Mountain troll walked this Earth before he sat to rest his feet.

The question is, is FE under his feet or under his seat? After all the "flat" mountain slope is not aligned to either his feet or his seat.

Just another proof that the earth is not flat.

[Filos]

@notroundhead Keep disregarding all the proof given. Throw new crap on the table, it could work.

[notbatman]

^^^ Proof you're a fool or a liar?

   You're literally disregarding how optics works, you allow the angular resolution limit of specifically the human eye (1 minute) to be falsely attributed to a sphere below your feet. The globe can literally be debunked with a powerful zoom lens (less than 1 minute) such as a Nikon P900 or P1000.

Pegging the horizon at a distance far beyond the 3 miles a 6 foot person would see it, with a landmark of known distance, using the zoom lens, this debunks the globe.



Image source:
   https://www.puregrenada.com/explore/scuba-diving/underwater-sculpture-park/