|
ThickAsThieves
|
 |
July 20, 2013, 11:18:39 PM |
|
I guess we know now that all the SDice money is running to AMC....holy shit.
Or is all AMC money going into AMC? Food for thought. |
|
|
|
|
|
CMMPro
|
|
July 20, 2013, 11:26:56 PM |
|
Interesting comment....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voodah
|
|
July 21, 2013, 01:20:39 AM |
|
Not disclosing the buyer is really hurting the credibility of this whole thing.
I guess, after all, this is not that first good exit we're all waiting as a btc success story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voodah
|
|
July 21, 2013, 10:21:14 AM |
|
Not disclosing the buyer is really hurting the credibility of this whole thing.
I guess, after all, this is not that first good exit we're all waiting as a btc success story.
I can't wait to see you exit from your company. Ohh wait you don't have a bitcoin company. So? Are you stupid or blind? Why are you so eager to negate something so simple and obvious in plain sight as what I say? Let me rephrase it for you: A clear visible buyer would be a better success story for BTC. PERIOD. I'm not saying anything else. Please read intently before posting stupid shit and hopping on the protect/bash Erik bandwagon. That's not what I'm doing. |
|
|
|
|
|
MPOE-PR
|
|
July 21, 2013, 12:08:53 PM |
|
Not disclosing the buyer is really hurting the credibility of this whole thing.
I guess, after all, this is not that first good exit we're all waiting as a btc success story.
I can't wait to see you exit from your company. Ohh wait you don't have a bitcoin company. The magical power of the Internet anon to shape reality at work. You see, if "Voodah" were to say somewhere on some thread that X is not Y, then therefore that immediately becomes the case. Hope and pray he doesn't one day wake up with an urge to post here that the Sun won't rise tomorrow. We could be pretty majorly screwed. All hail the great Internet anon. Please don't fuck astronomy up with your magic keyboard thingie. I guess we know now that all the SDice money is running to AMC....holy shit.
Try harder. |
|
|
|
|
CMMPro
|
|
July 21, 2013, 02:40:44 PM |
|
That happens all the time...I sold my online business this past December and the new buyer wanted to remain as anonymous as possible due to the goodwill I had built up with my customers over the previous 5 years of operations.
He actually didn't even want the sale announced...he just wanted to be listed as a part of my "team" when in reality he took over the entire operation. The entire thing goes under a non-disclosure in the sale agreement and life goes on.
If it wasn't for the buyout and getting rid of the outstanding shares I'm sure this is scenario a possibility for any of these funds as well.
Possibly the people who started these funds may not be the people who are running them now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lohoris
|
|
July 21, 2013, 02:48:08 PM |
|
He actually didn't even want the sale announced...he just wanted to be listed as a part of my "team" when in reality he took over the entire operation. The entire thing goes under a non-disclosure in the sale agreement and life goes on.
Is this legal? |
|
|
|
miscreanity
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1005
|
|
July 21, 2013, 04:13:42 PM |
|
I guess we know now that all the SDice money is running to AMC....holy shit.
Try harder. PTs have obviously seen a disbursal among other equities, but that certainly isn't the whole story. As a great deal of funds were already in MPEx, it appears a good amount flowed into MPOE and the other listed gaming stocks. |
|
|
|
|
stephwen
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
July 21, 2013, 04:19:41 PM |
|
MPOE-PR and erik voorhees suck. he screws investors over. And Mireca Popescu is an alter ego of MPOE-PR and is a pedophile (in a bad way).
Dont give any of them your coins
What's the good way of being a pedophile?  |
|
|
|
|
bapakece
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
July 21, 2013, 04:20:39 PM |
|
helping children but thats not the point
MPOE-PR is not a pr HE constantly insults people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lohoris
|
|
July 21, 2013, 05:25:47 PM |
|
The objective in DPR is to discredit someone else doesn't apply |
|
|
|
|
boonies4u
|
|
July 21, 2013, 06:15:15 PM |
|
The objective in DPR is to discredit someone else doesn't apply IMO MPOE-PR is an example of bad Negative PR. The bad part comes from the fact we know MPOE-PR represents MPOE. |
|
|
|
|
|
WildFire.ca
|
|
July 21, 2013, 06:39:42 PM |
|
When is the S.Dice payout supposed to happen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMMPro
|
|
July 21, 2013, 09:45:34 PM |
|
He actually didn't even want the sale announced...he just wanted to be listed as a part of my "team" when in reality he took over the entire operation. The entire thing goes under a non-disclosure in the sale agreement and life goes on.
Is this legal? My business was a private corp and I was the only shareholder, so I could do what I want as I didn't have any responsibility to report to external shareholders. If I had external shareholders I would be ethically required to reveal my new role in the corporation. Right now I stay on the books as a consultant and occasionally I do have a phone conversation with the new owner about tech details and deals I had in the past with vendors and big customers...so he can still say we are part of a "team". With these virtual corporations being basically unregulated I can see that it could happen the same with one of them as well. Ethically I would hope they would be open and transparent about the sale or control of the funds being switched to another person. In this case Evan could have just performed a buyback at 110% or whatever, then transferred ownership of the corporation to the new owner without telling anyone it was even sold. He didn't have to pay out as much as he did, so I'd say he was admirable in his intentions to the shareholders. (He could have really screwed over everyone much much worse.) |
|
|
|
|
RationalSpeculator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
This bull will try to shake you off. Hold tight!
|
|
July 21, 2013, 10:05:00 PM |
|
He actually didn't even want the sale announced...he just wanted to be listed as a part of my "team" when in reality he took over the entire operation. The entire thing goes under a non-disclosure in the sale agreement and life goes on.
Is this legal? My business was a private corp and I was the only shareholder, so I could do what I want as I didn't have any responsibility to report to external shareholders. If I had external shareholders I would be ethically required to reveal my new role in the corporation. Right now I stay on the books as a consultant and occasionally I do have a phone conversation with the new owner about tech details and deals I had in the past with vendors and big customers...so he can still say we are part of a "team". With these virtual corporations being basically unregulated I can see that it could happen the same with one of them as well. Ethically I would hope they would be open and transparent about the sale or control of the funds being switched to another person. In this case Evan could have just performed a buyback at 110% or whatever, then transferred ownership of the corporation to the new owner without telling anyone it was even sold. He didn't have to pay out as much as he did, so I'd say he was admirable in his intentions to the shareholders. (He could have really screwed over everyone much much worse.) With evan you mean Erik Voorhees? |
|
|
|
|
|
CMMPro
|
|
July 21, 2013, 10:07:31 PM |
|
Doi...yes for some reason I wrote Evan. I meant Erik.
|
|
|
|
|
RationalSpeculator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
This bull will try to shake you off. Hold tight!
|
|
July 21, 2013, 10:45:59 PM
Last edit: July 29, 2013, 06:56:31 PM by RationalSpeculator |
|
He actually didn't even want the sale announced...he just wanted to be listed as a part of my "team" when in reality he took over the entire operation. The entire thing goes under a non-disclosure in the sale agreement and life goes on.
Is this legal? My business was a private corp and I was the only shareholder, so I could do what I want as I didn't have any responsibility to report to external shareholders. If I had external shareholders I would be ethically required to reveal my new role in the corporation. Right now I stay on the books as a consultant and occasionally I do have a phone conversation with the new owner about tech details and deals I had in the past with vendors and big customers...so he can still say we are part of a "team". With these virtual corporations being basically unregulated I can see that it could happen the same with one of them as well. Ethically I would hope they would be open and transparent about the sale or control of the funds being switched to another person. In this case Erik could have just performed a buyback at 110% or whatever, then transferred ownership of the corporation to the new owner without telling anyone it was even sold. He didn't have to pay out as much as he did, so I'd say he was admirable in his intentions to the shareholders. (He could have really screwed over everyone much much worse.) The relative high price for shareholders was only relatively high because the company was doing poor, which is also his responsibility. Running the company poorly but negotiating a good price, that evens out to neutral in my book. |
|
|
|
|
|
CMMPro
|
|
July 21, 2013, 10:50:32 PM |
|
There is the possibility that he did screw everyone over in much bigger terms than we think....I believe we will never know the answer to that question.
If he delved into insider trading, bots on SDICE etc. then he basically bought is way out of jail/hell with a few thousand btc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
