🌟🎲🌟 MoneyPot.com

[DarkStar_]

It is not my main account and that account is old because i was trying to play in dust lottery with my BitMaxz moneypot long time ago..
Now i notice that my investment in moneypot is decreases . i notice even there is no history of interest of decrease or increase profit.
I tried to divest  few minutes ago and invest it back just to know the total of my investment history and now open again and i notice the decreases. and i think there is few bits are not in total..

Screenshot shows that you profited ~14k bits (0.014BTC), so I'm not sure where your getting at. Doesn't really show that you divested to gamble and than reinvested, just an investment and a divestment today. The logs don't show profits/losses, because it would be dumb seeing +0.01 bits this second, -0.02 bits the next, e.t.c. Get the amount you have now, subtract by your original investment and you get your profit.

[Lanzador]

It is not my main account and that account is old because i was trying to play in dust lottery with my BitMaxz moneypot long time ago..
Now i notice that my investment in moneypot is decreases . i notice even there is no history of interest of decrease or increase profit.
I tried to divest  few minutes ago and invest it back just to know the total of my investment history and now open again and i notice the decreases. and i think there is few bits are not in total..

Screenshot shows that you profited ~14k bits (0.014BTC), so I'm not sure where your getting at. Doesn't really show that you divested to gamble and than reinvested, just an investment and a divestment today. The logs don't show profits/losses, because it would be dumb seeing +0.01 bits this second, -0.02 bits the next, e.t.c. Get the amount you have now, subtract by your original investment and you get your profit.

Yeah buddy, seems completely normal to me - not sure what your'e seeing that's out of place

[BTCevo]

Any update on the Rubies / v2 implementation? Almost 2/3rds through November at this point,  haven't heard anything recently.

Will they make an update on rubies? I never know that though because last time what they reallt said about is they always but rubies on 1k satoshi and always like that so I never know if they still go for it for not since rubies movement already been slowed down. I saw it from c-cex exchanger and there is nothing about rubies though, max volume is around 0.01-0.02 onlyå

[BTCforJoe]

Any update on the Rubies / v2 implementation? Almost 2/3rds through November at this point,  haven't heard anything recently.

Will they make an update on rubies? I never know that though because last time what they reallt said about is they always but rubies on 1k satoshi and always like that so I never know if they still go for it for not since rubies movement already been slowed down. I saw it from c-cex exchanger and there is nothing about rubies though, max volume is around 0.01-0.02 onlyå

I've been waiting a long time for one, as well. I bought into the RBIES hype several months ago and picked some up for 10,000+ sat each... I'm REALLY hoping that there's something great in the RBIES pipeline...

Since they've announced that they'll be bottoming at 1k sat, they've done a good job with keeping the floor at 1,000sat+, so I'll give them that... Just waiting to see RBIES integrated into MP... That will be great!

[Text]

What would happen to my invesment if I already earned a profit from winning against the gamblers? Would it be decreased or get affected once there's someone wons a bet? Thank you.

[Erza]

What would happen to my invesment if I already earned a profit from winning against the gamblers? Would it be decreased or get affected once there's someone wons a bet? Thank you.

Yeah of course, unless you withdraw some of your profit but since it binds your investment so I think when somone win, your profit will be decreased, depends on how much you put on your investment. And you might have chance to lose some of your real investment too in case some have big winning

[zupdawg]

What would happen to my invesment if I already earned a profit from winning against the gamblers? Would it be decreased or get affected once there's someone wons a bet? Thank you.

when you invest your money will be part of the bankroll so when a player losses it will be a win for you and if player wins it will be a lose for you. but in the long run since you are part of the house and have the house edge advantage you will most likely win around 1% of your invested amount

[ranlo]

What would happen to my invesment if I already earned a profit from winning against the gamblers? Would it be decreased or get affected once there's someone wons a bet? Thank you.

when you invest your money will be part of the bankroll so when a player losses it will be a win for you and if player wins it will be a lose for you. but in the long run since you are part of the house and have the house edge advantage you will most likely win around 1% of your invested amount

The amount earned for the entire bankroll is approximately 1% (or the HE of bets, due to varying apps) of wagered amount, not whatever you invested. So coming up with a % of your investment you'd earn is impossible, since it is entirely related to the volume, rather than an individual investment. However, your increase/decrease is related to how much you have invested and what the sway was. Just to illustrate:

BR is 100 BTC. You hold 1 BTC. Player lost 100 BTC. You earned 100% (1->2)
BR is 100 BTC. You hold 50 BTC. Player lost 100 BTC. You earned 100% (50->100)

It's estimated players will lose 1% of volume (or the HE of their respective app).

[dooglus]

you will most likely win around 1% of your invested amount

It's 1% of the HE of bets, not whatever you invested.

I don't think that's right either is it?

That would mean moneypot is effectively taking a 99% commission and I doubt that's accurate.

[ranlo]

you will most likely win around 1% of your invested amount

It's 1% of the HE of bets, not whatever you invested.

I don't think that's right either is it?

That would mean moneypot is effectively taking a 99% commission and I doubt that's accurate.

Sorry, that was a typo. Should have been "It's 1% or the HE of bets." Which is also a simplification due to varying HE of different apps, but was posted simply to get the point across that you can't simply say "your investment will go up 1%."

[joksim299]

Looks like Socketpot is down on most apps.

[BitLegit.com]

Hi, how can I verify my app?

www.bitlegit.com - website
www.bitlegit.com/minesweeper.html - application page

https://www.moneypot.com/apps/1252-kill-a-terrorist - moneypot app page


thanks

[mehmedchelebi]

Hi, how can I verify my app?

BettorChain.com

[joksim299]

Hi, how can I verify my app?

BettorChain.com

Your app is verified already, look at the post above yours.
I woner why they verified another 'Untitled Dice' fork.

[MartinL]

Your app is verified already, look at the post above yours.
I woner why they verified another 'Untitled Dice' fork.

A casino being verified doesn't mean that MoneyPot approves of or vouches for the game itself. It only means that the casino actually owns its claimed domain and isn't pretending to be another casino.

[joksim299]

Your app is verified already, look at the post above yours.
I woner why they verified another 'Untitled Dice' fork.

A casino being verified doesn't mean that MoneyPot approves of or vouches for the game itself. It only means that the casino actually owns its claimed domain and isn't pretending to be another casino.

They said few weeks ago that they will not verify apps which use basic 'Untitled Dice' script.

[BitLegit.com]

Ill hopefully be getting some graphic design done to make it better than the basic sweepabit design.  Thanks

[BoXXoB]

Just my two satoshis but does anybody else think a site should be finalized as far as possible before launch? The first expression would be a lot better if players could get a fresh feeling once they visit the site for the first time instead of having to wait for upgrades to come bit by bit. This is not directed to any certain site but it just seems like unfinished products are being released all the time.

[Lanzador]

Just my two satoshis but does anybody else think a site should be finalized as far as possible before launch? The first expression would be a lot better if players could get a fresh feeling once they visit the site for the first time instead of having to wait for upgrades to come bit by bit. This is not directed to any certain site but it just seems like unfinished products are being released all the time.

It was a small window of opportunity to get in early on BTC gambling - it looks like it paid off for them

[CrazyCraig]

Just my two satoshis but does anybody else think a site should be finalized as far as possible before launch? The first expression would be a lot better if players could get a fresh feeling once they visit the site for the first time instead of having to wait for upgrades to come bit by bit. This is not directed to any certain site but it just seems like unfinished products are being released all the time.

A site should be functional. No one website is ever complete.

In the last few years a practice has rose in the development community known as agile. Agile focuses on proving minimum viable product before features are added. As the site progresses, features are continousouly added. This differs from waterfall, which focuses on bloating a product before release.