enhu
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1018
|
 |
October 19, 2016, 05:14:06 PM |
|
WAVES i think would be much better. This time let get this fix for the release is very much awaited by tons of us excited to see ICN on the exchange and what it can offer in the future. We'd like to see it live.
|
|
|
|
|
DaniellPlasmmer
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:16:12 PM |
|
WAVES i think would be much better. This time let get this fix for the release is very much awaited by tons of us excited to see ICN on the exchange and what it can offer in the future. We'd like to see it live.
Waves is so good like a text missing commas? |
|
|
|
|
Sindren
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 535
Merit: 250
Love me tender
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:23:54 PM |
|
WAVES i think would be much better. This time let get this fix for the release is very much awaited by tons of us excited to see ICN on the exchange and what it can offer in the future. We'd like to see it live.
Waves is so good like a text missing commas? maybe also without letters  |
|
|
|
|
|
MrPresident
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:25:53 PM |
|
So finally there is no account swap possible as replied from Jani.people can ask refund who sent BTC to escrow,must provide tx hash.
Is it secure? Anyone can send any tx to the escrow. Person need PROVE the ownership of the sending address. That offer has ended. Move ICONOMI to Lisk, why not?
As much as I would LOVE that, Lisk simply isn't ready. We could "make it happen", but it would violate our roadmap. Lisk is meeting with Iconomi actually right now sharing DDoS setups... who knows, could change. True. Also Iconomi, what if ultimately Ethereum fails. What is the backup scenario?
LSK, NXT, Counterparty... Counterparty is stable and an excellent option. WAVES i think would be much better. This time let get this fix for the release is very much awaited by tons of us excited to see ICN on the exchange and what it can offer in the future. We'd like to see it live.
Waves? No! If that were to happen I would dump 100% at launch. Many others would do the same. We have yet to get an update guys... the test contract may have deployed without issue; we just need wait for an official update. ANYTHING ELSE IS PURE SPECULATION or FUD at this point. |
Develop Custom Decentralized Blockchain Applications in JavaScript with LISK!
Website | Blog | BTT Thread | Chat - Be part of the decentralized application movement!
|
|
|
|
DaniellPlasmmer
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:33:15 PM |
|
So finally there is no account swap possible as replied from Jani.people can ask refund who sent BTC to escrow,must provide tx hash.
Is it secure? Anyone can send any tx to the escrow. Person need PROVE the ownership of the sending address. That offer has ended. Move ICONOMI to Lisk, why not?
As much as I would LOVE that, lisk simply isn't ready. We could "make it happen", but it would violate our roadmap. Lisk is meeting with Iconomi actually right now sharing DDoS setups... who knows, could change. True. Also Iconomi, what if ultimately Ethereum fails. What is the backup scenario?
LSK, NXT, Counterparty... Counterparty is stable and an excellent option. WAVES i think would be much better. This time let get this fix for the release is very much awaited by tons of us excited to see ICN on the exchange and what it can offer in the future. We'd like to see it live.
Waves? No! If that were to happen I would dump 100% at launch. Many others would do the same. We have yet to get an update guys... the test contract may have deployed without issue; we just need wait for an official update. ANYTHING ELSE IS PURE SPECULATION or FUD at this point. Why Waves isn't good? Can Lisk be better than Counterparty? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MrPresident
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:42:29 PM |
|
Why Waves isn't good?
Can Lisk be better than Counterparty?
Mom told me not to talk bad about folks... (Waves)  CAN Lisk be better than Counterparty? Sure, sometime in the future; but as of RIGHT NOW... Lisk is NOT READY. I know because I run a dozen Lisk servers, am an alpha tester, and I asked Oliver, Max, and Isabella about it. Isabella did some testing in behalf of ICN on Devnet. It is possible if a private network is created between Iconomi and exchanges, but some updates would need deployed to the main network, and would need tested on both devnet and testnet first. or.... Counterparty is stable and ready. |
Develop Custom Decentralized Blockchain Applications in JavaScript with LISK!
Website | Blog | BTT Thread | Chat - Be part of the decentralized application movement!
|
|
|
|
Daparski
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:43:35 PM |
|
So finally there is no account swap possible as replied from Jani.people can ask refund who sent BTC to escrow,must provide tx hash.
Is it secure? Anyone can send any tx to the escrow. Person need PROVE the ownership of the sending address. That offer has ended. Move ICONOMI to Lisk, why not?
As much as I would LOVE that, lisk simply isn't ready. We could "make it happen", but it would violate our roadmap. Lisk is meeting with Iconomi actually right now sharing DDoS setups... who knows, could change. True. Also Iconomi, what if ultimately Ethereum fails. What is the backup scenario?
LSK, NXT, Counterparty... Counterparty is stable and an excellent option. WAVES i think would be much better. This time let get this fix for the release is very much awaited by tons of us excited to see ICN on the exchange and what it can offer in the future. We'd like to see it live.
Waves? No! If that were to happen I would dump 100% at launch. Many others would do the same. We have yet to get an update guys... the test contract may have deployed without issue; we just need wait for an official update. ANYTHING ELSE IS PURE SPECULATION or FUD at this point. Why Waves isn't good? Can Lisk be better than Counterparty? We still need to give ether network a chance. Regarding other platforms - my main concerns are: 1. Iconomi would be the first major project deployment. Not good idea when it comes down to managed funds platform. 2. Liquidity. If you look at the trading volume of all other alternatives, it can be a major problem for high volume weekly transactions. Bitcoin would be the best option, but it is expensive. So it looks like we stay with ether for now. |
|
|
|
|
|
ShooterXD
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:45:01 PM |
|
Prob ICONOMI team still looking at this other option.
Wait any Ann.
|
|
|
|
|
5thangel
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:46:49 PM |
|
thanks  |
|
|
|
|
|
Daparski
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:47:32 PM |
|
Why Waves isn't good?
Can Lisk be better than Counterparty?
Mom told me not to talk bad about folks... (Waves) CAN Lisk be better than Counterparty? Sure, sometime in the future; but as of RIGHT NOW... Lisk is NOT READY. I know because I run a dozen Lisk servers, am an alpha tester, and I asked Oliver, Max, and Isabella about it. Isabella did some testing in behalf of ICN on Devnet. It is possible if a private network is created between Iconomi and exchanges, but some updates would need deployed to the main network, and would need tested on both devnet and testnet first. or.... Counterparty is stable and ready. Don't you think that counterparty low trading volume and low supply makes it a no-go? I think low supply is why it is not listed in ICNX |
|
|
|
|
|
DaniellPlasmmer
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:47:53 PM |
|
So finally there is no account swap possible as replied from Jani.people can ask refund who sent BTC to escrow,must provide tx hash.
Is it secure? Anyone can send any tx to the escrow. Person need PROVE the ownership of the sending address. That offer has ended. Move ICONOMI to Lisk, why not?
As much as I would LOVE that, lisk simply isn't ready. We could "make it happen", but it would violate our roadmap. Lisk is meeting with Iconomi actually right now sharing DDoS setups... who knows, could change. True. Also Iconomi, what if ultimately Ethereum fails. What is the backup scenario?
LSK, NXT, Counterparty... Counterparty is stable and an excellent option. WAVES i think would be much better. This time let get this fix for the release is very much awaited by tons of us excited to see ICN on the exchange and what it can offer in the future. We'd like to see it live.
Waves? No! If that were to happen I would dump 100% at launch. Many others would do the same. We have yet to get an update guys... the test contract may have deployed without issue; we just need wait for an official update. ANYTHING ELSE IS PURE SPECULATION or FUD at this point. Why Waves isn't good? Can Lisk be better than Counterparty? We still need to give ether network a chance. Regarding other platforms - my main concerns are: 1. Iconomi would be the first major project deployment. Not good idea when it comes down to managed funds platform. 2. Liquidity. If you look at the trading volume of all other alternatives, it can be a major problem for high volume weekly transactions. Bitcoin would be the best option, but it is expensive. So it looks like we stay with ether for now. Bitcoin?  I've never hear about Bitcoin as platform for DAPPs/custom asset tokens. |
|
|
|
|
favdesu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:49:08 PM |
|
So there is another attack, does this mean there will be more delays for the launch?
doubt the new attack is has as much impact as the first. hope there will be no further delay I hope too for no more further delays. Iconomi team should give us an update about this 2nd hf thing if its possible True. Also Iconomi, what if ultimately Ethereum fails. What is the backup scenario? they only really need a chain that is capable of paying out dividends. there are a lot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daparski
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:50:11 PM |
|
So finally there is no account swap possible as replied from Jani.people can ask refund who sent BTC to escrow,must provide tx hash.
Is it secure? Anyone can send any tx to the escrow. Person need PROVE the ownership of the sending address. That offer has ended. Move ICONOMI to Lisk, why not?
As much as I would LOVE that, lisk simply isn't ready. We could "make it happen", but it would violate our roadmap. Lisk is meeting with Iconomi actually right now sharing DDoS setups... who knows, could change. True. Also Iconomi, what if ultimately Ethereum fails. What is the backup scenario?
LSK, NXT, Counterparty... Counterparty is stable and an excellent option. WAVES i think would be much better. This time let get this fix for the release is very much awaited by tons of us excited to see ICN on the exchange and what it can offer in the future. We'd like to see it live.
Waves? No! If that were to happen I would dump 100% at launch. Many others would do the same. We have yet to get an update guys... the test contract may have deployed without issue; we just need wait for an official update. ANYTHING ELSE IS PURE SPECULATION or FUD at this point. Why Waves isn't good? Can Lisk be better than Counterparty? We still need to give ether network a chance. Regarding other platforms - my main concerns are: 1. Iconomi would be the first major project deployment. Not good idea when it comes down to managed funds platform. 2. Liquidity. If you look at the trading volume of all other alternatives, it can be a major problem for high volume weekly transactions. Bitcoin would be the best option, but it is expensive. So it looks like we stay with ether for now. Bitcoin? I've never hear about Bitcoin as platform for DAPPs/custom asset tokens. Bitcoin as paying dividends. Not as a platform for asset tokens |
|
|
|
|
SanFrancisco
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:57:07 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5thangel
|
|
October 19, 2016, 05:58:25 PM |
|
wait for news |
|
|
|
|
SanFrancisco
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
October 19, 2016, 06:00:39 PM |
|
wait for news Never used this contract thing on Ethereum. I'm running Mist. There will be a tutorial, I hope, hrhr. |
|
|
|
|
ccomeon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
October 19, 2016, 06:08:16 PM |
|
Why Waves isn't good?
Can Lisk be better than Counterparty?
Mom told me not to talk bad about folks... (Waves) CAN Lisk be better than Counterparty? Sure, sometime in the future; but as of RIGHT NOW... Lisk is NOT READY. I know because I run a dozen Lisk servers, am an alpha tester, and I asked Oliver, Max, and Isabella about it. Isabella did some testing in behalf of ICN on Devnet. It is possible if a private network is created between Iconomi and exchanges, but some updates would need deployed to the main network, and would need tested on both devnet and testnet first. or.... Counterparty is stable and ready. Don't you think that counterparty low trading volume and low supply makes it a no-go? I think low supply is why it is not listed in ICNX With Counterparty, dividend can be issued in Bitcoin. ICONOMI just need to create a token using Counterparty protocol, like what it is doing now on Ethereum, using ICN token but giving out dividend in ETH. |
|
|
|
|
|
MrPresident
|
|
October 19, 2016, 06:10:35 PM |
|
Just synced mist... it is still slow beginning with block 2468688 but does eventually sync. 0x384e762dAd922B22a0d06f4D1229582473D2DEe6There is the test contract address for icn/test watchtoken. It does not look to be listed as erc20, but it's there. Transactions are indeed being recorded many hours ago as expected. I entered the test watch address into Mist along with token's name "ICONOMI [test]"... it showed up instantly...   and a balance is showing in wallet... but the test amount is a tad short (should be 1.99201)  |
Develop Custom Decentralized Blockchain Applications in JavaScript with LISK!
Website | Blog | BTT Thread | Chat - Be part of the decentralized application movement!
|
|
|
|
