[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

[Lauda]

Oh look who has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar  

I was not caught with anything. The fact that you jump on this pathetic bandwagon just shows how butthurt you are.

Anyone going to whip out the red paint now?

No, as I have not done anything wrong. Unless of course, they plan on abusing their position like a certain someone.

[passionwagon]

We have got a big fish here
Arsen56

Accounts connected:
Lhinglhung
Trevon
gamblebuilder
ahmedshawezi
rampalija
dirts
Hypes
Omnivion
MindGrenade
wetroof
Maqa71
Kotos123
mekler22
montyfd
dudupang
wakeupcall
agoenkjrz
aricleather
ndan13
Crystyan
liberatorium
Heisenberg74
Loq
Capitanike


Proof: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yd7bd94LuppHsBzoICGYJj3cEuf-eA8AoJPyhmvo45s/edit#gid=1764646260
Arsen56 ETH address - https://etherscan.io/address/0x3b041627814ba14f6d5eaa29249d28df1d463fc8#tokentxns

All these multiaccounts are sending the bounties from their accounts to Arsen56 address. You can check the spreadsheet. This person is abusing signature campaigns, blog campaigns and others.

https://i.imgur.com/mo1zx3W.png

You can see how he is burstposting in order to get ranks for his next signature campaigns:
https://asktom.cf/index.php?action=profile;u=340183;sa=showPosts

I am sure these accounts were hacked, some of them have their last posts made in 2015 in English, Indonesian or any other language, but now they are writing articles in Russian.

Addresses:
0x3b041627814ba14f6d5eaa29249d28df1d463fc8
0xd47538f95737de4ab5e303a8ac0993b820cbb7ea
0xe7f97f8b7c2fa3550b76f976d5edb3535b3e11b2
0x21dfe64c86e7ad907eb03d848e763c4f48c382b5
0x0267626a8b7812826740e1e61f06f9e26e08afcf
0x395f63c7a9d9d5fd623f297c3fe3dced1d0197bd
0xf8a3b60272641e216a393e8cfbbdb590cfc69f7c
0x62a87c726c7a080e3817bf011ffd636a8ece0411
0x9d8c45d15c216b16c450be5a596c54d124569b44
0x7b8b522133769c834328aa292831a3a28906805c
0xb5648a334d26edabebb2894b275bc668cd739762
0x224657681f6ed007b1fb79602926fba1c714484d
0xd6fda454ee37acfcb2b582c327b8fbf4df194803
and others.


Here he is seen selling member accounts:
https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=2311295.msg23448020
He says he has loads of them.

Here he says that they are needed for bounties, and he is selling them because he does not have much time for signature campaigns:
https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=2311295.msg23460845#msg23460845

[Doc Martin]

Accounts connected: Lauda, Xanis

Lauda nuked the Xanis account in July 2015. It previously had almost 3000 posts.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0159d14a67570b3d/addresses
Lauda: 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD (https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=996318.msg10896717#msg10896717 / http://archive.is/XzVUk)
Xanis: 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942 / http://archive.is/tikrd / https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv)

cd40260d5a57d13eb5d2a4582ef036346f2a66ff948f7ba4ef981795bd64b3ef
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD as change address)

3a5f78995c9b93c6192d93fabc4bf0534e27a9b781d42626330d0b6cce41a6d7
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD -- provably links Lauda to 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (Xanis)

As I said, Lauda nuked the alt account. But the Xanis address was archived on bitcointa.lk (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942). It was also archived by a Bitcointalk address scraper on Github (https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv). A cursory glance through the addresses archived by the scraper shows that they are quite accurate. Pick a few at random and see for yourself.

Miscellaneous notes:

Lauda/Xanis buying forum accounts:

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=320328.msg3435067#msg3435067
http://archive.is/2TBKt
https://i.imgur.com/EBcWS4c.jpg

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=292662.msg3334977#msg3334977
http://archive.is/qFolm
https://i.imgur.com/Ge0WOAr.jpg

But why would Lauda be buying forum accounts? The answer is obvious:

https://bitcointa.lk/threads/primedice-highest-paid-signature-earn-up-to-2-4-btc-month-by-posting.168569/page-465#post-7616384
http://archive.is/4D76m
https://i.imgur.com/OzC84Hy.jpg

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=216854.msg3005096#msg3005096
http://archive.is/zcn2G
https://i.imgur.com/lCiJZda.jpg

"Signature managers against spam?" Oh, the irony!

There is a non-zero chance that Lauda has used (and continues to use) his Default Trust status to facilitate these account trading and signature spamming practices.

The fact that Lauda has been outed as an account trader while simultaneously heading up the SMAS initiative and being a signature campaign manager himself raises questions about a conflict of interest. In any case, please see the feedback Lauda has left for other users. Specifically, Lauda has extensively tagged users with negative trust with the following feedback: "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming." I agree, and by Lauda's own standards, Lauda is clearly untrustworthy for engaging in these practices.

I don't have the time or energy to look further into this now, but Xanis had thousands of posts in the Altcoin sections. I believe that both accounts were being used to scam giveaways. I've recently archived giveaway entry posts made by Lauda (those which haven't been deleted yet) for further research. Unfortunately, as Xanis was nuked, we only have quotes and archives like bitcointa.lk to work from. C'est la vie.

Quoted for reference

I suppose this one won't be added to the OP

[Lauda]

I suppose this one won't be added to the OP

It will not as it is a worthless connection. You'd realize this if you were smarter than a baboon.  

[Doc Martin]

I suppose this one won't be added to the OP

It will not as it is a worthless connection. You'd realize this if you were smarter than a baboon.  

Most of the connections are "worthless" then. Many are self-admitted, neutral trust, no scamming. Why are they listed at all? Why do the rules not apply to you??

You tried to buy dozens of accounts over multiple occasions. Since those posts were recovered from deleted posts, there's probably more. That seems relevant in a thread called "[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone." Also, you say one of your alt accounts is perma-banned. An opportunity to add pretty colors!!!

Why no add??

Edit: And immediately, Lauda DT neg trusts my account just for mentioning the accusation against him/her. Such fair rules, much even application!

[gobsmacker]

I suppose this one won't be added to the OP

It will not as it is a worthless connection. You'd realize this if you were smarter than a baboon.  

In this thread I will list known alt accounts of users.

Are you listing "known alt accounts of users," or arent you?

You only list accounts that aren't your own alts???

Theres plenty of users on that list who don't have red paint. Why are your alts exempt from the discussion?

Oh look who has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar   Anyone going to whip out the red paint now? Oh wait double standards and everyone giving blowjobs to each other. At least spit some out before you swallow next time. DT is rotten to the core. Hahahaha.

As expected. Lauda has tagged people for just mentioning buying/selling accounts. No proof required, we are all supposed to take Lauda's word for everything!!

I'm sure there will be no reciprocation here. But it's good to point out the hypocrisy from time to time.

Don't verify! Just trust Lauda!

[Lauda]

Are you listing "known alt accounts of users," or arent you?

No.

You only list accounts that aren't your own alts???

No.

Theres plenty of users on that list who don't have red paint. Why are your alts exempt from the discussion?

Dead accounts are not alts. Dead accounts should not be listed unless they have other implications such as more alts, ban evasion, and similar.

Don't verify! Just trust Lauda!

Given that you aren't smart enough to verify yourself, yes. Time to make the measures even stricter.

[Doc Martin]

Dead accounts are not alts. Dead accounts should not be listed unless they have other implications such as more alts, ban evasion, and similar.

By your own standards, your alt engaged in untrustworthy behavior. That reflects on you. Nobody cares about the dead account lol.

So you are trustworthy because the account buying happened on your alt account instead of your main account? That's the logic here??!

BTW the multiple trust ratings you gave me today show why people are so scared to speak against you......all I did was fucking point out the allegations that are well-sourced and proven.

[actmyname]

people are so scared to speak against you

Lauda is hitler! All hail Bitcoin Cash! /s

You don't really believe that people can't voice their disagreement towards Lauda, do you?

BTW the multiple trust ratings you gave me today show why

Did not happen in one day.

[Lauda]

Lauda is hitler! All hail Bitcoin Cash!

Incoming negative rating in 3, 2/s.. Oh wait.

You don't really believe that people can't voice their disagreement towards Lauda, do you?

There are a few threads every week or two. Seems about right. I highly doubt that he actually believes that nonsense.

[Doc Martin]

people are so scared to speak against you

Lauda is hitler! All hail Bitcoin Cash! /s

You don't really believe that people can't voice their disagreement towards Lauda, do you?

I got negative trust for bringing Lauda' activity up at all. I never lied once. Everything I said was proven, clearly as day. But Lauda neg trusted me for "lying."

Now my account is ruined. And you wonder why people are scared to speak against Lauda??

BTW the multiple trust ratings you gave me today show why

Did not happen in one day.

Happened in less than 24 hours for the same alleged "lies."

And if it happened over two days instead of one, what difference does it make??

Lauda just lives in Bizarro World, where everyone who disagrees with her = Quickseller and every disagreement = "a lie" that justifies ruining their account forever.....

[Quickseller]

people are so scared to speak against you

Lauda is hitler! All hail Bitcoin Cash! /s

You don't really believe that people can't voice their disagreement towards Lauda, do you?

You do realize that sarcastically saying is not the same as seriously saying something, right?

[actmyname]

You do realize that sarcastically saying is not the same as seriously saying something, right?

Second sentence was not referring to the first. People have voiced their disapproval of Lauda's actions. The problem is in the demographic of most of them being a bunch of kakapos.

[Indescribable]

Grabbed Popcorn  


Wait, Why does other DT was silence about this accusation. Even great timelord is silent about this one. Afraid of having another red trust score? hmmm.

edited:

The format of the posting of the accuser is same with timelord. Just giving a hint

[Quickseller]

You do realize that sarcastically saying is not the same as seriously saying something, right?

Second sentence was not referring to the first. People have voiced their disapproval of Lauda's actions. The problem is in the demographic of most of them being a bunch of kakapos.

When Lauda is giving out negative ratings for being a "liar" and a "troll" who are speaking against him, it sure looks like he is leaving negative ratings in retaliation to speaking out against him. 

[minifrij]

When Lauda is giving out negative ratings for being a "liar" and a "troll" who are speaking against him, it sure looks like he is leaving negative ratings in retaliation to speaking out against him. 

It looks to me like he is leaving negative trust to liars and trolls.

It's also rather entertaining that you don't go after people doing the exact same thing, especially when you're personally invested in projects that they run. What a coincidink.

[Doc Martin]

People have voiced their disapproval of Lauda's actions. The problem is in the demographic of most of them being a bunch of kakapos.

I got negative trust for bringing Lauda' activity up at all. I never lied once. Everything I said was proven, clearly as day. But Lauda neg trusted me for "lying."

Now my account is ruined. And you wonder why people are scared to speak against Lauda??

You think any Hero or Legendary member will risk having their account permanently ruined by saying anything against Lauda??

Of course I used my fucking alt account. And look what happened, just for speaking about it!

Even great timelord is silent about this one.

Indeed, how interesting!

When Lauda is giving out negative ratings for being a "liar" and a "troll" who are speaking against him, it sure looks like he is leaving negative ratings in retaliation to speaking out against him. 

Especially when the references show they aren't lies........

Lauda admits Xanis is his alt (although clearly trying to dance around the subject) but denies that anything Xanis did can be associated with him. Haha!

Why don't we all have this privilege?? The first several posts of this thread are examples of hundreds of people who don't get that privilege. Why is it reserved only for Lauda??

[actmyname]

People have voiced their disapproval of Lauda's actions. The problem is in the demographic of most of them being a bunch of kakapos.

You think any Hero or Legendary member will risk having their account permanently ruined by saying anything against Lauda??

What did I say? I said people have voiced their disapproval of Lauda's actions.

Even great timelord is silent about this one.

Indeed, how interesting!

Timelord was last active a day after the linkage was posted. Not sure if he even saw it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Especially when the references show they aren't lies........

Lauda admits Xanis is his alt (although clearly trying to dance around the subject) but denies that anything Xanis did can be associated with him. Haha!

How's this for showing you up?

I agree that given the evidence, it shows a linkage between Lauda and Xanis. One can assume that at some point, Lauda had control of the Xanis account before it was nuked due to the address linkage.We can assume that the bids on the Xanis account were for the sake of buying accounts... or we can take the other perspective and imagine it being a shitpost.

Given that I had been relatively active during the height of the account sale/shitpost days, I absolutely KNOW that people used to post bids and useless questions on account sale threads. This was to boost their post count so they could farm their peanuts. The very same thing happened in the Lending section and probably still happens now. "collateral?" "read the sticky u need collateral" "lol u won't get a loan without collateral" "haha these newbies" etc.

The chance of Xanis doing this is non-zero. You could say it is more likely that Xanis was actually bidding, but it's uncertain. I admit that I had also occasionally posted on the auction threads about asking for more information about the account sale (just for the sake of posting).Note how I agree with you but have my own opinion on the matter.

[Doc Martin]

or we can take the other perspective and imagine it being a shitpost.

If this standard applies to Lauda, it should apply to everyone. Everyone should get the benefit of the doubt. Because Lauda does.

But clearly, this standard only applies to Lauda. Everyone else caught buying accounts get red paint. From Lauda.

Heck, Lauda was banned several times for spamming, too. Yet adds people to SMAS w/o informing them then neg trusts them just for applying to a sig campaign. You think those people get a second chance?? Haha!! Lauda gets lots of second chances and double standards. Funny that.

[actmyname]

Heck, Lauda was banned several times for spamming, too. Yet adds people to SMAS w/o informing them then neg trusts them just for applying to a sig campaign

I don't see your point here. If I was a reformed thief, am I now disallowed from performing a citizen's arrest upon other thieves?

You think those people get a second chance??

Yes I do.

If this standard applies to Lauda, it should apply to everyone. Everyone should get the benefit of the doubt. Because Lauda does.

I've talked previously about how times have changed and that negative ratings in those days were not usually the norm unless the accounts were hacked.