Bitcoin Forum
January 06, 2026, 06:25:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more asktom.cf users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the asktom.cf administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 [892] 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 ... 2136 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com  (Read 3050099 times)
sheebang
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0



View Profile
October 22, 2013, 07:43:15 PM
 #17821

If the powers that be go to adversely effect BTC, aside from having Washington DC make it outright illegal, they'll target BTC stability, pump and dump punishing investors again.

How can Washington do that? They are closer to being bankrupt than Greece.
Micky25
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 974
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 22, 2013, 07:44:43 PM
 #17822

oh.. for a moment I thought KNC found a way to run the Jupiters at 900...
frankenmint
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1020


HoneybadgerOfMoney.com Weed4bitcoin.com


View Profile WWW
October 22, 2013, 07:45:44 PM
 #17823

I got my unit today  Grin

Just a mercury - was having some trouble on the ghash.io pool....KNC miner would start then drop to 39 GHash before spitting out issues with connectivity.  I'm also having some problem with consistency in connection.  Once I switched pools it has been very smooth sailing since.  (~130-143 GH/s 45.5 C)

Also, I decided to upgrade my fw to .96 which has been fantastic so far.  The comparison between .95 and .96 speaks for itself and its nice and responsive.  

I put in Bertmod but didnt realise it was only tested up to .95 only.  I'd be willing to downgrade firmware (maybe)...but I think I"ll instead choose NOT to tinker with anything as its seeming to run well and stable.  30 extra gh over what was expected.  Great Job KNC....This alone was off the ground in less than 30 minutes wheras my block erupters and fpgas took like 3-4 hours to configure (probably helped that I've had experience with the latter so it was very fast to get my KNC miner off the ground)

Yes I had a loose fan shroud that was very easy to reattach.

Yes I checked


DPoS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 22, 2013, 07:46:53 PM
 #17824


I had been in direct contact with Luke-Jr (thanks for your time!) and it looks like he could find the problem and
fix it. I think re-installing bfgminer from the GIT repository will fix the problem (if anyone else did experience it).

I made some tests (using a binary compiled with debug symbols - I must re-compile it) and it did work for 1 hour.

As some questions did pop up using bfgminer, I switched back to cgminer.

Luke-Jr: Can you give us some more ideas about how your software works with a KnC miner?
The old cgminer (or is it some other task running in background?) is disabling (and enabling) cores with too many HW errors.
This can be visualized using that BertMod utility.
bfgmiger is now doing this task by its own. You can see the number of active cores (2*4*48=384 for a Saturn) in the status
line. It looks like you can manually "enable" disabled cores. Will they also be enabled over time automatically again?
Is it possible that the BertMod statistics don't match the status of bfgminer?

My DIE 0 is the one that always had been warmer and the one that starts to disable cores (without very good cooling).
Using bfgminer you can see very good that this DIE has 7% HW errors compared to 2% of the other DIE 3.

The effect of a fushwork is still a big impact on the hashrate. I can not really confirm that it's better than how
cgminer is doing this.

Luke-Jr: Is this a general problem that can not be fixed due to the nature of those multi hundred cores?
From your programmers point of view, what advantage do you think bfgminer will have on those flushworks?

trepex / Ralf


I think you have cgminer still running in the backgound.   You have to kill it more than once it seems

The only problem I had installing bfgminer was that I first tried in the /config dir and that has write perms of its own, so just start in / and all is well

 Block: ...9687465b #265382  Diff:268M ( 1.92Ph/s)  Started: [19:43:45]
 ST:6  F:0  NB:6  AS:0  BW:[ 52/ 28 B/s]  E:2534.02  I:33.94mBTC/hr  BS:90.9k
 4/683  41.0C | 468.0/472.9/449.2Gh/s | A:320 R:3+0(.93%) HW:14999/8.0%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 KNC 0: 38.0C | 122.9/127.7/120.3Gh/s | A: 80 R:0+0(none) HW: 4798/9.5%
 KNC 1: 37.0C | 131.2/137.8/134.2Gh/s | A: 98 R:2+0(2.0%) HW:  865/1.6%
 KNC 2: 35.0C | 107.1/112.4/106.0Gh/s | A: 73 R:1+0(1.4%) HW: 3444/7.8%
 KNC 3: 41.0C | 91.48/95.11/88.77Gh/s | A: 69 R:0+0(none) HW: 5896/ 15%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This is my troubled miner with the dead die (on KNC 3) and another with lots of cores off (KNC 2) so only 683 enabled

I do wonder what would be left of the install after a reboot

and a reminder to everyone, GUI stats/bertmod won't work as designed without cgminer so you give those up for now (if your screen resolution can handle it, you can switch the display to show each core hashing.. good luck with showing more than 1 asic chip on normal screens)




~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~Play Boardgames for Bitcoins!!~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~ Something I say help? Donate BTC! 1KN1K1xStzsgfYxdArSX4PEjFfcLEuYhid
The Avenger
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 22, 2013, 08:02:08 PM
 #17825



Seems KNC have entirely fallen off the wagon as regards to their "daily" updates.

"I am not The Avenger"
1AthxGvreWbkmtTXed6EQfjXMXXdSG7dD6
Luke-Jr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 1196



View Profile
October 22, 2013, 08:14:04 PM
 #17826

The old cgminer (or is it some other task running in background?) is disabling (and enabling) cores with too many HW errors.
This can be visualized using that BertMod utility.
bfgmiger is now doing this task by its own. You can see the number of active cores (2*4*48=384 for a Saturn) in the status
line. It looks like you can manually "enable" disabled cores. Will they also be enabled over time automatically again?
Is it possible that the BertMod statistics don't match the status of bfgminer?
BFGMiner only scans the core state at startup, and doesn't yet support enabling or disabling them, either manually or automatically.

DPoS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 22, 2013, 08:20:45 PM
 #17827

BFGMiner only scans the core state at startup, and doesn't yet support enabling or disabling them, either manually or automatically.

that could be real interesting when running .93   (not disabling cores)

I think I just have the miner worth trying that on...(posted its situation a few comments up)

~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~Play Boardgames for Bitcoins!!~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~ Something I say help? Donate BTC! 1KN1K1xStzsgfYxdArSX4PEjFfcLEuYhid
jelin1984
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004



View Profile
October 22, 2013, 08:27:35 PM
 #17828

Ok also does anyone know that will be better or not?
To put some ram heatsink to VRm.?.? Smiley
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1007


View Profile
October 22, 2013, 08:30:16 PM
 #17829


Got your unit?Smiley

paranoidx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 146
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 22, 2013, 08:31:38 PM
 #17830

Upgraded to 0.96.1
Miner status shows as stopped.  Have tried hitting the restart cg miner button.  Nada. Sad
eiliant
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10



View Profile
October 22, 2013, 08:32:57 PM
 #17831

Hosted Jupiter here. Eligius says 320 GH/s but KNC Portal stats read 510 GH/s?
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1007


View Profile
October 22, 2013, 08:35:50 PM
 #17832

I have some noob and semi offtopic questions: 1) how do i check a transaction by the txid?; 2) how do i send a transaction with a message in it?
uuuh, copy & paste worked great for me....?


just kidding...
copy the message they give you..
open your wallet
click on recieve tab
highlight your wallet
at bottom choose sign message
paste message into big box
click sign message
copy the signature over to the signature field in eligius
do not hit save for at least 1/2 hour, as the blockchain will need to send out the signature...
it will tell you if signature failed or succeeded then

I already knew how to sign messages. I'm interested in sending a message visible in blockchain.
you are signing the wallet with a message.."signature"...do it same way
problem is..it's encrypted... so dunno

https://blockchain.info/address/1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp scroll way to the bottom and you will see some messages like: "Public Note: Thank you for the work you do for the community! Get a drink (or two) on me"

Found the way to search for a transaction by txid thx to blockchain.

http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/18/how-can-one-embed-custom-data-in-block-headers

And any other solutions for noobs like me? Because i have no idea how to do that...

Dalkore
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026


Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012


View Profile WWW
October 22, 2013, 08:46:18 PM
 #17833

Hosted Jupiter here. Eligius says 320 GH/s but KNC Portal stats read 510 GH/s?


That is a large discrepancy.  How would we explain that?

-D

Hosting: Low as $60.00 per KW - Link
Transaction List: jayson3 +5 - ColdHardMetal +3 - Nolo +2 - CoinHoarder +1 - Elxiliath +1 - tymm0 +1 - Johnniewalker +1 - Oscer +1 - Davidj411 +1 - BitCoiner2012 +1 - dstruct2k +1 - Philj +1 - camolist +1 - exahash +1 - Littleshop +1 - Severian +1 - DebitMe +1 - lepenguin +1 - StringTheory +1 - amagimetals +1 - jcoin200 +1 - serp +1 - klintay +1 - -droid- +1 - FlutterPie +1
trepex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 22, 2013, 08:51:09 PM
 #17834

The old cgminer (or is it some other task running in background?) is disabling (and enabling) cores with too many HW errors.
This can be visualized using that BertMod utility.
bfgmiger is now doing this task by its own. You can see the number of active cores (2*4*48=384 for a Saturn) in the status
line. It looks like you can manually "enable" disabled cores. Will they also be enabled over time automatically again?
Is it possible that the BertMod statistics don't match the status of bfgminer?
BFGMiner only scans the core state at startup, and doesn't yet support enabling or disabling them, either manually or automatically.

Is it possibly to permanently "break/destroy" a core that drops many HW errors and that is not disabled?

Will work for BTC and DEM (eMark)   No joke!   Network, WiFi, IPv6
Beste Bank für den BTC Handel: Fidor Bank, Partner von bitcoin.de und Kraken.com   Registrierung: https://banking.fidor.de/registrierung?ibid=43713861
xyzzy099
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1068
Merit: 1109



View Profile
October 22, 2013, 09:04:41 PM
 #17835

The old cgminer (or is it some other task running in background?) is disabling (and enabling) cores with too many HW errors.
This can be visualized using that BertMod utility.
bfgmiger is now doing this task by its own. You can see the number of active cores (2*4*48=384 for a Saturn) in the status
line. It looks like you can manually "enable" disabled cores. Will they also be enabled over time automatically again?
Is it possible that the BertMod statistics don't match the status of bfgminer?
BFGMiner only scans the core state at startup, and doesn't yet support enabling or disabling them, either manually or automatically.

Is it possibly to permanently "break/destroy" a core that drops many HW errors and that is not disabled?

I don't think the miner has anything to do with enabling/disabling cores...  I'm pretty sure that is done by the program called 'asic_test' that is run at startup, and saves its output in /config/asic_test.  I could be wrong.

For a lot of good under-the-hood info, check out this thread:

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=313978.0

Libertarians:  Diligently plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
darianc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 73
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 22, 2013, 09:14:46 PM
 #17836

Hosted Jupiter here. Eligius says 320 GH/s but KNC Portal stats read 510 GH/s?


Three hosted Jupiters here.

Portal shows: 526, 416, 408
Slush shows: 438, 399, 361
DPoS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 22, 2013, 09:15:02 PM
 #17837

.96 and asic_test seems to make enabling/disabling cores a two step process now.

In the past flaky cores would go off and on all the time but .96 seems to do a few tests early and just shuts them off and creates that file as a blueprint to keep troubled ones off for good

you can still have cores come on and off using .96 but it is really reduced by the early filtering of bad ones

and then you can run enabled_cores to try to get bad ones back on (I guess just keep running it until you get as many to pass as you can)

~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~Play Boardgames for Bitcoins!!~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~ Something I say help? Donate BTC! 1KN1K1xStzsgfYxdArSX4PEjFfcLEuYhid
texaslabrat
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 22, 2013, 09:16:01 PM
 #17838

So is it just me or is Eligius' payment system broken?  The payment graphs are not updating, the queue status is frozen and I haven't received any pay-outs in like 12-ish hours.  Gonna be pissed if half a day's mining gets destroyed.
blastbob
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 22, 2013, 09:20:07 PM
 #17839

So is it just me or is Eligius' payment system broken?  The payment graphs are not updating, the queue status is frozen and I haven't received any pay-outs in like 12-ish hours.  Gonna be pissed if half a day's mining gets destroyed.

Everything should be fine, its just in need of a manual calc.

There is 14 blocks thats need to be manual calced. Just wait for it Smiley

Bitrated user: blastbob.
texaslabrat
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 22, 2013, 09:25:21 PM
 #17840

So is it just me or is Eligius' payment system broken?  The payment graphs are not updating, the queue status is frozen and I haven't received any pay-outs in like 12-ish hours.  Gonna be pissed if half a day's mining gets destroyed.

Everything should be fine, its just in need of a manual calc.

There is 14 blocks thats need to be manual calced. Just wait for it Smiley

Does this happen often?  I've been using BTCGuild for a while and I'm relatively new to elgius.  Just trying to set my expectations appropriately Smiley
Pages: « 1 ... 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 [892] 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 ... 2136 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!