|
mestar
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 05:29:26 PM |
|
That's a good explanation. But what happens if 51% of hashpower want bigger blocks but Core Developers refuse?
Then 51% can go to war and hope to get lucky to create the longest chain, and this is one of the basic Bitcoin facts, longest chain wins. This is almost exactly what is going on right now, but with 10% of hashrate instead of 51%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FractalUniverse
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 05:29:58 PM |
|
omg almost 20 new pages since i left. Did this thread become BTH observer thread? 
|
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 5229
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 05:33:45 PM |
|
As for actual value, there is no other value other than somebody willing to buy them from you, and this is true for both BTC and BCH.
There is big difference! Everybody is willing to buy BTC. Only Ver and Wu are willing to buy BCH. Hope that clears your confusion. It is also not a 0/1 matter of "will buy/won't buy". Price does matter. I am not a BCH believer, but I would buy say, 1000 BCH for 0.01 BTC, just for the heck of it and the remote possibility of profiting off some future pump that might or might not happen. I wouldn't, on the other hand, buy BCH at the fake prices suggested by the exchanges that actually (say they) deal with BCH. I could sell some though, if it was actually possible (or easy).
|
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 05:34:26 PM |
|
omg almost 20 new pages since i left. Did this thread become BTH observer thread?  Yes. Long may it prosper.
|
|
|
|
|
d5000
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4536
Merit: 10188
Decentralization Maximalist
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 05:35:18 PM |
|
I see we're still going sideways... currently $2725USD (Bitcoinaverage). Not bad, considering the fact that we all just got gifted an equal number of altcoin (BCH) tokens.
Exactly my feelings, I'm pleasantly surprised by the price evolution. Although it dips sometimes below $2700, I had expected a large dump coming from Big Blockers that simply want to harm the original Bitcoin. Now it seems the largest dump was before the split - in anticipation of a move that didn't happen. Maybe the BCH adherents are still not sure if their coin will survive and therefore dump'd only a little fraction of their BTC, to scare us. But nobody panicked  I don't think the drama is done quite yet. Let's at least wait until segwit is fully activated.
I think the activation will be flawless. The "extreme" group of Big Blockers has now their altcoin to play with, so they wouldn't try to influence Jihan and other miners that sympathize with the big block idea. And I think most miners are expecting high prices or even a new ATH if Segwit is activated, so they won't be interested in turbulences that could harm this scenario they would massively benefit from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mestar
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 05:42:22 PM |
|
That's a good explanation. But what happens if 51% of hashpower want bigger blocks but Core Developers refuse?
Miners can then just recompile with one constant changed. In practice, they would have a hard time organizing, and finding someone trustful enough to create a new version and compile it for them, so, "current state" always has a huge advantage. But now that this has been done, it would be really interesting to see what would happen if majority of miners switched, even if for no other reason but because they are all Chinese.
|
|
|
|
|
infofront (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 3095
Shitcoin Minimalist
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 05:44:32 PM |
|
Can we get a new poll for the thread?  What kind of poll do you want? I'm tempted to make a poll regarding BCC price, but this isn't supposed to be an altcoin thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Dafar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
dafar consulting
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 05:44:36 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
williamuk
Member

Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 05:47:50 PM |
|
I had expected a large dump coming from Big Blockers that simply want to harm the original Bitcoin. Now it seems the largest dump was before the split - in anticipation of a move that didn't happen. Maybe the BCH adherents are still not sure if their coin will survive and therefore dump'd only a little fraction of their BTC, to scare us.
You are speculating that people with money behave like kids. They don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mestar
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 06:02:33 PM |
|
Exchanges, on the other hand...
Lets say there is a miner underground movement to recompile the client with 8MB block limit. They can do it, and they don't even have to tell anyone. However, the first ones to do it are risking it, because their big blocks will probably not end up in the longest chain. However, if more than 50% do it, we get a hard fork, and small block miners are forced to switch. And, believe me, exchanges would be first ones to switch, as they have most to lose.
|
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 5229
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 06:05:06 PM |
|
ETH splits = combined value lower than value before split
BTC splits = combined value higher than value before split
Combined value higher? Let's wait until transfers work almost normally. Let's plug the BTC price before the split into the equation. Let's recalculate. Higher still? I'm not defending ETH shills, by the way. Only predicting red BCH candles given a sufficiently long time frame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
julian071
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 06:06:20 PM |
|
Can we get a new poll for the thread?  What kind of poll do you want? I'm tempted to make a poll regarding BCC price, but this isn't supposed to be an altcoin thread. I agree, all that is interesting about BCC is what it means for the price of BTC. If you do want to make a poll related to BCC, maybe you could ask something pertaining to that, so e.g. whether people think this fork will a) show that the governance model of BTC is working as it should or b) shows the inherent weakness of the governance model of BTC etc. Just thinking out loud here. Thanks again infofront for maintaining this thread, it's running very well! We can discuss developments that both in the short term and the long term influence the market value of BTC. Walls may not be the most important things in that respect anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 5229
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 06:07:45 PM |
|
Exchanges, on the other hand...
Lets say there is a miner underground movement to recompile the client with 8MB block limit. They can do it, and they don't even have to tell anyone. However, the first ones to do it are risking it, because their big blocks will probably not end up in the longest chain. However, if more than 50% do it, we get a hard fork, and small block miners are forced to switch. And, believe me, exchanges would be first ones to switch, as they have most to lose. Yes: if all miners switch, there's only one way things can go. However, if a minority stubbornly sticks to the old chain, we have 2 chains. The exchanges will probably list both coins and let the market do the rest. Which the market is doing right now. Let's give it some time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
traincarswreck
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 06:08:40 PM |
|
Can we get a new poll for the thread?  What kind of poll do you want? I'm tempted to make a poll regarding BCC price, but this isn't supposed to be an altcoin thread. I agree, all that is interesting about BCC is what it means for the price of BTC. If you do want to make a poll related to BCC, maybe you could ask something pertaining to that, so e.g. whether people think this fork will a) show that the governance model of BTC is working as it should or b) shows the inherent weakness of the governance model of BTC etc. Just thinking out loud here. Thanks again infofront for maintaining this thread, it's running very well! We can discuss developments that both in the short term and the long term influence the market value of BTC. Walls may not be the most important things in that respect anymore. there is no better poll than the long run of the aggregated exchange prices. But Bach prices are not matured enough yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mestar
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 06:09:07 PM |
|
It currently stands at $460 BCH / 2700 BTC at Kraken, and $720 BCH /2700 BTC at Bitterx. Such a high price is definitely unexpected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
traincarswreck
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 06:11:08 PM Last edit: August 02, 2017, 06:40:31 PM by traincarswreck |
|
Exchanges, on the other hand...
Lets say there is a miner underground movement to recompile the client with 8MB block limit. They can do it, and they don't even have to tell anyone. However, the first ones to do it are risking it, because their big blocks will probably not end up in the longest chain. However, if more than 50% do it, we get a hard fork, and small block miners are forced to switch. And, believe me, exchanges would be first ones to switch, as they have most to lose. Yes: if all miners switch, there's only one way things can go. However, if a minority stubbornly sticks to the old chain, we have 2 chains. The exchanges will probably list both coins and let the market do the rest. Which the market is doing right now. Let's give it some time. its fucked how people have been screaming at small blockers to read the white paper when literally they themselves stoped at the title
|
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 5229
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 06:13:41 PM |
|
It currently stands at $460 BCH / 2700 BTC at Kraken, and $720 BCH /2700 BTC at Bitterx. Such a high price is definitely unexpected.
Such a price isn't supported by any significant volume of trades. Only the lucky first will be able to profit from "free money". Free money can exist only for a short time, like virtual particles in quantum mechanics. Then conservation laws kick in without mercy. Give it time.
|
|
|
|
|
bitserve
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1772
Self made HODLER ✓
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 06:28:10 PM |
|
Bitstamp will most probably credit BCH to BTC: https://www.bitstamp.net/article/bitcoin-cash-our-position/Bitcoin Cash: Our Position
2 AUG 2017
As the dust settles on the recent hard fork, we are now in a position to explain in more detail how we will deal with Bitcoin Cash.
In the run up to the hard fork, we advised our customers that we had chosen not to interact with the UAHF chain, and that those who wanted to receive Bitcoin Cash (BCH) immediately after the fork should withdraw their BTC.
Although this was perhaps not the most convenient way for our customers to receive their BCH funds, it was clearly the best course of action to take to ensure the continued stability and security of our platform. The safety of the funds under our custodianship comes before all other considerations, even if this may cause temporary disruption.
For those of our customers who chose to leave their BTC on our platform at the time of the fork, we recorded their BCH balances for the timestamp of the last common block (block 478558), which is 1 August 2017, 13:16:14 UTC.
These BCH balances will be made available to our customers as soon as it is safe to do so. If and when the Bitcoin Cash system has been thoroughly tested and is sufficiently stable, we will then consider listing BCH. However, a series of technical, safety and regulatory requirements need to be met in order for this to occur, and it is still too early in the day to make realistic predictions about the timeframes involved.
Please check back here, on our Facebook page and on our Twitter feed for updates as and when they happen.
|
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4402
Be a bank
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 06:35:13 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wexlike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1474
Merit: 1087
|
 |
August 02, 2017, 06:41:11 PM |
|
Can't wait for the SegWit2x HF. 
|
|
|
|
|
|