Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Biodom]

Welcome to the Jungle....

Jungle are good and it's too good to have a cup of tea/coffee there!!!

10-11 years ago, someone planted "it" in a public park around here (in a more secluded spot)-10K plants, lol.

[psycodad]

Post parity is what we should be looking up to.

This is the way.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Post parity is what we should be looking up to.

2033 I think, maybe after the 2032 halving. We’re not going that high next cycle imo, it’ll be the one after.

I reserve the right to change my mind if we go to $250,000 or more this year.

[coinlary]

~

I don’t  even understand  if he's buying or selling  these days

[Leahized]

Post parity is what we should be looking up to.

2033 I think, maybe after the 2032 halving. We’re not going that high next cycle imo, it’ll be the one after.

I reserve the right to change my mind if we go to $250,000 or more this year.

But I can see in a Rainbow Chart, Bitcoin can reach $20m in 2035

To me this is incredible, but what does rainbow graph lie?


@BitcoinNews21M

Bitcoin is on track to reach $20 million by 2035 🚀


https://x.com/BitcoinNews21M/status/1947304462634156178

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[Biodom]

Post parity is what we should be looking up to.

2033 I think, maybe after the 2032 halving. We’re not going that high next cycle imo, it’ll be the one after.

I reserve the right to change my mind if we go to $250,000 or more this year.

But I can see in a Rainbow Chart, Bitcoin can reach $20m in 2035

To me this is incredible, but what does rainbow graph lie?


@BitcoinNews21M

Bitcoin is on track to reach $20 million by 2035 🚀


https://x.com/BitcoinNews21M/status/1947304462634156178

444K to 85K would feel so incredibly bad......as usual 

[Leahized]

444K to 85K would feel so incredibly bad......as usual  

If unfortunately this happens, it will be the worst situation I have ever seen, which I never imagined.

It won't be 

[psycodad]

The headline/teaser made me smirk and after reading I am way much less scared about those quantum thingies factoring meaningful numbers (like i.e. public keys) in foreseeable future:

..
Peter Gutmann, a professor of computer science at the University of Auckland New Zealand, thinks PQC is bollocks – "nonsense" for our American readers – and said as much in a 2024 presentation [PDF], "Why Quantum Cryptanalysis is Bollocks."
..

-> https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/17/quantum_cryptanalysis_criticism/

[Biodom]

444K to 85K would feel so incredibly bad......as usual  

If unfortunately this happens, it will be the worst situation I have ever seen, which I never imagined.

It won't be 

Percentage-wise it is roughly the same when we went from 20K to 3.2K and from almost 69k to 15.6K.
The absolute numbers would be strikingly different, of course.
btc at 444K is a 9.3 tril "entity". For btc market as a whole to lose 7.5 tril would feel stupendously bad (and very similar in numbers to the Nasdaq plunge from 5K to 1K in 2001-2002).
My "heart" tells me that it won't happen, but my brain tells me that it could.

[philipma1957]

R.I.P.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/articles/malcolm-jamal-warner-played-son-172000656.html


He. Did some other work on the screen that I liked.


https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0290966/?ref_=nm_flmg_job_1_cdt_c_51


This was a decent show

[JimboToronto]

444K to 385K would feel so incredibly bad......as usual 

ftfy

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[Miramax12]

444K to 85K would feel so incredibly bad......as usual  

If unfortunately this happens, it will be the worst situation I have ever seen, which I never imagined.

It won't be 

Percentage-wise it is roughly the same when we went from 20K to 3.2K and from almost 69k to 15.6K.
The absolute numbers would be strikingly different, of course.
btc at 444K is a 9.3 tril "entity". For btc market as a whole to lose 7.5 tril would feel stupendously bad (and very similar in numbers to the Nasdaq plunge from 5K to 1K in 2001-2002).
My "heart" tells me that it won't happen, but my brain tells me that it could.

"When emotions run high, it's easy to ignore the math but history has taught us that even the unimaginable is always just a few steps away in the markets. Whether it's a reset or a revaluation, the key is to stay rational, not reactive.
"Hope is not a strategy, but ignoring risk isn't wisdom either. Gut says no... brain says maybe. That tension is the essence of every cycle.

[Paashaas]

From $0 to $100,000 was the hardest part, futeremore from $100,000 to $1,000,000 BTC will be achieved faster that you think.

[OutOfMemory]

From $0 to $100,000 was the hardest part, futeremore from $100,000 to $1,000,000 BTC will be achieved faster that you think.

The graph's baseline really starts to look like 2/3 of a S-curve.  

[Miramax12]

The headline/teaser made me smirk and after reading I am way much less scared about those quantum thingies factoring meaningful numbers (like i.e. public keys) in foreseeable future:

..
Peter Gutmann, a professor of computer science at the University of Auckland New Zealand, thinks PQC is bollocks – "nonsense" for our American readers – and said as much in a 2024 presentation [PDF], "Why Quantum Cryptanalysis is Bollocks."
..

-> https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/17/quantum_cryptanalysis_criticism/

that headline definitely caught me too and the quote is gold. It's oddly reassuring to hear someone as credible as Gutmann cut through the hype with such bluntness. Quantum computing still feels like a buzzword minefield, so it’s nice to see a grounded take. Makes me wonder how much of the PQC rush is real urgency, just future proofing theater.

[OutOfMemory]

The headline/teaser made me smirk and after reading I am way much less scared about those quantum thingies factoring meaningful numbers (like i.e. public keys) in foreseeable future:

..
Peter Gutmann, a professor of computer science at the University of Auckland New Zealand, thinks PQC is bollocks – "nonsense" for our American readers – and said as much in a 2024 presentation [PDF], "Why Quantum Cryptanalysis is Bollocks."
..

-> https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/17/quantum_cryptanalysis_criticism/

that headline definitely caught me too and the quote is gold. It's oddly reassuring to hear someone as credible as Gutmann cut through the hype with such bluntness. Quantum computing still feels like a buzzword minefield, so it’s nice to see a grounded take. Makes me wonder how much of the PQC rush is real urgency, just future proofing theater.

QC is about as developed as AI.
Both are higher class vapourware...

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[roemer]

What hash rate and electrical use will bitcoin be using at 1 million evaluation?