Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Emeraldo]

A little off-topic but this makes a lot of sense because I have always resented the media and politicians.


Source

The time we are, anything can affect the price of Bitcoin.
The government, fake news, politics and media can make people starts selling or buying Bitcoin.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[BitHodlers]

Much better. I carry some bearish news now. It seems our dear Bitcoin has lost the battle.  





These websites are full of shitcoins. I just caught it before they removed it.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[SPIDERMAN008]

Go go go

brrrrr time?

Stop it.

No celebrating until $125k again.

$125k will come and go but the real “brrrr” is from the cycles of our greed and fear.
carry on observers, we are on it. 

[philipma1957]

did some kick buddy in the butt?

now lets not mention any numbers until I break open the jack barrel strength 130.1 proof.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[JayJuanGee]

[edited out]

Here's the dolly you can have them point to.

Isn't it a wee bit ironic that some of us have ended up having to defend some of the WO bears, since a few newbies came into the thread and are ongoingly trying to act like they know what is up in these here parts.  I don't even agree with LFC and/or OgNasty and/or some other members who have been overly convinced that the top is in, even though they are entitled to their opinion, which likely will be changing once the BTC prices go back above $110k or $112k and they start whining that they sold too much too soon.

So yeah, we have some regular members here who are whining about the BTC price going down too much and/or the BTC price failing to go up enough, but so what?  There are always whiners during price correction, even in these here parts.

For my own part, I tried to get OgNasty to enter into some kinds of bet to help to separate him more from some of his satoshis, like LFC will end up having to pay 100k satoshis (plus the other two equal bets) for his negative Nancy convictions.... hahahahahaha.  It's all good.  We've been here before.. Sure, maybe not exactly here, but some variation of "here."    

Can we have bears banned for 3 months once we hit $125k again?

If the bears are banned for 3 months, it seems they will come back and spread more double negatives. Let them keep talking,, On the other hand, let the price of Bitcoin fluctuate normally..

The supposed existence of a large number of WO bears?  

Are they in the room with you now?  

The denial is pretty boring through. Try something else, entertain me.

None of us has any obligation to entertain you.  Maybe you could try engaging with members in regards to actual meaningful and interesting bitcoin-related substance rather than ongoingly trying to impose yourself as if you need more and moar and MOAR attention?

Whatever, I am not bothered either way.  Do what you like.  

Maybe at some point, when you grow up a wee bit, you will figure out a way to be less distracting in your presentation style.  Perhaps? perhaps?

[cAPSLOCK]

I want to buy this burger with Bitcoin at 2035.
I don't want to be a second Laszlo by buying it now .



X

Everyone assumes Laszlo regrets the pizzas...

He wrote the first GPU miner I think.  I would bet he has more money still than most could fathom.

Well he was in at a time that having 100k coins was a possibility.

He may be down to 30 or 40k coins which is good enough.

ESPECIALLY when he could mine with GPUs before ANYONE else.  Imagine the advantage that would give you.  For a period of time a single miner could be submitting the majority of blocks and banking 50BTC every time he did.

I should go make sure I am not making things up... but I believe Satoshi did NOT react entirely positively to the GPU miner development.  I assume this was because he realized it tilted the playing field and could affect game theory balance.  He was prescient in that regard because ultimately it has led us to one of Bitcoin's greatest risks today.  ASICS forced an earlier advent of mining pools (inevitable anyway), and now we are scrambling to fight miner/pool centralization.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[cAPSLOCK]

Sometimes I wish I could give negative merit to people, and after a certain number of negative merit, they are no longer able to post in this thread.

Ignore just isn't effective enough.

No sir.  Not getting rid of me that easily.

@cAPSLOCK - I thought maybe he was referring to you. I knew it couldn't possibly be me...

I am a menace.

Ask anyone.

[BTCETFInvestor]

BANG - $107K

[Hueristic]

[edited out]

Here's the dolly you can have them point to.

Isn't it a wee bit ironic that some of us have ended up having to defend some of the WO bears, since a few newbies came into the thread and are ongoingly trying to act like they know what is up in these here parts.  I don't even agree with LFC and/or OgNasty and/or some other members who have been overly convinced that the top is in, even though they are entitled to their opinion, which likely will be changing once the BTC prices go back above $110k or $112k and they start whining that they sold too much too soon....

Yeah, it is, Og has been fudding for years.

[philipma1957]

BANG - $107K

And the market has now dropped under 106.6

As a watched pot never boils.

Please leave reporting alone until it's time to break out the 130.1 proof barrel strength Jack.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[asUHWEceyc]

I want to buy this burger with Bitcoin at 2035.
I don't want to be a second Laszlo by buying it now .

Everyone assumes Laszlo regrets the pizzas...

He wrote the first GPU miner I think.  I would bet he has more money still than most could fathom.

Well he was in at a time that having 100k coins was a possibility.

He may be down to 30 or 40k coins which is good enough.

ESPECIALLY when he could mine with GPUs before ANYONE else.  Imagine the advantage that would give you.  For a period of time a single miner could be submitting the majority of blocks and banking 50BTC every time he did.

I should go make sure I am not making things up... but I believe Satoshi did NOT react entirely positively to the GPU miner development.  I assume this was because he realized it tilted the playing field and could affect game theory balance.  He was prescient in that regard because ultimately it has led us to one of Bitcoin's greatest risks today.  ASICS forced an earlier advent of mining pools (inevitable anyway), and now we are scrambling to fight miner/pool centralization.

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=12.msg54#msg54

Fortunately waste energy can't centralize

[cAPSLOCK]

BANG - $107K

And the market has now dropped under 106.6

As a watched pot never boils.

Please leave reporting alone until it's time to break out the 130.1 proof barrel strength Jack.

1.75L of this is ~$8.50 where I am...

I must resist!



Ethanol is death to me.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[DaRude]

I want to buy this burger with Bitcoin at 2035.
I don't want to be a second Laszlo by buying it now .



X

Everyone assumes Laszlo regrets the pizzas...

He wrote the first GPU miner I think.  I would bet he has more money still than most could fathom.

Well he was in at a time that having 100k coins was a possibility.

He may be down to 30 or 40k coins which is good enough.

ESPECIALLY when he could mine with GPUs before ANYONE else.  Imagine the advantage that would give you.  For a period of time a single miner could be submitting the majority of blocks and banking 50BTC every time he did.

I should go make sure I am not making things up... but I believe Satoshi did NOT react entirely positively to the GPU miner development.  I assume this was because he realized it tilted the playing field and could affect game theory balance.  He was prescient in that regard because ultimately it has led us to one of Bitcoin's greatest risks today.  ASICS forced an earlier advent of mining pools (inevitable anyway), and now we are scrambling to fight miner/pool centralization.

If i recall correctly he claimed to have sold all his BTC and didn't keep any. Smart move either way. But I also recall him saying somewhere that he's still working and doesn't drive a lambo, which makes me think that he actually might be telling the truth. If i had $4Billion i wouldn't admit it either, but after 15yrs of holding there would be signs, and it would be private jets and private islands and not showing up for work.

[Ermaios]

Found the perfect buddy this time, eh?  

Anyone that sticks the finger at WO - is good in my book.

You could have said "I have no idea what you mean", though.

Why would I pretend? Don’t you want me to be as honest as possible?
You extremely woke lefties are un-fucking-believable on this matter.

Good news for you: Everybody thinks he's smart.

Really? I don’t.
Who is “everybody”?

Bad news for you: Most everybody is wrong.

How about I don’t care what “most everybody” does, thinks or not?

Could not be that CT mass-deleted his later posts, no? no? perhaps?

That’s a hard “no” sweetheart.

I would have done it, if i were posting so much insulting bullshit, like he did.

Perhaps Antisthenes can elaborate.

Freedom of speech is not freedom to insult.

Oh yes it is!

Why don't you right MoFo's get this?

Because you left MoFo’s don’t ever get how far right your intentions are.

It did, when i was younger. Taught me a lot.

Dah!

For example don't insult random people.

I don’t insult “random” people. Only specific ones.