⚡ [ANN] ⚡ DeepOnion TOR ⚡ DeepVault ⚡ Cryptopia 🚀 Airdrop 24/40 🚀 WE DOMINATE!

[youngwebs]

Please make a good pool.

Please let me know if there is need for a community pool.
I can build a MPOS pool within 24 hours, but will need to know if there is a big demand, or if the community is willing to share in the costs for the hosting.

[avlen]

"Registrations Temporarily Suspended"

• Junior members and above are eligible to apply, Newbies are not qualified.

I'm late, is that still open for registration? 

[JustMissed]

Wow, I had to work this weekend and needed to wake up a couple of hours early each day just to keep up with the thread. The DeepOnoin community is realy growing in a nice direction. Did we get enough votes on livecoin to be listed there, I don not see the coin on the voting list any more?

[themonkii]

"Registrations Temporarily Suspended"

• Junior members and above are eligible to apply, Newbies are not qualified.

I'm late, is that still open for registration? 

Registration will reopen after the upcoming AirDrop.

[kamalsharma100]

Amazing ONION gained triple the market volume over 20 BTC within a day
Price currently at about 50000 Satoshi

  ONIONs with record breaking surprises

These past two days have been amazing I was not expecting to be this fast really... but I had the 1000% feeling immediately after checking this coin for the first time

Your username is very interesting.  How is it possible? 

[Caztiel]

Posted my views on DeepOnion -
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@arcangel/deeponion-one-of-my-money-making-secrets

Please do review & let me know if any corrections required. Also follow me & I will follow you.

[JesusCryptos]

In theory I like the new rule that from now on the posts must be of good quality to be valid, but in the practice this is introducing an element of arbitrarity - how to distinguish good quality from bad quality? Rules should be as objective as possible, once they get subjective you open the doors to criticism.

[themonkii]

In theory I like the new rule that from now on the posts must be of good quality to be valid, but in the practice this is introducing an element of arbitrarity - how to distinguish good quality from bad quality? Rules should be as objective as possible, once they get subjective you open the doors to criticism.

The main issue is that we're trying to build value within the Threads - I mean, we only need so many "Wow, look at the price" or "Can't wait for my free Onions" posts. I just finished reviewing a lot of accounts, and can attest to the utter garbage people post. Its the patterns.

For example, Day before the drop, 10x posts are made, very low quality, and in most instances, those people aren't involved in the community at all.

It isn't that we're going over each post with a fine tooth comb, it really is just about ensuring there's at least some quality in what is being posted. Heck, sometimes the posts are poor, but their activity is positive, and so that can balance it out. It's really the combo of poor posts + Zero activity in the community + old signatures that we're weeding out.

[hackmyl1fe]

Amazing ONION gained triple the market volume over 20 BTC within a day
Price currently at about 50000 Satoshi

  ONIONs with record breaking surprises

THis is so good to see! lets hope the price keeps rising and its not just an pump and dump

[hackmyl1fe]

In theory I like the new rule that from now on the posts must be of good quality to be valid, but in the practice this is introducing an element of arbitrarity - how to distinguish good quality from bad quality? Rules should be as objective as possible, once they get subjective you open the doors to criticism.

The main issue is that we're trying to build value within the Threads - I mean, we only need so many "Wow, look at the price" or "Can't wait for my free Onions" posts. I just finished reviewing a lot of accounts, and can attest to the utter garbage people post. Its the patterns.

For example, Day before the drop, 10x posts are made, very low quality, and in most instances, those people aren't involved in the community at all.

It isn't that we're going over each post with a fine tooth comb, it really is just about ensuring there's at least some quality in what is being posted. Heck, sometimes the posts are poor, but their activity is positive, and so that can balance it out. It's really the combo of poor posts + Zero activity in the community + old signatures that we're weeding out.

I agree, it can be hard to validate the content of everyone's posts tho

[avlen]

Registration will reopen after the upcoming AirDrop.

Thanks for your info.
So hot on this post. Will try it on next AirDrop time: 25 Aug 2017 UTC 09:30

[JesusCryptos]

In theory I like the new rule that from now on the posts must be of good quality to be valid, but in the practice this is introducing an element of arbitrarity - how to distinguish good quality from bad quality? Rules should be as objective as possible, once they get subjective you open the doors to criticism.

The main issue is that we're trying to build value within the Threads - I mean, we only need so many "Wow, look at the price" or "Can't wait for my free Onions" posts. I just finished reviewing a lot of accounts, and can attest to the utter garbage people post. Its the patterns.

For example, Day before the drop, 10x posts are made, very low quality, and in most instances, those people aren't involved in the community at all.

It isn't that we're going over each post with a fine tooth comb, it really is just about ensuring there's at least some quality in what is being posted. Heck, sometimes the posts are poor, but their activity is positive, and so that can balance it out. It's really the combo of poor posts + Zero activity in the community + old signatures that we're weeding out.

I agree that if the posts consist just in  "Wow, look at the price" or "Can't wait for my free Onions" the level of information shared with the community is zero, and to treat it as such is wise. Plus if it's a combo of factors it makes even more sense.
By the way, I have just looked at the price and I have said "wow". Now even more I can't wait for my free onions!

[hashpuppy]

Frankly, this coin have big potential thats why even though I have not yet received anything from airdrop I bought some stash upon researching this. I could have easily sold when it x3 from my cost. But I learned the lesson that if I just hold my stash in Darkcoin when I mined the hell out of it in early 2014.  I should have been retired by now.

[themonkii]

In theory I like the new rule that from now on the posts must be of good quality to be valid, but in the practice this is introducing an element of arbitrarity - how to distinguish good quality from bad quality? Rules should be as objective as possible, once they get subjective you open the doors to criticism.

The main issue is that we're trying to build value within the Threads - I mean, we only need so many "Wow, look at the price" or "Can't wait for my free Onions" posts. I just finished reviewing a lot of accounts, and can attest to the utter garbage people post. Its the patterns.

For example, Day before the drop, 10x posts are made, very low quality, and in most instances, those people aren't involved in the community at all.

It isn't that we're going over each post with a fine tooth comb, it really is just about ensuring there's at least some quality in what is being posted. Heck, sometimes the posts are poor, but their activity is positive, and so that can balance it out. It's really the combo of poor posts + Zero activity in the community + old signatures that we're weeding out.

I agree, it can be hard to validate the content of everyone's posts tho

It is being done manually by a few of us. Again though, in a lot instances, its a combination of poor posts + low activity or improper implementation of the proper signature. The goal is not to penalize, but instead ensure the proper people receive it.

[themonkii]

In theory I like the new rule that from now on the posts must be of good quality to be valid, but in the practice this is introducing an element of arbitrarity - how to distinguish good quality from bad quality? Rules should be as objective as possible, once they get subjective you open the doors to criticism.

The main issue is that we're trying to build value within the Threads - I mean, we only need so many "Wow, look at the price" or "Can't wait for my free Onions" posts. I just finished reviewing a lot of accounts, and can attest to the utter garbage people post. Its the patterns.

For example, Day before the drop, 10x posts are made, very low quality, and in most instances, those people aren't involved in the community at all.

It isn't that we're going over each post with a fine tooth comb, it really is just about ensuring there's at least some quality in what is being posted. Heck, sometimes the posts are poor, but their activity is positive, and so that can balance it out. It's really the combo of poor posts + Zero activity in the community + old signatures that we're weeding out.

I agree that if the posts consist just in  "Wow, look at the price" or "Can't wait for my free Onions" the level of information shared with the community is zero, and to treat it as such is wise. Plus if it's a combo of factors it makes even more sense.
By the way, I have just looked at the price and I have said "wow". Now even more I can't wait for my free onions!

LOL - oh, I see what you just did there - clever 

[forstik]

Mining question > I am mining ONION using CCminer 1.0 (alexis version) and I am getting only 13,4 Mh/s on a GTX 1070. I have seen people getting much higher hashrates. What am I missing?

[elmeijera]

Registration will reopen after the upcoming AirDrop.

Thanks for your info.
So hot on this post. Will try it on next AirDrop time: 25 Aug 2017 UTC 09:30

Same here. I will hold this coin I think it has a lot of potential!

[trannamtan]

Hello everyone 
You want ONION to be on POLO and Bittrex soon !
Let's go tweets to @bittrex exchanges and @POLO
This is my 02 tweets I did:
https://twitter.com/Business_crypto/status/899307145409118208
https://twitter.com/Business_crypto/status/899308699528843264
We should tweets
  Continuously every day
    good luck for all.

[Jackl87]

Mining question > I am mining ONION using CCminer 1.0 (alexis version) and I am getting only 13,4 Mh/s on a GTX 1070. I have seen people getting much higher hashrates. What am I missing?

I get 18,4 mh/s with a 1080 TI OC on ccminer version 2.0. So for me your hashrate looks fine for a GTX 1070.

[a14m]

Amazing ONION gained triple the market volume over 20 BTC within a day
Price currently at about 50000 Satoshi

  ONIONs with record breaking surprises

THis is so good to see! lets hope the price keeps rising and its not just an pump and dump

some poor hands trying to pump this coin, don't judge a coin with low volume