[ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees

[Antivoid]

wow, how can a thread have so many posts within two months and how can a fork be the market cap top 3? its so surprising

[MartinGandhiKennedy]

wow, how can a thread have so many posts within two months and how can a fork be the market cap top 3? its so surprising

The Bitcoin fork was supposed to be dropped (as forks are basically "upgrades", to use simple terms). But Blockstream/Core got greedy and took the "Bitcoin" name (regardless of it needing an upgrade), and censored all of this (and continues to censor/propagandize/smear). So anyone who is buying Bitcoin, is buying only the name (and obsolete version) because the correct implementation and protocol is Bitcoin Cash. Sooner or later, the exchanges will rename Bitcoin to something like "Bitcoin Classic" and Bitcoin Cash will simply get changed to Bitcoin.

[bones261]

wow, how can a thread have so many posts within two months and how can a fork be the market cap top 3? its so surprising

Because this has the backing of some pretty big names in BTC. Roger Ver(Early bitcoin investor), Jihan Wu(Cofounder of Bitmain. Leadin ASIC manufacturer and Pool operator.), Craig Wright (Claims to be the real Satoshi) and many others. With that kind of clout backing this coin, it got listed on many exchanges with relative ease.

[thiec]

wow, how can a thread have so many posts within two months and how can a fork be the market cap top 3? its so surprising

Because its HOT, FUD and uncertain everywhere.
Off course its top 3, since its takes btc volume (coin circulated) as "pre-mine" and generate block faster than BTC. No surprising at all

[Mrpumperitis]

wow, how can a thread have so many posts within two months and how can a fork be the market cap top 3? its so surprising

Because this has the backing of some pretty big names in BTC. Roger Ver(Early bitcoin investor), Jihan Wu(Cofounder of Bitmain. Leadin ASIC manufacturer and Pool operator.), Craig Wright (Claims to be the real Satoshi) and many others. With that kind of clout backing this coin, it got listed on many exchanges with relative ease.

That includes us the Bitcoin cash community 

[TrumpBump]

wow, how can a thread have so many posts within two months and how can a fork be the market cap top 3? its so surprising

The Bitcoin fork was supposed to be dropped (as forks are basically "upgrades", to use simple terms). But Blockstream/Core got greedy and took the "Bitcoin" name (regardless of it needing an upgrade), and censored all of this (and continues to censor/propagandize/smear). So anyone who is buying Bitcoin, is buying only the name (and obsolete version) because the correct implementation and protocol is Bitcoin Cash. Sooner or later, the exchanges will rename Bitcoin to something like "Bitcoin Classic" and Bitcoin Cash will simply get changed to Bitcoin.

via Imgflip Meme Generator

[TrumpBump]

I don't see why some of these people come in here so obviously salty and mad over a supposed "altcoin". *shrugs" I'm just chilling here waiting for the 10th, and then next difficulty changes like...

[thiec]

wow, how can a thread have so many posts within two months and how can a fork be the market cap top 3? its so surprising

The Bitcoin fork was supposed to be dropped (as forks are basically "upgrades", to use simple terms). But Blockstream/Core got greedy and took the "Bitcoin" name (regardless of it needing an upgrade), and censored all of this (and continues to censor/propagandize/smear). So anyone who is buying Bitcoin, is buying only the name (and obsolete version) because the correct implementation and protocol is Bitcoin Cash. Sooner or later, the exchanges will rename Bitcoin to something like "Bitcoin Classic" and Bitcoin Cash will simply get changed to Bitcoin.

Its not as simple as say that every fork is REAL one, and the coin before fork will turn out as legacy or "classic"
The coin have economic value, its have its community, if you can drive MAJORITY community and economy to fork one than you can claim as "REAL" one, if not, the fork just another ALT COIN.

And i think bitcoin supporter have the right to defend their coin, as anything done like censoring, is part of it. and if BCH think they could take the lead, show us how they should be, not make claim with no REAL thing to back it up

[connexus]

wow, how can a thread have so many posts within two months and how can a fork be the market cap top 3? its so surprising

Because this has the backing of some pretty big names in BTC. Roger Ver(Early bitcoin investor), Jihan Wu(Cofounder of Bitmain. Leadin ASIC manufacturer and Pool operator.), Craig Wright (Claims to be the real Satoshi) and many others. With that kind of clout backing this coin, it got listed on many exchanges with relative ease.

That includes us the Bitcoin cash community 

Absolutely, the community itself is the building blocks of a very strong foundation that will make Bitcoin Cash bigger and stronger in the long run.

[Rinaze]

Mathematical Proof That the Lightning Network Cannot Be a Decentralized Bitcoin Scaling Solution
https://medium.com/@jonaldfyookball/mathematical-proof-that-the-lightning-network-cannot-be-a-decentralized-bitcoin-scaling-solution-1b8147650800

The Illusion of Scale in Segregated Witness
https://nchain.com/en/blog/illusion-scale-segregated-witness/

Risk of SegWit – Mining Cartels
https://nchain.com/en/blog/risks-of-segregated-witness-mining-cartels/

8 times Core told people Segwit is a Blocksize Increase
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6wml7g/8_times_core_told_people_segwit_is_a_blocksize/

Continued Discussion on why Lightning Network Cannot Scale
https://medium.com/@jonaldfyookball/continued-discussion-on-why-lightning-network-cannot-scale-883c17b2ef5b

Dr. Peter Rizun - SegWit Coins are not Bitcoins - Arnhem 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoFb3mcxluY

Amaury Sechet - Back to the Basics - Arnhem 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=By0w43NQdiY&list=PLW5YLgBF2qh_1NKB3hW24cg26KSTCsTjY&index=16

Nikita Zhavoronkov - *Why* Bitcoin needs a Scaling Solution - Arnhem 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIM8mQfs1Xk&list=PLW5YLgBF2qh_1NKB3hW24cg26KSTCsTjY&index=3

Bitcoin is Being Hot-Wired for Settlement
https://medium.com/@jgarzik/bitcoin-is-being-hot-wired-for-settlement-a5beb1df223a

Are you saying the Bitcoin Core developers still went ahead with Segwit and LN because the majority of BTC community is not educated enough or are you implying that the developers themselves are not capable enough to understand fully on the topic?

[TrumpBump]

BCH = TrumpCoin ?

That explains a lot of the kind of rhetoric we read so far...

Does that mean that TrumpCoin = BCH = BCC = NeoNazyCoin?

Wrong forum, Shillary.

Neonazi smh lol

[Mrpumperitis]

Does that mean that TrumpCoin = BCH = BCC = NeoNazyCoin?

lols..

[TrumpBump]

Does that mean that TrumpCoin = BCH = BCC = NeoNazyCoin?

lols..

.

Haha, your gif game is big league. I wouldn't have pegged anyone here to know about the list.

[theleaf]

Mathematical Proof That the Lightning Network Cannot Be a Decentralized Bitcoin Scaling Solution
https://medium.com/@jonaldfyookball/mathematical-proof-that-the-lightning-network-cannot-be-a-decentralized-bitcoin-scaling-solution-1b8147650800

The Illusion of Scale in Segregated Witness
https://nchain.com/en/blog/illusion-scale-segregated-witness/

Risk of SegWit – Mining Cartels
https://nchain.com/en/blog/risks-of-segregated-witness-mining-cartels/

8 times Core told people Segwit is a Blocksize Increase
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6wml7g/8_times_core_told_people_segwit_is_a_blocksize/

Continued Discussion on why Lightning Network Cannot Scale
https://medium.com/@jonaldfyookball/continued-discussion-on-why-lightning-network-cannot-scale-883c17b2ef5b

Dr. Peter Rizun - SegWit Coins are not Bitcoins - Arnhem 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoFb3mcxluY

Amaury Sechet - Back to the Basics - Arnhem 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=By0w43NQdiY&list=PLW5YLgBF2qh_1NKB3hW24cg26KSTCsTjY&index=16

Nikita Zhavoronkov - *Why* Bitcoin needs a Scaling Solution - Arnhem 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIM8mQfs1Xk&list=PLW5YLgBF2qh_1NKB3hW24cg26KSTCsTjY&index=3

Bitcoin is Being Hot-Wired for Settlement
https://medium.com/@jgarzik/bitcoin-is-being-hot-wired-for-settlement-a5beb1df223a

Are you saying the Bitcoin Core developers still went ahead with Segwit and LN because the majority of BTC community is not educated enough or are you implying that the developers themselves are not capable enough to understand fully on the topic?

so many links...Bitcoin cash vs Bitcoin.

[narutos]

most people probably already sold most of they Bch n claim it for Bitcoin, price rise to $$5000

[.cryptic.]

most people probably already sold most of they Bch n claim it for Bitcoin, price rise to $$5000

Most of those people will regret soon once BCH start its moon journey. This is a really nice price to accumulate and hold.

[alevlaslo]

BCH and ETC is a bubbles, nobody's interested, hold a course for developers only https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=2116436.0;topicseen

[Lauda]

Are you saying the Bitcoin Core developers still went ahead with Segwit and LN because the majority of BTC community is not educated enough or are you implying that the developers themselves are not capable enough to understand fully on the topic?

All those links are from: 1) People who have no place making articles about technical changes. 2) People who do not understand them yet they pretend they do (e.g. Rizun). 3) People who are paid to write propaganda (see Ver's employees). Both SegWit and LN are far superior to anything that will ever be produced by the developer of Bitcoin Unlimited, Bitcoin Classic, Bitcoin Cash, or whatever fake Bitcoin (or implementation of) they make up next.

Most of those people will regret soon once BCH start its moon journey. This is a really nice price to accumulate and hold.

If you truly think that, you're a delusional idiot. BCH has absolutely zero reason to exist, is much more centralized than Bitcoin in: 1) Mining. 2) Distribution. You should take a look at the rich list before they try to obfuscate this. Additionally, the value stems from Ver & co using their wealth to pump this piece of turd.

[mindrust]

How can you still lie about the cheap fees?

How can you even promote this piece of shit while the creators of bcash are pure liars/scammers?

C'mon gimme an answer! Some bitmain-cash shill come and say something stupid  

Another 2 pages and still no answers

[Lauda]

Another 2 pages and still no answers

How about this: Roger Ver Lies

Roger Ver lies more often than he tells the truth. This is not an attack, just an objective observation of the facts.
"Mt. Gox is totally fine."... shortly thereafter Mt. Gox implodes ... "I am here to 'apologize'. Even though everything I said when I told you 'Mt. Gox is fine' was true, I am sorry that some of you lost money when it collapsed. Buy ether."
"I am banned from posting in /r/Bitcoin" ... accidentally posts to /r/Bitcoin ... "Oops. Now I'll pretend like I never claimed to be banned from /r/Bitcoin, and ignore anyone who asks me about that claim."
"I've dumped a few hundred BTC for BCC"... 2 weeks later: "I haven't sold a single Bitcoin for Bitcoin Cash up until yesterday"
He lies about the subreddit he controls. He regularly lies about his holdings. He lied and scammed his way into the bitcoin.com domain, which he uses to push out FUD about Bitcoin and its developers. He lies on agreements he signs (e.g. "the bitcoin.com pool will mine with NYA/btc1/2x code... whoops just kidding, we're mining bcash instead"). He even had the audacity to lie about what happened in court, when there is a public transcript available which disproves everything he said.
There are more examples of blatant deception that I don't have the time or patience to dig up right now. Make no mistake: the man is, unfortunately, a sociopath.

Source with full links here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6xpu8j/roger_ver_lies/