Stunna (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1285
Primedice.com, Stake.com
|
 |
October 01, 2014, 08:39:52 PM |
|
You want more BTC because you could have doubled it, then doubled it again? That's a completely mathematically ignorant approach. You could not only have lost it - I think you're forgetting that - but a) you're basing on this on the fact that you are now claiming you would have gambled that BTC, which obviously you can't prove, and b) if you use those BTC to gamble now you have the exact same chance of doubling it. Your approach makes no sense and I find it sickening that you would try to twist a site's support this way because want a few extra bucks.
Quick Side Note: I am not affiliated with PD other than moderating chat, I do not get paid by them, this is my own opinion, etc etc etc.
Not because I could have doubled it -but I ALWAYS DO -that's how I played and my bet history can prove that too. Also, I like the way you try to play it down 'a few extra bucks' yeah sure just a few extra bucks whatever. It was more than a few bucks, AND the amount should not matter at all. Furthermore, on a final note, this does not concern you, so stay out of fit, insect. YOU ALWAYS DOUBLE your money?! Damn thats some good shit, how can I sign up with your guaranteed double your money gambling fallacy?! There is no guarantee you will ever win. In fact, especially with primedice, you almost always lose. Your biggest problem here isn't the 0.03 BTC or whatever you're bitching about but the fact that you truly are arguing that if you still had that 0.03 that you FOR SURE would have doubled up through the game. You sir, have a gambling problem because that is a huge gambling fallacy your mind is thinking. This nonce thing has me intrigued. Back in the day I lost so many coins to PD, at least 20 BTC over the course of my run. Be nice to see if any of my screennames are on that list so I can get a little bit back from the thousands upon thousands Stunna's site has made off me... where is this list of nonce affected usernames found?Thanks hellosir1990 and Danksheet for the support. You sir are the one who is out of your mind, because you cannot read. Perhaps you need to go back and do some comprehensive reading lessons so you can keep up with the class. I will put it in simple English in case any more dim minded individuals like yourself attempt a reply like this. I am only requesting to see the results from this run -no others. If it turns out that I lost my bankroll on a direct string of bets when in fact I should have won then I think yes I deserve the wagered amount back as the game was manipulated or cheated or poorly programmed in seems in this case. Oh, by the way, by doubling I mean doubling my bets in a martingale sequence -perhaps you need to read the OP, but I fear asking you to read anything else. There is massive misinformation in this thread as usual. There was no "nonce" issue with primedice, you are thinking of dicebitcoin. On primedice 2 the edge was 1.01% instead of 1% as advertised when betting on 2x due to how the numbers were rounded. This effected an extremely small amount of bets above faucet amount, there is a 1/10,000 chance your bet was effected. On the highest payout though the edge was more-so effected but there weren't really any significant sized bets made at that payout, almost exclusively faucet bets. No rolls were manipulated the edge was literally just 0.01% more than advertised. This was disclosed to us after PD3 had already launched with a system that seems to definitively be 1%. Obviously this wasn't intentional and the effects were much more minimal than I initially thought from what we've seen so far. Lain's logic isn't exactly sound, he was offered a refund + bonus but believes that his betting decisions made were effected by that loss. I'm willing to look into it not because he is right but simply because the cost will likely be extremely minimal if anything at all (if he won the bet after then it wouldn't matter) and because I want him to be satisfied. @lain I responded to your email earlier today, should have more on the weekend, as I've said though it is highly unlikely it effected a large martingale series granted how many bets you've made. With regards to the promised giveaways, the 1B giveaway was a lot of fun and I'm thinking up some ideas for the near future, open to suggestions. |
|
|
|
LainThirtyThree
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2014, 08:41:59 PM
Last edit: October 03, 2014, 08:44:18 AM by LainThirtyThree |
|
You want more BTC because you could have doubled it, then doubled it again? That's a completely mathematically ignorant approach. You could not only have lost it - I think you're forgetting that - but a) you're basing on this on the fact that you are now claiming you would have gambled that BTC, which obviously you can't prove, and b) if you use those BTC to gamble now you have the exact same chance of doubling it. Your approach makes no sense and I find it sickening that you would try to twist a site's support this way because want a few extra bucks.
Quick Side Note: I am not affiliated with PD other than moderating chat, I do not get paid by them, this is my own opinion, etc etc etc.
Not because I could have doubled it -but I ALWAYS DO -that's how I played and my bet history can prove that too. Also, I like the way you try to play it down 'a few extra bucks' yeah sure just a few extra bucks whatever. It was more than a few bucks, AND the amount should not matter at all. Furthermore, on a final note, this does not concern you, so stay out of fit, insect. YOU ALWAYS DOUBLE your money?! Damn thats some good shit, how can I sign up with your guaranteed double your money gambling fallacy?! There is no guarantee you will ever win. In fact, especially with primedice, you almost always lose. Your biggest problem here isn't the 0.03 BTC or whatever you're bitching about but the fact that you truly are arguing that if you still had that 0.03 that you FOR SURE would have doubled up through the game. You sir, have a gambling problem because that is a huge gambling fallacy your mind is thinking. This nonce thing has me intrigued. Back in the day I lost so many coins to PD, at least 20 BTC over the course of my run. Be nice to see if any of my screennames are on that list so I can get a little bit back from the thousands upon thousands Stunna's site has made off me... where is this list of nonce affected usernames found?Thanks hellosir1990 and Danksheet for the support. You sir are the one who is out of your mind, because you cannot read. Perhaps you need to go back and do some comprehensive reading lessons so you can keep up with the class. I will put it in simple English in case any more dim minded individuals like yourself attempt a reply like this. I am only requesting to see the results from this run -no others. If it turns out that I lost my bankroll on a direct string of bets when in fact I should have won then I think yes I deserve the wagered amount back as the game was manipulated or cheated or poorly programmed in seems in this case. Oh, by the way, by doubling I mean doubling my bets in a martingale sequence -perhaps you need to read the OP, but I fear asking you to read anything else. There is no "this run" . It could be the run till pd2 got closed. Come on be reasonable. I will not discuss this anymore. There is just no way to inspect every "run" on pd2 on every bet that didn't round properly . U will get ur money back for each bet that was settled incorrectly . And that is it. Sorry for bad sense of humor in previous posts. Its just that what u are saying (atleast to me) doesn't make any sense . Btw, everybody who is on that list should contact support@primedice.com and they will refund u. Cheers. Noo Micro... :/ I mean, if on the very next bet I doubled and lost as a result I am have been duped. I would not have doubled up if I never lost the next bet, and thus I have lost a large amount. If I had won the bet then I would have starting pre-rolling or reverting to my lower base bet. It seem to me, although it may not be, suspicious that this flaw would happen on such a significant bet considering I pre-roll 5 reds and had almost 1 million bets... On a further note, PD has contacted me back. The developer who handles the PD2 database or something is gone for a few days it seems but they will apparently look into is. I don't know why Micro is speaking on behalf of PD regarding this serious matter, I am in contact with support though. Let's see what happens  |
|
|
|
|
MICRO
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1037
Oldschool!
|
|
October 01, 2014, 08:46:51 PM |
|
You want more BTC because you could have doubled it, then doubled it again? That's a completely mathematically ignorant approach. You could not only have lost it - I think you're forgetting that - but a) you're basing on this on the fact that you are now claiming you would have gambled that BTC, which obviously you can't prove, and b) if you use those BTC to gamble now you have the exact same chance of doubling it. Your approach makes no sense and I find it sickening that you would try to twist a site's support this way because want a few extra bucks.
Quick Side Note: I am not affiliated with PD other than moderating chat, I do not get paid by them, this is my own opinion, etc etc etc.
Not because I could have doubled it -but I ALWAYS DO -that's how I played and my bet history can prove that too. Also, I like the way you try to play it down 'a few extra bucks' yeah sure just a few extra bucks whatever. It was more than a few bucks, AND the amount should not matter at all. Furthermore, on a final note, this does not concern you, so stay out of fit, insect. YOU ALWAYS DOUBLE your money?! Damn thats some good shit, how can I sign up with your guaranteed double your money gambling fallacy?! There is no guarantee you will ever win. In fact, especially with primedice, you almost always lose. Your biggest problem here isn't the 0.03 BTC or whatever you're bitching about but the fact that you truly are arguing that if you still had that 0.03 that you FOR SURE would have doubled up through the game. You sir, have a gambling problem because that is a huge gambling fallacy your mind is thinking. This nonce thing has me intrigued. Back in the day I lost so many coins to PD, at least 20 BTC over the course of my run. Be nice to see if any of my screennames are on that list so I can get a little bit back from the thousands upon thousands Stunna's site has made off me... where is this list of nonce affected usernames found?Thanks hellosir1990 and Danksheet for the support. You sir are the one who is out of your mind, because you cannot read. Perhaps you need to go back and do some comprehensive reading lessons so you can keep up with the class. I will put it in simple English in case any more dim minded individuals like yourself attempt a reply like this. I am only requesting to see the results from this run -no others. If it turns out that I lost my bankroll on a direct string of bets when in fact I should have won then I think yes I deserve the wagered amount back as the game was manipulated or cheated or poorly programmed in seems in this case. Oh, by the way, by doubling I mean doubling my bets in a martingale sequence -perhaps you need to read the OP, but I fear asking you to read anything else. There is no "this run" . It could be the run till pd2 got closed. Come on be reasonable. I will not discuss this anymore. There is just no way to inspect every "run" on pd2 on every bet that didn't round properly . U will get ur money back for each bet that was settled incorrectly . And that is it. Sorry for bad sense of humor in previous posts. Its just that what u are saying (atleast to me) doesn't make any sense . Btw, everybody who is on that list should contact support@primedice.com and they will refund u. Cheers. Noo Micro... :/ I mean, if on the very next bet I doubled and lost as a result I am have been duped. I would not have doubled up if I never lost the next bet, and thus I have lost a large amount. If I had won the bet then I would have staring pre-rolling or reverting to my lower base bet. It seem to me, although it may not be, suspicious that this flaw would happen on such a significant bet considering I pre-roll 5 reds and had almost 1 million bets... On a further note, PD has contacted me back. The developed who handles the PD2 database is gone for a few days it seems but they will apparently look into is. I don't know why Micro is speaking on behalf of PD regarding this serious matter, I am in contact with support though. Let's see what happens I don't speak on behalf of PD. I speak my own opinion. And what u are telling is only what u say. If u won that bet u might stopped betting, u might went all in. U say u know what u would do but nobody else does. Its just un provable . That's what i was trying to say. They can't read minds, and they can't refund "what would happen if didn't happen" . |
|
|
|
LainThirtyThree
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2014, 08:48:51 PM |
|
You want more BTC because you could have doubled it, then doubled it again? That's a completely mathematically ignorant approach. You could not only have lost it - I think you're forgetting that - but a) you're basing on this on the fact that you are now claiming you would have gambled that BTC, which obviously you can't prove, and b) if you use those BTC to gamble now you have the exact same chance of doubling it. Your approach makes no sense and I find it sickening that you would try to twist a site's support this way because want a few extra bucks.
Quick Side Note: I am not affiliated with PD other than moderating chat, I do not get paid by them, this is my own opinion, etc etc etc.
Not because I could have doubled it -but I ALWAYS DO -that's how I played and my bet history can prove that too. Also, I like the way you try to play it down 'a few extra bucks' yeah sure just a few extra bucks whatever. It was more than a few bucks, AND the amount should not matter at all. Furthermore, on a final note, this does not concern you, so stay out of fit, insect. YOU ALWAYS DOUBLE your money?! Damn thats some good shit, how can I sign up with your guaranteed double your money gambling fallacy?! There is no guarantee you will ever win. In fact, especially with primedice, you almost always lose. Your biggest problem here isn't the 0.03 BTC or whatever you're bitching about but the fact that you truly are arguing that if you still had that 0.03 that you FOR SURE would have doubled up through the game. You sir, have a gambling problem because that is a huge gambling fallacy your mind is thinking. This nonce thing has me intrigued. Back in the day I lost so many coins to PD, at least 20 BTC over the course of my run. Be nice to see if any of my screennames are on that list so I can get a little bit back from the thousands upon thousands Stunna's site has made off me... where is this list of nonce affected usernames found?Thanks hellosir1990 and Danksheet for the support. You sir are the one who is out of your mind, because you cannot read. Perhaps you need to go back and do some comprehensive reading lessons so you can keep up with the class. I will put it in simple English in case any more dim minded individuals like yourself attempt a reply like this. I am only requesting to see the results from this run -no others. If it turns out that I lost my bankroll on a direct string of bets when in fact I should have won then I think yes I deserve the wagered amount back as the game was manipulated or cheated or poorly programmed in seems in this case. Oh, by the way, by doubling I mean doubling my bets in a martingale sequence -perhaps you need to read the OP, but I fear asking you to read anything else. There is massive misinformation in this thread as usual. There was no "nonce" issue with primedice, you are thinking of dicebitcoin. On primedice 2 the edge was 1.01% instead of 1% as advertised when betting on 2x due to how the numbers were rounded. This effected an extremely small amount of bets above faucet amount, there is a 1/10,000 chance your bet was effected. On the highest payout though the edge was more-so effected but there weren't really any significant sized bets made at that payout, almost exclusively faucet bets. No rolls were manipulated the edge was literally just 0.01% more than advertised. This was disclosed to us after PD3 had already launched with a system that seems to definitively be 1%. Lain's logic isn't exactly sound, he was offered a refund + bonus but believes that his betting decisions made were effected by that loss. I'm willing to look into it not because he is right but simply because the cost will likely be extremely minimal if anything at all (if he won the bet after then it wouldn't matter) and because I want him to be satisfied. @lain I responded to your email earlier today, should have more on the weekend, as I've said though it is highly unlikely it effected a large martingale series granted how many bets you've made. Thanks Stunna, I now rest assured that the correct result will be looked into. I am glad that at least not everybody got confused about what I was saying, I was not question all other bets, only the ones straight after these affected bets. (there were 2) It's also feels weird that 2 of my bets were victim of this, I must the most unlucky guy ever haha as it was like 0.05 over lol PS You still seem very confused Mirco, seriously, are you high man? I am not asking for the results of some theoretical roll, just the result of my next rolls (I say rolls in plural as there were 2 best.. I fear I confuse you more..) |
|
|
|
|
MICRO
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1037
Oldschool!
|
|
October 01, 2014, 08:52:59 PM
Last edit: October 01, 2014, 09:03:43 PM by MICRO |
|
You want more BTC because you could have doubled it, then doubled it again? That's a completely mathematically ignorant approach. You could not only have lost it - I think you're forgetting that - but a) you're basing on this on the fact that you are now claiming you would have gambled that BTC, which obviously you can't prove, and b) if you use those BTC to gamble now you have the exact same chance of doubling it. Your approach makes no sense and I find it sickening that you would try to twist a site's support this way because want a few extra bucks.
Quick Side Note: I am not affiliated with PD other than moderating chat, I do not get paid by them, this is my own opinion, etc etc etc.
Not because I could have doubled it -but I ALWAYS DO -that's how I played and my bet history can prove that too. Also, I like the way you try to play it down 'a few extra bucks' yeah sure just a few extra bucks whatever. It was more than a few bucks, AND the amount should not matter at all. Furthermore, on a final note, this does not concern you, so stay out of fit, insect. YOU ALWAYS DOUBLE your money?! Damn thats some good shit, how can I sign up with your guaranteed double your money gambling fallacy?! There is no guarantee you will ever win. In fact, especially with primedice, you almost always lose. Your biggest problem here isn't the 0.03 BTC or whatever you're bitching about but the fact that you truly are arguing that if you still had that 0.03 that you FOR SURE would have doubled up through the game. You sir, have a gambling problem because that is a huge gambling fallacy your mind is thinking. This nonce thing has me intrigued. Back in the day I lost so many coins to PD, at least 20 BTC over the course of my run. Be nice to see if any of my screennames are on that list so I can get a little bit back from the thousands upon thousands Stunna's site has made off me... where is this list of nonce affected usernames found?Thanks hellosir1990 and Danksheet for the support. You sir are the one who is out of your mind, because you cannot read. Perhaps you need to go back and do some comprehensive reading lessons so you can keep up with the class. I will put it in simple English in case any more dim minded individuals like yourself attempt a reply like this. I am only requesting to see the results from this run -no others. If it turns out that I lost my bankroll on a direct string of bets when in fact I should have won then I think yes I deserve the wagered amount back as the game was manipulated or cheated or poorly programmed in seems in this case. Oh, by the way, by doubling I mean doubling my bets in a martingale sequence -perhaps you need to read the OP, but I fear asking you to read anything else. There is massive misinformation in this thread as usual. There was no "nonce" issue with primedice, you are thinking of dicebitcoin. On primedice 2 the edge was 1.01% instead of 1% as advertised when betting on 2x due to how the numbers were rounded. This effected an extremely small amount of bets above faucet amount, there is a 1/10,000 chance your bet was effected. On the highest payout though the edge was more-so effected but there weren't really any significant sized bets made at that payout, almost exclusively faucet bets. No rolls were manipulated the edge was literally just 0.01% more than advertised. This was disclosed to us after PD3 had already launched with a system that seems to definitively be 1%. Lain's logic isn't exactly sound, he was offered a refund + bonus but believes that his betting decisions made were effected by that loss. I'm willing to look into it not because he is right but simply because the cost will likely be extremely minimal if anything at all (if he won the bet after then it wouldn't matter) and because I want him to be satisfied. @lain I responded to your email earlier today, should have more on the weekend, as I've said though it is highly unlikely it effected a large martingale series granted how many bets you've made. Thanks Stunna, I now rest assured that the correct result will be looked into. I am glad that at least not everybody got confused about what I was saying, I was not question all other bets, only the ones straight after these affected bets. (there were 2) It's also feels weird that 2 of my bets were victim of this, I must the most unlucky guy ever haha as it was like 0.05 over lol PS You still seem very confused Mirco, seriously, are you high man? I am not asking for the results of some theoretical roll, just the result of my next roll. As always , better to wait for The man to give his word than argue it for nothing . Hehe... I can't agree with u, or it might been just an misunderstanding. I just wouldn't pay attention to ur next roll , no matter if it was win or loss. But ok u lost that money , not me. Cheers Lain33 . |
|
|
|
monnecon
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
|
|
October 02, 2014, 12:31:21 AM |
|
thanks oh wow its the 10,000th post usernme on PD - babbud thanks any tips welcomed I think I deleted one of my posts to help you achieve the goal |
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1762
|
|
October 02, 2014, 08:01:30 AM |
|
"significant bet considering I pre-roll 5 reds and had almost"
You sir seriously need to learn the basics of probability  You do realise pre-rolling does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to your odds of winning. If you play 2x, your odds are still 50/50 whether you pre-roll 5 reds or pre-roll 150 reds. Each result is independent of the prior. Your "strategy" is a joke I know you think that, there is a 1% chance of getting 6 reds in a row, its TRUE however. If you ONLY bet after 5 reds, you're odds start on the 6th roll which is 50/50. Reason why you think you have a 99% of winning is because youre mind is tricking you. You DO NOT have a 99% of winning because when you were pre-rolling for your 5 reds, there were many greens that you didn't bet on. Since you never took this bets, and you only bet after 5 pre-rolls, you're odds of winning are still 50/50. Instead of continuing with this "WINNING" stragegy of yours, consider donating money to a charity instead of blaming PrimeDice because you have NO IDEA how basic probability works.'
|
|
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1920
The Concierge of Crypto
|
|
October 02, 2014, 08:33:16 AM |
|
I'm a fan of the "pre-rolling" strategy. It does not make it right or correct, just that the odds of rolling so many losses or wins in a row, as a whole is a different probability than when rolling per individual event. Stunna, if you're looking for an idea on how to do a giveaway, I have an idea. It's called "Purposely Rigged Lotto" ... hehehe. I'm serious. There will be a winner, we just have to pick who. |
|
|
|
LainThirtyThree
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2014, 08:46:25 AM
Last edit: October 02, 2014, 09:20:09 AM by LainThirtyThree |
|
"significant bet considering I pre-roll 5 reds and had almost"
You sir seriously need to learn the basics of probability http://www.pdfbook.co.ke/images/books/probability436000633.jpgYou do realise pre-rolling does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to your odds of winning. If you play 2x, your odds are still 50/50 whether you pre-roll 5 reds or pre-roll 150 reds. Each result is independent of the prior. Your "strategy" is a joke I know you think that, there is a 1% chance of getting 6 reds in a row, its TRUE however. If you ONLY bet after 5 reds, you're odds start on the 6th roll which is 50/50. Reason why you think you have a 99% of winning is because youre mind is tricking you. You DO NOT have a 99% of winning because when you were pre-rolling for your 5 reds, there were many greens that you didn't bet on. Since you never took this bets, and you only bet after 5 pre-rolls, you're odds of winning are still 50/50. Instead of continuing with this "WINNING" stragegy of yours, consider donating money to a charity instead of blaming PrimeDice because you have NO IDEA how basic probability works.' http://www.snaptheconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Mom-Blogging-for-Dummies.jpg Clearly you struggle to read. Your title '"significant bet considering I pre-roll 5 reds and had almost" -why dont you finish what was said? You spead misinformation combined with your lame attemp to be funny, typical it seem of you faggots that defend PD without know the all. You need to learn to read before you speak you stupid imbisil. I won't even say anything more because of fucking morons like you who butt in topics without any knowledge. 'Winning strat' of mine was meant sarcastic, I don't expect you to understand language much. People defending PD when they didn't even read the OP, or can't even grasp the content. At least some people can. Get a life you, this doesn't concern people who cannot be bothered to understand the full story. Seriosuly, look this fuckhead 'consider donating money to a charity instead of blaming PrimeDice... NO IDEA how basic probability works...' mate you have a strange way of twisting things, I bet you couldnt follow a childrens book Here is some help: http://www.readingpains.com/books.htmlOvercoming Dyslexia for Dummies |
|
|
|
|
|
moreia
|
|
October 02, 2014, 10:30:44 AM |
|
Removed
|
|
|
|
|
bitbituser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:33:31 PM |
|
is primedice offline now??
|
|
|
|
|
|
pthnmj
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:34:25 PM |
|
I think it's getting filtered in the US... O_O
coinbase won't load for me either.
|
|
|
|
|
bitbituser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:37:33 PM |
|
I think it's getting filtered in the US... O_O
coinbase won't load for me either.
coinbase not working too here. I'm from EU |
|
|
|
|
bitbituser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:38:23 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minnlo
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:38:51 PM |
|
is primedice offline now??
I think it's getting filtered in the US... O_O
coinbase won't load for me either.
I have no problem loading both Primedice or Coinbase, and I am from Asia. And I have no problem for btc-e as well. |
|
|
|
|
griffinriz
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:39:50 PM |
|
is primedice offline now??
I think it's getting filtered in the US... O_O
coinbase won't load for me either.
I have no problem loading both Primedice or Coinbase, and I am from Asia. And I have no problem for btc-e as well. working for me too, Europe  |
|
|
|
|
bitbituser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:40:46 PM |
|
is primedice offline now??
I think it's getting filtered in the US... O_O
coinbase won't load for me either.
I have no problem loading both Primedice or Coinbase, and I am from Asia. And I have no problem for btc-e as well. Ok. Thanks for feedback, Now the 3 websites are working ...still problems.. |
|
|
|
|
keithers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1001
This is the land of wolves now & you're not a wolf
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:53:28 PM |
|
Weird, I am from the US, and coinbase.com will not open, but prime dice opened after refreshing about 5 times..
This is one of the reasons that I have been telling people to basically treat coinbase as you would any other exchange. Only keep the amount of coins on there that you plan on buying or selling. Don't use it as a wallet, because you are trusting them with the safekeeping of all those funds. I am not implying that something serious is wrong right now, but if you need to access those funds that are stored there right now, you are out of luck...
|
|
|
|
|
|
snarlpill
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:54:29 PM |
|
I agree, this is strange. I thought my internet wasn't working here at my house because I was trying to load my Blockchain wallet, even though it's showing full WiFi, it won't load. I don't want to sound like a conspiracy theorist but none of the BTC sites I'm trying to go to are loading... btc-e.com, primedice.com, blockchain.info... all say "This webpage is not available" and I am in the U.S. Very strange because all of the "regular" websites I'm trying are going through fine. Bitcointalk is working for me also as you can tell.
EDIT: Now all of them are working for me. Very odd that many of us in the U.S. experienced a short "black out" there...
|
|
|
|
bitbituser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2014, 04:07:28 PM |
|
I agree, this is strange. I thought my internet wasn't working here at my house because I was trying to load my Blockchain wallet, even though it's showing full WiFi, it won't load. I don't want to sound like a conspiracy theorist but none of the BTC sites I'm trying to go to are loading... btc-e.com, primedice.com, blockchain.info... all say "This webpage is not available" and I am in the U.S. Very strange because all of the "regular" websites I'm trying are going through fine. Bitcointalk is working for me also as you can tell.
EDIT: Now all of them are working for me. Very odd that many of us in the U.S. experienced a short "black out" there...
Now is working too here. |
|
|
|
|
|
