[ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com

[Chello]

I noticed Look how much Immature I have compare to yours this is why the profit is different I think???

0,01237131 - you total
0,01431799 - me total

In 20 Min you lose ~ 0,00039 with our speed and not like 0,00194668 yours compared to mine.

So somewhere there must be something.

[gtraah]

I noticed Look how much Immature I have compare to yours this is why the profit is different I think???

0,01237131 - you total
0,01431799 - me total

In 20 Min you lose ~ 0,00039 with our speed and not like 0,00194668 yours compared to mine.

So somewhere there must be something.

Where are you getting those Immature Totals from?

You stated at the time we both had these results

ME - 0.00219991
you -0.00057449

This score shows that I almost have 4 x the ammount of Immature compare to you.

[Chello]

0.00219991 + 0.00540925 + 0.00476215 = 0,01237131 -- you
0.00057449 + 0.00645326 + 0.00729024 = 0,01431799 -- me

that easy

[jamesc760]

Lol, it's true that cyrpto-currnecy people don't know simple math.

[gtraah]

^^^ Relax yourself lol I just didnt realise he added them together.

Anyway - hmmm

there you go, you have just proven the instability from middlecoin server-

I have very Stable Dedicated mining configuration hardware (Not used for any other purpose), No Errors, Constant Hardwired Internet connection.

And you see that there is a clear difference between my payout and yours... Now just imagine all the other people on here, I bet you will find MANY examples  of this.

The question is why does this happen.

I think this may be looking like my final pay cycle on here... This is my first Multipool coin I have tested , so far not so good results.. Ill test out hashcows when they get back online.

[Gamer67]

Oh I didnt realise u added them together.

Ok well there you go, you have just proven the instability from middlecoin server-

I have very Stable Dedicated mining configuration hardware (Not used for any other purpose), No Errors, Constant Hardwired Internet connection.

And you see that there is a clear difference between my payout and yours... Now just imagine all the other people on here, I bet you will find MANY examples  of this.

The question is why does this happen.

Just thinking out loud here but could there have been connection issues between you and the server that might have only been specific to you and your location. I realise that you say your connection is stable at your end but did you or have you done a ping trace to the server ?

[gtraah]

Yeh I have done one,,, Just then but What am I looking for... I can see many ping time results come back at me?

I done a tracert middlecoin.com &  eu.middlecoin.com

On the first server - 24 ping requests came back and about 5 timed out,

The EU server out of 30 Ping requests exactly 15 of them came back timed out.

[jedimstr]

Yeh I have done one,,, Just then but What am I looking for... I can see many ping time results come back at me?

Although out of 24 about 5 timed out, whats that mean.?

What are the lag times on your ping.  100ms, 230ms, more? You shouldn't be getting any timeouts.  That's a bad sign right there.

[gtraah]

Im betting If anyone does a tracecert at different tiems of the day some will come back timed out.

WHy dont you try do this

tracert middlecoin.com

tracert eu.middlecoin.com


My ping results start off VERY fast then slow down as they go down the list

From 2 Microseconds - 370 Micro seconds

[Gamer67]

Did you do a traceroute ?

C: prompt, type tracert followed by the destination server name or an IP address, for example: tracert google.com

If any of the hops come back with * Request timed out, this denotes network congestion and a reason for slow loading Web pages and dropped connections.

Things could have changed since yesterday though. Ideally you need to do it when/if you are experiencing issues.


Sorry if you already know how to do this

[Gamer67]

Sorry, just noticed your edited post.

[jedimstr]

Im betting If anyone does a tracecert at different tiems of the day some will come back timed out.

WHy dont you try do this

tracert middlecoin.com

tracert eu.middlecoin.com


My ping results start off VERY fast then slow down as they go down the list

From 2 Microseconds - 370 Micro seconds

Ping not tracert because various hops through tracert will obscure the results you want directly to Middlecoin.com.

This is what I get through ping:

Code:

PING middlecoin.com (54.214.242.184): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=97.102 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=97.217 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=98.666 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=98.229 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=96.472 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=96.303 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=97.930 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=97.749 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=97.198 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=97.045 ms

Zero timeouts and all my pings at under 100ms.

[duz]

Pinging middlecoin.com [54.214.242.184] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 54.214.242.184: bytes=32 time=369ms TTL=44
Reply from 54.214.242.184: bytes=32 time=433ms TTL=44
Reply from 54.214.242.184: bytes=32 time=388ms TTL=44
Reply from 54.214.242.184: bytes=32 time=397ms TTL=44

Ping statistics for 54.214.242.184:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 369ms, Maximum = 433ms, Average = 396ms

pretty average ping times, with a roughly 2% reject rate

[gtraah]

Im betting If anyone does a tracecert at different tiems of the day some will come back timed out.

WHy dont you try do this

tracert middlecoin.com

tracert eu.middlecoin.com


My ping results start off VERY fast then slow down as they go down the list

From 2 Microseconds - 370 Micro seconds

Ping not tracert because various hops through tracert will obscure the results you want directly to Middlecoin.com.

This is what I get through ping:

Code:

PING middlecoin.com (54.214.242.184): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=97.102 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=97.217 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=98.666 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=98.229 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=96.472 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=96.303 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=97.930 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=97.749 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=97.198 ms
64 bytes from 54.214.242.184: icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=97.045 ms

Zero timeouts and all my pings at under 100ms.

Ohh well Yes Ping I get 0 Timeouts offcourse.

Mind you I am on my Wireless laptop NOT my miner - My miner is Hardwired into the network.

On my laptop Using Windows 8.1 here are the results:

Pinging middlecoin.com [54.214.242.184] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 54.214.242.184: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=42
Reply from 54.214.242.184: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=42
Reply from 54.214.242.184: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=42
Reply from 54.214.242.184: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=42

Ping statistics for 54.214.242.184:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 164ms, Maximum = 164ms, Average = 164ms

[Chello]

there you go, you have just proven the instability from middlecoin server-

I have very Stable Dedicated mining configuration hardware (Not used for any other purpose), No Errors, Constant Hardwired Internet connection.

And you see that there is a clear difference between my payout and yours... Now just imagine all the other people on here, I bet you will find MANY examples  of this.

Im not that sure that you are that stable, as your test with the new compiled version shows that you have Staled (me had never ever one single one with middlecoin same for Getwork Failures)

[gtraah]

there you go, you have just proven the instability from middlecoin server-

I have very Stable Dedicated mining configuration hardware (Not used for any other purpose), No Errors, Constant Hardwired Internet connection.

And you see that there is a clear difference between my payout and yours... Now just imagine all the other people on here, I bet you will find MANY examples  of this.

Im not that sure that you are that stable, as your test with the new compiled version shows that you have Staled (me had never ever one single one with middlecoin same for Getwork Failures)

Are you for real? Isnt this normal to have a percentage? of stale? and Get work failures? The only way to see these is if you have CG watcher, if you dont CGminer looks perfectly normal No issue there. For example If I never used Cgwatcher I would never see that I have some stale and GW failures

Everything seems stable?  VRM Temperatures  in the 80c   Stable Hashrate  , No Hardware or Dead GPUs or Sick EVER with this config.

Normal Accepted and Rejected percentages

I have heard people having stale and getwork failures which is normal

[RickJamesBTC]

Middle coin is on amazon servers. If you have problems reaching them you probably have network problems.

[hausrath]

I've searched back through the thread as best I can but can't seem to find any more info.

The frontpage data is available in JSON format at the URL:
http://middlecoin.com/json

But unfortunately this file is nearly 2 MB, which is quite a lot when all that's needed (in my case) is stats for one payout address.

Is there another way to access the data for an individual miner via JSON, or is parsing data for the entire pool the only option?

[gtraah]

Middle coin is on amazon servers. If you have problems reaching them you probably have network problems.

?? No one is having a problem reaching them

[jedimstr]

Middle coin is on amazon servers. If you have problems reaching them you probably have network problems.

?? No one is having a problem reaching them

Not lately.  A few days ago there were issues, but h2o confirmed those and fixed.