[ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com

[Pay87]

Please someone of middlecoin check that Transaction ( http://middlecoin.com/reports/191Y8iU9PtPr7XsGVi3gdFMdVwmH9XTzqR.html )

As far as I understand 0.36333083 BTC were sent ?
But I did not got them into my btc wallet yet, any explanation ?

Thanks!

[Thracky]

Please someone of middlecoin check that Transaction ( http://middlecoin.com/reports/191Y8iU9PtPr7XsGVi3gdFMdVwmH9XTzqR.html )

As far as I understand 0.36333083 BTC were sent ?
But I did not got them into my btc wallet yet, any explanation ?

Thanks!

If your address is correct the coins are there. The transaction is long confirmed and the network verifies that the coins were sent to that address, so if you don't have them, there's an issue somewhere on your end.

[juggs]

Please someone of middlecoin check that Transaction ( http://middlecoin.com/reports/191Y8iU9PtPr7XsGVi3gdFMdVwmH9XTzqR.html )

As far as I understand 0.36333083 BTC were sent ?
But I did not got them into my btc wallet yet, any explanation ?

Thanks!

http://blockchain.info/tx/76756523491fa3a5e06ab28875ab3084488414d89d9ec6ca95833cc30dab3c44

Has 63 confirmations and shows:
191Y8iU9PtPr7XsGVi3gdFMdVwmH9XTzqR 0.21732087 BTC


http://blockchain.info/address/191Y8iU9PtPr7XsGVi3gdFMdVwmH9XTzqR
This also shows the 0.21732087 BTC hitting that address at 2013-12-17 06:39:33 UTC



The previous day's payment (0.14600996 BTC) also shows up at http://blockchain.info/address/191Y8iU9PtPr7XsGVi3gdFMdVwmH9XTzqR at 2013-12-16 02:32:05 UTC


With that same amount being moved on to two other addresses at 2013-12-17 00:27:48 UTC

Hope that helps!

[exokk]

Please ensure and tripple check, that its your right address. Well its quite obvious, that you have to update the blockchain in your wallet, right? Please make sure, that it is really up to date. Otherwise you cannot see the transmission in your wallet. If address is correct and wallet blockchain up to date, the only idea I have left is:
Delete everything in %APPDATA%/bitcoin/     !!EXCEPT!!  wallet.dat (you surely have some backups of it hopefully anyway, if not: do it right now and copy it before restarting bitcoin-qt). Restart Bitcoin-qt and check, if the new sync will help you out (well in fact it must do the job .... ).



@Shastada: thanks for your clarification. Agreed, OP seems to do a really god job.

[Pay87]

Thanks for all the posts regarding my problem.
I migrated to BitcoinQT from Multibit now and syncing whole chain.
Hopefully Multibit just did not show it right.
I will give a feedback as soon as syncing with BitcoinQT is complete (this should take some hours).

Thanks! 

[Xer]

How accurate is the "Accepted MH/s (Last Hour)" and "Rejected MH/s" (Last Hour) fields?

Im mining with 2 cards at 480 khash and about 4% stale shares.
But the stats page is listing them as 0.38 and 0.37 with a blank rejected field.
Where is the missing 210 khash? Thats 20% of the hashing power not accounted for.


http://middlecoin.com/#1HrJZEj4fLaxi5UaPMEFPSAfP6KELdBSmy
http://middlecoin.com/#1KkWcM1Vw8JvYnTVLsJFypCmd1hiV934XV

[xIronCrossx]

How long ago did you start? Mine varies from all the way down to ~.95 up to 1.35. My actual is around 1145 kH/s, but ~1070 WU. It always takes about an hour or 2 to get stable.

[Pay87]

How accurate is the "Accepted MH/s (Last Hour)" and "Rejected MH/s" (Last Hour) fields?

Im mining with 2 cards at 480 khash and about 4% stale shares.
But the stats page is listing them as 0.38 and 0.37 with a blank rejected field.
Where is the missing 210 khash? Thats 20% of the hashing power not accounted for.


http://middlecoin.com/#1HrJZEj4fLaxi5UaPMEFPSAfP6KELdBSmy
http://middlecoin.com/#1KkWcM1Vw8JvYnTVLsJFypCmd1hiV934XV

Just give it some hours up to a day and it should show up right. 

[Xer]

Its been running since yesterday. with a ~20 second downtime several hours ago when i restarted guiminer to get fresh stats.

Whats going on? middlecoin is only showing the hashrate for one of my cards, but both have submitted the same amount of shares?
Seems to have happened directly after the payout.
Iv pointed the miners to different addresses now to see if that solves it. But if the stats are correct iv lost 9h of doge mining  on one card

http://middlecoin.com/reports/12KA96Te7pUKxZ8Jy6QntLABL946FyxvRG.html

Im now mining on 1HrJZEj4fLaxi5UaPMEFPSAfP6KELdBSmy with a second card.

Edit: with only one 480 mhash card pointed on 12KA96Te7pUKxZ8Jy6QntLABL946FyxvRG it lists the hasrate as 0.3728 and the reject field is empty. Coingeeks graph lists a reject of 0.01.Mhash.

Iv now pointed both cards on new adresses.

[willittobe]

Report from the Mineshaft - DOGEing Bullets (during a Chinese Fire Drill)
http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=report_from_the_mineshaft-dogeing_bullets_during_a_chinese_fire_drill

[bdiddle]

So between having some rigs pointed at doge and some here, these last two days have been entertaining 

[Spencer]

Just noticed my payout. BTC.015 for 380 kh/s or so!  I should stop doubting    I don't know how he does it but I really don't care at this point.

[MoNxO]

Is it profitable mining by CPU here?

[bdiddle]

Is it profitable mining by CPU here?

I really don't think so.

[2RoyalSox]

Hashrate seems to have increased from 2.5GH to 3.6GH in less than 48 hours. Thats amazing.

going to mean lower profits

Though we've done excellently these past few days.

[jamesc760]

The pool may be getting too big for its own good. H2O really needs to split and point to different coins soon.

[CumpsD]

The pool may be getting too big for its own good. H2O really needs to split and point to different coins soon.

Without reading all 100+ page, any chance you could tell me in short why the pool becoming bigger is a bad thing?

[2RoyalSox]

The pool may be getting too big for its own good. H2O really needs to split and point to different coins soon.

Without reading all 100+ page, any chance you could tell me in short why the pool becoming bigger is a bad thing?

More miners means more hashrate meaning:
-more coin swapping as difficulty adjustments hit harder
-hurts dedicated miners of the coin when we leave them with high difficulty
-more miners here likely means more everywhere, meaning lower profits across the board

If we split the miners across two or more coins this could mean greater stability in the difficulty of individual coins, and possibly better long term profits. We would have to have some kind of method of determining who gets to mine the best coins, and who mines the subpar coins though. Maybe round-robin style of approach, or maybe just based on raw hashrate (aka you earn h20 more fees so you get the best work to hash)

[EdBoon]

The pool may be getting too big for its own good. H2O really needs to split and point to different coins soon.

Without reading all 100+ page, any chance you could tell me in short why the pool becoming bigger is a bad thing?

The more and more coins you have to unload at one time tends to drop the value.  By splitting coins you would reduce that sway in market value

[Shastada]

The pool may be getting too big for its own good. H2O really needs to split and point to different coins soon.

Without reading all 100+ page, any chance you could tell me in short why the pool becoming bigger is a bad thing?

More miners means more hashrate meaning:
-more coin swapping as difficulty adjustments hit harder
-hurts dedicated miners of the coin when we leave them with high difficulty
-more miners here likely means more everywhere, meaning lower profits across the board

If we split the miners across two or more coins this could mean greater stability in the difficulty of individual coins, and possibly better long term profits. We would have to have some kind of method of determining who gets to mine the best coins, and who mines the subpar coins though. Maybe round-robin style of approach, or maybe just based on raw hashrate (aka you earn h20 more fees so you get the best work to hash)

If he left people off the best coins then people would leave this pool in droves and go to the pools that don't intentionally screw part of the pool, or just mine the best coin themselves. Why would anyone think this is an ok idea? If a coin is the best value its the best value, just milk it. I don't think cutting the hash in half would make that much improvement, it would just lower profits all around.