Bitcoin Forum
January 14, 2026, 07:56:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 [244] 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 ... 537 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com  (Read 829960 times)
SimonG
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 06:08:35 PM
 #4861

Anyone know anything about middlecoin payout address 1M3jtksp1upR33SX1VzeCfH5x9fc6zKykR? 500 mhs seems hard to believe. I wonder if it's a company and hundreds of gpus are running in the same building or if it's many different places all hashing to the same address?
It was confirmed by h2o that it's a legit user in China.

The user have actually posted here too. He or she owns a company with a mining-farm in China. Smiley
xminerx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 172
Merit: 100


quickest cross blockchain transactions


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 06:15:44 PM
 #4862

have any of you played with expiry and scan-time i was reading lowering them will really improve getting shares in and out faster with scrypt and it has my work utility used to be 100+ less then the hash now its same or more.
these seem to really work good for my 2x 7970s.
"expiry" : "12",
"scan-time" : "6",


I've worked with "5" for both, but I'll try your setting nows. I'm mining with just one 7850.

vrba
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
January 08, 2014, 06:20:14 PM
Last edit: January 08, 2014, 07:07:13 PM by vrba
 #4863

As per EUR or USD to GBP, yeah, I don't think there are any big enough BTC/GBP markets.
I've been looking at this the last few days and the cheapest solution I seemed to have found so far is:
1) trade out of BTC into EUR on Kraken for 0.2%
2) SEPA transfer to a EUR bank account in the UK
3) Use a cheap FX company to change into GBP (found these guys earlier: http://www.worldfirst.com/) and doesn't charge for transfers.

Sounds good no?

For all of you that are in the EU SEPA zone: use Bitstamp https://www.bitstamp.net ... fast, secure and easy to use with low fees.

I've used www.therocktrading.com, they also support SEPA transfers. You should also check does your bank accept SEPA transfers, I found out that my doesn't, still got the money today but paid 1% fees. SEPA fee is allegedly 1€.
Mikk36
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 06:42:55 PM
 #4864

As per EUR or USD to GBP, yeah, I don't think there are any big enough BTC/GBP markets.
I've been looking at this the last few days and the cheapest solution I seemed to have found so far is:
1) trade out of BTC into EUR on Kraken for 0.2%
2) SEPA transfer to a EUR bank account in the UK
3) Use a cheap FX company to change into GBP (found these guys earlier: http://www.worldfirst.com/) and doesn't charge for transfers.

Sounds good no?

For all of you that are in the EU SEPA zone: use Bitstamp https://www.bitstamp.net ... fast, secure and easy to use with low fees.

I've used www.therocktrading.com, they also support SEPA transfers. You should ačsp check does your bank accept SEPA transfers, I found out that my doesn't, still got the money today but paid 1% fees. SEPA fee is allegedly 1€.
By February 1st, 2014, all transactions will be made in SEPA system, all current national systems are expired (between banks inside the SEPA region).
Biggen
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 07:19:07 PM
 #4865

For the guys that are running 100+ mh/s farms: are you running on 120 or 220 volt systems? I'm debating making the switch to 220 to lower the Amperage on each system and gain some efficiency.  What kind of amp load are you seeing for a 4 GPU (290 or 280X) system?

Anyone running a significant amount of hashpower is not using 120V.  My farm is approx 18Mh/s and I'm using 240V.  I have three phase power to my facility (600A total) though my PDUs are currently single phase only.

A 4-card 280X rig will pull around 1100W.
sykal
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 07:27:14 PM
 #4866

Seems like a very bad day today so far-
mikeybit
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 07:28:36 PM
 #4867

For the guys that are running 100+ mh/s farms: are you running on 120 or 220 volt systems? I'm debating making the switch to 220 to lower the Amperage on each system and gain some efficiency.  What kind of amp load are you seeing for a 4 GPU (290 or 280X) system?

Anyone running a significant amount of hashpower is not using 120V.  My farm is approx 18Mh/s and I'm using 240V.  I have three phase power to my facility (600A total) though my PDUs are currently single phase only.

A 4-card 280X rig will pull around 1100W.

I understand that, I'm mostly concerned about the Amperage, not wattage.  Wattage will stay the same, voltage will increase, therefore amperage will decrease. Theoretically it should be greater than 2:1 reduction since the PSU's will actually gain efficiency at 240V.
soothaa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1151
Merit: 528



View Profile
January 08, 2014, 07:34:34 PM
 #4868

Seems like a very bad day today so far-
Really? 2 of my miners are down and so far it's still looking like a good day so far..

Want increased coin support within AwesomeMiner? Try my free plugin to add support for nearly any coin! https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=2979494
Want Masternode income stats within AwesomeMiner? Try my free plugin to add support for them! https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=3047367
Biggen
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 07:38:33 PM
 #4869


I understand that, I'm mostly concerned about the Amperage, not wattage.  Wattage will stay the same, voltage will increase, therefore amperage will decrease. Theoretically it should be greater than 2:1 reduction since the PSU's will actually gain efficiency at 240V.

What is your exact question?  Maybe I shouldn't have skipped lunch....

Yes, you will halve you amperage going from 120V to 240V.  Yes, your PSU units will run a tad more efficiently (like a couple %) running on 240V versus 120V.  As I stated, a 4 card R9 280X rig pulls about 1100W from the wall which equates to ~4.5A @ 240V.
mikeybit
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 07:42:41 PM
 #4870


I understand that, I'm mostly concerned about the Amperage, not wattage.  Wattage will stay the same, voltage will increase, therefore amperage will decrease. Theoretically it should be greater than 2:1 reduction since the PSU's will actually gain efficiency at 240V.

What is your exact question?  Maybe I shouldn't have skipped lunch....

Yes, you will halve you amperage going from 120V to 240V.  Yes, your PSU units will run a tad more efficiently (like a couple %) running on 240V versus 120V.  As I stated, a 4 card R9 280X rig pulls about 1100W from the wall which equates to ~4.5A @ 240V.


Thank you for that.  My current 4 280x rigs pull ~10.5-11A, so the reduction is greater than 2.  That's what I was looking for. 
aint_no_enthusiast
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 07:48:10 PM
 #4871

Seems like a very bad day today so far-
Really? 2 of my miners are down and so far it's still looking like a good day so far..

Agreed, I had one card flipping shit on me today and still have a decent balance + unexchanged...
RickJamesBTC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 07:53:20 PM
 #4872


I understand that, I'm mostly concerned about the Amperage, not wattage.  Wattage will stay the same, voltage will increase, therefore amperage will decrease. Theoretically it should be greater than 2:1 reduction since the PSU's will actually gain efficiency at 240V.

What is your exact question?  Maybe I shouldn't have skipped lunch....

Yes, you will halve you amperage going from 120V to 240V.  Yes, your PSU units will run a tad more efficiently (like a couple %) running on 240V versus 120V.  As I stated, a 4 card R9 280X rig pulls about 1100W from the wall which equates to ~4.5A @ 240V.


Thank you for that.  My current 4 280x rigs pull ~10.5-11A, so the reduction is greater than 2.  That's what I was looking for.  

Reduction greater than two what? You aren't using 2x less power from your drop, the advantage is that you can use smaller cables to your psus, more power supplies from existing breakers, a few percent in efficiency.
mikeybit
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 07:55:09 PM
 #4873


I understand that, I'm mostly concerned about the Amperage, not wattage.  Wattage will stay the same, voltage will increase, therefore amperage will decrease. Theoretically it should be greater than 2:1 reduction since the PSU's will actually gain efficiency at 240V.

What is your exact question?  Maybe I shouldn't have skipped lunch....

Yes, you will halve you amperage going from 120V to 240V.  Yes, your PSU units will run a tad more efficiently (like a couple %) running on 240V versus 120V.  As I stated, a 4 card R9 280X rig pulls about 1100W from the wall which equates to ~4.5A @ 240V.


Thank you for that.  My current 4 280x rigs pull ~10.5-11A, so the reduction is greater than 2.  That's what I was looking for.  

Reduction greater than two what? You aren't using 2x less power from your drop, the advantage is that you can use smaller cables to your psus, more power supplies from existing breakers, a few percent in efficiency.

If you read the sentence again, I'm referring to Amperage.  The Amps drop allowing you to do what you said, get more computers on the same breaker, etc.
kalus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 263

let's make a deal.


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 08:17:46 PM
 #4874

^ why don't you move this to the mining forum?



also, was there a large connectivity outage about 10 hours ago?  my internet was also down (MCI backbone), but it looks like a big chunk in our hashrate was taken out around that time too. 

DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
Neon001
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 08:28:27 PM
Last edit: January 08, 2014, 08:48:28 PM by Neon001
 #4875

Seems like a very bad day today so far-
+1

I went from 4Mh/s to about 4.7Mh/s last night and today is on pace to pay about 20% less than yesterday.  No significant change to immature/unexchanged either.

0.034-0.035 BTC isn't what I was expecting for 24hrs of 4.7-4.8Mh/s of hashing power.  

Coingeek, I don't suppose it's possible to add minor lines along the x-axis, is it?  It'd be nice to be able to read the graph with better resolution than 24 hr increments.
Zombie123
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 08:30:27 PM
 #4876

Seems like a very bad day today so far-
+1

I went from 4Mh/s to about 4.7Mh/s last night and today is on pace to pay about 20% less than yesterday.  No significant change to immature/unexchanged either.

0.034-0.035 BTC isn't what I was expecting for 24hrs of 4.7-4.8Mh/s of hashing power. 

Why dont you do something about it then .. With that hashrate on RPC you would have got .1BTC without doing anything lol
Biggen
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 08:34:41 PM
 #4877

I saw no such drop in hashrate from my mining farm to middlecoin.com.
bigblind
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 252


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 08:47:17 PM
 #4878

Seems like a very bad day today so far-
+1

I went from 4Mh/s to about 4.7Mh/s last night and today is on pace to pay about 20% less than yesterday.  No significant change to immature/unexchanged either.

0.034-0.035 BTC isn't what I was expecting for 24hrs of 4.7-4.8Mh/s of hashing power.  

that equals exactly what im getting with 1.65Mh/s the last days - about 0.012
sykal
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 08:50:34 PM
 #4879

Seems like a very bad day today so far-
+1

I went from 4Mh/s to about 4.7Mh/s last night and today is on pace to pay about 20% less than yesterday.  No significant change to immature/unexchanged either.

0.034-0.035 BTC isn't what I was expecting for 24hrs of 4.7-4.8Mh/s of hashing power. 

Why dont you do something about it then .. With that hashrate on RPC you would have got .1BTC without doing anything lol

What's RPC?
Doozie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 08, 2014, 08:59:43 PM
Last edit: January 08, 2014, 09:12:20 PM by Doozie
 #4880

Seems like a very bad day today so far-
+1

I went from 4Mh/s to about 4.7Mh/s last night and today is on pace to pay about 20% less than yesterday.  No significant change to immature/unexchanged either.

0.034-0.035 BTC isn't what I was expecting for 24hrs of 4.7-4.8Mh/s of hashing power.  

Why dont you do something about it then .. With that hashrate on RPC you would have got .1BTC without doing anything lol

What's RPC?

I'm guessing by RPC he means http://www.ronpaulcoin.com/ronpaulcoin_downloads.php maybe?

I'm only running a 1.6Mh/s rig at the moment but my numbers on here seem very low today. I ran it for 1 full day and ended up with about .016BTC and stopped it to try another coin only to end up coming back this morning and trying again, after 4 hours im sitting at about 0.00028039BTC which isn't very impressive. Maybe I'm just mining the wrong pool, i dunno. Still have much to learn I can see...
Pages: « 1 ... 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 [244] 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 ... 537 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!