[ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com

[ButterBread]

... to do some ddos attacke on  his enamy list.

Typo police : it's spelled 'enema'

[MiMiMiner]

The guy with 575 mh/s can not be a botnet. Then his rejection would be much higher.

[gtraah]

Hi Guys newbiw here So all I do to my cgminer is point it at hashcows and thats it? Whaich one do you think is better < this or middle coin


Whats the Proc and Cons of each and whats your spayout for 2250KH

[CaptainBeck]

Hi Guys newbiw here So all I do to my cgminer is point it at hashcows and thats it? Whaich one do you think is better < this or middle coin


Whats the Proc and Cons of each and whats your spayout for 2250KH

You know this is middle coin rite???

And ofc this is better since we are all on here.

2250KH can be looked up on the site because there is no one right answer, just a load of averages.

[dragonmike]

Just a quick one, I'm building this rig at the moment and it'll have 4GB of ram... I read that's plenty enough for LTC mining but would a multi-coin switching pool like middlecoin require more ram for any reason? Haven't been able to find anything specific. I was under the impression Scrypt mining isn't ram intensive so it shouldn't matter?

[CaptainBeck]

Just a quick one, I'm building this rig at the moment and it'll have 4GB of ram... I read that's plenty enough for LTC mining but would a multi-coin switching pool like middlecoin require more ram for any reason? Haven't been able to find anything specific. I was under the impression Scrypt mining isn't ram intensive so it shouldn't matter?

Scrypt mining is Scrypt mining. All the coins should roughly be the same, so what works for LTC will work for the rest.

So 4GB of ram should be enuff but its fairly cheap stuff once u r mining so would be hard to buy another 4gb and stick it in latter to give u comfort that u r doing the best you can.

[iarsenaux]

Just a quick one, I'm building this rig at the moment and it'll have 4GB of ram... I read that's plenty enough for LTC mining but would a multi-coin switching pool like middlecoin require more ram for any reason? Haven't been able to find anything specific. I was under the impression Scrypt mining isn't ram intensive so it shouldn't matter?

I am not really sure if it was related to RAM, however when i compared my 2 mining rigs (same GPU's , same config, same cgminer version, same AMD CATA and SDK , different MoBo , different RAM) they get almost the same hash rate but the one with higher RAM hash a bit higher (5 - 8kh/s more and more stable) and have a lesser rejection and no hardware errors. On the rig with lower RAM, i get very few (not that noticeable) hardware errors (around 6HW and 10 rejected out of 1800 accepted shares).



EDIT: I am using Asus R9 280x DC2 TOP version 1, I am getting around 780kh/s for each card.

[ButterBread]

Just a quick one, I'm building this rig at the moment and it'll have 4GB of ram... I read that's plenty enough for LTC mining but would a multi-coin switching pool like middlecoin require more ram for any reason?

Actually, RAM does become important once you start to go over a certain amount of GPUs in your rig. You may have to lower you TC to compensate.

The cgminer error you'll get could be "Error -5: Enqueueing kernel onto command queue." and one or more of your GPUs wil be disabled.

For example, 7x7950 with 8GB ram and a TC of 24000 gives me the error whereas it was working with 6x7950. Lowering TC to 22400 fixed it and had little to no effect on my hashrate.

I have no idea why that is though, as memory usage is < 2GB once cgminer does get to work.

[Taxidermista]

EDIT: I am using Asus R9 280x DC2 TOP version 1, I am getting around 780kh/s for each card.

May I ask your cgminer configuration, please?

[dragonmike]

EDIT: I am using Asus R9 280x DC2 TOP version 1, I am getting around 780kh/s for each card.

May I ask your cgminer configuration, please?

Yes please, I'm going to use the exact same card... Your config would be most useful!

[bigblind]

EDIT: I am using Asus R9 280x DC2 TOP version 1, I am getting around 780kh/s for each card.

May I ask your cgminer configuration, please?

Yes please, I'm going to use the exact same card... Your config would be most useful!

If that's so, i would also switch my 3x R9 290 to 4x R9 280X

[Pompobit]

EDIT: I am using Asus R9 280x DC2 TOP version 1, I am getting around 780kh/s for each card.

May I ask your cgminer configuration, please?

+1

780kh/s seems very high

[Pita]

EDIT: I am using Asus R9 280x DC2 TOP version 1, I am getting around 780kh/s for each card.

May I ask your cgminer configuration, please?

+1

780kh/s seems very high

780 surely sounds kinda high. Could you share your configuration please and also show us maybe a screenshot of your miner? Not trying to bash, just wanted to see since I was planning on buying a few of those myself, but am still looking around at others. This would give me a 100% confirmation to choose those if one can still find them.

[dablanket]

getting 750kh/s on 280x DC2 TOP on BAMT

Code:

{
"pools" : [
        {
                "url" : "stratum+tcp://asia.middlecoin.com:3333",
                "user" : "omnomnom",
                "pass" : "cookies"
        },
        {
                "url" : "stratum+tcp://middlecoin.com:3333",
                "user" : "omnomnom",
                "pass" : "cookies"
        },
        {
                "url" : "stratum+tcp://eu.middlecoin.com:3333",
                "user" : "omnomnom",
                "pass" : "cookies"
        },
        {
                "url" : "stratum+tcp://useast.middlecoin.com:3333",
                "user" : "omnomnom",
                "pass" : "cookies"
        }
],
"api-listen" : true,
"intensity" : "20",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "scrypt",
"auto-fan" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "81",
"temp-overheat" : "76",
"temp-target" : "71",
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "1",
"retry-pause" : "5",
"scan-time" : "1",
"scrypt" : true,
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"shaders" : "2048",
"thread-concurrency" : "24768",
"gpu-thread" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1150",
"sharethreads" : "32",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500"
}

[hodger]

Fellow middlecoiners....I've put a post in the hardware section about my rigs that I'd appreciate some thoughts on if anyone can spare a couple of mins of their time.

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=406706.0

Thanks.

[jam3zs]

I get 820kh/s on my 290

surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?

[vrm86]

I get 820kh/s on my 290

surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?

They talk about 280x, not 290x.

[duz]

I get 820kh/s on my 290

surely a 290x should be the same, if not higher? and you guys are saying 780 is high?

I'm getting 880 stable on my 290's

https://i.imgur.com/r93Srsl.png

[Biggen]

I'm loving the new Virginia server (useast), H2o.  I am really hoping you plan on keeping it going.  I get less than half the rejects from that one (~1.5%) compared to the standard Oregon server (~4%).

Really nice thing to have multiple servers to spread the load.

[ozoner]

Hi all, I'm in the process of moving from 1 rig to 2 rigs for the first time.

Are there any disadvantages in using the same BTC payout address for multiple rigs?  I'm guessing it works fine (given the hashrates of some of the bigger miners!) just asking the question to see if anyone has any other thoughts.

Thanks in advance.