[ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - www.middlecoin.com

[Catswold]

who said they're offended?  You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.

Sorry, did I address you?  Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest.  The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen."  So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant.

you seem to be far more offended by 'political correctness'  than anything said here. 

in fact, that was the first time that offense was raised. 

and my profitability is great today, thanks for asking.

Yeah, probably am.

anyway, someone attributed the profits to DOGE, but I don't see how he could know.

[ButterBread]

Please people, just treat the rock with respect and we'll all be fine.

[bitter_miner]

Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.

-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense.

i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated.

who said they're offended?  You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.

Sorry, did I address you?  Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest.  The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen."  So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant.
And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar.

Sophistry won't fly here.

NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies?

i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism..

A person who only knows the dictionary definitions of words is an illiterate in the real world.  ARe you "gay," happy, or "gay," homosexual?  The second is quite recent in dictionaries, but most of us knew the second definition as everyday speech long before.

stupid words.. i had no idea.. no idea..

[Catswold]

Please people, just treat the rock with respect and we'll all be fine.

The rock is good.  The rock is wise.  The rock is life.

[Catswold]

Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.

-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense.

i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated.

who said they're offended?  You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.

Sorry, did I address you?  Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest.  The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen."  So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant.
And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar.

Sophistry won't fly here.

NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies?

i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism..

A person who only knows the dictionary definitions of words is an illiterate in the real world.  ARe you "gay," happy, or "gay," homosexual?  The second is quite recent in dictionaries, but most of us knew the second definition as everyday speech long before.

stupid words.. i had no idea.. no idea..

Not a response, sport, a cop-out.  See it all the time, people who can't respond reasonably, so they attempt to be dismissive.  Won't wash.

[RickJamesBTC]

Why don't you two go hug it out.

MODS!! Cleanup aisle 10.

[jedimstr]

[bitter_miner]

Against my better judgement, I'm simply going to say, it gets really tiresome having to worry about what somebody else thinks is offensive.

-- Using "you" in the generic sense -- The world is not your pearl, you have no right not to be offended, and if you are, then it says a heck of a lot more about you than it does the person from whose action or words you take offense.

i merely pointed out that to use words like that was to portray himself as uneducated.

who said they're offended?  You're the first person to claim offense. You're fighting a strawman.

Sorry, did I address you?  Nevermind, both Your and bitter-miner's comments were intellectually dishonest.  The implied sense of offense is in the original comment taking exception to the word "chinamen."  So the absence of the precise word is irrelevant.
And using the dictionary definition of "liberal" reveals nothing of the modern connotation of the word with which everyone in the Western world, at least, is familiar.

Sophistry won't fly here.

NOW, How about those profit numbers today, kiddies?

i totally agree, meanings of words are completely irrelevant.. no point in reading a dictionary.. they're also "intellectually dishonest" and don't cover the meaning of liberalism..

A person who only knows the dictionary definitions of words is an illiterate in the real world.  ARe you "gay," happy, or "gay," homosexual?  The second is quite recent in dictionaries, but most of us knew the second definition as everyday speech long before.

stupid words.. i had no idea.. no idea..

Not a response, sport, a cop-out.  See it all the time, people who can't respond reasonably, so they attempt to be dismissive.  Won't wash.

i walk away, humbled and ashamed.. sometimes in life, a circle has no end..

[bal3wolf]

Why don't you two go hug it out.

MODS!! Cleanup aisle 10.

lol mods could clean up 99.9% of the posts here that arent helping at all and on another note a great day today last 2 weeks have been pretty good for me only about 2-3 days i didnt go over 0.03 for 2-2.4mhash In 24 days on middlecoin i made .70 btc.

[kalus]

someone attributed the profits to DOGE, but I don't see how he could know.

doge went up 50% in value today, and difficulty happened to go up from 400 to 600 in the past 48.  we're not mining catcoin.

[ozoner]

I suspect it's whatever that low difficulty coin is that we keep hitting. It hovers between maybe 6 and 9 difficulty.

My guess is the unexchanged is mainly doge, and will be exchanged when the value trends downwards, which it hasn't in a few days.

Sorry for being off topic with this post, should have said something with intellectual wankery involved - apologies to catswold et al.

someone attributed the profits to DOGE, but I don't see how he could know.

doge went up 50% in value today, and difficulty happened to go up from 400 to 600 in the past 48.  we're not mining catcoin.

[hardergamer]

Looks like it will be a very nice payout for me today 

[Pita]

Quick question regarding cgminer. I reinstalled BAMT today on my USB and let the default settings run which gave me a +20khash/s boost per card. However, I did notice over the day today that I get like 10% rejection ratio, which with my old settings and lower hash I was much lower on rejects. Not sure if that is something with todays mining in general or just me. Couple things I was wondering about however.

Do you guys use expiry in your configuration and if so, what value? I know the default is 120, while mine is set to 30. How about the other ones like
scan-time
retry-pause
queue
sharethreads ?

Thanks!

[willittobe]

Still having shares stop submitting after ~20 minutes like clockwork. No actual freeze with cgminer, just shares no longer get submitted at all, even as it continues to hash away.

Is no one else experiencing this? It's not on my end, I ruled out pretty much every variable, tried different versions of cgminer, et al. Something had to have changed server side, and it affects uswest, useast, and eu at the least (I didn't try asia). Tried a different address- same deal.

Meanwhile testing on other pools and it's fine. Hashcows for instance has no issues as far as this symptom goes.

[h2odysee]

Still having shares stop submitting after ~20 minutes like clockwork. No actual freeze with cgminer, just shares no longer get submitted at all, even as it continues to hash away.

Is no one else experiencing this? It's not on my end, I ruled out pretty much every variable, tried different versions of cgminer, et al. Something had to have changed server side, and it affects uswest, useast, and eu at the least (I didn't try asia). Tried a different address- same deal.

Meanwhile testing on other pools and it's fine. Hashcows for instance has no issues as far as this symptom goes.

I saw that someone on twitter has the same issue. How many people are experiencing this?

Do you get rejected shares, or cgminer just stops submitting them?

Edit: Could it be an issue with having a difficulty of 1024? Did it happen at the same time as that change, or later?

[Biggen]

I am not seeing any of those issues with my miners.

[willittobe]

Still having shares stop submitting after ~20 minutes like clockwork. No actual freeze with cgminer, just shares no longer get submitted at all, even as it continues to hash away.

Is no one else experiencing this? It's not on my end, I ruled out pretty much every variable, tried different versions of cgminer, et al. Something had to have changed server side, and it affects uswest, useast, and eu at the least (I didn't try asia). Tried a different address- same deal.

Meanwhile testing on other pools and it's fine. Hashcows for instance has no issues as far as this symptom goes.

I saw that someone on twitter has the same issue. How many people are experiencing this?

Do you get rejected shares, or cgminer just stops submitting them?

Edit: Could it be an issue with having a difficulty of 1024? Did it happen at the same time as that change, or later?

I believe everything was running smooth with 1024 difficulty for at least a few hours, anyway. My overall WU actually went up slightly with that change. Okay, checking into it- looks like everything was actually fine for almost an entire day. Issue began occurring shortly after the payout for the 17th (Jan. 18, 2014, 2:36 a.m.) My own configuration did not change at all during this time.

Cgminer continues to chug away as normal, except it no longer has accepted shares. No rejects, no nothing. Diff changes appear as usual, new blocks are detected as usual, etc- it just keeps hashing away, but entirely futilely. Not an "Accepted" or "Rejected" in sight. (Oddly, once in a while there is still "stale share detected, submitting as user requested", even though there wasn't an actual share to do that with.)

As I normally have cgwatcher set to restart cgminer if more than 2 minutes go by with any accepted or rejected shares, I can watch via the logs the extreme regularity by which it happens, every 20 minutes or so.

[fafalecureuil]

I think it's just the high standard deviation the 1024 diff involves.

My rig posts a share every minute / MH/s.
So sometimes you can have more than 5 minutes without a share.
It's still showing correct values in middlecoin graphs.

[hardergamer]

Best payout for a long time, hope there are meny more to come 

[phaddie]

If DOGE keeps going like this the payout will continue for sure.  It is tempting to go mine just DOGE at this point, but no guarantee that the price will hold for long enough for my measly single r9 290 to mine enough...

  Phad