Bitcoin Forum
January 01, 2026, 11:22:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 [592] 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 ... 843 »
  Print  
Author Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.1  (Read 5806692 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (3 posts by 1+ user deleted.)
lano1106
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2013, 03:52:53 AM
Last edit: August 13, 2013, 04:04:27 AM by lano1106
 #11821

Hi,

I'm having this message continually since I upgraded to 3.3.3

 [2013-08-12 23:49:01] Rejected 9f13b83d Diff 1/1 AMU 3 pool 0 (Extranonce2_size violated)

will roll back to 3.2 to see if it fix the problem.

EDIT: The problem seems to only happen with bitminter. I have switch to slush pool and all is fine.
EDIT2: Yep. The incompatibility has been introduced by 3.3.3. I have come back to 3.3.2 and it started to work again.

BTC: 1ABewnrZgCds7w9RH43NwMHX5Px6ex5uNR
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4648
Merit: 1701


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2013, 04:37:38 AM
 #11822

Hi,

I'm having this message continually since I upgraded to 3.3.3

 [2013-08-12 23:49:01] Rejected 9f13b83d Diff 1/1 AMU 3 pool 0 (Extranonce2_size violated)

will roll back to 3.2 to see if it fix the problem.

EDIT: The problem seems to only happen with bitminter. I have switch to slush pool and all is fine.
EDIT2: Yep. The incompatibility has been introduced by 3.3.3. I have come back to 3.3.2 and it started to work again.

Ah yes I see what's wrong there. I've committed a fix to git for this.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4648
Merit: 1701


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2013, 04:51:28 AM
 #11823

First problem found in  --avalon-freq <arg> Set frequency range for avalon-auto, single value or range

with range set from 330-360 this is not working and miner has been sat on 330 for over an hour not increasing on decreasing in speed yet on previous version was working?
There's a regression where auto doesn't go quite as fast as it used to, I'm working on a fix now.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4788
Merit: 1910


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 13, 2013, 05:07:38 AM
 #11824

FYI I put the 3.3.3a binaries and sources etc into my cgminer-binaries git as usual ... but about 2 hours ago.
Yes I'm skimping on the post this time Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 13, 2013, 06:43:43 AM
 #11825

FYI I put the 3.3.3a binaries and sources etc into my cgminer-binaries git as usual ... but about 2 hours ago.
Yes I'm skimping on the post this time Smiley
Damn, no Raspbian binary this time. Sad

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4648
Merit: 1701


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2013, 08:29:27 AM
 #11826

First problem found in  --avalon-freq <arg> Set frequency range for avalon-auto, single value or range

with range set from 330-360 this is not working and miner has been sat on 330 for over an hour not increasing on decreasing in speed yet on previous version was working?
There's a regression where auto doesn't go quite as fast as it used to, I'm working on a fix now.
I've uploaded a new firmware. Should fix this.

http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/avalon/20130813-1/

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4788
Merit: 1910


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 13, 2013, 10:09:43 AM
 #11827

FYI I put the 3.3.3a binaries and sources etc into my cgminer-binaries git as usual ... but about 2 hours ago.
Yes I'm skimping on the post this time Smiley
Damn, no Raspbian binary this time. Sad
I've a 2nd RPi in transit (that I'll leave running Raspbian)
Once I get that I'll build both each time (and a 3.3.3a Raspbian) - just annoying to shut it down, switch, reboot, build, shutdown, switch, reboot, mine ...
... since I know the other one is due here soon.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 1065



View Profile WWW
August 13, 2013, 11:48:11 AM
 #11828

hope ck releases a single firmware and maybe updates jalapeno to 1.2.6 Smiley

https://blockchain.info/tx/52485d6a05fdaa54d6c6bd73906a840590503bfb078cb1bacc77c6e0f76df5bb

didjaydisteele
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 96
Merit: 10


All For Bitcoin!


View Profile
August 13, 2013, 09:15:33 PM
 #11829

There are difficulties changes be mining while the old value was only without found number of shares -, but isn't what number this really the shares than other calculated to this.
More worse than without found based on it, but still, if the mining was after the number not really the matter of what they say.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4788
Merit: 1910


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 13, 2013, 09:22:06 PM
 #11830

There are difficulties changes be mining while the old value was only without found number of shares -, but isn't what number this really the shares than other calculated to this.
More worse than without found based on it, but still, if the mining was after the number not really the matter of what they say.
Gotta love google translate Smiley

Let see if I understood the question ....

A 1diff share is fixed, independent of the network difficulty.
You should find on average 1x1diff share per 2^32 hashes done - average, after finding a few million of them Smiley

The network difficulty defines how many of these you need to find before you should, on average, find a block
Of course you have to find thousands of blocks to expect to be close to the average.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
didjaydisteele
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 96
Merit: 10


All For Bitcoin!


View Profile
August 13, 2013, 09:33:28 PM
 #11831

Got it! Thanks Kano.  Grin
Roy Badami
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 563
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 13, 2013, 10:32:58 PM
 #11832

The network difficulty defines how many of these you need to find before you should, on average, find a block

Where does cgminer's reported 'network difficulty' come from - and is it supposed to be the same as Bitcoin's difficulty?  (I find it's not the same - but I guess that may be just down to what the pools report?)

roy
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4788
Merit: 1910


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 13, 2013, 10:58:08 PM
 #11833

The network difficulty defines how many of these you need to find before you should, on average, find a block

Where does cgminer's reported 'network difficulty' come from - and is it supposed to be the same as Bitcoin's difficulty?  (I find it's not the same - but I guess that may be just down to what the pools report?)

roy
It's there in the block header you are hashing.
Block header being hashed is: Type, Prev, Merkl, Time, Bits, Nonce.
Diff = f(Bits)

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4648
Merit: 1701


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2013, 02:10:40 AM
 #11834

New version: 3.3.4, 14th August 2013

Hotfix release.


Human readable changelog:

- Fixed the breakage when mining on bitminter.
- Fixed the performance regression on avalons
- Added extra % counts to devs fields in API


Full changelog:

- API/miner.php add some % fields
- Nonce2 stratum submission is not working with nonce2 lengths >4, revert the
buggy __bin2hex function and use bin2hex.
- The write thread in avalon is only ever actually woken up by timeout so remove
the write semaphore and use a simple sleep poll.
- Fix warning.
- Interrupting reads on the avalon to start writes loses data so remove the
cgsem_post in the read code.
- Add room for the null byte at the end of the nonce2 string on stratum share
submission and zero the allocated ram.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
lano1106
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2013, 02:14:58 AM
 #11835

Already running 3.3.4 on bitminter flawlessly.

thank you very much for your amazing job!

BTC: 1ABewnrZgCds7w9RH43NwMHX5Px6ex5uNR
bzh
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 14, 2013, 03:41:38 AM
 #11836

want to move past 3.1.1 on my pi with BE's but i really dislike arch. does 3.3.4 still have usb issues with rasbian wheezy? Is there a custom libusb that works with it yet?

Sorry if this is posted elsewhere i did a few searches and could not find anything. Thanks.
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4648
Merit: 1701


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
August 14, 2013, 03:46:07 AM
 #11837

want to move past 3.1.1 on my pi with BE's but i really dislike arch. does 3.3.4 still have usb issues with rasbian wheezy? Is there a custom libusb that works with it yet?

Sorry if this is posted elsewhere i did a few searches and could not find anything. Thanks.
As we discovered, it's not cgminer that has usb issues, it's the libusb included with the distributions, so - yes you will need a custom libusb installed if you wish to use raspbian and not move to arch (which has the new libusb). You'll have to compile it yourself. Maybe some generous soul here will create a custom libusb package for raspbian?

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4788
Merit: 1910


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 14, 2013, 04:39:02 AM
 #11838

want to move past 3.1.1 on my pi with BE's but i really dislike arch. does 3.3.4 still have usb issues with rasbian wheezy? Is there a custom libusb that works with it yet?

Sorry if this is posted elsewhere i did a few searches and could not find anything. Thanks.
How to compile with the known working libusb is documented step by step in README (I added it in 3.3.2)
https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer/blob/master/README#L112

It is actually not many commands: get, extract, configure, make, autogen.sh cgminer (with the new libusb) then the rest as usual
I have that working libusb source archive in my cgminer-binaries also:
https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer-binaries

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
daemondazz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 14, 2013, 04:53:52 AM
 #11839

Are you able to build the binaries you released statically against the known good version of libusb?

Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
Roy Badami
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 563
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 14, 2013, 05:01:10 AM
 #11840

The network difficulty defines how many of these you need to find before you should, on average, find a block

Where does cgminer's reported 'network difficulty' come from - and is it supposed to be the same as Bitcoin's difficulty?  (I find it's not the same - but I guess that may be just down to what the pools report?)

roy
It's there in the block header you are hashing.
Block header being hashed is: Type, Prev, Merkl, Time, Bits, Nonce.
Diff = f(Bits)

Thanks.  And of course the value reported by cgminer is correct :-)

I made the mistake of believing the figure at the top of bitcoincharts.com

roy
Pages: « 1 ... 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 [592] 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 ... 843 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!