|
-Redacted-
|
 |
September 24, 2013, 11:33:08 PM |
|
My miner has worked great since I got it going 2 weeks ago. No restarts or anything. But today I changed the pool configuration to another pool. Now I can't get it to run again. I have been restarting it both with the buttons in the browser and physically and it will not go. Any suggestions? Below is a photo of the start up page. I'm a little concerned about the line that says "miner: no process found.
That may or may not be an issue. Log in as pi with password raspberry, and do a "sudo screen -ls" to see what processes are running. You should have one screen process running for each proxy you have enabled, and one for the miner. I only have one proxy running here... pi@bitfury ~ $ sudo screen -ls There are screens on: 27739..bitfury (24/09/13 23:30:00) (Detached) 3657..bitfury (21/09/13 02:24:32) (Detached) 2 Sockets in /var/run/screen/S-root. EDIT: Make doubly certain your new pool config is correct. You can't use http:// in front of the pool URL. You can't be using port 8332, 8333, or 8334.
|
|
|
|
|
skrazy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 24, 2013, 11:35:49 PM |
|
any sign of chips stopping at random? When I had 1.16K i could rarely get more then 15 chips working, and sometimes it would drop to 14 at times. I now have about 1.178k and 16 chips work well for the first 5-15 minutes, then it seems to drop to 15 chips again. Ive only once in the last 24hrs seen it drop to 14 chips. Im not sure if this is the chips themselves, or if the pencil mod is pushing the limits of the DC 30A converter and forcing a chip to turn off as some result of that.
Have you tried clocking the chips down? Mine seem much happier at 54 or 53 with the higher voltage. I need a bit of patience with mine as well, it often does not achieve its top end for a few hours.
|
|
|
|
|
Swimmer63
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
|
 |
September 24, 2013, 11:40:27 PM |
|
My miner has worked great since I got it going 2 weeks ago. No restarts or anything. But today I changed the pool configuration to another pool. Now I can't get it to run again. I have been restarting it both with the buttons in the browser and physically and it will not go. Any suggestions? Below is a photo of the start up page. I'm a little concerned about the line that says "miner: no process found.
That may or may not be an issue. Log in as pi with password raspberry, and do a "sudo screen -ls" to see what processes are running. You should have one screen process running for each proxy you have enabled, and one for the miner. I only have one proxy running here... pi@bitfury ~ $ sudo screen -ls There are screens on: 27739..bitfury (24/09/13 23:30:00) (Detached) 3657..bitfury (21/09/13 02:24:32) (Detached) 2 Sockets in /var/run/screen/S-root. I filled in all three proxy's but they are to the same pool. That's the way I had it set up when it was working. My screen is also going off and on occasionally. https://i.imgur.com/e7Jd9cC.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
 |
September 24, 2013, 11:46:30 PM |
|
That looks correct. Now do a cat /run/shm/.putstat.log
That will show you if the proxies are doing anything and the port they're connected on. I only have one running so mine looks like this:
6 1461752 937198 937192 [ 0 ]http://127.0.0.1:8332/ 0 1390783 839498 839498 [ 1 ]http://127.0.0.1:8333/ 0 1396964 703864 703864 [ 2 ]http://127.0.0.1:8334/
If that looks OK, do a cat /opt/bitfury/rpoxy_pools.conf and see if it looks mostly like this. Again, I only have one enabled.
POOL1_START=1 POOL1_ADDRESS=stratum.bitcoin.cz POOL1_PORT=3333 POOL1_USER=xxxxx.work_01 POOL1_PASS=xxxxx POOL2_START=0 POOL2_ADDRESS=stratum.btcguild.com POOL2_PORT=3333 POOL2_USER=rxxxxx_02 POOL2_PASS=xxxxx POOL3_START=0 POOL3_ADDRESS=us2.eclipsemc.com POOL3_PORT=3333 POOL3_USER=xxxxx_worker3 POOL3_PASS=xxxxx
|
|
|
|
|
Swimmer63
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
|
 |
September 24, 2013, 11:54:57 PM |
|
That looks correct. Now do a cat /run/shm/.putstat.log
That will show you if the proxies are doing anything and the port they're connected on. I only have one running so mine looks like this:
6 1461752 937198 937192 [ 0 ]http://127.0.0.1:8332/ 0 1390783 839498 839498 [ 1 ]http://127.0.0.1:8333/ 0 1396964 703864 703864 [ 2 ]http://127.0.0.1:8334/
If that looks OK, do a cat /opt/bitfury/rpoxy_pools.conf and see if it looks mostly like this:
POOL1_START=1 POOL1_ADDRESS=stratum.bitcoin.cz POOL1_PORT=3333 POOL1_USER=xxxxx.work_01 POOL1_PASS=xxxxx POOL2_START=0 POOL2_ADDRESS=stratum.btcguild.com POOL2_PORT=3333 POOL2_USER=rxxxxx_02 POOL2_PASS=xxxxx POOL3_START=0 POOL3_ADDRESS=us2.eclipsemc.com POOL3_PORT=3333 POOL3_USER=xxxxx_worker3 POOL3_PASS=xxxxx
Not really. I turned off the last two Proxys. Here is mine: 0 754 0 0 [ 0 ]http://127.0.0.1:8332/ 0 773 0 0 [ 1 ]http://127.0.0.1:8333/ 0 761 0 0 [ 2 ]http://127.0.0.1:8334/
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
 |
September 24, 2013, 11:58:45 PM |
|
Well, if possible post your proxy_pools.conf (not rpoxy_pools) - I don't think they are running. I'd guess bad config...
As a sanity check, you can always put the original pool configuration back and try restarting the proxies.
|
|
|
|
|
Swimmer63
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 12:03:17 AM |
|
Well, if possible post your proxy_pools.conf (not rpoxy_pools) - I don't think they are running. I'd guess bad config...
As a sanity check, you can always put the original pool configuration back and try restarting the proxies.
Here you go. Showing both: https://i.imgur.com/Lw1zyeg.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
Swimmer63
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 12:06:26 AM |
|
Well, if possible post your proxy_pools.conf (not rpoxy_pools) - I don't think they are running. I'd guess bad config...
As a sanity check, you can always put the original pool configuration back and try restarting the proxies.
Here you go. Showing both: https://i.imgur.com/Lw1zyeg.jpgDid the Sanity Check and it started right off! WTF. I guess I can't use that pool?
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 12:07:46 AM |
|
You got me there.... I haven't tried to run bitminter in the bitfury. Give me a minute to try it....
Seems to work for me, but I use multiple workers, so my username is redacted_worker3
Rej Acc I got a crapload of rejects when it started up: 77 43
Hashrate gauge on the stats page seems screwed....
|
|
|
|
|
frankenmint
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1020
HoneybadgerOfMoney.com Weed4bitcoin.com
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 12:09:51 AM |
|
honest question - why would I join a private pool instead of a large one like btcguild or bitminter or eligious?
|
|
|
|
Swimmer63
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 12:11:27 AM |
|
You got me. I haven't tried to run bitminter in the bitfury. Give me a minute to try it....
Just noticed some earlier posts from today. Some have it working fine. Others do not.
|
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 12:17:15 AM |
|
Well, if possible post your proxy_pools.conf (not rpoxy_pools) - I don't think they are running. I'd guess bad config...
As a sanity check, you can always put the original pool configuration back and try restarting the proxies.
Here you go. Showing both: https://i.imgur.com/Lw1zyeg.jpgDid the Sanity Check and it started right off! WTF. I guess I can't use that pool? I use this just fine : mint.bitminter.com 3333 XXX.BF1 XX1 mint.bitminter.com 3333 XXX.BF2 XX2 I think your problem is trying to use port 3332. use 3333 and 2 workers INTERESTING: I just changed from 3 workers to 2 workers only, and my hashrate has gone from 30.5-33 GHash average per 'bitminter shift' to a much more steady 34.2-35.0 GHash. It seems bitminter does NOT benefit from 3 workers>2 workers. I have yet to see how 1 worker only is handled, but this seems pretty optimal at the moment
|
|
|
|
Cablez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 12:47:06 AM |
|
honest question - why would I join a private pool instead of a large one like btcguild or bitminter or eligious? First, it has 0% fee which none of the public pools have. It does have a very small withdrawal fee and I do mean small. Second, it is good to decentralize the pool hierarchy to minimize possible (albeit unlikely) 51% attacks. Third, I am sure there are probably more but the first 2 suffice.
|
Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup??? Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right! No job too hard so PM me for a quote Check my products or ask a question here: https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
|
|
|
Morblias
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 01:17:05 AM |
|
honest question - why would I join a private pool instead of a large one like btcguild or bitminter or eligious? First, it has 0% fee which none of the public pools have. It does have a very small withdrawal fee and I do mean small. Second, it is good to decentralize the pool hierarchy to minimize possible (albeit unlikely) 51% attacks. Third, I am sure there are probably more but the first 2 suffice. This. And the pool is rock solid. Also, it is a large private pool. Larger than bitminter and eligius in hashrate
|
Tips / Donations accepted: 1Morb18DsDHNEv6TeQXBdba872ZSpiK9fY
|
|
|
|
mo_mo
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 01:37:40 AM |
|
what is bitminter's withdrawal fees? and I see donations for perks, anyone choosing any of those?
|
|
|
|
|
Cablez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 02:56:07 AM |
|
honest question - why would I join a private pool instead of a large one like btcguild or bitminter or eligious? First, it has 0% fee which none of the public pools have. It does have a very small withdrawal fee and I do mean small. Second, it is good to decentralize the pool hierarchy to minimize possible (albeit unlikely) 51% attacks. Third, I am sure there are probably more but the first 2 suffice. EMC has 0% DGM. I stand corrected. Another point is that the out of order coms issue has been fixed for bitfury miners there.
|
Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup??? Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right! No job too hard so PM me for a quote Check my products or ask a question here: https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
|
|
spiccioli
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1379
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 11:18:41 AM |
|
I stand corrected. Another point is that the out of order coms issue has been fixed for bitfury miners there.
HHTT works as well, and has a very low fee  spiccioli
|
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 11:54:59 AM |
|
Its worth noting that after a sd card re-build, and using 2 workers and a pencil mod of 1.178k; I am getting a fairly stable average of 34.5 ghash/s, based on 33-37 ghash fluctuations.
|
|
|
|
|
gmannn
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 05:08:16 PM |
|
Its worth noting that after a sd card re-build, and using 2 workers and a pencil mod of 1.178k; I am getting a fairly stable average of 34.5 ghash/s, based on 33-37 ghash fluctuations.
Great result, any aftermarket cooling on your cards?
|
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
 |
September 25, 2013, 05:32:41 PM |
|
Its worth noting that after a sd card re-build, and using 2 workers and a pencil mod of 1.178k; I am getting a fairly stable average of 34.5 ghash/s, based on 33-37 ghash fluctuations.
Great result, any aftermarket cooling on your cards?  I have tiny heatsinks on the face of each chip (except 2 of them), 5 small heatsinks on the back (centered opposite the capacitor clusters), a 120mm fan blowing directly at the back and a 60mm and 80mm blowing from opposite sides on the front face. This seems excessive, and nothing on the board gets past "warm". even the Dc converter (i assume thats what the cube is) has a tiny heatsink to help shed its warmth (it was the hottest component i think) I was using 2 workers at difficulty 8 and getting hashrate fluctuating between 30-36, with 34 being about the average over the last 12 hours. I just changed to 1 worker at diff=16 and will see how that works. 2 workers seemed to be a bit more stable than 3 workers. I have yet to do any tuning, will wait for new difficulty to kick in and see what the .stat.log looks like. Right now all 16 chips are auto at 55 and running 1.9-2.35 ghash each, with error rates between 2-15% (good:2317 errors:221 spi-err:1 miso-err:6) edit: at first 5min glance, 1 worker at diff:16 seems to only result in <26Ghash at the pool. Im switching back to 2 workers at 16
|
|
|
|
|