Slimdev
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 237
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 15, 2018, 09:45:07 PM |
|
newton.fairhash.org Transparent Newton pool with 24/7 support Features: - Mining to exchange - Workers - Adjustable instant payout levels - Email and telegram notifications - SSL |
|
|
|
|
Namixi
Member
Offline
Activity: 227
Merit: 10
|
|
June 16, 2018, 08:20:42 AM |
|
Every time I see a future greater than this coin, a few days ago my millions were worth nothing and already syuperate the $ 100 each time there are more people in the chat channels and more followers in social networks, something that is very important as it goes up but the difficulty and more among all we vote and support the entry to new exchanges newton could be a great economic ball for all. !!
|
|
|
|
|
Newton_Coin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 241
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2018, 08:42:09 PM |
|
Every time I see a future greater than this coin, a few days ago my millions were worth nothing and already syuperate the $ 100 each time there are more people in the chat channels and more followers in social networks, something that is very important as it goes up but the difficulty and more among all we vote and support the entry to new exchanges newton could be a great economic ball for all. !!
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ |
|
|
|
|
Newton_Coin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 241
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2018, 08:51:28 PM |
|
newton.fairhash.org Transparent Newton pool with 24/7 support Features: - Mining to exchange - Workers - Adjustable instant payout levels - Email and telegram notifications - SSL Do you Donate 1% for science? |
|
|
|
|
kalel22
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2018, 04:41:04 AM |
|
NCP has been disabled on stocks.exchange is there any reason why? |
|
|
|
|
Newton_Coin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 241
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2018, 11:26:35 AM |
|
NCP has been disabled on stocks.exchange is there any reason why? From Stocks.Exchange Official Channel "NCP is online and works like a dream!🔥😎" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EngShadi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2018, 08:15:59 PM |
|
Great, I believe that the Bitebtc.com Exchange, which has different trading pairs will contribute rising total volume of Newton coin significantly. they will list NCP in another exchange soon. |
|
|
|
|
kalel22
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2018, 08:49:17 PM |
|
NCP forever!!!   |
|
|
|
|
barry.evans
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
June 18, 2018, 06:29:43 AM |
|
Can't find the link to Whitepaper. Can you share the link, please?
|
|
|
|
|
mrknc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2018, 01:43:03 AM |
|
newton.fairhash.org
Do you Donate 1% for science? We were considering it before we got banned from the telegram channel when we came to talk about broken network and how to fix it. Which is kind of funny, because my partner is an actual scientist So the next time it broke we had to fix it ourselves. But still we'd consider it, provided an agreement can be reached with large pools AND there could be some transparency introduced regrading these science donations and how they are done. |
|
|
|
|
Newton_Coin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 241
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2018, 06:42:12 AM |
|
newton.fairhash.org
Do you Donate 1% for science? We were considering it before we got banned from the telegram channel when we came to talk about broken network and how to fix it. Which is kind of funny, because my partner is an actual scientist So the next time it broke we had to fix it ourselves. But still we'd consider it, provided an agreement can be reached with large pools AND there could be some transparency introduced regrading these science donations and how they are done. No, that is not the truth, we sent you without responce, and we announce for 48 hour about unofficial pools, i have a screenshot for our chat on telegram. how your pool fix network?? can you explan that for community here please?? can you eexplan how your pool made problem to network?? all community know about donating and we posted all fee from pools, every pool and coins that funded science wallet. |
|
|
|
|
emmiebrizzie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2018, 06:48:13 AM |
|
Great idea. Please where can i find the link to your bounty program?
|
|
|
|
|
Newton_Coin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 241
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2018, 07:03:40 AM |
|
Great idea. Please where can i find the link to your bounty program?
Hello please talk to Admin @ main channel https://t.me/newton_coin |
|
|
|
|
LitQ
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2018, 09:13:09 PM |
|
Project is good but price is too low...(
|
|
|
|
|
snakejack
Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 55
|
|
June 19, 2018, 09:14:30 PM |
|
Thank you for banning me of your Telegram channel just for asking question about stock exchange.. 2 friends already banned for asking questions about dev team.
Another scam project like many others..
|
|
|
|
|
mrknc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2018, 10:57:53 PM
Last edit: June 19, 2018, 11:15:02 PM by mrknc |
|
newton.fairhash.org
Do you Donate 1% for science? We were considering it before we got banned from the telegram channel when we came to talk about broken network and how to fix it. Which is kind of funny, because my partner is an actual scientist So the next time it broke we had to fix it ourselves. But still we'd consider it, provided an agreement can be reached with large pools AND there could be some transparency introduced regrading these science donations and how they are done. No, that is not the truth, we sent you without responce, and we announce for 48 hour about unofficial pools, i have a screenshot for our chat on telegram. how your pool fix network?? can you explan that for community here please?? can you eexplan how your pool made problem to network?? all community know about donating and we posted all fee from pools, every pool and coins that funded science wallet. What do you mean "not the truth"? What did I say that wasn't the truth? The fact that network broke at least twice with pools hashrate dropping to 0? Or the fact that we indeed got banned without a warning form TG channel we came looking for people we thought were interested in fixing it? Your post is barely coherent yet you guys want to collect money for science? The OP in this topic is also extremely pretty inconsistent, it talks about 5% commission on official pool, yet it runs 2%. You expect people to run a pool and give up 2% to the devs with no assurances of any kind and also do it for free? How do you expect us to compete on the market with such high fees? Not sure what chat you are referring to, but I assume it was Slimdev who was talking to you. When he raised this question with us, my partner said "sure" and I said "no way we are paying anybody 2% without talking to them first, so let me talk to them", but it was around ETN fork, so we were just too busy with the pools at the time. At the point when we had time to talk, NCP network went down, so we came to you to find out if anybody has a clue what's going on and quickly got banned without warning of any kind and our messages were deleted. Still we could be open to suggestions as long as I said: - there is a well-established and transparent way to spend the money out of science wallet, least you can do is provide view key for it - there is an agreement between pools, otherwise, pools that opt in will quickly lose their miners, since such high commission is unheard of on pools markets nowadays The better way to do it is to build in said commission into block reward distribution, as has been done already by several cryptonote coins and let the miners decide if they want to mine it. Attempting to strong-arm pools into paying will not help the science. Hell, we have one of the biggest, if not the biggest, pools on the network and it's lifetime 1% commission so far would amount to about 30 mln, which is a drop in a bucket comparing to premine numbers. Now, regarding network and "help to the community". We don't have any obligations to it, our obligations are to our miners. We do, however, provide a valuable service to community by running transparent and efficient pool, thus securing the network and making sure transactions can actually be sent on it. There are at least 2 major problems with network code. We don't exploit it, because our goal is to make sure miners mine, get rewarded and their rewards can reach the exchange. What do you think happened the last time network stopped? It just fixed itself? Hell, why am i telling you this, we had to run own block explorer, because the one you got is down half the time and the other half, when it's up, it can't even show mempool transactions. Maybe you guys should reconsider your stance on treating people who come to help... |
|
|
|
|
Reality_Bytes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2018, 11:05:41 PM |
|
Thank you for banning me of your Telegram channel just for asking question about stock exchange.. 2 friends already banned for asking questions about dev team.
Another scam project like many others..
I seriously doubt that you were banned for merely "asking" a question about stocks exchange. We have people asking questions about stocks exchange everyday, and we answer them "everyday" So you were doing "more" than just asking a question. As for your friends getting banned for asking questions about the devs... We tell people what we can about the devs. at this point in time, people know all they need to know about the devs. This is NOT an ICO where people invested millions of dollars. Since the donations being made are coming from the premine and NOT from people donating thousands towards funding, there is no reason to know more about the devs until they reach that point. I find it a little suspicious that "you" and 2 of "your" friends have been banned for "merely" asking questions. Strange that no one else has complained about being banned for asking questions. I think you may be right... sounds like a scam... But YOU are the scammer! |
|
|
|
|
Reality_Bytes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2018, 11:37:05 PM |
|
newton.fairhash.org
Do you Donate 1% for science? We were considering it before we got banned from the telegram channel when we came to talk about broken network and how to fix it. Which is kind of funny, because my partner is an actual scientist So the next time it broke we had to fix it ourselves. But still we'd consider it, provided an agreement can be reached with large pools AND there could be some transparency introduced regrading these science donations and how they are done. No, that is not the truth, we sent you without responce, and we announce for 48 hour about unofficial pools, i have a screenshot for our chat on telegram. how your pool fix network?? can you explan that for community here please?? can you eexplan how your pool made problem to network?? all community know about donating and we posted all fee from pools, every pool and coins that funded science wallet. What do you mean "not the truth"? What did I say that wasn't the truth? The fact that network broke at least twice with pools hashrate dropping to 0? Or the fact that we indeed got banned without a warning form TG channel we came looking for people we thought were interested in fixing it? Your post is barely coherent yet you guys want to collect money for science? The OP in this topic is also extremely pretty inconsistent, it talks about 5% commission on official pool, yet it runs 2%. If you learned to read English, you would see that pool fee is 2%, with 1% going towards the science fund.
5% of pool rewards (which is 5% of the 1% profit the main pool makes) would also go towards donations You expect people to run a pool and give up 2% to the devs with no assurances of any kind and also do it for free? How do you expect us to compete on the market with such high fees? Where does it say that Newton Coin Project expects pools to give up 2% to the devs?
Where does it say pools are to do it for free?
If pools don't want to charge a fee, they don't have to. Those pools are not official pools and will receive no support from Newton devs.Not sure what chat you are referring to, but I assume it was Slimdev who was talking to you. When he raised this question with us, my partner said "sure" and I said "no way we are paying anybody 2% without talking to them first, so let me talk to them", but it was around ETN fork, so we were just too busy with the pools at the time. At the point when we had time to talk, NCP network went down, so we came to you to find out if anybody has a clue what's going on and quickly got banned without warning of any kind and our messages were deleted. I recall someone mentioning the network issues. I have no info on the banning.Still we still could be open to suggestions as long as I said: - there is a well-established and transparent way to spend the money out of science wallet, least you can do is provide view key for it - there is an agreement between pools, otherwise, pools that opt in will quickly lose their miners, since such high commission is unheard of on pools markets nowadays There is transparency involving the wallets. We share screen shots and balances for all the wallets. Again... Don't know where you get that devs require 2%, when they clearly say 1%. The other 1% is for the pool, which you can opt to give back to miners.This project IS about funding science. If pools don't want to help us raise funds to donate to science, they shouldn't be complaining.The better way to do it is to build in said commission into block reward distribution, as has been done already by several cryptonote coins and let the miners decide if they want to mine it. Attempting to strong-arm pools into paying will not help the science. Hell, we have one of the biggest, if not the biggest, pools on the network and it's lifetime 1% commission so far would amount to about 30 mln, which is a drop in a bucket comparing to premine numbers. This sounds like a viable alternative. In hindsight, they could have premined 2%, with the 1% for the science wallet already mined.
Then all they would have to do is show withdrawals from the wallet for funding. But it's too late to change things now.Now, regarding network and "help to the community". We don't have any obligations to it, our obligations are to our miners. We do, however, provide a valuable service to community by running transparent and efficient pool, thus securing the network and making sure transactions can actually be sent on it. There are at least 2 major problems with network code. We don't exploit it, because our goal is to make sure miners mine, get rewarded and their rewards can reach the exchange. What do you think happened the last time network stopped? It just fixed itself? Hell, why am i telling you this, we had to run own block explorer, because the one you got is down half the time and the other half, when it's up, it can't even show mempool transactions. Maybe you guys should reconsider your stance on treating people who come to help... If there are serious bugs, then of course the devs should take your warnings seriously and be open to you helping them fix it so that the network is secure.
And yes, the devs should appreciate the fact that you reached out to help them with a security issue. |
|
|
|
|
mrknc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2018, 01:28:29 AM |
|
If you learned to read English, you would see that pool fee is 2%, with 1% going towards the science fund.
5% of pool rewards (which is 5% of the 1% profit the main pool makes) would also go towards donations
My English is fine, maybe do a better job in OP next time? If pools don't want to charge a fee, they don't have to. Those pools are not official pools and will receive no support from Newton devs. Yet we get 48 hours ultimatums somehow? There is transparency involving the wallets. We share screen shots and balances for all the wallets. Where? Where are those screenshots and viewkeys? Surely not in the OP This sounds like a viable alternative. In hindsight, they could have premined 2%, with the 1% for the science wallet already mined.
Then all they would have to do is show withdrawals from the wallet for funding. But it's too late to change things now. No, the proper viable alternative would be, as i mentioned, to write into the code to distribute part of the block reward to science wallet If there are serious bugs, then of course the devs should take your warnings seriously and be open to you helping them fix it so that the network is secure.
And yes, the devs should appreciate the fact that you reached out to help them with a security issue. That's what you say, but in fact, when we reached out we got banned, i know you were around when it happened. This time I just answered the question from Newton_Coin on where we stand and he called me a liar. So no, we are not reaching out, but you guys know where to find us. |
|
|
|
|
|
