Bounty and too many participants

[gilbert767]

More participants mean less percentage of free token distribution.

[glavos]

The more the ICOs and crypto in general is advertised the better in my opinion. So this is a good thing.

[avirdoz]

I prefer to join those bounties which have limited number of participants or which count weekly rewards not in stakes but in tokens. In this case you always can predict approximately how much you'll earn in total. The main problem is to find such bounties as they are very rare.

This is actually very good advice. Bounty campaigns which are regulated by the manager yahoo62278 are one of those. The only thing you need is monitoring due to high users activity.

[hasis]

But there are more ICO nowadays so its okay if there are more participants, they have right to earn more from ICO. Its better because when they have money from ICO, they will invest in ICO. So this industry will be huge.

[Boristhecat]

The more the ICOs and crypto in general is advertised the better in my opinion. So this is a good thing.

Yes, if the ICO is good, then each participant will give a conversion from their advertising and "earn" a reward. If the project is bad, then there is no difference of many participants or little.

[manish9841]

True many people joining bounty could dilute the market what it was before. My suggestion would be to dedicate in those projects that are top notch.

[HEvangelista]

As a bounty hunter myself, I also find it problematic to have too many participants ON THOSE WHO ARE DEEMED PROFITABLE endeavors. There are bounties that has few participants also. I think it is a matter of finding the right bounty.

[vnnbot]

I hope that companies will carefully select the participants to recruit them less and pay them more. Because try to hire so many of them and not everybody do their work properly

[Way2Paradise]

i think the same. too many participants in the bounty campaigns. they should limited the participants and lower the number of posts for signatures (maybe 5 per week), but the eligible posts must be 250-300 character long.

with this changes, the spam maybe would be lower in this forum and the bounty participants also have more of them.

[jkinit2125]

At some point, investors would know if they joined bounty campaigns having potential participants to join, they probably have less rewards. Instead they invest if in case they evaluated project seems to be promising. With twitter and facebook campaigns to be very well known, what we need is to diversify. Join signature campaigns or learn how to translate some ICOs to your language.

[Nagrogflaz]

bounty campaign is issued indeed to introduce a project made by the company so the more participants bounty then their goals are achieved and I think it's a good thing because the coins issued will also gain the confidence of the market and the price will also follow good, that's my opinion

[Apex Investments]

I can only speak for myself but I think the more people participating in the campaign the better. 

Remember, a Bounty campaign is a marketing tool for the ICO promoter.  The more people that support it the better. 

I think the emphasis should be on quality rather than having a max amount.

The higher quality the more likely to attract high quality investors which will ultimately lead to success of the project and increasing the value of your investment. 

I think there should be an effort to increase the quality of those who participate but that would be up to the project sponsor and is not my role as a participant

[TreXzar]

Bounty programs will naturally come to an equilibrium with the number of participants and the rewards available. At some point, people will decide its not worth the effort to earn $0.20 of tokens for example.

The bigger issue is the dumping of bounty rewards immediately after it gets unlocked. So I am very aware of the amount of bounty rewards up for grabs as it determines the dump when it gets on the exchanges. Looking only to get involved in bounty programs which offers less than 1% of its total tokens.

[camryku]

Don't worry, we are still in the early days. Even though it seems like we have gone mainstream, we are still in the very early stages of cryptocurrencies, ICOs and thereby bounty programs.

I don't see how investors will be discouraged, because they can join the bounty programs too and at the same time invest.

It's a lot of bounties because many people are looking for gifts but many investors are inclined to invest in bounty, because there are bounty campaigns that limit bounty participants the best thing to do is to choose a good gift manager with good ICO, better use your time to find the gift manager good and ICO development rather than incorporating all the gifts

[CageMabok]

You are right, I also see in spreedseth in a matter of days can be full,This is the result of many of its members registering Even my knowledge many who take advantage of this condition by making more than one bitcoin account

[captain8]

Sign up to more than 1 to increase what you recieve, only good way around it

[lanax]

Yes now there are too many participants in the ICO bounty, and it is became harder to earn money. All bounty need to start making KYC, because those multiaccaunts are really bad.

[Carisba]

The community grows and naturally the participants grow for the bounty programs. I think it's a good thing

[maduranga]

in the end of some campaigns not worthy the rewards according to work i think managers should limit participants or strict rules now some campaigns use kyc to reduce participants by removing multi accounts

[redwings17x]

This can be good! I don't see why not. Free coins