|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 09:52:58 PM |
|
Can't we put this in it's own thread with a poll so members can vote and express their opinions on the upcoming features.
Why not. Post the link here, plz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
smartwart
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 09:54:09 PM |
|
Hey there!
about the voting system, just for my understanding...
from what I understand every account will have one vote, right? how can we avoid that one person create thousands of accounts and vote? so one opinion could change the majority.
UPDATED easyCopyString: 162.243.214.68; 95.85.46.164; 162.243.216.55; 162.243.143.15; 95.85.46.249; 93.190.92.74; 37.209.120.192; 93.190.92.75; 85.25.134.59; 93.190.92.76; vps1.nxtcrypto.org; vps2.nxtcrypto.org; vps3.nxtcrypto.org; vps4.nxtcrypto.org; vps5.nxtcrypto.org; nxtwallet.com; 31.220.50.208; nxt.ddos.me; 203.174.12.25; 88.198.142.92; 66.197.138.90; 64.120.180.106; 109.230.224.65; 80.86.92.50; node1.nextcoin.it; node2.nextcoin.it; node3.nextcoin.it; node4.nextcoin.it; node5.nextcoin.it; nxt.homer.ru; 31.204.130.123; 209.222.0.194; 209.222.16.10; node1.nxtbase.com; node11.nxtbase.com; node21.nxtbase.com; node31.nxtbase.com; node41.nxtbase.com; node51.nxtbase.com; node61.nxtbase.com; node71.nxtbase.com; node81.nxtbase.com; node91.nxtbase.com; 85.214.222.82;
Vps Owners: keep updated the easycopystring adding your nodes!!!!
|
NxT: 13574045486980287597
|
|
|
|
davethetrousers
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 09:55:32 PM |
|
how can we avoid that one person create thousands of accounts and vote?
Need reputation system asap 
|
|
|
|
mr_random
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 09:56:29 PM |
|
Hey there!
about the voting system, just for my understanding...
from what I understand every account will have one vote, right? how can we avoid that one person create thousands of accounts and vote? so one opinion could change the majority.
UPDATED easyCopyString: 162.243.214.68; 95.85.46.164; 162.243.216.55; 162.243.143.15; 95.85.46.249; 93.190.92.74; 37.209.120.192; 93.190.92.75; 85.25.134.59; 93.190.92.76; vps1.nxtcrypto.org; vps2.nxtcrypto.org; vps3.nxtcrypto.org; vps4.nxtcrypto.org; vps5.nxtcrypto.org; nxtwallet.com; 31.220.50.208; nxt.ddos.me; 203.174.12.25; 88.198.142.92; 66.197.138.90; 64.120.180.106; 109.230.224.65; 80.86.92.50; node1.nextcoin.it; node2.nextcoin.it; node3.nextcoin.it; node4.nextcoin.it; node5.nextcoin.it; nxt.homer.ru; 31.204.130.123; 209.222.0.194; 209.222.16.10; node1.nxtbase.com; node11.nxtbase.com; node21.nxtbase.com; node31.nxtbase.com; node41.nxtbase.com; node51.nxtbase.com; node61.nxtbase.com; node71.nxtbase.com; node81.nxtbase.com; node91.nxtbase.com; 85.214.222.82;
Vps Owners: keep updated the easycopystring adding your nodes!!!!
Perhaps weight votes in accordance with how much NXT is in the account.
|
|
|
|
BitAddict
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:01:49 PM |
|
What about adding decimals and lowering fees? Now 1NxT is $0.08. Is an overkill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
instacalm
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:03:27 PM |
|
Can't we put this in it's own thread with a poll so members can vote and express their opinions on the upcoming features.
Why not. Post the link here, plz. simple thread https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=387799.0no voting system enabled as that is easily biased by multiple accounts
|
|
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1002
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:04:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ola
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:05:04 PM |
|
Goodjob someone posted it on fb by the way there is a fb group for nxt at, for those that are a little flexible on anonymity https://www.facebook.com/groups/NxtCurrency/
|
Nxter,Bitcoiner,Ether highlevel developer working to improve the world.
|
|
|
|
smartwart
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:11:10 PM |
|
Perhaps weight votes in accordance with how much NXT is in the account.
this approach could bring us in another ethical problem ;-) (I got your point to make it expensive to gain the vote-power via multiple accounts)
|
NxT: 13574045486980287597
|
|
|
newsilike
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 630
Merit: 262
This account was hacked. just recently got it back
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:11:58 PM |
|
http://dgex.com is running so smooth now, GJ! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
idev
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:12:18 PM |
|
Can't we put this in it's own thread with a poll so members can vote and express their opinions on the upcoming features.
Why not. Post the link here, plz. simple thread https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=387799.0no voting system enabled as that is easily biased by multiple accounts Good job.
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:21:16 PM |
|
Thx for the link, Pin. Pity these guys provided only Bitcoin address for donations...
|
|
|
|
|
|
onepix
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:24:58 PM |
|
seems that wouldn't compile fine :s 2013-12-27 23:20:14.003:INFO:oejs.ServerConnector:main: Started ServerConnector@5dcf031e{HTTP/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7874} 2013-12-27 23:20:14.239:INFO:oejs.ServerConnector:main: Started ServerConnector@42500e5{SSL-http/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7875} [2013-12-27 23:20:29.004] 11: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException and it's "blocked", my ubuntu's terminal don't crash but don't want finish this compilation :/
|
|
|
|
|
|
rickyjames
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:27:56 PM |
|
Perhaps weight votes in accordance with how much NXT is in the account.
this approach could bring us in another ethical problem ;-) (I got your point to make it expensive to gain the vote-power via multiple accounts) LOL. The NXT transaction fee distribution algorithm already weights participation in accordance with how much NXT is in the account of an individual, not the sheer number of nodes being contributed by computers operated by that individual - which is far more important to the health of the NXT network. And you talk about ethical problems applying the exact same arrangement to member voting? Just a wry observation, I see the merit (and pitfalls) of both approaches...
|
|
|
|
|
Framewood
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:34:34 PM |
|
DGEX seems to be back in the game.....
Works really crisp, no lag for me at the mo.
Over the Framewood issue:
10 characters is not enough for a passphrase. Not in the 21st century.
My passphrase tips:
Take yr favorite movie quote:
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Kill the punctuation, throw in some random substitutions:
I$4ywet4keoff4ndnuketheentire$itefromorbitIt$theonlyw4ytobe$ure
Add some psuedo-random caps gibberish to both ends, and hey presto:
SweAtyI$4ywet4keoff4ndnuketheentire$itefromorbitIt$theonlyw4ytobe$ureBoLLocks
Now , hoe long is that gonna take to bruteforce?
But for f**ks sake, make sure u write it down somewhere, and/or hide it in the middle of a *.txt file to copy and paste to avoid keylogging.
Yes this is ok for you and me who are tech heads but what about mainstream..... mum, dad, gran aren't going to do this.
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:35:13 PM |
|
seems that wouldn't compile fine :s 2013-12-27 23:20:14.003:INFO:oejs.ServerConnector:main: Started ServerConnector@5dcf031e{HTTP/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7874} 2013-12-27 23:20:14.239:INFO:oejs.ServerConnector:main: Started ServerConnector@42500e5{SSL-http/1.1}{0.0.0.0:7875} [2013-12-27 23:20:29.004] 11: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException and it's "blocked", my ubuntu's terminal don't crash but don't want finish this compilation :/
This is due to race conditions during catching new blocks. Next block will fix it.
|
|
|
|
|
pinarello
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:38:14 PM |
|
Pity these guys provided only Bitcoin address for donations... Hoarder... 
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:39:58 PM |
|
Perhaps weight votes in accordance with how much NXT is in the account.
this approach could bring us in another ethical problem ;-) (I got your point to make it expensive to gain the vote-power via multiple accounts) LOL. The NXT transaction fee distribution algorithm already weights participation in accordance with how much NXT is in the account of an individual, not the sheer number of nodes being contributed by computers operated by that individual - which is far more important to the health of the NXT network. And you talk about ethical problems applying the exact same arrangement to member voting? Just a wry observation, I see the merit (and pitfalls) of both approaches... Voting System is based on number of coins, more coins = more voices. This is applied to global voting. Local voting (among asset shareholders) takes into account number of shares. U can issue a "fake" asset and give exactly 1 share to 1 person who proves their identity by providing scanned copy of a passport (similar to KYC). Then u can do voting among "verified" accounts on whatever u want.
|
|
|
|
|
Damelon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010
|
 |
December 27, 2013, 10:40:36 PM |
|
Yes this is ok for you and me who are tech heads but what about mainstream..... mum, dad, gran aren't going to do this.
Erm, it's not thát difficult to make a long and safe password and store it safely.  Also, just like mum, dad and gran now ask their kids (or someone else they trust) to set up their equipment, if they want to get into NXT safely, they will have to ask for help. There is always risk involved, but there are simple ways of getting better safety. However, if they cannot, then for now, NXT and other currency online is not for them.
|
|
|
|
|