jl777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:32:37 PM |
|
Will all the proposed features eventually get implemented?
Is there any rough idea of the time needed to complete each feature?
Are there any estimates as to the amount of transaction fees each feature is expected to generate?
James
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:32:48 PM |
|
Is there any way we could include that timer in the cmd window and/or is there any other way we could check that we are still forging?
I could add some API calls. Remind me after the release plz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PGPpfKkx
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:33:34 PM |
|
daily report about aliases (give up thread):
its been the fourth consecutive day i have been trying to register some aliases that are not registered (and will not be if the system persists in randomness).
what happens is that i send 50 words to say with 1440 (as advised by CfB) deadline and 1 nxt for example.
a day later some 20% of them are registered and the rest are free.
this is completely random and sad. before implementing kick-ass features like assets and whatever make sure this wonderful coin is not ridiculed by such bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:36:30 PM |
|
My understanding is that separate features don't really depend on each other or interact with each other. Kind of like email and http coexisting. Just because email might have some bugs, it doesn't make sense to stop work in http, unless they are both being worked on by a single person.
James
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:39:45 PM |
|
Will all the proposed features eventually get implemented?
All except marked as "concept not ready". We must have a concept before implementation. Is there any rough idea of the time needed to complete each feature?
Ask Jean-Luc. Are there any estimates as to the amount of transaction fees each feature is expected to generate?
No.
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:41:14 PM |
|
daily report about aliases (give up thread):
its been the fourth consecutive day i have been trying to register some aliases that are not registered (and will not be if the system persists in randomness).
what happens is that i send 50 words to say with 1440 (as advised by CfB) deadline and 1 nxt for example.
a day later some 20% of them are registered and the rest are free.
this is completely random and sad. before implementing kick-ass features like assets and whatever make sure this wonderful coin is not ridiculed by such bugs.
Switch logging on and send me the log after u complete sending AS transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:41:55 PM |
|
Hey... just to be clear... there is no way to send NXT from the cmd window if the browser is closed, right?
Right.
|
|
|
|
|
landomata
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:42:26 PM |
|
CfB,
I suggest that we encapsulate each new NXT feature that generates its own transaction fees into a NXTcompany. I am assuming we can accurately track each NXTcompany's transaction fees and that is the equivalent of the traditional revenue statement. A NXTcompany will usually have no, or minimal costs, at least I think that is the case as once the software is developed, we might need a few custom servers, but mostly just manpower to nurture each NXTcompany. The profit calculation will simply be the difference between total transaction fees minus whatever costs, if any. If any additional costs are needed, it could be funded from sales of IPO shares, individual contributions, etc.
Dear James, I feel our thinking is going in the right direction....I had propose a few days back that we create a Decentralized autonomous corporation called (NXT/BTC Gateway) which will collect a fix transaction fee when ever anyone deposit or withdraws Nxt or BTC from the NXT Asset Exchange. Nxt/BTC Gateway would issue shares thru IPO on the Nxt Asset Exchange....on the last day of each month the fees collected would be divided up and distributed based on each account share holding. -- MONTHLY DIVIDENTS The shares of NXT/BTC Gateway will also be TRADED on the Nxt Asset exchange....so its will depend on supply and demand -- Basic Stock Trading The NXT/BTC Gateway cannot fail because it is a gateway into the NXT asset Exchange....noone can trade on the NXT Asset Exchange using NXT or BTC without going thru the BTC/NXT Gateway. THIS WOULD BE A WORLD FIRST.....TOTALLY AUTONOMOUS CORPORATION....I THINK THIS IS DOABLE. THE NXT ASSET EXCHANGE IS READY (ITS DONE)....so we can try this IMMEDIATELY!
|
|
|
|
farl4web
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1205
Merit: 1000
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:44:15 PM |
|
then maybe you'd want to listen to their concerns. And do exctaly what in decentalized system? U're concerned so stay sway. It's very important in investor's career to fully understand what's going on and predict future. For a currency to succeed, it needs to be used and accepted by lots and lots and lots of people. If you own NxT, it's in your best interest to listen to potential investors' concerns. Your mentality "If you don't like this, then stay away" is not gonna fly in the long run if you want this currency to succeed. Very good point!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
brooklynbtc
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
AKA jefdiesel
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:48:55 PM |
|
looks like were stuck going on 8 minutes..
27821 15362659172498110070 12/29/2013 1:40:45 PM 0 0 + 0 0 B 1 16127869774401288920 159 %
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:50:41 PM |
|
looks like were stuck going on 8 minutes..
27821 15362659172498110070 12/29/2013 1:40:45 PM 0 0 + 0 0 B 1 16127869774401288920 159 %
High difficulty.
|
|
|
|
|
farl4web
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1205
Merit: 1000
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:50:50 PM |
|
utopianfuture,
Why is defending marketing attacks against NXT lower in priority? What is more important that the public's perception of NXT? Perception is reality, especially in crypto
If people's first impression is what yuri's of the world spread, that would severely lighten the load on the NXT servers. There are over one hundred altcoins plus bitcoin itself and presumably other challenges ahead for NXT. We cannot stay 100% tech oriented and just count on the public to accept NXT.
Distributed servers, distributed development all very good. However, distributed marketing is essentially no marketing. Is that what the NXT community wants? If so, let's just take down all the wikis, videos, etc. Just publish the source code and be done with the public.
Do we want NXT to grow to what it is capable of? If so, we MUST defend ourselves and establish the market position NXT deserves. NXT is up and running, NXT has an active user base. NXT has an active trading volume. NXT has the second generation features that no other coin currently has. I estimate at most a three month window of opportunity for NXT to capture the slot of being the next bitcoin.
Of course we need servers, but we also need good concentrated laser beam marketing.
James
You nailed it!
|
|
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:51:04 PM |
|
landomata,
I see a couple of issues with a NXT/BTC gateway. First problem is that there is no guarantee it will be a monopoly and almost a sure thing that there will be multiple issuers of BTC within NXT.
What most people here don't realize is that the entire trust the issuer problem has been ignored. Over in ripple-land, that is the single biggest hurdle for any gateway.
The other issue is competition. I know that peercover isn't charging fees for their ripple gateway and so it is quite possible someone will setup a free service to be a BTC gateway into NXT.
Of course, there is nothing to stop anybody from taking the ball and running with it. Just offering my take on it
James
|
|
|
|
brooklynbtc
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
AKA jefdiesel
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:54:33 PM |
|
landomata,
I see a couple of issues with a NXT/BTC gateway. First problem is that there is no guarantee it will be a monopoly and almost a sure thing that there will be multiple issuers of BTC within NXT.
What most people here don't realize is that the entire trust the issuer problem has been ignored. Over in ripple-land, that is the single biggest hurdle for any gateway.
The other issue is competition. I know that peercover isn't charging fees for their ripple gateway and so it is quite possible someone will setup a free service to be a BTC gateway into NXT.
Of course, there is nothing to stop anybody from taking the ball and running with it. Just offering my take on it
James
Hey James, I'm missing the leap of understanding on getting this set up "within" nxt.. I mean dgex is already an exchange
|
|
|
|
mr_random
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:55:08 PM |
|
Do we have a list of all the developers working on NXT. From what I can gather we have: Developers- BCNext - Come-From-Beyond - Nexern? (This is from memory correct me if I am wrong) - Jean Luc 1. Is this list complete? 2. Are all these individuals anonymous or do we have a public figurehead here? Someone like Gavin for Bitcoin rather than BCNext acting as Satoshi. 3. What is the development timeline? - My understanding is parts of the source code will be open sourced on January 3rd. What features will be complete and when? I know when is difficult in software development The more developers we have working on this, the better it looks (and is) for NXT! And the development timeline is also important in my opinion to inspire confidence that we are working to a schedule and have a plan. It will also make the features seem more real. When alias suddenly appeared it generated a lot of buzz for NXT. Three things are important I feel: - Development/features - Marketing! Spreading the word in related forum topics, reddit, blog posts, getting on sites like coindesk etc - Services Those are my thoughts for the day
|
|
|
|
|
|
farl4web
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1205
Merit: 1000
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 06:57:04 PM |
|
OK... so one has chosen a super secure passphrase... you know one of those that will take a billion gazillion trillion years of non-stop brute force to crack...
Considering that he/she needs to have his/her wallet unlocked to forge and at the same time that wallet needs to have a decent amount of NXT in order to have a chance generating a block...
Shouldn't the client ask for the passphrase AGAIN when trying to send NXT?
How far can a super secure passphrase take you if all a hacker needs is to remotely access your computer and hope you are forging?
There need to be more security, you're right!
|
|
|
|
|
|
salsacz
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 07:01:07 PM |
|
Do we have a list of all the developers working on NXT. From what I can gather we have: Developers- BCNext - Come-From-Beyond - Nexern? (This is from memory correct me if I am wrong) - Jean Luc 1. Is this list complete? 2. Are all these individuals anonymous or do we have a public figurehead here? Someone like Gavin for Bitcoin rather than BCNext acting as Satoshi. 3. What is the development timeline? - My understanding is parts of the source code will be open sourced on January 3rd. What features will be complete and when? I know when is difficult in software development The more developers we have working on this, the better it looks (and is) for NXT! And the development timeline is also important in my opinion to inspire confidence that we are working to a schedule and have a plan. It will also make the features seem more real. When alias suddenly appeared it generated a lot of buzz for NXT. Three things are important I feel: - Development/features - Marketing! Spreading the word in related forum topics, reddit, blog posts, getting on sites like coindesk etc - Services Those are my thoughts for the day I am trying to collect Nxteam here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgAGADgnQcrtdHRrV3V3Z1lzOXVEMWtqdElUaEtqV1E&usp=drive_web#gid=6But - BCNext - Come-From-Beyond - Jean Luc belong to the paid Core, while othes are only activists
|
|
|
|
|
landomata
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 07:04:48 PM |
|
landomata,
I see a couple of issues with a NXT/BTC gateway. First problem is that there is no guarantee it will be a monopoly and almost a sure thing that there will be multiple issuers of BTC within NXT.
What most people here don't realize is that the entire trust the issuer problem has been ignored. Over in ripple-land, that is the single biggest hurdle for any gateway.
The other issue is competition. I know that peercover isn't charging fees for their ripple gateway and so it is quite possible someone will setup a free service to be a BTC gateway into NXT.
Of course, there is nothing to stop anybody from taking the ball and running with it. Just offering my take on it
James
It may not be a monopoly in the world but it will be the ONLY Gateway for BTC/NXT on the Asset Exchange....you will need some form of Gateway to deposit/withdraw either NXT or BTC for example from Nxt Asset Exchange ....JUST AS IN DGEX HOMEPAGE....we deposit/withdraw/Trade and pay a fee in the process like any normal exchange. Its basically GDEX automated and linked to the Nxt Asset Exchange....who cares if there are other competitors....other competitors are not gonna pay out monthly dividents to share holders.....other competitors are not gonna have their shares traded in the NXT Asset exchange ....I repeat the NXT ASSET EXCHANGE IS READY! I am not a dev...so I can;t code this but I don;t think it would be difficult....I would surely invest in this....and also trade the shares and many would cuz they can profit from price movements. IT WOULD ALSO BE INNOVATIVE and could act as a template for other decentralized autonomous corporation....and the main exchange to list would be the NXT ASSET EXCHANGE....cuz it has a liquid and developed marketplace....if NXT doesn;t do this somebody else will.
|
|
|
|
|