brooklynbtc
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
AKA jefdiesel
|
 |
December 29, 2013, 08:33:09 PM |
|
I sunk 1 more Btc in today, bought all under 0.00006 so not bad. Thanks to the shareholders, or whoever is helping out with nice prices.
|
|
|
|
TwinWinNerD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
CEO Bitpanda.com
|
|
December 29, 2013, 08:35:29 PM |
|
im not so sure it is stakeholders that are selling. The volume is quite low, and many bots are marketmaking the huge spreads. So it could be just random walk, but who knows, i for one enjoy the newfound prices  |
|
|
|
|
ZeroTheGreat
|
|
December 29, 2013, 08:36:14 PM |
|
Hmm, in that case annual cleaning can create some problems, am I right? Big businesses creating plans for tens of years.
The shrinking doesn't erase all the data. Also Service Providers will keep all blockchains. I see. |
|
|
|
|
S3MKi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1016
|
|
December 29, 2013, 08:48:39 PM |
|
nice price  nxt to da ground? |
|
|
|
|
bitcoinrocks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 29, 2013, 08:52:31 PM |
|
i hope the stake holders do not sell into buy walls but rather to just put up their own monster sell walls. Can anyone explain to me how that works? I understand the order book but I always just buy at market. |
|
|
|
|
TwinWinNerD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
CEO Bitpanda.com
|
|
December 29, 2013, 08:54:03 PM |
|
i hope the stake holders do not sell into buy walls but rather to just put up their own monster sell walls. Can anyone explain to me how that works? I understand the order book but I always just buy at market. If an stakeholder wants to sell an amount that moves the market (in todays orderbook that would be 250k+) then a market order would be bad for all parties. One should just set an sell order at a given price and wait for the market to absorb it. |
|
|
|
|
ZeroTheGreat
|
|
December 29, 2013, 08:55:39 PM |
|
i hope the stake holders do not sell into buy walls but rather to just put up their own monster sell walls. Can anyone explain to me how that works? I understand the order book but I always just buy at market. Someone do order with high volume at higher price and if there's enough demand to beat all lower-price deals, price go up for sure and stays till wall lives. Same with selling. Any price-watchers'd keep in mind it means times less, if there's no stable big enough volumes are trading. Low volumes can do 50-200% previous price with no time. I suppose it can be second reason (to first as preventing spam) of setting a +/-30% boundary. To give time stakeholders to react and to not show something like -80%/+200% every next minute |
|
|
|
|
utopianfuture
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 268
Internet of Value
|
|
December 29, 2013, 08:55:54 PM |
|
Hmm, in that case annual cleaning can create some problems, am I right? Big businesses creating plans for tens of years.
The shrinking doesn't erase all the data. Also Service Providers will keep all blockchains. Hi Cfb, can we make a public announcement function in which a message can be broadcasted to the whole network. We may need this feature in case a certain public forum got shut down. |
|
|
|
S3MKi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1016
|
|
December 29, 2013, 08:56:37 PM |
|
please donate me some NXT. No. |
|
|
|
|
|
GröBkAz
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:01:27 PM |
|
what could de bottom price before the next rise starts?
|
|
|
|
|
ferment
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
IDEX - LIVE Real-time DEX
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:01:50 PM |
|
hi, i'm yueye000. Sorry made that mistake, how about "acc:5693933960808456307" ?
U r the 1st who implemented this feature, so u decide. Just make sure it's not reserved in URI standard. Ur decision will change the future. Here are the URI schemes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URI_scheme. acct might be a better choice. Based on the spec, the correct format would be "acct:5693933960808456307@nxt". Of course, we could leave the "@nxt" off and imply that an acct uri without a host is a NXT account. But, I think we should follow the spec so you could have aliases like "acct:ferment@bitcointalk". |
|
|
|
xyzzyx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
I don't really come from outer space.
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:05:51 PM |
|
Here are the URI schemes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URI_scheme. acct might be a better choice. Based on the spec, the correct format would be "acct:5693933960808456307@nxt". Of course, we could leave the "@nxt" off and imply that an acct uri without a host is a NXT account. But, I think we should follow the spec so you could have aliases like "acct:ferment@bitcointalk". God I hate those posts that quote a previous post and just add a "+1", but... +1 |
"An awful lot of code is being written ... in languages that aren't very good by people who don't know what they're doing." -- Barbara Liskov
|
|
|
Alias
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 127
Merit: 100
Money be green
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:18:13 PM |
|
i hope the stake holders do not sell into buy walls but rather to just put up their own monster sell walls. Can anyone explain to me how that works? I understand the order book but I always just buy at market. Open the Market Levels at dgex and see at which prices NXT would be selling if someone decided they wanted a couple of million NXT and you will get the point. You guys should come and contribute to our "Wall Observer" thread! - https://nextcoin.org/index.php/topic,74.0.html |
In times of change, it is the learners who will inherit the earth, while the learned will find themselves beautifully equipped for a world that no longer exists.
|
|
|
TwinWinNerD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
CEO Bitpanda.com
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:18:32 PM |
|
Hi Cfb, can we make a public announcement function in which a message can be broadcasted to the whole network. We may need this feature in case a certain public forum got shut down.
+1 who would control such a feature? This sounds potentially dangerous tbh |
|
|
|
|
pandaisftw
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:19:21 PM |
|
I sunk 1 more Btc in today, bought all under 0.00006 so not bad. Thanks to the shareholders, or whoever is helping out with nice prices.
I'm tempted to move some of my BTC into NXT right now, prices are way too tempting! |
NXT: 13095091276527367030
|
|
|
TwinWinNerD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
CEO Bitpanda.com
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:21:40 PM |
|
27914 15469581309328573862 Sonntag, 29. Dezember 2013 22:18:59
7 499 + 7 1'269 B
1 726782742001008098 1207 %
am i on a fork, or why is the target so high?
|
|
|
|
xyzzyx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
I don't really come from outer space.
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:22:58 PM |
|
Hi Cfb, can we make a public announcement function in which a message can be broadcasted to the whole network. We may need this feature in case a certain public forum got shut down.
+1 who would control such a feature? This sounds potentially dangerous tbh Sounds like a job for a service provider if you ask me. |
"An awful lot of code is being written ... in languages that aren't very good by people who don't know what they're doing." -- Barbara Liskov
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:23:30 PM |
|
nice price nxt to da ground? LOL |
|
|
|
|
bitcoinrocks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:24:14 PM |
|
i hope the stake holders do not sell into buy walls but rather to just put up their own monster sell walls. Can anyone explain to me how that works? I understand the order book but I always just buy at market. If an stakeholder wants to sell an amount that moves the market (in todays orderbook that would be 250k+) then a market order would be bad for all parties. One should just set an sell order at a given price and wait for the market to absorb it. So you create a buy or sell "wall" to avoid moving the market? |
|
|
|
|
Patel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1320
Merit: 1007
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:25:21 PM |
|
So you create a buy or sell "wall" to avoid moving the market?
yeah, its the same as when people put buy or sell walls on bitcoin exchanges, instead of directly dumping into buys. wall = set a price to sell at (selling 1k btc at 1000), is a wall at 1000 market order = sell to whoever is buying, dumping the coin into people who have buy orders up, thus eliminating the buy order and driving the price down for bids. Is the same for buys as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
