NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information

[salsacz]

so whats it gonna take to get graviton to release the name?  did his users agree to any privacy policy?

Privacy Policy: Any details provided to us as a result of requesting any of our services are strictly confidential. Your details will not be shared, sold, rented or divulged to any third party under any circumstances unless specifically being forced to do so by appropriate legal authorities and / or in the event that your transactions are proven to be fraudulent.

Ricky, you know what to do

[rickyjames]

And I think you misunderstand hiberNXT - just because it doesnt have a public key associated with it does NOT mean that nobody knows the password to the account.

Think about your very first NXT account you had when someone sent you some NXT but you had no outgoing transactions.  Those funds in your NXT account were hiberNXT.  The only difference is you did know its password, you just hadnt used it yet.

Nope, I fully understand the difference between darkNXT and hiberNXT. 

DarkNXT is effectively like sunken treasure on a ship that has sunk to the bottom of the ocean.  If you are somehow smart enough to hack the entrance code (or maybe have a trapdoor to find it?) , it's pretty much morally yours under salvage law.

HiberNXT is, as you say, sitting there waiting for somebody who deliberately created the passcode to use it for the first time.  Like possibly a "well known and reputable NXT community member" who did so four times in a 180 second window after a three-week cool-down period. 

As I've always said, something scary is going on that we STILL haven't gotten to the bottom of.  And I'm not the man to go down this mean street...

http://quotes.dictionary.com/down_these_mean_streets_a_man_must_go

[rickyjames]

Ricky, you know what to do

Sigh.  I'm pretty sure Dgex is European, right?  That's your side of the pond, not mine.

Edited to add:

I've narrowed it down to Scenario 3 as being the truth:

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=345619.msg4321533#msg4321533


"3. There is one or more completely independent hacker(s) out there who took the 300K NXT from five accounts as part of a completely different heist and is laughing at all of us right now because we are not even on their trail yet."

Maybe the community can vote on what to do next.

[TwinWinNerD]

So guys, i decided to reenter the NXT market after my theft. Could you all please dump the price to 0.00005?
 I want to atleast own 50000 NXT. (Or someone could sell me 50000 NXT pretty please )

[salsacz]

How can we get the name???  And what was the total funds stolen by this wellknown/respected member?

ask graviton

12407220479703463755 containing 61,372 NXT currently worth approximately $6,500 USD (PaulyC)
2647797480528736696 containing 285,859 NXT currently worth approximately $30,000 USD (Framewood, plasticAiredale, newcn, sparta_cuss)

[r3animation]

Ricky, you know what to do

Sigh.  I'm pretty sure Dgex is European, right?  That's your side of the pond, not mine.

Edited to add:

I've narrowed it down to Scenario 3 as being the truth:

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=345619.msg4321533#msg4321533


"3. There is one or more completely independent hacker(s) out there who took the 300K NXT from five accounts as part of a completely different heist and is laughing at all of us right now because we are not even on their trail yet."

Maybe the community can vote on what to do next.

Can you add my 500,360 NXT (86162509365658888) to your list?

[evanxxx]

please check this
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=6635869272840226493

While I am writing, recent transfers for the account are all transfer in, the transfer amount is more than 6M, while the balance of the account is less than 3M, how could this happen?

[LiQio]

please check this
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=6635869272840226493

While I am writing, recent transfers for the account are all transfer in, the transfer amount is more than 6M, while the balance of the account is less than 3M, how could this happen?

there are more pages
(that's dgex account btw)

[evanxxx]

please check this
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=6635869272840226493

While I am writing, recent transfers for the account are all transfer in, the transfer amount is more than 6M, while the balance of the account is less than 3M, how could this happen?

there are more pages
(that's dgex account btw)

Page 1 is the most recent records, right?  The balance is less than the recent transfer amount (which all are transfer in),  doesn't that mean the balance is negative before those transfers?

[LiQio]

*********** BEGIN GRAVITON COMMENTS**********************

"The BTC from the apparently stolen NXT were cashed out yesterday morning, so what I have left is some info if anything....

10715382765594435905 is not a DGEX account.

We had a moderately large deposit two days ago from 2647797480528736696, washing it quickly through instant withdrawals to BTC.

The owner of the account is a well known and reputable NXT community member."

*********** END GRAVITON COMMENTS**********************

@Graviton: would you mind to define "well known and reputable"?
(amount of posts in forums? which forums? member status? anything...)

[relm9]

please check this
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=6635869272840226493

While I am writing, recent transfers for the account are all transfer in, the transfer amount is more than 6M, while the balance of the account is less than 3M, how could this happen?

there are more pages
(that's dgex account btw)

Page 1 is the most recent records, right?  The balance is less than the recent transfer amount (which all are transfer in),  doesn't that mean the balance is negative before those transfers?

Something is wrong with the site, on the blockchain in my local client I'm seeing 213 confirmations on that transaction - while on the site, it says 3

http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=2000&tra=10556286089892141388

Also see here

http://www.mynxt.info/blockexplorer/details.php?action=ac&ac=6635869272840226493

I believe those other transactions came after the 5 M, not sure why the other blockchain site has the order messed up.

[l8orre]

I think theres something wrong in the asset exchange test system  I issued 2 assets some time ago and they arent showing up, though I did get Ids for them:

# ncli placeAskOrder holms.cloudapp.net PASSPHRASE 15328485893864579482 100000 2 1 100

    transaction: 11152796696257253233
#

# ncli issueAsset holms.cloudapp.net PASSPHRASE Widget Thingamabobdoohickey 1000 1000

    transaction: 11636237124380534441

#

I noticed the test system doesnt seem to respond to most API commands either;  Ive never been able to getBalance to getState or anything like that, or to send NXT to another account.

seems to work fine for me  - created asset, sent asset, placed asm order, sent money, get transactions etc

[LiQio]

please check this
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=6635869272840226493

While I am writing, recent transfers for the account are all transfer in, the transfer amount is more than 6M, while the balance of the account is less than 3M, how could this happen?

there are more pages
(that's dgex account btw)

Page 1 is the most recent records, right?  The balance is less than the recent transfer amount (which all are transfer in),  doesn't that mean the balance is negative before those transfers?

Something is wrong with the site, on the blockchain in my local client I'm seeing 213 confirmations on that transaction - while on the site, it says 3

http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=2000&tra=10556286089892141388

Also see here

http://www.mynxt.info/blockexplorer/details.php?action=ac&ac=6635869272840226493

I believe those other transactions came after the 5 M, not sure why the other blockchain site has the order messed up.

agree with relm9

you can check with http://localhost:7874/nxt?requestType=getTransaction&transaction=10556286089892141388

[Come-from-Beyond]

CFB/Klee : can you send some coins from the test network to: 14766716747567685583

thanks!

I am stuck for hours at 43944. CfB??

Ur account is generating incorrect blocks. We need someone else to generate the next block.

[martismartis]

JL, could you please explain in simple Joe words what causes "generating an incorrect block..." error? In one month of using NRS of newest version, I get only these errors.

Maybe this?
https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=397183.msg4645132#msg4645132

 

[evanxxx]

Something is wrong with the site, on the blockchain in my local client I'm seeing 213 confirmations on that transaction - while on the site, it says 3

http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=2000&tra=10556286089892141388

Also see here

http://www.mynxt.info/blockexplorer/details.php?action=ac&ac=6635869272840226493

I believe those other transactions came after the 5 M, not sure why the other blockchain site has the order messed up.

agree with relm9

you can check with http://localhost:7874/nxt?requestType=getTransaction&transaction=10556286089892141388

Ok, then it is no big deal. thanks

[l8orre]

Announcement

http://holms.cloudapp.net:6874/ hosts test version of NRS with enabled Asset Exchange. U can play with APIs here. PM me if u find any bugs, plz.

NB: Don't use ur real account on the testnet. If u need some test coins then ask Klee for that, he is supposed to send the coin coz this server is provided by him me to send u some coins.

oops - is the testnet down, or is it just me bumbling around with the cloudapp link? Had my computer on standby overnight, but I don't seem to be able to re-establish connection to http://[Suspicious link removed]/3B0Z0U0C2n0D / http://holms.cloudapp.net:6874/

[Come-from-Beyond]

oops - is the testnet down, or is it just me bumbling around with the cloudapp link? Had my computer on standby overnight, but I don't seem to be able to re-establish connection to http://[Suspicious link removed]/3B0Z0U0C2n0D / http://holms.cloudapp.net:6874/

It's down. Let's wait for klee.

[gimre]

It seems that Jaguar's implementation is the only one that achieved the 100TPS. Is this true? No offense to the others,but would there be a reason for people to use the slower versions?
I might have misunderstood the benchmarks in that thread as I didn't find any benchmarks of all four on the same computer

What you don't see in the scores, is that there was both rivalry and cooperation.
I think hoax was the first one to have fastest implementation.
Jaguar's initial trials were quite slow, and his approach changed after tips from both hoax (drop long) and BloodyRookie (switch to 16bit math).
Also BloodyRookie probably nailed down the problem in math behind Curve.sign, which probably deserves separte credit itself: https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=397183.msg4645132#msg4645132

I was bit late t the party, I joined when I've seen info in "flaws" thread: https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=397183.1080
The only credit I think I can give to myself is "hinting", what's up with magic is_negative...

Still, we all have spent fair amount of time working on this

[NxtChoice]

V0.5.9 Client got error after two days running.

Code:

[2014-01-20 09:33:45.146] NRS 0.5.9 started successfully.
[2014-01-21 22:00:51.223] Re-scanning blockchain...
[2014-01-21 22:00:57.832] ...Done
[2013-01-22 10:19:34.646] DEBUG: Error sending JSON request
java.io.IOException: Error writing to server
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.writeRequests(Unknown Sou
rce)
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.writeRequests(Unknown Sou
rce)
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(Unknown So
urce)
        at java.net.HttpURLConnection.getResponseCode(Unknown Source)
        at Nxt$Peer.send(Nxt.java:3595)
        at Nxt$Peer.send(Nxt.java:3556)
        at Nxt$7.run(Nxt.java:6301)
        at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
access$301(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
run(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
[2013-01-22 10:28:42.212] DEBUG: Error sending JSON request
java.io.IOException: Error writing to server
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.writeRequests(Unknown Sou
rce)
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.writeRequests(Unknown Sou
rce)
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(Unknown So
urce)
        at java.net.HttpURLConnection.getResponseCode(Unknown Source)
        at Nxt$Peer.send(Nxt.java:3595)
        at Nxt$Peer.send(Nxt.java:3556)
        at Nxt$Peer.connect(Nxt.java:3270)
        at Nxt$2.run(Nxt.java:6094)
        at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
access$301(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
run(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)