Bitcoin Forum
January 16, 2026, 05:42:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 [1734] 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 ... 2548 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2761756 times)
opticalcarrier
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 17, 2014, 09:55:22 PM
 #34661

i did a video interview with tai zen about how the network discovers the right chain. i cant make any promises but it may be helpful. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzKyXzZJJA8

dude, the longer you dont author our white paper, the more we will suspect you are BCNext.
martismartis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1161
Merit: 1005


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 09:55:39 PM
 #34662


[2014-02-17 21:22:23.586] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from node55.nxtbase.com, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:26.391] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from miasik.no-ip.org, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:50.345] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from nxt.homer.ru, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:23:02.295] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from node10.nxtbase.com, blacklisting

I don't understand why it keeps happening to your node, but again those two block ids are from the correct blockchain - at least on the nodes I run.


I am still not sure, who determines what is the correct chain?

i did a video interview with tai zen about how the network discovers the right chain. i cant make any promises but it may be helpful. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzKyXzZJJA8

Anon, I think I'm sure I am not on forked chain. Check http://217.17.88.5:7874/

with base targets like those i would tend to agree. i do not think you are on a fork.

OK. So what is the problem? In public node i see errors for not accepting 90% of good blocks, which are good in blockchain, private node and public node.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 09:56:36 PM
 #34663

Nxt is mentioned here - http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2393940 (It Will Cost You Nothing to 'Kill' a Proof-of-Stake Crypto-Currency)

Resume of this paper: All PoS coins will die except Nxt coz it's 90% attack-proof.
rickyjames
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 09:56:50 PM
 #34664

A system has already been created to reward running a public node.  https://www.peerexplorer.com/ (seems to be down right now for maintenance).

Sponsors create caches in the form of small amounts of NXT which are rewarded to registered public nodes.

Hmmm....must have been asleep at my desk when this happened. or it could have got lost in the information tsunami that is this thread.....

...or another thread:
https://nextcoin.org/index.php/topic,2266.120.html

Obviously I need to get out more......pity the cache system seems to have got gamed/broken.

LOL, probably lost in the tsunami Wink

Looking at the nextcoin.org post, seems he's shutting it down after some recent changes let someone walk away with 4100 NXT...  A real pity.  The peerexplorer.com cache system encouraged me to set up a few extra public VPS nodes.  Hope he reconsiders...

Thinking generally here: we've put a lot of effort into clients, AM, AE, marketing, etc over the last few weeks, but network infrastructure has been put a little to one side, since the massive efforts we made in December/January to get the current infrastructure up and running smoothly.

Looking at the peer explorer :
https://www.peerexplorer.com/
I'm only seeing 399 active nodes right now. One of them is mine, so I am currently responsible for 0.25% of NXTs network.
 Hmmmm......I would feel happier if we had more nodes. 1000 seems like a nice number.

So, what do u guys think? Do we need more nodes ?
How can we encourage more people to run nodes, given that forging revenues are not exactly brilliant right now?

So, I'm really interested in this as I hope to get on the infrastructure committee.  Is Blockexplorer your site?  does it show ALL active nodes at a given time, or just SOME active nodes, or just systems that people have registered that may or may not be on at all right now?  These are basic questions, sorry, but gotta start somewhere learning to get ready to ask the harder questions...
bitmadaboutcoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 09:57:34 PM
 #34665

holy crap this is nuts.. utilities actually breaking into houses to install smart meters? wtf?

http://www.movshare.net/video/ba7120ed1ddf1
BitcoinForumator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 09:58:24 PM
Last edit: February 17, 2014, 10:17:12 PM by BitcoinForumator
 #34666

I think it's wise to listen to this and consider some of the problems of proof of stake they're discussing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt3C8i51mmg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCqyGuDv57Q

Just listen to the whole interview because it's a plethora of good info.
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134


View Profile WWW
February 17, 2014, 10:11:32 PM
 #34667

CfB,

I am trying to come up with something that a forging node can do that a non-forging node cannot do. The only thing I have found so far is the numberOfUnlockedAccounts > 0 test, but this can easily be spoofed for someone that wants to pretend to be forging. I am hoping there is something that already exists in the NXT core that would enable a third party to verify that a reporting node was in fact forging. Maybe some sort of encryption calculation that is not done when not forging? It doesn't have to be 100% perfect for now.

I am just trying to make nodecoin that rewards people for forging. I dont want to use NXT transaction to do it, because it is too expensive, so I was just going to use direct connection to coin server. I was hoping that getState's cumulative difficulty wasnt available for non-forging nodes. Then I could just send that in and the coin server could verify it.

James

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
bitmadaboutcoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 10:17:34 PM
 #34668

do you need nrs open in order to use solaris??
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 10:19:10 PM
 #34669

CfB,

I am trying to come up with something that a forging node can do that a non-forging node cannot do. The only thing I have found so far is the numberOfUnlockedAccounts > 0 test, but this can easily be spoofed for someone that wants to pretend to be forging. I am hoping there is something that already exists in the NXT core that would enable a third party to verify that a reporting node was in fact forging. Maybe some sort of encryption calculation that is not done when not forging? It doesn't have to be 100% perfect for now.

I am just trying to make nodecoin that rewards people for forging. I dont want to use NXT transaction to do it, because it is too expensive, so I was just going to use direct connection to coin server. I was hoping that getState's cumulative difficulty wasnt available for non-forging nodes. Then I could just send that in and the coin server could verify it.

James

There is no way to determine if a node forging or not.
SongsofLove
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 10:20:40 PM
 #34670

On behalf of the Songs of Love Foundation, I would like to than the Nxt community for helping top raise much needed funding for our mission of music. For the last 18 years we have enhanced the lives of sick children and teens by giving them their very own personalized "songs of love". Over 24,000 children have been helped all across the world. You can see us in action on the 60 Minutes News Program at:
www.songsoflove.org/60minutes. Songs of Love and Nxt....making beautiful music together for the children who need a reason to smile.


John Beltzer
President and Founder
Songs of Love Foundation
Mario123
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 17, 2014, 10:25:47 PM
 #34671

Which brings me to some important questions about where are we heading with charity marketing:
Is SoL going to be the "official" NXT charity?
Are we going to make an ongoing commitment to them, or move on to another good cause after we hit the target?
Are multiple charity projects a good idea?
Does any one have any suggestions for another charity to support?

We have two inquiries:

- Ra'ad Charity: https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=468258.msg5179240#msg5179240
- SPICES: http://spices.org.my (they emailed me)

Please discuss!

Sh1n
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 10:26:32 PM
 #34672

Forgive me for having a little too much joy hearing this politically correct answer/reply from BitonicNL on twitter when asked whether they are going to start selling NXT for Euros! Smiley I have been buying bitcoins regularly from this site and is a happy customer.

Here is the tweet: https://twitter.com/Bitonicnl/statuses/435398282617966592
ChuckOne
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 10:27:06 PM
 #34673


[2014-02-17 21:22:23.586] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from node55.nxtbase.com, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:26.391] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from miasik.no-ip.org, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:50.345] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from nxt.homer.ru, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:23:02.295] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from node10.nxtbase.com, blacklisting

a
I don't understand why it keeps happening to your node, but again those two block ids are from the correct blockchain - at least on the nodes I run.


I am still not sure, who determines what is the correct chain?

i did a video interview with tai zen about how the network discovers the right chain. i cant make any promises but it may be helpful. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzKyXzZJJA8

Okay, let me ask you some questions. I put these ones on the table some time ago in my analysis of 'Transparent Forging' and CfB haven't answered it, yet. So, maybe you can.

You said: "The higher the stake involved in forging a block the 'better' the block."

So, how should a node (not the network as every node decides on their own) decide when two blocks are forged: one from account A and one from account B.

Now, there are several cases:
1) A comes first, TF says A is before B => A is on top of chain, B gets rejected when arriving (and vice versa)
2) B comes first, TF says A is before B => A didn't forge => B is on top of chain (and vice versa)

3) 2) happend; A arrived late; what happens? Will B get popped off?
hlksis
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 3


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 10:27:48 PM
 #34674

It would be awesome to get some Nxt Coins for testing. My ID would be 2221954241417961541.

Thank you very much!
Damelon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010



View Profile
February 17, 2014, 10:29:57 PM
 #34675

Forgive me for having a little too much joy hearing this politically correct answer/reply from BitonicNL on twitter when asked whether they are going to start selling NXT for Euros! Smiley I have been buying bitcoins regularly from this site and is a happy customer.

Here is the tweet: https://twitter.com/Bitonicnl/statuses/435398282617966592

Wow!
This would be great!
Bitonic is very good and dependable :-)

Member of the Nxt Foundation | Donations: NXT-D6K7-MLY6-98FM-FLL5T
Join Nxt Slack! https://nxtchat.herokuapp.com/
Founder of Blockchain Workspace | Personal Site & Blog
martismartis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1161
Merit: 1005


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 10:32:12 PM
 #34676

Returning back to my public node errors, I see, that my public node is in known peers list, not in active peers. Also in this list my node has version ?(?)@? Maybe from here comes problems?
Damelon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010



View Profile
February 17, 2014, 10:33:14 PM
 #34677

On behalf of the Songs of Love Foundation, I would like to than the Nxt community for helping top raise much needed funding for our mission of music. For the last 18 years we have enhanced the lives of sick children and teens by giving them their very own personalized "songs of love". Over 24,000 children have been helped all across the world. You can see us in action on the 60 Minutes News Program at:
www.songsoflove.org/60minutes. Songs of Love and Nxt....making beautiful music together for the children who need a reason to smile.


John Beltzer
President and Founder
Songs of Love Foundation

Thanks for taking the time to post here.
Hopefully it will be a success :-)

Member of the Nxt Foundation | Donations: NXT-D6K7-MLY6-98FM-FLL5T
Join Nxt Slack! https://nxtchat.herokuapp.com/
Founder of Blockchain Workspace | Personal Site & Blog
martismartis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1161
Merit: 1005


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 10:36:21 PM
 #34678


[2014-02-17 21:22:23.586] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from node55.nxtbase.com, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:26.391] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 13734259069497850723 at
height 68803 received from miasik.no-ip.org, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:22:50.345] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from nxt.homer.ru, blacklisting
[2014-02-17 21:23:02.295] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 209947979157787352 at he
ight 68804 received from node10.nxtbase.com, blacklisting

a
I don't understand why it keeps happening to your node, but again those two block ids are from the correct blockchain - at least on the nodes I run.


I am still not sure, who determines what is the correct chain?

i did a video interview with tai zen about how the network discovers the right chain. i cant make any promises but it may be helpful. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzKyXzZJJA8

Okay, let me ask you some questions. I put these ones on the table some time ago in my analysis of 'Transparent Forging' and CfB haven't answered it, yet. So, maybe you can.

You said: "The higher the stake involved in forging a block the 'better' the block."

So, how should a node (not the network as every node decides on their own) decide when two blocks are forged: one from account A and one from account B.

Now, there are several cases:
1) A comes first, TF says A is before B => A is on top of chain, B gets rejected when arriving (and vice versa)
2) B comes first, TF says A is before B => A didn't forge => B is on top of chain (and vice versa)

3) 2) happend; A arrived late; what happens? Will B get popped off?

Chuckone, in which list do you see your node and what version is showing near it?
iruu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 10:42:19 PM
Last edit: February 17, 2014, 10:54:19 PM by iruu
 #34679

Nxt is mentioned here - http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2393940 (It Will Cost You Nothing to 'Kill' a Proof-of-Stake Crypto-Currency)

Resume of this paper: All PoS coins will die except Nxt coz it's 90% attack-proof.
It doesn't matter how many coins are needed for destruction in his model, even 99.9% attack-proof currency would fall.  
It doesn't matter for NXT and other PoS currencies, because it's a ridiculous model.  

Short summary:
Each unit has a known, true value.  
Holders are willing to sell their coins at higher price than their real value.
An attacker has enough money to buy enough coins (using "true" valuation) to destroy the currency.  
Because he can do it, everyone sells his coins for nothing, because if he does buy the coins, anyone left holding will lose money. This causes the price to go to zero.
Therefore, it costs nothing to destroy any PoS currency.  

pure genius. let's sell nxt, everyone.

ChuckOne
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250

☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 10:48:22 PM
 #34680

Chuckone, in which list do you see your node and what version is showing near it?

Which lists? I cannot see myself in the NRS. But I run 0.7.5.
Pages: « 1 ... 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 [1734] 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 ... 2548 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!