Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
 |
March 02, 2014, 08:13:42 PM |
|
Just stating that other approaches could work because people do not like penalty, is leading nowhere.
Never said that. I said "it seems like"... I want mathematical proof, too. BCNext used a wrong word. Actually it's not a penalty, it's a trick to bump forging power of the other accounts back to 100%. |
|
|
|
|
|
chanc3r
|
|
March 02, 2014, 08:17:51 PM |
|
Just stating that other approaches could work because people do not like penalty, is leading nowhere.
Never said that. I said "it seems like"... I want mathematical proof, too. BCNext used a wrong word. Actually it's not a penalty, it's a trick to bump forging power of the other accounts back to 100%. Are you basically saying that preventing a node from forging for a period is essentially preventing a node forging or preventing an account forging. I assume its preventing an account forging not the actual NRS instance i.e. its like the account had an effective balance of ZERO - that also explains the 24h because its 1440 blocks for an account balance to become effective again. This would also automatically increase the forging of the remaining nodes because that NXT would not be included in the total able to forge. Have I understood it right? Therefore if an account was penalised you could log another account into that node and it would still have a chance to forge. |
|
|
|
ChuckOne
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
|
|
March 02, 2014, 08:22:33 PM |
|
- build a great gateway á la james
- work hard on AT and atomic cross chain transactions
Without a doubt if we can achieve atomic cross-chain txs then we will have basically got rid of the business model for all exchanges that don't do fiat. IMO "this is our job". The future will not be centralised! I could not agree more with you. @CfB Any internal plans for that feature in NXT? |
|
|
|
|
ChuckOne
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
|
|
March 02, 2014, 08:26:19 PM |
|
Therefore if an account was penalised you could log another account into that node and it would still have a chance to forge.
Correct. The account gives up its forging power in favor of other accounts. The node is completely irrelevant. |
|
|
|
|
ChuckOne
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
|
|
March 02, 2014, 08:28:00 PM |
|
Just stating that other approaches could work because people do not like penalty, is leading nowhere.
Never said that. I said "it seems like"... I want mathematical proof, too. BCNext used a wrong word. Actually it's not a penalty, it's a trick to bump forging power of the other accounts back to 100%. That sounds way more positive. Thank you, CfB.  |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
March 02, 2014, 08:28:53 PM |
|
Are you basically saying that preventing a node from forging for a period is essentially preventing a node forging or preventing an account forging.
I assume its preventing an account forging not the actual NRS instance i.e. its like the account had an effective balance of ZERO - that also explains the 24h because its 1440 blocks for an account balance to become effective again.
This would also automatically increase the forging of the remaining nodes because that NXT would not be included in the total able to forge.
Have I understood it right?
Therefore if an account was penalised you could log another account into that node and it would still have a chance to forge.
Something like that. This "penalty" is also used for other things, for example, it forces to split big accounts into smaller ones. Which in turn gives extra benefits (the small bias toward bigger accounts) to those who support "transparency" approach. |
|
|
|
|
ChuckOne
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
|
|
March 02, 2014, 08:30:59 PM |
|
Just stating that other approaches could work because people do not like penalty, is leading nowhere.
Never said that. I said "it seems like"... I want mathematical proof, too. Then, excuse me. I misunderstood. 'it seems like' sounds to me like 'it's basically proven that'. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zorke
|
|
March 02, 2014, 09:16:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
igmaca
|
|
March 02, 2014, 09:17:49 PM |
|
thanks!! |
|
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
|
|
March 02, 2014, 09:18:10 PM |
|
All files .html was removed. |
|
|
|
|
|
antanst
|
|
March 02, 2014, 09:24:21 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
^[GS]^
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
March 02, 2014, 09:44:21 PM |
|
Try configure the absolute path in the configuration file client NXT. Like html/nrs => /mnt/nxt/html/nrs |
|
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
|
|
March 02, 2014, 09:50:57 PM |
|
Try configure the absolute path in the configuration file client NXT. Like html/nrs => /mnt/nxt/html/nrs With this http://188.226.169.81:7874/ doesn't work .. also with the port 7876 mhh... |
|
|
|
|
^[GS]^
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
March 02, 2014, 09:52:34 PM |
|
Try configure the absolute path in the configuration file client NXT. Like html/nrs => /mnt/nxt/html/nrs With this http://188.226.169.81:7874/ doesn't work .. also with the port 7876 mhh... 7874 = network (peer 2 peer only) 7875 = nrs client (interface) 7876 = API port |
|
|
|
|
pinarello
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
|
|
March 02, 2014, 10:01:53 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
igmaca
|
|
March 02, 2014, 10:04:23 PM |
|
Try configure the absolute path in the configuration file client NXT. Like html/nrs => /mnt/nxt/html/nrs With this http://188.226.169.81:7874/ doesn't work .. also with the port 7876 mhh... 7874 = network (peer 2 peer only) 7875 = nrs client (interface) 7876 = API port no. it is a vps client perhaps i must change allowed user hosts?? |
|
|
|
|
|
