|
foaman
|
 |
April 02, 2014, 04:23:29 PM |
|
guys, thank for the efforts. but i do think, that such an issue will be easily fixed by the developers. as provided in the other thread there are a couple of solutions for an easy fix. so i think we just need to relax and calm down. no coin is broken.
Yes, the devs can easily address this. lol they cannot even respond in this thread. asking them to FIX this this is a lost cause. they do not care enough to even make an attempt to clarify the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
mgburks77
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:25:30 PM |
|
apparently they think it isn't an issue, can we get on with the doublespend attack now all of this talk is getting lame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
omahapoker
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:27:16 PM |
|
40 million sold at 12 just now(20 trades)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Jefferson
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:36:11 PM |
|
i understand that the developers don't work 24/7 on this project but a rapid response/fix might actually stop the price decline. i suppose they themselves have some MINT they don't want to lose value. on the other hand this way some people can get some really cheap MINT  |
|
|
|
|
|
mgburks77
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:40:49 PM |
|
it's been lower
now about that attack, I am genuinely interested in seeing if it can be done
lots of theoretical possibilities exist for any coin, I would like objective evidence of a doublespend because of 51% attack on MINT
lots of people say it can be done but no one does it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Jefferson
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:45:24 PM |
|
isn't the forking thing the bigger possible problem?  |
|
|
|
|
|
mgburks77
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:47:09 PM |
|
Well if it is I am interested in finding out
less talk, more hack
let's see it
|
|
|
|
|
|
mintcointeam (OP)
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:47:54 PM |
|
We have been made aware of potential security issues for MintCoin recently. As we always do, we're actively looking into these issues if any. If there is anything to fix, we'll do it, and we'll do it the best way possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mgburks77
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:48:52 PM |
|
there you have it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Jefferson
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:49:13 PM |
|
We have been made aware of potential security issues for MintCoin recently. As we always do, we're actively looking into these issues if any. If there is anything to fix, we'll do it, and we'll do it the best way possible.
you guys are awesome! just keep us updated! really appreciate it! |
|
|
|
|
|
broken_pixel
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:49:59 PM |
|
Build it for iphone...I don't think anyone is working on that yet.
Apple does not like crypto currency wallet apps. |
GA-990FXA-UD5, 1x 7970L, 2x S1, AX1200i, RIVBE, 2x R290x, NEX1500, BTC: 1G9cQix8bMgh35MQ9wY3Rb9yNSSCtnoRmK, DGC: DFo9FcKYsutv9Vx5c5xUzkrt7VJdECZWTM, LTC: LaAN33aktPGaimN5ALL9kjHjuJekfmKfTh
|
|
|
|
mgburks77
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:50:09 PM |
|
better grab some cheap MINT while you can
|
|
|
|
|
|
mgburks77
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:50:59 PM |
|
Build it for iphone...I don't think anyone is working on that yet.
Apple does not like crypto currency wallet apps. Yeah, I think that is going to take some doing. |
|
|
|
|
doona38317
Member
 Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
Some day i too can have a avatar and be like you.
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:52:45 PM |
|
We have been made aware of potential security issues for MintCoin recently. As we always do, we're actively looking into these issues if any. If there is anything to fix, we'll do it, and we'll do it the best way possible.
These are the developers troubles It is necessary for us to pay for them? Really annoying  |
Bitcoin bear will defeat you Bratcoin bulls. Bear bEAR bEAR!
|
|
|
|
mgburks77
|
|
April 02, 2014, 04:56:24 PM |
|
We have been made aware of potential security issues for MintCoin recently. As we always do, we're actively looking into these issues if any. If there is anything to fix, we'll do it, and we'll do it the best way possible.
These are the developers troubles It is necessary for us to pay for them? Really annoying why should you be annoyed? nothing even happened |
|
|
|
|
|
omahapoker
|
|
April 02, 2014, 05:08:32 PM |
|
We have been made aware of potential security issues for MintCoin recently. As we always do, we're actively looking into these issues if any. If there is anything to fix, we'll do it, and we'll do it the best way possible.
thanks, i feel a lot better now. I will buy 40 million MINT. that was sarcasm. can you at lease say if you think this is a major issue or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
April 02, 2014, 05:13:46 PM |
|
We have been made aware of potential security issues for MintCoin recently. As we always do, we're actively looking into these issues if any. If there is anything to fix, we'll do it, and we'll do it the best way possible.
thanks, i feel a lot better now. I will buy 40 million MINT. that was sarcasm. can you at lease say if you think this is a major issue or not. He said they are actively looking into the issue. Lets be a little patient. Lets also be thankful that, if there was potential for it, the BC devs chose not to exploit this security hole and do any real damage. |
|
|
|
|
doona38317
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
Some day i too can have a avatar and be like you.
|
|
April 02, 2014, 05:24:49 PM |
|
- No premine. Yep, not even for country coin, even it they have the best of intentions and they actually deliver (like Auroracoin did yesterday)
- other criteria as you see fit.
There would be two kind of criteria: mandatory and facultative. Mandatory criteria are stoppers, other just orient the decision. I'd say ressource-intensivness and premine should be mandatory.
The boundary of a criterium should be written clearly, to avoid as much arbitrary decision as possible.
Then you cannot include Mint and its premine, you either are fair and include any with premine or exclude all premined coins including Mint To allow one and exclude all others on this principle present a critical flaw for what you are trying to achieve by not being biased. It also would exclude Noble which is by far the most VAS exclusive coin currently in circulation I hope you are correct Thank you for your advice I'm going to buy Wish us luck |
Bitcoin bear will defeat you Bratcoin bulls. Bear bEAR bEAR!
|
|
|
moderndezigns
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
April 02, 2014, 05:27:04 PM |
|
- No premine. Yep, not even for country coin, even it they have the best of intentions and they actually deliver (like Auroracoin did yesterday)
- other criteria as you see fit.
There would be two kind of criteria: mandatory and facultative. Mandatory criteria are stoppers, other just orient the decision. I'd say ressource-intensivness and premine should be mandatory.
The boundary of a criterium should be written clearly, to avoid as much arbitrary decision as possible.
Then you cannot include Mint and its premine, you either are fair and include any with premine or exclude all premined coins including Mint To allow one and exclude all others on this principle present a critical flaw for what you are trying to achieve by not being biased. It also would exclude Noble which is by far the most VAS exclusive coin currently in circulation I hope you are correct Thank you for your advice I'm going to buy Wish us luck The Mintcoin fund is not going in this direction I believe |
|
|
|
|
mr_random
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 02, 2014, 05:31:15 PM |
|
We have been made aware of potential security issues for MintCoin recently. As we always do, we're actively looking into these issues if any. If there is anything to fix, we'll do it, and we'll do it the best way possible.
If there is anything to fix? You can clearly see the attack in the blockchain... |
|
|
|
|
