List of useful Bitcoin block explorers

[SFR10]

Can somebody double check please? Something doesn't seem OK, but it may be because of some of my script/ad blockers.
But I've opened this explorer, I've seen a list of last blocks and I've clicked to see the details of the last one (in a hope to get some transactions and see how they are displayed). However, instead of the expected list.. I get a red icon and a message "Error connecting to the server".

I wasn't around for the past couple of days, but I just checked the explorer in question, and I had no issues viewing the details of the latest blocks ^{[if you and LoyceV are still experiencing the same things, it might have something to do with the things that you mentioned the other day]}.
^{- It's worth noting that it only shows a few details for each block (hash, timestamp, TX count, and a few other things), so transactions within a specific block aren't included.}

[LoyceV]

if you and LoyceV are still experiencing the same things

It works again for me

[NeuroticFish]

if you and LoyceV are still experiencing the same things

It works again for me

Now it works for me too.

[GazetaBitcoin]

I get a red icon and a message "Error connecting to the server".

I just get a rotating "loading" animation, so I gave up.

It works on my side...:



Can you two try again, please...?

[DYING_S0UL]

I get a red icon and a message "Error connecting to the server".

I just get a rotating "loading" animation, so I gave up.

It works on my side...:



Can you two try again, please...?

I tried with different devices, different wifi connection and everything seems to be working. No issue, no error message from my side also...

[Lafu]

@GazetaBitcoin maybe it possible to add the tokenscope Explorer also to your List if you dont have it already there , but from what i have seen its not in the List.
Its an Explorer where you can see when you search for an Bitcoinaddress or wallet when it was created and sometimes you can see also to what exchange the wallet belongs.
On top of that you have an feature here where you can report an Address when it is used for a Scam oder an Hack.

Thery also offer some kind of chainalysis service but you have to pay for that.
I tried that and use that Explorer when i investigate for Hacks or other things and i think its usefull.
They offer other and more service but as i have written you have to pay for that.

https://tokenscope.com

[GazetaBitcoin]

I found a new explorer

Hey SFR10, I just added the new explorer to OP No other issues were encountered, thus it seems the site is functional.

I added it to the old table too and also to the Romanian version of OP. I will notify soon the translators about the changes, after we will figure out about Lafu's proposal as well.

@GazetaBitcoin maybe it possible to add the tokenscope Explorer also to your List if you dont have it already there , but from what i have seen its not in the List.

Hey Lafu, thank you for this proposal!
But I have a small request at you -- can you make the proposal using the template from OP? I just added it below. This is needed in order to add the proper information about the explorer; and also for adding a mark (which is given by the one making the proposal)...

Apart from this, since nobody objected to the website you proposed, I will add it immediately after you will submit the proposal using the template from OP

Code:

[table][tr]
[td]Name (link)[/td]
[td]Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?[/td]
[td]SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**[/td]
[td]Usefulness (subjective rating) :P ***[/td]
[td]Works without JS?[/td]
[td]Rated by[/td]
[/tr]

[tr]
[td]________________________[/td]
[td]________________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________________[/td]
[td]____________________[/td]
[td]________________[/td]
[/tr] 

[tr]
[td][url=http://xxx]xxx[/url][/td]
[td]Yes / No (xx/20xx) / Yes / No (xx/20xx)[/td] 
[td]Yes / No (xx/20xx)[/td] 
[td][b][color=black]x / 10 Points[/color][/b][/td]
[td][b]Yes / No[/b][/td] 
[td]Your name[/td]
[/tr][/table]

[SFR10]

Hey SFR10, I just added the new explorer to OP No other issues were encountered, thus it seems the site is functional.

Thank you for adding it to those tables.

I just finished checking other explorers for possible updates and I noticed something strange is happening with "BitcoinWho'sWho": Regardless of the address format, it keeps giving different errors for searching the same addresses twice/thrice.
^{- If the current situation remains the same for a longer period, I believe it means they're no longer fetching data, so they'd only be useful for reporting addresses that are connected to scams.}

[Lafu]

Hey Lafu, thank you for this proposal!
But I have a small request at you -- can you make the proposal using the template from OP? I just added it below. This is needed in order to add the proper information about the explorer; and also for adding a mark (which is given by the one making the proposal)...

Apart from this, since nobody objected to the website you proposed, I will add it immediately after you will submit the proposal using the template from OP

Here you have the requested template , sorry it was my fault for not using it in my other post i have made a few days earlier!
Hopefully its good now for be added to your List of Bitcoin Explorers.

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**	Usefulness (subjective rating) ***	Works without JS?	Rated by
________________________	________________________________	_________________________	_________________________________	____________________	________________
https://tokenscope.com	Yes	Yes	8 / 10 Points	Yes / No	Lafu

[GazetaBitcoin]

Here you have the requested template , sorry it was my fault for not using it in my other post i have made a few days earlier!
Hopefully its good now for be added to your List of Bitcoin Explorers.

Thank you for this, Lafu! I just added it to OP and also to the old version of the table.

But I have one question though... At the column "Works without JS?" you wrote "Yes / No"... Is it yes or no?

Thank you for adding it to those tables.

As always, a pleasure And I thank you for being so active in this thread, dear SFR10!

I just finished checking other explorers for possible updates and I noticed something strange is happening with "BitcoinWho'sWho": Regardless of the address format, it keeps giving different errors for searching the same addresses twice/thrice.
^{- If the current situation remains the same for a longer period, I believe it means they're no longer fetching data, so they'd only be useful for reporting addresses that are connected to scams.}

Okay... let's keep an eye on this too...

[Lafu]

Thank you for this, Lafu! I just added it to OP and also to the old version of the table.
But I have one question though... At the column "Works without JS?" you wrote "Yes / No"... Is it yes or no?

You are Welcome GazetaBitcoin !

About the column ( "Works without JS?" you wrote "Yes / No"... Is it yes or no? ) i dont know if it Works with JS thats why i have let it on yes/no .
But when i look at other Explorers i guess thats it will be a No , but i try to look at it and find out if it Works with it or not.
If i find something about i will send you a quick PM to let you know.

[GazetaBitcoin]

If i find something about i will send you a quick PM to let you know.

Okay, thank you so much!

Also, maybe someone else can check on this...?

I need this information, to update it in OP and afterwards to PM also all the translators, for updating their translations with these 2 recently added explorers...

[paid2]

Okay, thank you so much!

Also, maybe someone else can check on this...?

I need this information, to update it in OP and afterwards to PM also all the translators, for updating their translations with these 2 recently added explorers...

I don't have JS enabled (nor WebAssembly), I can access the homepage but can't use this explorer at all. Without JS you can't "Agree" with their cookies policy so the whole website is not usable and the whole thing is quite "broken". So it's definitely a "No" for the Works without JS? column.

[GazetaBitcoin]

the whole website is not usable and the whole thing is quite "broken". So it's definitely a "No" for the Works without JS? column.

Thank you for this information, paid2!

I updated the info in OP and also in the old table.

I will PM soon all the translators for kindly asking them to add these updates as well.

[DYING_S0UL]

I will PM soon all the translators for kindly asking them to add these updates as well.

Dear GB

As per your request I have updated the two new changes from my side! Hope that helps!

https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=631891.msg64435655#msg64435655

• Bengali: দরকারী বিটকয়েন ব্লক এক্সপ্লোরার গুলোর তালিকা, translation by DYING_S0UL

There is a slight mistake here! The ticker for my language should be "Bangla / বাংলা" not "Bengali". Will you kindly replace that!?

[GazetaBitcoin]

As per your request I have updated the two new changes from my side! Hope that helps!

Thank you.

There is a slight mistake here! The ticker for my language should be "Bangla / বাংলা" not "Bengali". Will you kindly replace that!?

As far as I remember, this has been discussed also inside AOBT and your countryman said that "Bengali" is also accepted. Furthermore, as far as I see on Wikipedia, the language can be called both "Bengali" and "Bangla". For AOBT it was decided since start to use "Bangla" instead of "Bengali".

However, for my topics I used the word "Bengali" since the beginning, so it would mean to change this term everywhere, inside all my translations and also inside the topic containing all my essays which I want to have translated in other languages -- and it would be too much effort. I am baffled though that you observed this only now, after years since I mentioned the word "Bengali" for the translations I received in this language.

Furthermore, 1miau also uses the term "Bengali" inside his topics, for referencing this language and nobody objected to this until now (example 1, example 2).

For my language, although we call it "română", the international people are call it "Romanian". I don't mind (and no Romanian would ever mind )if a foreigner calls our language as Romanian instead of "română" -- which is the exact case, as far as I understand, about your language.

So no offense, but I will not make this change, as it would mean for me to implement it inside all the topics of mine which are translated in your language.

[DYING_S0UL]

...snip...

Hey man, no worries, chill  . Don't get all hyped up. I still would have understood even if you wrote in a single line. A full sized article type reply wasn't really necessary! (Although this is exactly what I like about you the most, you always give detailed explanations for everything.)

Anyway, since there can be many interpretations, so I won't debate on that! And you've already used it everywhere, changing it might be a pain. In that case, let it be. A simple thing like that won't cause WW3. I was just suggesting/expressing my thoughts.

[SFR10]

I just found an AI-powered blockchain explorer that can also be used for answering blockchain-related questions, but it's not always accurate. It's worth noting that users are limited to data from the past six months, but by registering on their website ^{[for free]}, we can lift that restriction.

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**	Usefulness (subjective rating) ***	Works without JS?	Rated by
________________________	________________________________	_________________________	_________________________________	____________________	________________
ChainQ	Yes (04/2025) / Yes (04/2025)	No (04/2025)	3 / 10 Points	No	SFR10

[GazetaBitcoin]

Thank you for this new finding, SFR10

Let's wait a few days, to see if anyone raises any objection to this website. As usual, if no objections arise, I will add it.

[SFR10]

@GazetaBitcoin

• Atomic is still using the older version of Trezor explorer ^{[they're still using Trezor's logo in the header area]} and for the past two years ^[roughly], it hasn't offered anything unique to its users ^{[if there are any]}, so I think it's time to finally remove them from the list.
• Not sure what's happening to bitaps but lately, their servers keep going down a lot.
  
• The issues that I mentioned about BitcoinWho'sWho "roughly two months ago", are still present so we should probably also remove them from the list.
• And lastly, a small reminder about ChainQ... A month has passed with no objection