~snip
It's not just about yesterday's comic announcement.
When I first started as a member of the BestChange signature campaign, BestChange was in first place in terms of weekly payment among all signature campaigns existing at that time (with the exception of chipmixer, which we will consider as an exception, because the conditions there were clearly exceptional for the entire forum). BestChange was paying 100$ per week, while the rest had a maximum of around 80$ (correct me if I'm wrong). Now, paying 100$ is common and I counted 6 campaigns (I can list) that have the same bids. Add to this that some campaigns still have an avatar campaign, which, as a result, allows you to get about the same 100$ per week. In addition, many have added a bonus for the best posters following the example of the Betnomi.
That is, I want to say that 100$ has become a kind of payment standard on the forum (although there are campaigns with a smaller amount, I don't argue). If BestChange used to stand out in terms of payment ratings (and of course not only), now it has practically identical pay rates with the top-priced campaigns. Maybe it's time to go back to the roots and once again show that BestChange is head and shoulders above the rest? Demonstrate level and distinctiveness, so to speak.
I expressed my opinion. To support it or not, everyone's business. But I'm sure that every participant in the depths of his soul, at least, will be happy if the pay is increased, even if he doesn't publicly admit it.
i will never change my signature code for another despite any amount being offered, for long I have been admiring to join the green color in the house.
You not make nice follow up post to @m2017. You admire of the campaign and you don't admire BestChange to review it
This not honest. Just to quote on it.
Well if you must know there's no way a manager can just make changes of payment without the entire team putting heads together to make the changes, besides it's a thing of choice to stay with the campaign or not. In as much we are carving for the increment of payment that doesn't mean we shouldn't put the campaign first to get the required visibilities and exposure here on the forum.
However, those campaign currently are all mixers, meaning they are in higher competition to get utmost exposure among themselves since Chipmixer the number one have been seized. Please don't see me as the bad egg here but truth must be told, I am not against any payment increase.
Of course it is. Everything is in the power of the project team, and we are just discussing.
My words are not a call, not a request to raise the rate or something like that. I'm just bringing this matter to the attention of the campaign manager and participants. How to relate to what has been said is a personal matter for everyone.
ChipMixer was paying a shitload of money, because it had had $40 million dollars worth of bitcoin in the back (and who knows what else that we might never find out).
$4 per post is considered good pay rate, but what's even better is that it has lasted for 168 weeks. One of the best signature campaigns by far.
No one claims that 4$ is a bad pay rate. It just becomes commonplace among other campaigns. I'm talking about the fact that BestChange stood out with its pay rates from the very beginning, which is now fading away.
Why are we still talking about raising wages to April Fools pay rates?
BestChange is one of the best campaigns still running if not
the best - Ample participant size, 2nd longest duration, and not falling into the mixer/gambling category do wonders to attract people who otherwise do not feel comfortable with other campaigns.
Who's talking about April Pay Rates?
In my opinion, BestChange Campaign is one of the best on the forum and I am honored to wear this signature. It's undeniable, imho.
