I thank everyone who responded to my posts and commented on them. It's always good to hear alternative points of view. I can't leave them unattended and therefore I must answer.
What do I want to say? Has the BestChange project administration ever considered the possibility of increasing remuneration for its participants? BestChange has long been one of the highest paying signature campaigns, but competitors are starting to get ahead.
I believe there is no competition here regarding which campaign pays the most. if we look at the type of business, BestChange has no direct competition in the signature promotion. I would say that you have a wrong interpretation of why the payout in the campaign should be increased.
I don't think at all that the use of the word
"should" is applicable in this case.
I am not saying a word that the reward SHOULD be increased, but I suggest REVIEW the terms of the reward, if it is POSSIBLE.
Also, I noticed that not a single participant (correct if this is not so) of the BestChange signature campaign applied for new projects, despite a noticeable increase in remuneration. It seems to me that this is a strong indicator of the devotion of the participants.
You didn't notice this either, because I saw several members of the BestChange campaign who applied in other signature campaigns. I don't want to waste my time looking for them and possibly deleted application posts. (but if you are curious and detailed, you might go through the currently highest-paid campaign and all those who applied.)
This is not out of the question. I wrote about this, that if I made a mistake somewhere, then please correct me.
Is there any way to reward them for this? I guess for them (us) it's more than just participation for a fee (I think the atmosphere in the campaign plays a role here). If it was only a reward, then some would have changed their signatures long ago.
considering that this is based on completely incorrect facts, should those (those who applied in another campaign) members be excluded from the campaign by using this reward method?
the only possible reason for raising payment rates in signature campaigns is to match the inflation rate.
I don't understand the question. Whom and why to exclud from the campaign? It seems that the discussion of this is definitely not in my competence.
Thanks for the hint with the argument, in the form of inflation.
What do I want to say? Has the BestChange project administration ever considered the possibility of increasing remuneration for its participants? BestChange has long been one of the highest paying signature campaigns, but competitors are starting to get ahead.
If you dont like how much BestChange pays you for signature campaign spot simply quit and change it for something else.
There are higher and lower paying campaigns that come and go, but bestchange has been stable for years.
Payment rates could be higher for all campaigns and we are looking for someone to step up as a clear leader.
Thank you for your valuable advice, but it seems to me that these obvious things are already clear to any participant in signature campaigns.
You compromised yourself when you published this post on April 1st. Maybe it's a coincidence, but Royse777 posted his jokes on April 1st.
If the project spends more money on advertising, then it will close faster. I think that most signature mixer campaigns will close in 1-3 months.
If you want to get the maximum payout, then become a famous poster like Ratimov.
If campaign members want to get a bigger payout, then you need to make an offer to increase the number of posts, for example, 30 or 35 paid posts instead of 25. Then maybe this will be beneficial for BestChange management.
Should I cover my
ass self too by saying it was a joke?
I have had these questions before. It just so happened that I voiced them right now. Although, perhaps, Royse777's April Fool's joke pushed me to this step. From part.
We can't know the
inner kitchen of projects, and therefore, we don't know how changes in rates will affect them.
Also, it is impossible for everyone to be top posters. Such users are unique in this, that there are only a few of them. But that's another topic for discussion.
But this is an interesting proposal with an increase in the limit of posts. As you can see, the discussion allows to generate interesting ideas.
~snip
To be sincere, I do not expect we should be talking about this. It is not right, it is just like saying Bestchange does not know what he is doing, and that is so wrong.
Sorry if this hurts anyone.
Sorry Bestchange for us bringing this up, you have been here since the days of Chipmixer. Although, if you increased the weekly pay, we would all be happy about it, but pay rate discussion supposed to remain to you and your team, not us.
To be honest, I have similar feelings and I hesitated for a long time whether to raise this issue. But in any case, I said what I wanted to say, without even knowing if it was a manifestation of courage or stupidity.
I, and only I, have to apologize to the Bestchange. It was my initiative and therefore I apologize for bringing this topic up for public discussion.
