AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Ultegra134]

I don't know how to disprove this other than just providing screenshot from ZeroGPT, I am not subscribing to originality,


I do often ask AI for some topics but I don't just copy and paste, I rewrite and add some other info I found from google also verify the info gave by ChatGPT because as far as I know AI data is not realtime and sometimes outdated, I don't subscribe to ChatGPT or any other AI, and from what I know, AI won't write such phrase like 'In my Opinion' or 'As far as I know', but again, I don't know how to deny accusation, so feel free to decide.

Well, at least you replied here, compared to most of the users who are being reported here, you're taking accountability. I don't know what exactly you're doing and I'm not going to go through your posts. ZeroGPT isn't the most accurate, Originality and Winston are a lot more reliable because they're also for academic purposes. I personally would advise you to refrain from using AI again, I understand if you used it to gain some insight or ideas, but it's generally frowned upon, we're looking to have a discussion to see other people's opinions and ideas, not AI's.

You're the only one that came forward, perhaps you should be given a second chance, provided that you change your writing habits, I'll also wait for other members to express their opinion.

[FinneysTrueVision]

I don't know how to disprove this other than just providing screenshot from ZeroGPT, I am not subscribing to originality,

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/11/21/bL8ea.png

It is unreliable to only trust a single detector, here are the results from a few other detectors.

Quillbot.com - 30% of text is likely AI generated
Copyleaks.com - AI content detected
HiveModeration - 96% likely to contain AI generated text

I do often ask AI for some topics but I don't just copy and paste, I rewrite and add some other info I found from google also verify the info gave by ChatGPT because as far as I know AI data is not realtime and sometimes outdated, I don't subscribe to ChatGPT or any other AI, and from what I know, AI won't write such phrase like 'In my Opinion' or 'As far as I know', but again, I don't know how to deny accusation, so feel free to decide.

There might be some truth in this, but your posts seem unnatural and robotic that I am led to believe that even if your posts aren’t entirely AI-generated you still rely too heavily on AI assistance. I also find it hard to explain how you can write posts that are seemingly professionally crafted, using somewhat advanced vocabulary, yet there are very basic errors like adding an unnecessary hyphen or leaving out a preposition. That is very typical of users trying to hide the fact they are using AI.

[icalical]

I don't know how to disprove this other than just providing screenshot from ZeroGPT, I am not subscribing to originality,

Well, at least you replied here, compared to most of the users who are being reported here, you're taking accountability. I don't know what exactly you're doing and I'm not going to go through your posts. ZeroGPT isn't the most accurate, Originality and Winston are a lot more reliable because they're also for academic purposes. I personally would advise you to refrain from using AI again, I understand if you used it to gain some insight or ideas, but it's generally frowned upon, we're looking to have a discussion to see other people's opinions and ideas, not AI's.

You're the only one that came forward, perhaps you should be given a second chance, provided that you change your writing habits, I'll also wait for other members to express their opinion.

I value this forum and my account,

I don't know how to disprove this other than just providing screenshot from ZeroGPT, I am not subscribing to originality,

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/11/21/bL8ea.png

It is unreliable to only trust a single detector, here are the results from a few other detectors.

Quillbot.com - 30% of text is likely AI generated
Copyleaks.com - AI content detected
HiveModeration - 96% likely to contain AI generated text

I do often ask AI for some topics but I don't just copy and paste, I rewrite and add some other info I found from google also verify the info gave by ChatGPT because as far as I know AI data is not realtime and sometimes outdated, I don't subscribe to ChatGPT or any other AI, and from what I know, AI won't write such phrase like 'In my Opinion' or 'As far as I know', but again, I don't know how to deny accusation, so feel free to decide.

There might be some truth in this, but your posts seem unnatural and robotic that I am led to believe that even if your posts aren’t entirely AI-generated you still rely too heavily on AI assistance. I also find it hard to explain how you can write posts that are seemingly professionally crafted, using somewhat advanced vocabulary, yet there are very basic errors like adding an unnecessary hyphen or leaving out a preposition. That is very typical of users trying to hide the fact they are using AI.

I don't know about robotic, but I am not native English so basic error should be understandable, and for the advance vocabulary, I guess its because google translate that I use on some words or phrases that I don't know how to put it in English, but I would say that from my posts that you use as an example, I barely see any sophisticated word. And I do agree that using just one source is unreliable, so I really don't know how to deny this, also doesn't it mean that those AI detector is unreliable because they contradict each other, and I mean the difference is huge, one with 3% AI, the other with 30% and then the other one 97%, for me that will be very unreliable to accuse any user using that data. Other than that, if you said that one is more reliable then the other just because it shows higher percentage of AI, seems like cherry picking.

[Ultegra134]

I don't know about robotic, but I am not native English so basic error should be understandable, and for the advance vocabulary, I guess its because google translate that I use on some words or phrases that I don't know how to put it in English, but I would say that from my posts that you use as an example, I barely see any sophisticated word. And I do agree that using just one source is unreliable, so I really don't know how to deny this, also doesn't it mean that those AI detector is unreliable because they contradict each other, and I mean the difference is huge, one with 3% AI, the other with 30% and then the other one 97%, for me that will be very unreliable to accuse any user using that data. Other than that, if you said that one is more reliable then the other just because it shows higher percentage of AI, seems like cherry picking.

I haven't gone through the reported posts, but @FinneysTrueVision claimed that your text appeared 100% AI with minor corrections in punctuation. Thus, it's fair to assume that some of your posts are completely AI-generated and that you're not simply looking for ideas to write but to copy and paste the easy way. We're not cherry picking the AI detectors; I came up with Originality and Winston in this thread, which were the only ones that detected two members of the Stake campaign, and the first one was completely off the radar with the simple AI detectors we used because of the sophisticated way he messed up the text, so much so that the detection software couldn't identify that many grammatical mistakes as AI.

[icalical]

I don't know about robotic, but I am not native English so basic error should be understandable, and for the advance vocabulary, I guess its because google translate that I use on some words or phrases that I don't know how to put it in English, but I would say that from my posts that you use as an example, I barely see any sophisticated word. And I do agree that using just one source is unreliable, so I really don't know how to deny this, also doesn't it mean that those AI detector is unreliable because they contradict each other, and I mean the difference is huge, one with 3% AI, the other with 30% and then the other one 97%, for me that will be very unreliable to accuse any user using that data. Other than that, if you said that one is more reliable then the other just because it shows higher percentage of AI, seems like cherry picking.

I haven't gone through the reported posts, but @FinneysTrueVision claimed that your text appeared 100% AI with minor corrections in punctuation. Thus, it's fair to assume that some of your posts are completely AI generated and that you're not simply looking for ideas to write, but to copy paste the easy way. We're not cherry picking the AI detectors, I came up with Originality and Winston in this thread, which were the only ones that detected two members of the Stake campaign, and the first one was completely off the radar with the simple AI detectors we used because of the sophisticated way he messed up the text, so much, that the detection software couldn't identify that many grammatical mistakes as AI.

So, ok, as I understand from your post here here,

First, an AI generated text that is messed up so much buy the user will only be detected with supposedly more advance and better AI detector such as Originality and Winston,

Second @FinneysTrueVision accuse me that I generate the post with AI then only change the punctuation on my text.

So according to the first statement, shouldn't my text be easily detected as AI generated by even a simple and common AI detector? and also the result on the more common AI and the Originality shouldn't be too different because my text is not much altered.  

[nutildah]

So according to the first statement, shouldn't my text be easily detected as AI generated by even a simple and common AI detector? and also the result on the more common AI and the Originality shouldn't be too different because my text is not much altered.  

I think your heart is in the right place. Just don't copy/paste stuff from ChatGPT, at all. That's the best way to avoid getting mentioned here. If you do have to post it, make sure to credit ChatGPT, even if only as a reference.

[Lucius]

I value this forum and my account
~snip~

I wouldn't say your statement is true, because if it were, it would never occur to you to use AI for anything in your posts. We can argue about this for days, but all these AI detectors simply can't be wrong, especially those that are at a higher level than these free ones that are mostly used.

The solution is simple, forget about AI tools in the context of forum posts.

[icalical]

I value this forum and my account
~snip~

I wouldn't say your statement is true, because if it were, it would never occur to you to use AI for anything in your posts. We can argue about this for days, but all these AI detectors simply can't be wrong, especially those that are at a higher level than these free ones that are mostly used.

The solution is simple, forget about AI tools in the context of forum posts.

Then we need to agree to disagree, I wouldn't say that simply because someone use AI to search through some topics or article rather than just surfing through Google search means that he/she doesn't value this forum. For me AI in this case ChatGPT is just a much faster search engine, for example one of the hottest topic recently, 'Trump winning US Election' I can do google search or ask AI the same thing 'What is Trump policies related to Bitcoin and how it will affect Bitcoin?', if I do google search, I will need to pick among dozens of articles and news with their clickbait headlines, read the whole article, make a conlusion about the main point of the articles, go to the next 5-6 articles, repeat, until I found enough resource, then rewrite and rephrase those conclusions and main points, add my opinion or make a counter argument, then after at least 45-60 mins I have a post.

But with ChatGPT, I can ask the same thing, GPT will make me a long paragraphs of curated articles from google search, and answers my questions, then I can pick some points that I think is relevant, check on google about those specific points to verify, rephrase and rewrite them, add my opinion or counter argument, I can make the post in just 20-30 mins.

I mean value this forum and my account, but I also value my time.

All that being said, if what I have done as I explained above is violating any forum rules, then maybe I deserve to be tagged.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I mean value this forum and my account, but I also value my time.

All that being said, if what I have done as I explained above is violating any forum rules, then maybe I deserve to be tagged.

Based on your explanation, can we understand that valuing your time does not mean simply visiting a forum, which involves regular communication on topics that you understand well, but as a duty to do something? In this case, can we understand that you value your time so much that you do not read the forum out of interest in it, but rather prepare your posts to fulfill your subscription quota? Will this be any different from people communicating with a robot if you purposefully prepare answers from the Internet that you should know and not pull out of the network?

It is easy to say that AI tools cannot add a human opinion, but a person differs from a robot in that he can add phrases like "I am sure," "I think," etc.; in other words, not just copy robotic dry texts, but humanize them a little.

And yes, we can understand that here you are wasting your time. We may even begin to respect you and applaud you for “wasting” your time on us.

[icalical]

I mean value this forum and my account, but I also value my time.

All that being said, if what I have done as I explained above is violating any forum rules, then maybe I deserve to be tagged.

Based on your explanation, can we understand that valuing your time does not mean simply visiting a forum, which involves regular communication on topics that you understand well, but as a duty to do something? In this case, can we understand that you value your time so much that you do not read the forum out of interest in it, but rather prepare your posts to fulfill your subscription quota? Will this be any different from people communicating with a robot if you purposefully prepare answers from the Internet that you should know and not pull out of the network?

It is easy to say that AI tools cannot add a human opinion, but a person differs from a robot in that he can add phrases like "I am sure," "I think," etc.; in other words, not just copy robotic dry texts, but humanize them a little.

And yes, we can understand that here you are wasting your time. We may even begin to respect you and applaud you for “wasting” your time on us.

How could you come up with that conclusion? I simply said I value my time so I prefer ChatGPT rather than traditional googling,

Who said that I don't read more than I write? lol, I don't reply to all the posts I read.

You are just jumping to conclusion and putting word in my mouth

[Lucius]

~snip~
But with ChatGPT, I can ask the same thing, GPT will make me a long paragraphs of curated articles from google search, and answers my questions, then I can pick some points that I think is relevant, check on google about those specific points to verify, rephrase and rewrite them, add my opinion or counter argument, I can make the post in just 20-30 mins.

To me, what you are doing is completely unnatural, although I understand that you consider it completely normal because it saves time - but at the same time, you do not realize that you are using artificial intelligence that shapes your communication on the forum more than you want to admit. What you're actually admitting is that you're actually paraphrasing AI responses, and that's what AI detectors have discovered.

I mean value this forum and my account, but I also value my time.
All that being said, if what I have done as I explained above is violating any forum rules, then maybe I deserve to be tagged.

I also value my time, and I'm not an excellent English speaker, and yet it doesn't occur to me to use AI or to have to spend hours searching for something on the internet in order to be able to write something meaningful on the forum. I don't know if you deserve a tag or not, given that you defend some positions that are unacceptable to me - but given that I am not in DT 1/2 at the moment, my tag would not mean anything important.

[Ultegra134]

The altcoin section is notorious for token spammers with AI, hopefully this number has decreased the past few months, but here's another one.

User: Floratap02

Post 1.

As the decentralized finance  landscape continues to grow, we're seeing the rise of innovative protocols that aim to transform traditional lending models. One project that has piqued my interest is Morpho Protocol.

Morpho Protocol is a decentralized lending platform that utilizes a unique blend of liquidity pools and peer-to-peer matching engines. This strategy fosters a more efficient, flexible, and community-oriented lending experience.

Central to Morpho Protocol is its governance token, MORPHO. This token empowers holders to engage in protocol governance, ensuring that the community has a voice in shaping the protocol's future.

I would love to hear your opinions on Morpho Protocol and its approach to decentralized lending. What do you see as the potential advantages and disadvantages of this model? How does it stack up against other decentralized lending protocols in the market?

Let's dive into this discussion

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 96% AI
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Post 2.

As we navigate the ever-changing world of cryptocurrency, it's important to keep up with new and emerging projects. In this thread, I want to introduce you to Koma Inu ($KOMA), a community-driven meme coin built on the BSC.

Background

Koma Inu is a relatively new project that has been gaining attention in the crypto space. With a strong emphasis on community engagement and transparency, the project aims to foster a loyal and dedicated group of supporters.

Key Features

1. Community-Driven: The community-driven nature of Koma Inu is reflected in its high liquidity and steady trading activity. The project’s team actively interacts with the community, providing regular updates on developments and future plans.

2. Transparency: The team behind Koma Inu is dedicated to transparency, ensuring that the community stays informed about the project's progress and upcoming initiatives.

3. Technological Innovation: Koma Inu's team is committed to continuously enhancing the platform, making sure it remains competitive and secure.

As we delve into the Koma Inu project, it's crucial to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks. Some of the key advantages of Koma Inu include:

- A strong and engaged community

- High liquidity and steady trading activity

- A focus on transparency and technological advancement

However, like any investment, there are also risks to consider. These include:

- Market volatility and price fluctuations

- Regulatory uncertainty and possible changes in the cryptocurrency landscape

- Potential security risks and vulnerabilities


As we move forward, it's important to keep the conversation going and explore the potential benefits and challenges of Koma Inu. I invite you to share your thoughts and insights.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake

Post 3.

I want to share an exciting new cryptocurrency project that I believe deserves attention. CHEYENNE is a community driven token that operates on the Solana blockchain. This initiative is inspired by the story of Cheyenne, the first animal rescued by P'Nuts Freedom Farm, a nonprofit sanctuary dedicated to animal welfare.

The main goal of the token is to support P'Nuts Freedom Farm's mission while fostering a culture of compassion and kindness. Currently, the project is in its early phases, and the community plays a vital role in guiding its future.

Here are some important details about the CHEYENNE token:

Token Name: Cheyenne 

Ticker: CHEYENNE 

Blockchain: Solana 

Total Supply: 989,998,216 CHEYENNE 


I look forward to hearing your thoughts on CHEYENNE

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 82% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake

Post 4.

I wanted to share some exciting news about MEMEFI, a project that has been generating a lot of buzz in the crypto community. After months of anticipation, MEMEFI is finally listing on some exchanges like BingX in some hours now.

For those who may not be familiar, MEMEFI is a multi-function token that powers the MemeFi ecosystem, which combines gaming, social media, and cryptocurrency. The project has a strong focus on community engagement and participation, with a fixed supply of 10 billion tokens.

The listing of MEMEFI is a major milestone for the project, and many people are eagerly waiting to see how it performs in the market. I came across an event hosted by BingX, with a total reward pool of 460,000 MEMEFI tokens, is also generating a lot of excitement.

What are your thoughts on MEMEFI? Are you waiting for the listing? Share your opinions and let's discuss

---

Note: I'm not affiliated with MEMEFI or BingX, just a curious crypto enthusiast.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% Fake

[Ultegra134]

Another user, member of the MonkeyTilt campaign of @icopress, using AI to reply in simple posts anyone could reply themselves. He replied to a topic of mine, what an idiot. His AI usage is quite noticeable and I'm quite surprised he hasn't been caught yet.

User: Text

Post 1.

A small disclaimer on the site might help clarify that while trends can improve decision-making, they don’t override the inherent house edge.

The idea of a tutorial is spot on, especially for newcomers who might not be familiar with terms like "median multipliers" or "expected hit rates." A simple, interactive guide or FAQ section could go a long way in helping users understand how to interpret and apply the data.

I think showcasing some practical examples, like what "hot" and "cold" looked like in the last 100 rounds, could make the data more relatable. It might also help users visualize the value of your analysis.

Copyleaks: AI Content detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Undetectable: Your content is detected as written by AI

Post 2.

It’s frustrating how these incidents can undermine trust in platforms. Staying cautious and reporting suspicious messages and websites is a proactive way to protect the broader community.

You’re handling this well, stay safe, and thanks for raising awareness!

Copyleaks: AI Content detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Undetectable: Your content is detected as written by AI

Post 3.

Purchasing tokens pre-listing can offer significant profit potential, especially if the project gains traction after the listing. The downside is the lack of guarantees, it might not even make it to a reputable exchange or gain traction, leaving you with illiquid or low-value tokens.

Post-listing, you’re more likely to trade in a liquid market with a clearer view of market sentiment. However, the price might have already pumped, meaning you could miss out on the early adopter profits. It’s also important to remember that not all tokens pump after listing, some even decline due to early investors taking profits.

Copyleaks: AI Content detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Quilbot: 100% AI
Originality: 100% AI

Post 4.

Thanks for sharing this, it’s fascinating to look back on Bitcoin’s early days and the unique ways it was introduced to the mainstream. The Bitcoin Bowl is definitely one of those standout moments where crypto started to make its mark beyond the tech crowd.

RC Robocoin was one of the first Bitcoin ATM companies. They launched in 2013 and were a big deal for introducing physical Bitcoin transactions to everyday people. Unfortunately, they didn’t last too long, with operations ceasing in 2015.

The D Las Vegas does claim to be the first casino to accept Bitcoin, but I think there’s a bit of context worth noting. From what I recall, their Bitcoin acceptance was initially limited to non-gambling activities like restaurants and gift shops. I’m not sure if they implemented Bitcoin gaming directly. It would be interesting to hear if someone can confirm or challenge that claim!

Copyleaks: AI Content detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Originality: 100% AI

[igebotz]

Is using Ai and then finding a way to disguise the posts from looking like it is from an Ai not enough hardwork for those who do that? Why can they not keep to their own writing style instead of passing through all this Ai thing. Anyone who is lazy or lacks confidence to make their own posts and contributions from their brain should not be enrolled in a campaign. They do no deserve it.

Low esteem, low IQ, faking to be who you're not, seeking public validation, fitting in where you don't belong, and forcing knowledge are just a few of the million reasons why people use AI to communicate. Elon musk and China AI will take our jobs before 2030, and it's already happening on this forum.

Update - Legentbtc has been removed from our signature campaign, our mission of zero AI tolerance continues at Stake.

[FinneysTrueVision]

User: albert0bsd

This is a user who is knowledgeable in technical subjects, however, when it comes to gambling, their knowledge is far more limited, so they resort to using artificial intelligence in order to meet their campaign quota. The irony is that they made a thread, with the help of AI, to complain about campaign quotas creating gambling shitposts.
 
Post 1:

Your post highlights key considerations about separating personal emotions from betting and addressing ethical boundaries. Betting against your preferred candidate or team may feel counterintuitive, but rational analysis often leads to better outcomes. Gambling is about logic, not allegiance.

When it comes to events involving human suffering, like wars or natural disasters, many draw the line. Profiting from potential loss of life is morally contentious and desensitizing for some, making it a personal decision whether to participate in such markets.

As 2024 ends, betting markets may shift focus to 2025. Staying informed is important, but so is ensuring your bets align with your values. Gambling should remain within ethical and emotional boundaries you're comfortable with.

Sapling.AI - 100% Fake
Originality.ai - 100% Likely AI
Copyleaks - AI Content detected

Your perspective is well articulated, and the analogy with poker is particularly apt for understanding sports betting dynamics. Betting success indeed relies on having an analytical edge over the collective opinion of other players, much like choosing weaker opponents in poker to maximize your chances of winning.

The role of the bookmaker is often misunderstood. As the quote explains, their primary function is not to predict the outcome but to balance opinions and money flow, ensuring they minimize their own risk. In this sense, they act as brokers, merely facilitating the wagers rather than being the opponent. Their commission, while reducing overall player winnings, is the cost of using their platform, much like transaction fees in financial markets.

To gain a consistent edge, it's essential to focus on better analysis, deeper insights, and identifying inefficiencies in public perception. Just as in poker, success often comes down to preparation, patience, and knowing when and where to place your bets. By treating sports betting as a strategic game against other bettors rather than a gamble against the bookmaker, you can develop a more sustainable and informed approach.

Copyleaks - AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai - 100% Fake
Originality.ai - 100% Likely AI

Thanks for sharing your insights! Comparing the dice 98% strategy to Plinko's 16-row low-risk setup highlights a key difference: while dice offers quick wins, its all or nothing losses can be devastating. Plinko, with only 19.89% of outcomes as losses (0.5x), provides better longevity, making it a more sustainable option for players aiming to maximize wagering.

That said, as you and Agbamoni noted, gambling outcomes rely on luck. Even over millions of rolls or balls, probabilities don’t always align perfectly. Your suggestion of betting 0.05% of your bankroll is excellent for reducing risk and staying in the game longer.

Ultimately, strategies like this should be approached cautiously. Always treat gambling as entertainment, use funds you can afford to lose, and avoid chasing losses. Sharing such strategies adds value, but realistic expectations are key.

Originality.ai - 100% Likely AI
GPTZero.me - 100% probability AI generated
Sapling.ai - 100% Fake

[Ultegra134]

User: albert0bsd

Good catch, it's straight up AI, copy pasted from ChatGPT, with no changes made. I understand he could be struggling to meet his quota, but he didn't even make the effort to mask his AI, something we've seen quite a few times with users on signature campaigns.

I'd also report any of his posts that have AI content.

Edit: Tagging the campaign manager @Little Mouse

[hilariousandco]

User: albert0bsd

Good catch, it's straight up AI, copy pasted from ChatGPT, with no changes made. I understand he could be struggling to meet his quota, but he didn't even make the effort to mask his AI, something we've seen quite a few times with users on signature campaigns.

I'd also report any of his posts that have AI content.

You should report all these people straight to the campaign managers. I'm sure most reputable managers and campaigns won't want to pay for these sorts of posts.

[Ultegra134]

You should report all these people straight to the campaign managers. I'm sure most reputable managers and campaigns won't want to pay for these sorts of posts.

I was just about to tag @Little Mouse when you pointed it out, I'm hoping he sees this, even though it's quite late already; he has been paid for the previous week. At least this will prevent him from being paid in the future and reserve his spot for someone who's interested in actually putting some effort in their posts.

[igebotz]

You should report all these people straight to the campaign managers. I'm sure most reputable managers and campaigns won't want to pay for these sorts of posts.

I was just about to tag @Little Mouse when you pointed it out, I'm hoping he sees this, even though it's quite late already; he has been paid for the previous week. At least this will prevent him from being paid in the future and reserve his spot for someone who's interested in actually putting some effort in their posts.

Oops yeah that didn't age well. What pushed him to the gambling board when he was comfortable making posts from his brain on the technical board though. 

[Ultegra134]

Oops yeah that didn't age well. What pushed him to the gambling board when he was comfortable making posts from his brain on the technical board though. 

Wow, he's banned? I'm surprised because I haven't seen ranked up accounts banned for AI, unless it wasn't announced in the other cases of Yatsan or legendbtc.