AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Ultegra134]

Here's a pathetic attempt to look knowledgeable and ask for money, when a few years ago, he was begging to send him some Bitcoin because he was ill and mentally retarded. His words, not mine. His account must have recently woken up and chose AI in an attempt to make some Bitcoin.

Please Give me 1 btc bc1qskp2hhaflujt4teqmnnzazjwllr04sg95vxw00 I am not a fraud, but I cannot even earn that much money in my entire life, because I am an idiot and mentally retarded.

User: Desyationer

Post 1.

There are, indeed, people in this thread who relentlessly criticize all sorts of mad ideas, like stern judges armed with cold reason. But I, truly, prefer another path: I read them all, these fantastic, daring thoughts, for in every word, even the most absurd, a spark may flash—so necessary, so precious—what if? What if, amidst this chaos, I catch a glimpse of truth, see the path leading to the coveted, to the golden key? And I dare say, I am not alone in this. There are others who eagerly embrace these ideas, even the most preposterous ones, for in them lies hope, in them—discovery! Only the dry skeptics, slaves to bare logic, those who swear allegiance to brute-force key searching alone—only they remain indifferent to this thrill, to this faith.

Here’s my small contribution – a script for keyhuntcuda that allows splitting ranges into any number of parts, processing them in random order for 6 seconds each, and saving progress on exit to resume from the same point on the next launch. In this example, range 68 is divided into 30,000 parts, but you can edit these parameters in a text editor: adjust the number of subranges, change the search range, modify the random selection method, and set the processing time for each segment. If this script proves useful and someone, like me, experiences the joy of finding the "golden key," feel free to message me – I'll create a BTC wallet and share the address for any tokens of appreciation. 😊

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated

Post 2.

It really does seem strange to spend so many resources, including thousands of video cards, on ranges 67 and 68, where the return is not substantial and risky. After all, one could focus on ranges 135-140 with the same expenses and gain significantly more. Such actions virtually exclude any chance for luck for simple, poor people with a single inexpensive video card. It's like the saying: neither for oneself nor for the people. First, deprive the poor of any chances without gaining much benefit for oneself, and then move on to ranges 135-140.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 90% Probability AI Generated

Post 3.

But could it be that there exists that fateful key, one that holds untold riches yet is doomed to remain nothing more than an illusory promise, a fleeting mirage in the desert of human hopes?

And here it is—the moment of truth! I enter this cursed key into the Electrum wallet, and—oh, God!—the synchronization completes, and there, before my very eyes, lie fifty bitcoins! What is this? Fate? A miracle? Or, perhaps, the cruel mockery of some unseen force? All that is trivial and wretched fades before this revelation, before this grand, all-consuming vision of freedom. I am rich! I am liberated from the burden of daily toil, from the endless struggle for a piece of bread! Now my life shall belong only to joy, to art, to the loftiest aspirations of the soul!

But then comes the final, decisive step: I attempt to withdraw this fortune, to transfer it to my Binance exchange wallet. Ah, how sweet even the anticipation of it! Five million dollars, and I can already see them before me, feel their power, their undeniable reality… But what is this? Why does the transaction refuse to move? Why does it freeze in agonizing limbo, like a condemned man awaiting his sentence? And then, after long, unbearable minutes, it arrives—the error. The error, inevitable, indifferent, cold as fate itself.

And now, what remains? Was this key granted to me by destiny only to prove the futility of human hopes? Or is it a merciless jest, its very essence lying in eternal temptation, in an unreachable promise forever beyond one's grasp? And, at last, does such a cursed, illusory key truly exist somewhere in a hidden corner of the world, available to all yet possessed by none?..

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated

[Free Market Capitalist]

Louce

The main goal of a Bitcoin investor is to invest for the long term. However, some people may not understand the value of their Bitcoin investments and end up spending their money on things that won't bring them profits in the long run.
As we've seen, Bitcoin has proven to be a good investment over time. Even when the market is down, some investors use this opportunity to buy more Bitcoins and increase their holdings. Only those who don't understand Bitcoin would sell out of fear.
New investors should focus on buying more Bitcoins instead of spending their money on unnecessary things. The people we surround ourselves with can influence our investment decisions, and fear can lead to selling at the wrong time.

To avoid making costly mistakes, you can conder,
 Keeping separate funds for expenses and emergencies
 Seeking financial advice from those who have been in bitcoin investments for long.  Making informed investment decisions
Even though everyone must make their own decisions, but being informed and patient can help you succeed in the long run.

GPTzero 90%Probability AI generated

https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector 100% AI

I recently joined this forum to learn more about cryptocurrency. At first, I was reading and browsing through the forum a lot, trying to understand the concepts. I had so many questions and taught about creatin new topics to ask, but then I noticed the search bar at the top of the forum. I tried using it and found that most of my questions had already been answered in previous threads.

Since then, it's been easy for me to find answers to my questions without needing to create new topics. I wanted to share this tip with other new members who may have questions but aren't sure where to start. You can create a new topic to ask your question, but I've found that searching through old threads provides a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.

Think of the forum as a resource where almost everything you can think of has already been discussed. Using the search bar can get you accurate and helpful answers to your questions.
 

GPTzero 100%Probability AI generated

https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector 100% AI

[Louce]

Louce

The main goal of a Bitcoin investor is to invest for the long term. However, some people may not understand the value of their Bitcoin investments and end up spending their money on things that won't bring them profits in the long run.
As we've seen, Bitcoin has proven to be a good investment over time. Even when the market is down, some investors use this opportunity to buy more Bitcoins and increase their holdings. Only those who don't understand Bitcoin would sell out of fear.
New investors should focus on buying more Bitcoins instead of spending their money on unnecessary things. The people we surround ourselves with can influence our investment decisions, and fear can lead to selling at the wrong time.

To avoid making costly mistakes, you can conder,
 Keeping separate funds for expenses and emergencies
 Seeking financial advice from those who have been in bitcoin investments for long.  Making informed investment decisions
Even though everyone must make their own decisions, but being informed and patient can help you succeed in the long run.

GPTzero 90%Probability AI generated

https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector 100% AI

I recently joined this forum to learn more about cryptocurrency. At first, I was reading and browsing through the forum a lot, trying to understand the concepts. I had so many questions and taught about creatin new topics to ask, but then I noticed the search bar at the top of the forum. I tried using it and found that most of my questions had already been answered in previous threads.

Since then, it's been easy for me to find answers to my questions without needing to create new topics. I wanted to share this tip with other new members who may have questions but aren't sure where to start. You can create a new topic to ask your question, but I've found that searching through old threads provides a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.

Think of the forum as a resource where almost everything you can think of has already been discussed. Using the search bar can get you accurate and helpful answers to your questions.
 

GPTzero 100%Probability AI generated

https://copyleaks.com/ai-content-detector 100% AI

Hello sir or ma, can you please reconsider this? I swear I had not post with an AI, something should be wrong somewhere. Others said I should ask you about the number on my account so you can consider removing it. You can go through my other post, I have not written a single one of them using an AI. It's just not fair and I don't even know how to prove myself at this point.

[nutildah]

I've noticed a new trend emerging among AI spammers, and that is to prompt the bot to generate only lowercase text.

Here's an example from blomen.

As is:

i see a lot of negative comments about bitcoin lately. there are too many people in panic mode. i keep seeing questions like, "are we in a bear market?" "is this the end?" if you’re thinking this way, i want you to stop and reflect for a moment. how many times has bitcoin surprised us? how many times have we heard people say, "it’s over" or "don’t waste your time" just because they didn’t believe in it?

bitcoin hasn’t just surprised and proven people wrong a couple of times—it has done so repeatedly, forcing skeptics to swallow their words. those who doubted it in the past now regret not buying or panic-selling at the wrong time. while those who saw bitcoin as a get-rich-quick scheme have struggled with it, the ones who ignored the comparisons to endlessly printed fiat currencies like the usd have always managed to make better financial decisions.

guys, i’m telling you, i believe in bitcoin so much that even if everything i’ve saved becomes 10 times less valuable one day, i’ll still be proud. this isn’t a gamble, it’s not a get-rich-quick scheme—it’s a change. and i want to be part of that change. if it fails, i’d rather see my money disappear as part of a revolution than sit in a currency that’s endlessly printed without backing. i can accept that.

there will always be those who are impatient, chasing quick profits. but in the long run, the real winners are the ones who truly understand what bitcoin stands for. patience over panic, knowledge over fear, conviction over doubt.

bitcoin is here to stay. what matters is that we stay with it.

Sapling: 0.0% Fake
Copyleaks: 0% AI-generated

After capitalization is corrected:

I see a lot of negative comments about bitcoin lately. There are too many people in panic mode. I keep seeing questions like, "are we in a bear market?" "is this the end?" If you’re thinking this way, I want you to stop and reflect for a moment. How many times has bitcoin surprised us? How many times have we heard people say, "it’s over" or "don’t waste your time" just because they didn’t believe in it?

Bitcoin hasn’t just surprised and proven people wrong a couple of times—it has done so repeatedly, forcing skeptics to swallow their words. Those who doubted it in the past now regret not buying or panic-selling at the wrong time. While those who saw bitcoin as a get-rich-quick scheme have struggled with it, the ones who ignored the comparisons to endlessly printed fiat currencies like the USD have always managed to make better financial decisions.

Guys, I’m telling you, I believe in bitcoin so much that even if everything I’ve saved becomes 10 times less valuable one day, I’ll still be proud. This isn’t a gamble, it’s not a get-rich-quick scheme—it’s a change. And I want to be part of that change. If it fails, I’d rather see my money disappear as part of a revolution than sit in a currency that’s endlessly printed without backing. I can accept that.

There will always be those who are impatient, chasing quick profits. But in the long run, the real winners are the ones who truly understand what bitcoin stands for. Patience over panic, knowledge over fear, conviction over doubt.

Bitcoin is here to stay. What matters is that we stay with it.

Sapling: 94.4% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated

Here's another example where I fixed the capitalization:

Recently, I’ve been seeing a lot of gambling strategies in entertainment-focused posts on social media.

These strategies are mostly for games like mines, limbo, or dice, where we set the odds and make the decisions. They usually involve increasing the bet after a loss. The person making the video demonstrates the strategy for a short time, showing that it can make money.

They usually start off well. With a classic strategy, you can probably increase your money by around 10-20%. At first glance, everything seems great, giving you the hope that you'll double or triple your money and walk away.

But as you slowly win, a problem suddenly appears. Your strategy of increasing the bet after every loss drags you into a downward spiral. You just can't seem to win, even a little. And in the end, your exponentially growing bets will likely drain your entire balance.

This is the part that video creators never mention. When losing streaks last longer than expected, you can’t stop playing (because you’d lose your previous balance), and you can’t prevent your money from running out either.

All of these strategies will end the same way in the long run.In a game where the RTP isn’t fair, losing is only a matter of time. No one can beat the casino.

My question to you is: have you ever tried any of these strategies before? Were you successful?

Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated

(this post probably won't be deleted as its the first post of a long topic, but it should... losing their posts would encourage other posters to think twice before replying to a bot).

Here's one more for good measure, with corrected capitalization:

If you're going to place a bet on your favorite team, there are two possibilities.  

1. Betting on your team to win.  

If you do this, you'll celebrate every goal with pure joy. Your team scores, and your bet's chances of winning increase. It's a win-win situation. But there are risks. If your team concedes a goal, you have two reasons to be upset.  

2. Betting on the opposing team to win.  

If you’re doing this, I’d say you’re playing it safe. You can celebrate every goal in the match. If your team scores, you celebrate for them. If they concede, you celebrate for your bet. Whether you feel happier about money or your team depends on which one matters more to you.

Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 69% Probability AI Generated

One other thing to note is that this person posts a lot in Turkish, which could theoretically be an excuse to use AI for proof-reading of translating posts, but then telling it to decapitalize everything suggests AI is doing the heavy lifting.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Hello sir or ma, can you please reconsider this? I swear I had not post with an AI, something should be wrong somewhere. Others said I should ask you about the number on my account so you can consider removing it. You can go through my other post, I have not written a single one of them using an AI. It's just not fair and I don't even know how to prove myself at this point.

Reconsider what? I've even reported you for plagiarism and I see that it has been marked as good but you might have not been banned. When I leave a feedback unless there is an obvious error I don't change it for some time. So if you haven't been banned, the only way for me to change my tag would be if a long time has passed and I don't see any more cases of plagiarism.

Trying to convince me that I have made a mistake is not the right way to go because I myself run my posts through AI detectors and they do not come out with those AI percentages (they may come out 10 or 15% at most when they have been 100% written by me but most of the time they come out as 0%).

No one should be surprised by this. With my defense of the (good) use of AI on the forum I'm sure there are people watching:

This sounds a lot like the infamous user who was very determined to sneak in plagiarised content with as little attribution as he could get away with.

I am not saying that suchmoon is checking my posts but since he is not the only one who thinks that way I am sure that at least some of my posts are being checked.

I've noticed a new trend emerging among AI spammers, and that is to prompt the bot to generate only lowercase text.

They probably do this quickly and easily by pasting the text into a Word document and using shift+F3.

[Ultegra134]

I've noticed a new trend emerging among AI spammers, and that is to prompt the bot to generate only lowercase text.

One other thing to note is that this person posts a lot in Turkish, which could theoretically be an excuse to use AI for proof-reading of translating posts, but then telling it to decapitalize everything suggests AI is doing the heavy lifting.

Good catch! From what I've noticed, GPTZero has advanced quite a lot and is able to detect such modifications on the AI posts. It also had a paraphraser feature in beta, that detects if a post shows signs of being "humanized". The first post that I checked, even without fixing the capitalization, appears 100% AI Generated.

Edit: Reporting a user promoting their casino, even though they don't even make the effort to reply themselves. That's shady work if you ask me.

User: BETMODE

Post 1.

Thanks for the suggestion! Running exclusive tournaments on Bitcointalk sounds like a great idea. A slot multiplier contest or a highest odds sports bet challenge could definitely bring some excitement!

We’ll check out the Games and Rounds board for inspiration while making sure to create something fresh and unique. Of course, we’ll keep everything within the forum rules. Appreciate the heads-up and the link—definitely helps!

If you have any other ideas or formats you’d like to see, feel free to share. Always open to making things more fun and engaging for the community! 🚀

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated

Post 2.

Haha, yeah! Some of these numbers are wild—definitely takes some serious grinding to come out on top.

We totally get where Panjul07 is coming from, and adding some sort of consolation prize is something we've been considering. At the same time, the "winner-takes-all" format really fuels the competition, which keeps the race exciting and encourages players to push for the top spot.

That said, we’re always looking for ways to improve. We’ll definitely take this feedback into account as we fine-tune our upcoming competitions. Appreciate you sharing your thoughts! 🙌

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 90% Probability AI Generated

Post 3.

There are always two sides to the coin. On one hand, having a single grand prize—like $500 for first place—can create an intense, winner-takes-all competition where players push themselves to be the absolute best. The exclusivity of the prize can drive engagement, as everyone knows there’s only one winner, making the stakes feel even higher.

On the other hand, offering rewards for second or third place can keep more players engaged throughout the competition. When only one person wins, some might feel discouraged early on if they realize they can’t catch up. Having multiple prize tiers can give more participants a reason to stay in the game and keep trying.

Last Friday, we witnessed an intense head-to-head battle for first place! Two players went all in, pushing their limits in a race to the top. The winner placed an incredible 47,435 bets, while the runner-up was right on their heels with 45,096 bets—just shy of claiming victory. It was a true display of determination and competitive spirit!

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated

[lovesmayfamilis]

emileen

Recently woken up with a ten year registration date. All four little posts are written by AI.

Interesting discussion! While crypto has potential, mass adoption and stability are key for it to become a survival necessity. Fiat still dominates, but diversifying into crypto as a hedge against future uncertainties seems wise. The future is unpredictable, and being open to both traditional and digital currencies could be the best strategy.

quillbot.com  100%
Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Great points! Bitcoin's resilience and pioneering role are undeniable. However, altcoins like Ethereum bring innovations such as smart contracts and dApps, expanding blockchain use cases. I see them more as complementary rather than direct threats, contributing to the ecosystem's growth and diversity.

While Bitcoin's dominance is strong, the evolving landscape means we should stay open to how altcoins might shape the future. Diversity and competition can drive further innovation and adoption.

quillbot.com  100%
Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

It's great to see so many different perspectives on Bitcoin's safety here. I agree that understanding the technology and taking proper precautions is crucial.

For those new to Bitcoin, I'd recommend exploring reputable resources like Investopedia or CoinDesk to learn more about wallets, private keys, and security best practices.

quillbot.com  100%
Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Absolutely, quality is key, especially for newcomers. Well-crafted posts help establish your reputation and ensure your contributions are valued. Merits are earned through meaningful, high-quality content, so always aim to enhance the substance of your posts. This approach not only benefits you but also enriches the community.

quillbot.com  100%
Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

[Dark.Look]

User: jstyler

I'm no expert, but I've had some experience with blockchain issues. Have you tried contacting Blockchain.com support directly? They might be able to help you recover your balance or provide more insight into what's going on. I've heard their support team is pretty responsive. Maybe you can also try searching for similar issues on their forum or Reddit, see if anyone else has had a similar problem and how they resolved it.

undetectable.ai: 99%
zerogpt: 99%

I think I get what you mean, Dewi. It's like, why would someone be unhappy about winning a small amount when they could've won a lot more? I mean, I've seen people get so attached to the idea of winning big that they forget the whole point of gambling is to have fun and take a chance. And yeah, the fear of losing is a real thing, but it's weird when it starts to outweigh the potential reward. Maybe it's just human nature to crave more, but at the same time, isn't that just a form of irrationality? Like, why not just bet responsibly and enjoy the ride, rather than getting all worked up about the outcome?

quillbot: 100%
undetectable: 99%
zerogpt: 95%

Congrats on your 1st birthday Hoosat Network, wishing you many more milestones to come! I'm curious about your approach to securing Proof of Work Integrity, can you elaborate more on how it protects against Grover's Algorithm? Also, I've noticed you have a 360-block pre-mining phase, did you consider the potential implications of this on decentralization and fairness in the early stages of your network?

undetectable: 99%
zerogpt: 90%

i feel you on this one, guy, i've been in that same boat before, thinking crypto was a get rich quick scheme, but then i got in, did my research, studied the charts, and slowly but surely, i started to get the hang of it. now, i'm not saying it's easy, but i do think it's worth it. the thing is, most people don't put in the time and effort to really understand how crypto works, they just jump in, hoping to make a quick buck. but the truth is, making money in crypto takes patience, persistence, and a willingness to learn. so yeah, change the title, make it honest, something like "making money from crypto: it's not as easy as it looks" or something like that. that way, people will know what they're getting into. and btw, i love the investopedia link, that's a great resource for newbies.

undetectable: 99%
zerogpt: 100%

[memehunter]

Aorta4991

That’s a fair take. Athlete-backed tokens have the potential to bridge mainstream audiences with crypto, especially when they offer real utility beyond speculation. If structured properly perhaps with governance features, fan engagement rewards, or real-world perks and they could create long-term value rather than just short-term hype.

That said, transparency is key. Many celebrity-backed tokens (MELANIA, TRUMP & KAMALA) in the past have struggled due to vague roadmaps or unclear tokenomics. If more footballers or athletes enter this space, it’ll be crucial to see whether these projects are driven by genuine community engagement or just quick financial gains.

It’s an interesting trend to watch, keeping eye on the on chart (via BingX).

Stealthwriter AI: 83.33%
Origin Gptzero:   100%
Sapling AI: 98.5%

Imagine casually browsing the market and spotting a token named after your favorite sports legend. Would you jump in out of pure fandom, or would you analyze it like any other trade?

We’ve seen everything from meme coins to serious blockchain projects tied to big names, and now STAR10, linked to Ronaldinho, is drawing attention. With its recent listing, it raises the age-old question does a famous name actually add value to a token?

A strong brand can spark instant hype, leading to early trading spikes. But hype alone doesn’t sustain a market. Without real utility, liquidity, or long-term demand, these tokens can lose momentum just as quickly as they gain it.

Then there’s the collector’s appeal. Some traders buy in just for the novelty of owning a digital asset tied to their idol. Others take a more analytical approach focusing on fundamentals, team, tokenomics, and market trends, rather than just the name.

So, what’s your take? If your favorite athlete launched a token tomorrow, would you trade it, hold it, or steer clear?

Copyleaks: 100%
Sapling AI: 100%
Origin Gptzero: 100%

In general, AI) tokens are digital assets designed to power AI-driven projects, applications, and services within the blockchain ecosystem. These tokens often facilitate transactions, grant governance rights, or provide access to specific AI functionalities.

The Athene Network (ATN) is a recent entrant in this space, the broader AI token market has been experiencing growth, with a total market capitalization of approximately $34.32 billion and a 24-hour trading volume of $6.19 billion. This surge is partly attributed to increased interest in AI technologies and significant events, such as Nvidia’s anticipated strong Q4 earnings report, which have bolstered optimism in AI-related sectors.
Meanwhile, ATN is trading at approximately $0.1398, with a 24-hour trading volume of around $1.63 million. (source: BingX chart) so investing in emerging tokens like ATN offers potential opportunities but also comes with inherent risks due to market volatility and the nascent stage of such projects.

Copyleaks: 100%
Sapling AI: 100%
Origin Gptzero: 85%

[Shishir99]

Should I report if someone used AI once and they are just a newbie with less than 5 posts in total? They did not use AI to write all their posts, but they used Ai to generate one response so far. Since they used it once, there is a possibility they will use AI again in the future. Since they did not write enough posts yet and did not used AI for all their posts, I guess it would be best to wait and see if they use it again in the future. What do you guys think about it?

[Awaklara]

Should I report if someone used AI once and they are just a newbie with less than 5 posts in total? They did not use AI to write all their posts, but they used Ai to generate one response so far. Since they used it once, there is a possibility they will use AI again in the future. Since they did not write enough posts yet and did not used AI for all their posts, I guess it would be best to wait and see if they use it again in the future. What do you guys think about it?

In my opinion, still report posts with AI, even if it's just one post. Then report to the moderator, the post will be deleted and when the user of the account realizes it or with a neutral tag left, he will not post with AI again.
I checked several accounts with a member rank or higher that were proven to post with AI and have been tagged, finally posting normally again, with a human brain.

[Ultegra134]

Should I report if someone used AI once and they are just a newbie with less than 5 posts in total? They did not use AI to write all their posts, but they used Ai to generate one response so far. Since they used it once, there is a possibility they will use AI again in the future. Since they did not write enough posts yet and did not used AI for all their posts, I guess it would be best to wait and see if they use it again in the future. What do you guys think about it?

If I were you, I'd monitor him and see if his next posts are also AI. If so, report him, if he doesn't continue, I'd leave him be and check back on him after some time has passed.

Edit: As Awaklara already mentioned, don't forget to report the post so it gets deleted. He might get the message and not try it again.

[nutildah]

User: jstyler

Assuredly an AI spammer but please report the posts as well so they'll be deleted. When hitting the Report to Moderator button, I usually write "AI spammer: (URL of your post in this thread)" and that does the trick. Most of the time.

Should I report if someone used AI once and they are just a newbie with less than 5 posts in total? They did not use AI to write all their posts, but they used Ai to generate one response so far. Since they used it once, there is a possibility they will use AI again in the future. Since they did not write enough posts yet and did not used AI for all their posts, I guess it would be best to wait and see if they use it again in the future. What do you guys think about it?

Fair question. I would wait until they have at least 3 posts that are clearly AI-generated. I suppose it doesn't matter so much if someone just does it once or twice. Making a habit out of it is where it becomes bad, for everyone.

[blomen]

I've noticed a new trend emerging among AI spammers, and that is to prompt the bot to generate only lowercase text.

Here's an example from blomen.

the reason why my writings are in lower case is not to avoid ai detectors. you've seen my writings in the Turkish section, this is the way I've been writing for a long time. it's just because I'm used to writing like this, my intention is not what you are talking about.

i see a lot of negative comments about bitcoin lately. there are too many people in panic mode. i keep seeing questions like, "are we in a bear market?" "is this the end?" if you’re thinking this way, i want you to stop and reflect for a moment. how many times has bitcoin surprised us? how many times have we heard people say, "it’s over" or "don’t waste your time" just because they didn’t believe in it?

bitcoin hasn’t just surprised and proven people wrong a couple of times—it has done so repeatedly, forcing skeptics to swallow their words. those who doubted it in the past now regret not buying or panic-selling at the wrong time. while those who saw bitcoin as a get-rich-quick scheme have struggled with it, the ones who ignored the comparisons to endlessly printed fiat currencies like the usd have always managed to make better financial decisions.

guys, i’m telling you, i believe in bitcoin so much that even if everything i’ve saved becomes 10 times less valuable one day, i’ll still be proud. this isn’t a gamble, it’s not a get-rich-quick scheme—it’s a change. and i want to be part of that change. if it fails, i’d rather see my money disappear as part of a revolution than sit in a currency that’s endlessly printed without backing. i can accept that.

there will always be those who are impatient, chasing quick profits. but in the long run, the real winners are the ones who truly understand what bitcoin stands for. patience over panic, knowledge over fear, conviction over doubt.

bitcoin is here to stay. what matters is that we stay with it.

Sapling: 0.0% Fake
Copyleaks: 0% AI-generated

After capitalization is corrected:

I see a lot of negative comments about bitcoin lately. There are too many people in panic mode. I keep seeing questions like, "are we in a bear market?" "is this the end?" If you’re thinking this way, I want you to stop and reflect for a moment. How many times has bitcoin surprised us? How many times have we heard people say, "it’s over" or "don’t waste your time" just because they didn’t believe in it?

Bitcoin hasn’t just surprised and proven people wrong a couple of times—it has done so repeatedly, forcing skeptics to swallow their words. Those who doubted it in the past now regret not buying or panic-selling at the wrong time. While those who saw bitcoin as a get-rich-quick scheme have struggled with it, the ones who ignored the comparisons to endlessly printed fiat currencies like the USD have always managed to make better financial decisions.

Guys, I’m telling you, I believe in bitcoin so much that even if everything I’ve saved becomes 10 times less valuable one day, I’ll still be proud. This isn’t a gamble, it’s not a get-rich-quick scheme—it’s a change. And I want to be part of that change. If it fails, I’d rather see my money disappear as part of a revolution than sit in a currency that’s endlessly printed without backing. I can accept that.

There will always be those who are impatient, chasing quick profits. But in the long run, the real winners are the ones who truly understand what bitcoin stands for. Patience over panic, knowledge over fear, conviction over doubt.

Bitcoin is here to stay. What matters is that we stay with it.

Sapling: 94.4% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated

when what I wrote did not come out as artificial intelligence, you capitalized the letters of the article and tried again. in the end, what you are doing is wrong. the post that I wrote in lower case, as is my style, was not written by the AI. the fact that you translate and write it in capital letters makes it not my post, as you say;

One other thing to note is that this person posts a lot in Turkish, which could theoretically be an excuse to use AI for proof-reading of translating posts, but then telling it to decapitalize everything suggests AI is doing the heavy lifting.

if my converting all the letters to lower case means that the AI is doing the heavy lifting, doesn't your converting my writings to upper case mean that you are doing the heavy lifting?

[Dark.Look]

User: jstyler

Assuredly an AI spammer but please report the posts as well so they'll be deleted. When hitting the Report to Moderator button, I usually write "AI spammer: (URL of your post in this thread)" and that does the trick. Most of the time.

I did this the same day i posted. anyway, thank you for your guidance and help.

[nutildah]

the reason why my writings are in lower case is not to avoid ai detectors. you've seen my writings in the Turkish section, this is the way I've been writing for a long time.

Are you sure about that? How long is "a long time" to you?

One of tonight's matches is Montenegro vs. Turkey.

Let’s start with Turkey. Recently, except for a few exceptions, we are talking about a team with great potential and attention. Even though they only beat Montenegro 1-0 at home, I still see them as the clear favorite in tonight's match.

Montenegro, on the other hand, has created more negative statistics compared to Turkey. They have lost their last 7 matches. However, there’s a detail people often miss. Even when Montenegro loses, they don’t lose by conceding many goals. We can probably credit this to their above-average goalkeeper or defensive line. Meanwhile, Turkey had serious problems scoring in their last match against Wales. So, the contrasting strengths of these two teams might lead to an unexpected result.

In conclusion, despite everything, Turkey still seems more likely to win. Montenegro is going through a very tough period. This is my prediction.

Here's the AI detector results from 6 different detectors:

Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 0% AI-generated
Quillbot: 0% of text is likely AI
GPTZero: 90% Probability AI generated
ZeroGPT: 0% AI GPT
Undetectable.ai: 99% likely AI

There's definitely some modification going on with your post, whether you are running a translation through ChatGPT or something else.

So you were also using AI before you switched to all lowercase. AI detectors do a better job when more data is available to analyze, so let's pick a long post.

Unfortunately, this was a very poor approach. I’ll discuss it from the beginning. First of all, you've mentioned that the Ballon d'Or award is biased towards the West. Now, let’s think about this. First, we need to break down the term 'Western bias' into two parts;

The origins of the players and the countries of the winning football clubs. When we look at the last 20 years, we have a list which look like this;

2024 - Rodri (Spain), Manchester City (England)
2023 - Lionel Messi (Argentina), Inter Miami (USA)
2022 - Karim Benzema (France), Real Madrid (Spain)
2021 - Lionel Messi (Argentina), Paris Saint-Germain (France)
2020 - Award not given (due to the pandemic)
2019 - Lionel Messi (Argentina), Barcelona (Spain)
2018 - Luka Modrić (Croatia), Real Madrid (Spain)
2017 - Cristiano Ronaldo (Portugal), Real Madrid (Spain)
2016 - Cristiano Ronaldo (Portugal), Real Madrid (Spain)
2015 - Lionel Messi (Argentina), Barcelona (Spain)
2014 - Cristiano Ronaldo (Portugal), Real Madrid (Spain)
2013 - Cristiano Ronaldo (Portugal), Real Madrid (Spain)
2012 - Lionel Messi (Argentina), Barcelona (Spain)
2011 - Lionel Messi (Argentina), Barcelona (Spain)
2010 - Lionel Messi (Argentina), Barcelona (Spain)
2009 - Lionel Messi (Argentina), Barcelona (Spain)
2008 - Cristiano Ronaldo (Portugal), Manchester United (England)
2007 - Kaká (Brazil), Milan (Italy)
2006 - Fabio Cannavaro (Italy), Real Madrid (Spain)
2005 - Ronaldinho (Brazil), Barcelona (Spain)

As you can see here, we have 11 European and 9 Non-European winners. Although this is an exceptional statistic carried by Messi, it doesn't make sense to say that the Ballon d'Or is only Western-biased or Western-favored. When we look at club-based results, apart from the award given to Messi in 2023 (who spent a significant amount of time at Paris Saint-Germain before winning the award that year), all the other teams are European clubs.

We can't find this strange, can we? World football revolves around Europe. Just as the best basketball player each year is likely to come from the NBA, the best players in football will always come from Europe. Moreover, the English, Spaniards, Italians, and Germans you mentioned have the most prestigious leagues in the world. You can't expect the organizers to choose the Player of the Year from the Congo Ligue 1.

Sapling.ai: 78.8% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated

I dare you to find one of my posts that is greater than 80 words in length where either of these detectors (or any detectors) say the post is more than 5% AI generated. If you can, I will not only remove my tag but also apologize to you as well.

if my converting all the letters to lower case means that the AI is doing the heavy lifting, doesn't your converting my writings to upper case mean that you are doing the heavy lifting?

Not really. It took maybe 1 minute to fix the capitalization. Writing this post took much longer, because I wanted to be fair to you in my reply. You can keep doing what you're doing but don't be surprised to see your posts keep getting deleted.

[blomen]

the reason why my writings are in lower case is not to avoid ai detectors. you've seen my writings in the Turkish section, this is the way I've been writing for a long time.

Are you sure about that? How long is "a long time" to you?

i've been active on this forum for about 6 months, is it so abnormal for me that a long time for me is around 3 or 4 months? i barely even remember writing these posts. how logical is it for you to take a post from my early days on the forum and hold me accountable now? it's also funny that 3 out of 6 AI detectors detect AI, if you flipped a coin 6 times you would get about the same result

i am telling you one more time, the summary of the issue is exactly like this;

-i have never asked AI to write for me, i will never ask AI to write for me.
-i have never, nor will i ever, do anything in the past or in the future, except ask the AI to correct me where i am not confident about my english (which should not be a problem for you).

I dare you to find one of my posts that is greater than 80 words in length where either of these detectors (or any detectors) say the post is more than 5% AI generated. If you can, I will not only remove my tag but also apologize to you as well.

i never said anything about what you wrote, i don't care what people write or what method they use. the fact that you don't have anything doesn't mean that i am guilty, i don't know what you are trying to prove here.

will you be convinced if you have 2 detectors that say my posts are written by AI, and I have 2 detectors that say they are not written by AI? Is this the right method for you?

what I'm doing is not a crime, it's the same as looking up the english equivalent of any word. like I said, i'm not asking the AI to write, it can only have errors that it corrects. nothing more than that.

[nutildah]

i've been active on this forum for about 6 months, is it so abnormal for me that a long time for me is around 3 or 4 months? i barely even remember writing these posts. how logical is it for you to take a post from my early days on the forum and hold me accountable now?

Our perspectives don't have to be centered around the frame of your limited forum experience. I personally wouldn't consider "3 or 4 months" to be a long time, unless I was talking about battling an infection or something. Regardless if a post is 5 days or 5 years old, forum rules will still apply to it. For example, accounts are banned for plagiarism all the time for years-old posts.

it's also funny that 3 out of 6 AI detectors detect AI, if you flipped a coin 6 times you would get about the same result

Not true. For posts that don't involve the use of AI, you absolutely could not get this result. I'm saying this as someone who has been doing this for over a year longer than your account is old.

i am telling you one more time, the summary of the issue is exactly like this;

-i have never asked AI to write for me, i will never ask AI to write for me.
-i have never, nor will i ever, do anything in the past or in the future, except ask the AI to correct me where i am not confident about my english (which should not be a problem for you).

OK, so now you are admitting you are using it. Just use Grammarly instead from now on so as to avoid any doubt what you are doing. Also, AI would correct your capitalization if you were asking it to fix your English, unless you specifically told it not to. So I'm not sure I believe you.

i never said anything about what you wrote, i don't care what people write or what method they use. the fact that you don't have anything doesn't mean that i am guilty, i don't know what you are trying to prove here.

I'm proving that the AI detectors are on to something, which with your previous admission, you just helped establish they are.

will you be convinced if you have 2 detectors that say my posts are written by AI, and I have 2 detectors that say they are not written by AI? Is this the right method for you?

Absolutely. Like I said, 2 detectors are very unlikely to report non-AI posts as mostly AI-generated, except in cases where the text length is short.

what I'm doing is not a crime, it's the same as looking up the english equivalent of any word. like I said, i'm not asking the AI to write, it can only have errors that it corrects. nothing more than that.

There's more to it than that. You are asking the AI to write for you because you use a lot of phrases that are exceedingly common among GPT programs. However, for your case, I will modify your tag to reflect what you have said.

[memehunter]

how logical is it for you to take a post from my early days on the forum and hold me accountable now?

What, early days? All three posts that were detected for AI usage were recent ones: 4th March, 27 Feb, and 16 Feb. 

it's also funny that 3 out of 6 AI detectors detect AI, if you flipped a coin 6 times you would get about the same result

Seriously! Is this how you think?  I challenge you to publish any paper/research article in any journal with positive reports from 2 AI detectors, let alone 3. 

i don't know what you are trying to prove here.

That you are AI spammer.

what I'm doing is not a crime,

Infesting this wonderful place with AI garbage is a crime, IMO. You are also misrepresenting yourself by using AI and not acknowledging it.

What disturbs me more is your attitude towards the action taken by the reputed member. Instead of realizing your mistake and apologizing, you are defending the indefensible. I mean, the proof is out there, and it is enough to tag you as an AI spammer (like we are doing for others). You should be thankful to others (like me) who are not tagging you yet because of the belief that you will change your course of action here; please do not give us an impression otherwise. Take it as a firm warning; next time, there will be more tags.        

[ABCbits]

Can anyone help check any of these users?
https://asktom.cf/index.php?action=profile;u=3655329 - BitJannik
https://asktom.cf/index.php?action=profile;u=3680189 - MaxLevCoin
https://asktom.cf/index.php?action=profile;u=3687362 - Dee_BlackdAddy

I checked and only  BitJannik and MaxLevCoin are confirmed AI spammer as per me.
--snip--

Following my previous request, i recently found out those users actually are part of accounts who shill probable scam mining website[1] while performing ban evasion[2]. So i wonder whether other involved users also use AI to perform spam and shilling.

doubletheprof - https://asktom.cf/index.php?action=profile;u=3594764 Edit: i found someone already write a report.
serchan - https://asktom.cf/index.php?action=profile;u=229993
KovaBTC - https://asktom.cf/index.php?action=profile;u=3686132 Edit: lovesmayfamilis remind me he already write a report.

[1] https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=5534176.0
[2] https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=5094661.msg65137220#msg65137220